I'm not arguing that it's dumb, just that that's how it is.
Myrdhyn Send a noteboard - 12/08/2010 06:45:13 PM
That's just the way it is in the Star Wars Universe. No baddies = balance to the force. That's how Vader fulfilled the prophecy. During the short period of time after he killed the Emperor and turn back to the light side, there was balance to the force i.e. no more dark practioners. Of course in the expanded universe ones start to pop back up almost immediately.
http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Chosen_One
Look under the "Behind the Scenes" section.
http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Chosen_One
Look under the "Behind the Scenes" section.
Why are the Sith always made to seem stronger than the Jedi?
11/08/2010 03:19:11 PM
- 1401 Views
To make them a scary menace
11/08/2010 03:54:50 PM
- 986 Views
. *NM*
12/08/2010 10:58:16 AM
- 564 Views
Precisely.
12/08/2010 11:00:31 AM
- 937 Views
This. And "Star Wars" is not really trying to be anything more than a campy space opera. &
12/08/2010 06:51:48 PM
- 1163 Views


Maybe it has to do with the rule of two?
11/08/2010 04:04:08 PM
- 1195 Views
12/08/2010 01:13:20 AM
- 953 Views
This, and there's no maybe about it.
11/08/2010 04:25:45 PM
- 1022 Views
Mno
11/08/2010 04:52:27 PM
- 1017 Views
I'm not talking about prophecies or theory so much as about the story.
11/08/2010 05:14:48 PM
- 957 Views
Wrong as it sounds: Balance to the force actually means no dark side practitioners. *NM*
11/08/2010 07:27:18 PM
- 562 Views
Of course, that's completely illogical and *cough* unrealistic.
11/08/2010 07:35:33 PM
- 867 Views
I'm not arguing that it's dumb, just that that's how it is.
12/08/2010 06:45:13 PM
- 1061 Views
Evil is what throws it out of balance. Why do people persist in thinking it is ever necessary? *NM*
16/08/2010 06:14:29 PM
- 672 Views

It makes sense
12/08/2010 02:51:28 AM
- 991 Views
"One to embody power. The other to crave it."
12/08/2010 07:46:26 AM
- 800 Views
I think being confident in the Dark Side requires a certain selflessness
13/08/2010 03:44:11 AM
- 998 Views
Not they don't Edited
11/08/2010 04:21:01 PM
- 922 Views
Yeah. Compare the number of years Jedi had power vs. the Sith. *NM*
12/08/2010 07:52:44 AM
- 586 Views
Isn't there a 600-year Sith empire at some point in the books? *NM*
12/08/2010 10:09:49 AM
- 406 Views
Because, without it, there's no tension or danger of the Good Guys losing. Goes for all media. *NM*
11/08/2010 05:08:34 PM
- 534 Views
Fourth wall arguments are stupid.
11/08/2010 06:05:22 PM
- 896 Views
Sorry. Guess I should immerse myself in official SW novels before replying.
11/08/2010 10:42:05 PM
- 922 Views

Nonsense
11/08/2010 11:32:19 PM
- 957 Views
In that case, it's because Lucas is a shitty writer with a risible ethical system. *NM*
12/08/2010 07:47:26 AM
- 474 Views
I don't get your question/rant. Shouldn't you be happy the Sith are stronger? considering your name *NM*
11/08/2010 05:21:41 PM
- 605 Views
I have a feeling people have said this, but I'm too tired to look.
12/08/2010 03:23:23 AM
- 959 Views
They aren't. How many times have they actually done things?
12/08/2010 07:51:23 AM
- 808 Views
What exactly are you focusing on?
12/08/2010 11:01:58 AM
- 871 Views
It doesn't matter.
12/08/2010 08:18:19 PM
- 845 Views
Re: It doesn't matter.
13/08/2010 12:22:12 AM
- 866 Views
That's all true, but my point is simply that the Jedi are in charge more often than the Sith.
13/08/2010 01:12:38 AM
- 991 Views

Because they're more powerful
12/08/2010 10:59:45 AM
- 1073 Views
Force lightning didn't age him.
12/08/2010 06:50:44 PM
- 902 Views
Re: Force lightning didn't age him.
12/08/2010 08:02:28 PM
- 903 Views