It makes sense for when there are multiple sith at a time (note the rule of two didn't occur until after the Old Republic games, and in the last 100 years after the two trilogies it has been broken completely), two things happened
1) The sith killed each other due to infighting
2) When there was multiple sith the jedi did their best to hunt down the sith.
Now since the rule of two, the jedi believed the sith to be extinct. Furthermore the apprentice never challenges the master till he is confident he will win. If he fails the master kills him for he is too weak and thus not a worthy successor and thus tries to find another apprentice.
1) The sith killed each other due to infighting
2) When there was multiple sith the jedi did their best to hunt down the sith.
Now since the rule of two, the jedi believed the sith to be extinct. Furthermore the apprentice never challenges the master till he is confident he will win. If he fails the master kills him for he is too weak and thus not a worthy successor and thus tries to find another apprentice.
Why are the Sith always made to seem stronger than the Jedi?
11/08/2010 03:19:11 PM
- 1332 Views
To make them a scary menace
11/08/2010 03:54:50 PM
- 909 Views
. *NM*
12/08/2010 10:58:16 AM
- 536 Views
Precisely.
12/08/2010 11:00:31 AM
- 872 Views
This. And "Star Wars" is not really trying to be anything more than a campy space opera. &
12/08/2010 06:51:48 PM
- 1120 Views
Maybe it has to do with the rule of two?
11/08/2010 04:04:08 PM
- 1112 Views
This, and there's no maybe about it.
11/08/2010 04:25:45 PM
- 948 Views
Mno
11/08/2010 04:52:27 PM
- 949 Views
I'm not talking about prophecies or theory so much as about the story.
11/08/2010 05:14:48 PM
- 909 Views
Wrong as it sounds: Balance to the force actually means no dark side practitioners. *NM*
11/08/2010 07:27:18 PM
- 532 Views
Evil is what throws it out of balance. Why do people persist in thinking it is ever necessary? *NM*
16/08/2010 06:14:29 PM
- 643 Views
12/08/2010 01:13:20 AM
- 893 Views
It makes sense
12/08/2010 02:51:28 AM
- 907 Views
"One to embody power. The other to crave it."
12/08/2010 07:46:26 AM
- 734 Views
I think being confident in the Dark Side requires a certain selflessness
13/08/2010 03:44:11 AM
- 930 Views
Not they don't Edited
11/08/2010 04:21:01 PM
- 878 Views
Yeah. Compare the number of years Jedi had power vs. the Sith. *NM*
12/08/2010 07:52:44 AM
- 553 Views
Isn't there a 600-year Sith empire at some point in the books? *NM*
12/08/2010 10:09:49 AM
- 379 Views
Because, without it, there's no tension or danger of the Good Guys losing. Goes for all media. *NM*
11/08/2010 05:08:34 PM
- 503 Views
Fourth wall arguments are stupid.
11/08/2010 06:05:22 PM
- 827 Views
Sorry. Guess I should immerse myself in official SW novels before replying.
11/08/2010 10:42:05 PM
- 850 Views
Nonsense
11/08/2010 11:32:19 PM
- 889 Views
In that case, it's because Lucas is a shitty writer with a risible ethical system. *NM*
12/08/2010 07:47:26 AM
- 446 Views
I don't get your question/rant. Shouldn't you be happy the Sith are stronger? considering your name *NM*
11/08/2010 05:21:41 PM
- 551 Views
I have a feeling people have said this, but I'm too tired to look.
12/08/2010 03:23:23 AM
- 880 Views
They aren't. How many times have they actually done things?
12/08/2010 07:51:23 AM
- 749 Views
What exactly are you focusing on?
12/08/2010 11:01:58 AM
- 810 Views
It doesn't matter.
12/08/2010 08:18:19 PM
- 775 Views
Re: It doesn't matter.
13/08/2010 12:22:12 AM
- 787 Views
That's all true, but my point is simply that the Jedi are in charge more often than the Sith.
13/08/2010 01:12:38 AM
- 919 Views
Because they're more powerful
12/08/2010 10:59:45 AM
- 977 Views
Force lightning didn't age him.
12/08/2010 06:50:44 PM
- 829 Views
Re: Force lightning didn't age him.
12/08/2010 08:02:28 PM
- 827 Views