Active Users:1096 Time:22/11/2024 10:17:13 PM
I don't care for the In your face-effects... ironclad Send a noteboard - 04/06/2010 08:58:30 AM
So far pretty much everyone that has posted is unimpressed or not interested. I don't know if it is age or what but at 34 I really don't care to go to a movie just so I can see some "depth" in the movie or even see something shooting out at me. It just doesn't interest me. I would rather watch an enjoyable movie with a good plot than a special effects bonanza in 3-D or not in 3-D. Now, get off my lawn!!!

...but for me going to the movies is a bit like travelling to a wondrous place for two hours. Anything that adds some additional amusement to that is fine with me and I am okay with the extra money for it. Mind you, that's the real 3D effect Avatar presented I am talking about, not the fake one. I went to see it twice and probably would have gone a third time too.
As you say, not everyone's interested in that, but I think a lot of people are. Of course the industry will fuck up this momentum very quickly if they deliver too many films that aren't really 3D or are just simply bad flicks. But assuming that when a movie comes out in 3D, it can't possibly have much of a plot to offer may be a mistake.
*MySmiley*

You mustn't be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling.
Reply to message
3D films - The real deals and fakers of the next months - 03/06/2010 09:58:28 PM 871 Views
I still haven't seen a single 3D film -- real or otherwise - 03/06/2010 11:29:22 PM 540 Views
Me neither. - 03/06/2010 11:59:27 PM 497 Views
You left out Piranha 3-D. - 03/06/2010 11:53:03 PM 480 Views
3-D what? - 05/06/2010 01:33:26 AM 461 Views
Was Goblet of Fire shot in 3D? - 04/06/2010 12:51:04 AM 499 Views
There's a difference between a movie in 3D, and a 3D movie - 04/06/2010 01:31:28 AM 455 Views
I have to disagree. - 04/06/2010 02:28:52 AM 474 Views
Rebuttal - 04/06/2010 02:45:38 AM 562 Views
I guess it's just a matter of opinion. - 04/06/2010 03:53:22 AM 529 Views
Oh, they definitely are. I think our (or at least, my) is that Avatar did something new - 04/06/2010 05:38:48 AM 509 Views
Yes - 04/06/2010 08:52:00 AM 499 Views
Two points: - 04/06/2010 05:34:21 AM 580 Views
Re: Two points: - 07/06/2010 02:32:03 AM 394 Views
I haven't seen anything in 3D since 3rd Rock From the Sun had an episode. - 04/06/2010 02:54:15 AM 470 Views
Interesting. I thought I was the only one who didn't care about 3-D. - 04/06/2010 03:12:35 AM 500 Views
*throws tp all over your house, bushes and trees* *NM* - 04/06/2010 03:26:12 AM 180 Views
I don't care for the In your face-effects... - 04/06/2010 08:58:30 AM 505 Views
Harry Potter? Seriously? - 04/06/2010 05:16:40 AM 440 Views
3D is terrible and needs to die in a fire. - 04/06/2010 06:13:40 AM 577 Views
Absolutely. *NM* - 04/06/2010 09:35:35 AM 165 Views
Then just don't go *shrugs* - 04/06/2010 10:13:45 AM 507 Views
with Avatar, it made the CG more realistic IMO - 04/06/2010 07:37:13 PM 560 Views
That's because you were watching a 3D movie without 3D glasses. - 04/06/2010 11:36:47 PM 514 Views
I agree! *NM* - 05/06/2010 08:41:56 PM 162 Views
I want Mike Leigh and Ken Loach to make 3D films. *NM* - 04/06/2010 03:39:51 PM 221 Views
I haven't watched anything in 3D since Captain EO. - 04/06/2010 05:15:11 PM 639 Views
I don't know about 3D - 05/06/2010 01:48:12 AM 454 Views
I try to only see the films made for 3D in a 3D theater. - 05/06/2010 08:40:37 PM 431 Views
Legend of the Guardians actually looks gorgeous. *NM* - 06/06/2010 07:48:09 PM 172 Views
I hate 3D. It makes my eyes hurt. - 07/06/2010 04:13:16 AM 446 Views
I enjoyed Shrek Forever After immensely. - 07/06/2010 09:10:27 AM 523 Views

Reply to Message