Firstly, I saw it in IMAX 3D. Dunno if that's what you saw it in, but if not, that could be the cause of our conflict. It's just... insanely better. But as great as IMAX is, the reason Avatar was so beautiful was because it didn't just use the "throw a tomato at the screen" gimmick (in fact, I'm not sure if it used it at all). Put IMAX 3D of Avatar up to, say, "Up" or "Harry Potter," and there's no comparison (although I enjoyed the stories of the latter two much more, but that's neither here nor there...)
That won't happen. Ever. Unless you somehow go back in time and forget what a movie is, you're never going to go "AHHHH A ROCK DUCK!!!!" from a 3D Movie, as we know them today.
The entire problem with 3D movies is that they often try to do what you're talking about, to the exclusion of any other technique. It's basically the equivalent of watching a scary movie, and suddenly the camera pans over and AHHH THERE'S THE KILLER!
It's just shock value, and the realism is ruined the first time you DON'T duck that rock, and it just disappears.
3D- good 3D is about immersion. Unless you plan on making a movie where someone throws something at the screen every 10 seconds, you're gonna need a few new tricks- like Avatar used.
Unless there's shit flying off the screen making me duck in my seat I don't see the point of calling it 3D. I want to see a movie that makes me think I'm actually gonna get hit with debris when something gets blown to hell.
That won't happen. Ever. Unless you somehow go back in time and forget what a movie is, you're never going to go "AHHHH A ROCK DUCK!!!!" from a 3D Movie, as we know them today.
The entire problem with 3D movies is that they often try to do what you're talking about, to the exclusion of any other technique. It's basically the equivalent of watching a scary movie, and suddenly the camera pans over and AHHH THERE'S THE KILLER!
It's just shock value, and the realism is ruined the first time you DON'T duck that rock, and it just disappears.
3D- good 3D is about immersion. Unless you plan on making a movie where someone throws something at the screen every 10 seconds, you're gonna need a few new tricks- like Avatar used.
I amuse myself.
3D films - The real deals and fakers of the next months
03/06/2010 09:58:28 PM
- 870 Views
There's a difference between a movie in 3D, and a 3D movie
04/06/2010 01:31:28 AM
- 455 Views
I have to disagree.
04/06/2010 02:28:52 AM
- 473 Views
Rebuttal
04/06/2010 02:45:38 AM
- 562 Views
I guess it's just a matter of opinion.
04/06/2010 03:53:22 AM
- 528 Views
Oh, they definitely are. I think our (or at least, my) is that Avatar did something new
04/06/2010 05:38:48 AM
- 508 Views
i would argue you did not see the actual 3D version if that was your experience
06/06/2010 06:49:31 PM
- 564 Views
Re: i would argue you did not see the actual 3D version if that was your experience
07/06/2010 02:29:33 AM
- 521 Views
I haven't seen anything in 3D since 3rd Rock From the Sun had an episode.
04/06/2010 02:54:15 AM
- 469 Views
Interesting. I thought I was the only one who didn't care about 3-D.
04/06/2010 03:12:35 AM
- 500 Views
3D is terrible and needs to die in a fire.
04/06/2010 06:13:40 AM
- 576 Views
Then just don't go *shrugs*
04/06/2010 10:13:45 AM
- 506 Views
You make it sound like the studios aren't ramming it down our throats at every possible turn.
04/06/2010 11:35:38 PM
- 482 Views
Luckily if you have a movie theater with many screens you can get it 2D.
05/06/2010 08:43:04 PM
- 418 Views