From all of the history I've studied this past year, and all of the historical fiction I've read as well, I cannot accept a physically pretty woman as being Cleo. I liked some of Marshal's performance of that shows version of Cleopatra, but then, the character she played was NOT Cleopatra, just as almost none of the major characters from the show were really anything like they were portrayed. Well, there is one major exception: I thought that David Bamber was perfect as Cicero; from the moment I saw him on screen the first time I watched the show, I suspected that would be Cicero, and then he opened his mouth and started speaking. Oh that voice! I knew right then, before any character even referred to him as Cicero, who he was playing. I also thought that Max Pirkis as the younger Octavian was a great choice (he even sort of looked like Octavian). The only other historical figure on the show that I liked the casting for was Marc Antony; Purefoy (despite not looking the part to me, being way smaller than I figured Antony would be) played the part perfectly I thought.
I really did enjoy "Rome" just as long as I ignored the inaccuracies that are all over the place.
I really did enjoy "Rome" just as long as I ignored the inaccuracies that are all over the place.
Death to the Regressives of the GOP and the TeaParty. No mercy for Conservatives. Burn them all at the stake for the hateful satanists they are.
*Incoherent sputters of historian rage* Angelina Jolie Incorrectly Cast In New Cleopatra Role
11/06/2010 02:35:15 AM
- 838 Views
I love Angelina jolie
11/06/2010 06:36:48 AM
- 511 Views
Did you read his post? There's no reason for an Africanish person to play the part. *NM*
11/06/2010 06:58:42 AM
- 171 Views
They should get Lyndsey Marshal back, she was awesome. And looked the part.
11/06/2010 12:45:48 PM
- 459 Views
Angelina is HOT, Cleopatra was NOT
16/06/2010 10:42:42 PM
- 403 Views
I'm having a hard time telling if you agree with me about Marshal or not... *NM*
16/06/2010 11:29:02 PM
- 164 Views
she was too pretty in my opinion
20/06/2010 03:59:57 AM
- 389 Views
Wait...is the racist part the idiocy of trying to say Cleopatra was black or the "wog" calling part?
15/06/2010 01:38:42 AM
- 447 Views
it's not even a proper use of the term wog.
15/06/2010 10:16:25 AM
- 411 Views
No, actually it is.
15/06/2010 05:06:54 PM
- 499 Views
mk so, looking at that neither use is "wrong".
16/06/2010 08:53:05 AM
- 403 Views
Hence, your statement "it's not even a proper use of the term wog" is incorrect. *NM*
16/06/2010 01:34:45 PM
- 149 Views
And no one in the rest of the world cares about Australian slang. They're just weird down there. *NM*
16/06/2010 01:35:11 PM
- 161 Views
Wouldn't the closest modern ethnicity to the ancient egyptians be the Coptics? *NM*
16/06/2010 10:44:39 PM
- 152 Views
I wasn't calling anyone a wog, I was suggesting a likely parallel to the Ptolemies' attitude
17/06/2010 09:58:23 PM
- 477 Views
I completely agree that the "black Cleopatra" syndrome is born of insecurities.
18/06/2010 02:11:15 AM
- 413 Views
Yah...i don't see why people ever think Cleopatra should be black.
15/06/2010 10:18:12 AM
- 423 Views