Active Users:843 Time:14/11/2024 05:56:15 AM
Well I'm a huge Trek fan. Dragonsoul Send a noteboard - 07/09/2010 06:00:10 AM
And the only time I've ever seen a Commander take control of a ship was in the absence of a Captain. Although it may be canon that Commanders can command ships, according to the various series anyway, they rarely do.

As for the numerous amounts of them aboard the Enterprise, I would venture three guesses.

1. They have a ton because they always have several high ranking officers on Away Missions, which could potentially result in heavily casualties. Thus requiring command staff at the helm of the ship.

2. The distinguished career of the Enterprise allowed these select officers to reach ranks they normally wouldn't have attained in the time period given.

3. More command staff makes for better tv :P
Reply to message
Star Trek - 07/09/2010 05:29:20 AM 957 Views
Well I'm a huge Trek fan. - 07/09/2010 06:00:10 AM 681 Views
Nice. - 07/09/2010 07:06:44 AM 709 Views
Well, it was the flagship of the Federation - 07/09/2010 04:29:21 PM 861 Views
We don't see that in other ships though.... - 07/09/2010 09:18:01 PM 665 Views
This raises another question - 09/09/2010 01:41:47 PM 657 Views
I love a good Star Trek post to start off my morning. - 07/09/2010 04:54:17 PM 859 Views
Glad to be of service! - 07/09/2010 09:23:49 PM 831 Views
Sisko commanded the Defiant as a Commander... - 07/09/2010 08:31:14 PM 628 Views
Re: Sisko commanded the Defiant as a Commander... - 07/09/2010 08:50:09 PM 657 Views
True that. - 07/09/2010 09:28:18 PM 739 Views

Reply to Message