That was good. It is pretty much what I have been waiting for from Moffat. Of course, I hate him deeply for making it a two-parter and leaving me in agonising fear of angels and statues and basically blinking for a whole week. But I liked it.
I was not as enthusiastic about Alex Kingston this time (compared to Silence in the Library). She seems to have only one setting. I would have liked her to be somewhat subtler. But I may be wrong. I AM glad River Song is finally reintroduced. And I like how Moffat put two of his major creations together (ie scary as hell Angels and Doctor's mystery future something-or-other).
I wonder what it is she has done, which the priest does not think the Doctor would like to hear. Has she killed someone?
Thoughts?
I was not as enthusiastic about Alex Kingston this time (compared to Silence in the Library). She seems to have only one setting. I would have liked her to be somewhat subtler. But I may be wrong. I AM glad River Song is finally reintroduced. And I like how Moffat put two of his major creations together (ie scary as hell Angels and Doctor's mystery future something-or-other).
I wonder what it is she has done, which the priest does not think the Doctor would like to hear. Has she killed someone?
Thoughts?
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
/Doctor Who: Time of Angels *spoilers*
24/04/2010 07:53:37 PM
- 687 Views
Amy is growing on me.
24/04/2010 08:19:43 PM
- 572 Views
Re: Amy is growing on me.
24/04/2010 08:21:44 PM
- 554 Views
She seems as if she believes everything she says to be highly witty.
24/04/2010 08:23:51 PM
- 553 Views
Well, that answered the question about what the Doctor was shooting.
26/04/2010 11:20:01 AM
- 498 Views
True. And satisfactorily.
26/04/2010 05:19:12 PM
- 553 Views
Regarding River Song...
26/04/2010 05:36:30 PM
- 625 Views
Re: Regarding River Song...
26/04/2010 05:41:51 PM
- 472 Views