This is General Info from the Moderator, subsequent threads may be posted under this heading. As before, the update counter at the top says which one I'm on, so you should keep an open eye for changes to that and look in on this message when it changes.
Update 14: 18 Apr - Couple quick notes on activity and votes updates. First, if you don't see it updated very recently, one of two things have happened. Either I forgot to update the date under 'last updated' or I haven't actually updated yet. When a lynch isn't obviously in the offing I don't check the game much, I doubt there's many days I don't check the thread at least once, but the VNTL only comes into play when a lynch is ramping up so I don't always take the time on a given day to update it, since I like to send out NBs to the inactives when I do. That 'last updated' number means a rigorous check was done recently, though often when people get the NB they'll respond to the board and if I see that I'll take them off the update, but that doesn't mean I've rechecked everyone so someone might have slid over 72 hours. Obviously when lynch tallies are fairly close to the VNTL I check more often, though of course sometimes I am busy and really only have time to peak in to make sure nothing incredibly momentous has happened. I will always update it before officially announcing a lynch though, which is why you may see 'lynch pending' go up on the board, I'm checking to make sure no one unvoted or spoke up in the meantime who was inactive. The big thing to remember, inactivity-wise is that you need to be posting some new message in the thread at least every 72 hours or have a RBIRL thread title. Even if you really have nothing to say you need to make a point of saying something so people know you are still around answering questions, I'm not expecting at this stage to lose any players to modkill and we'll have a decent pool of subs as the game progresses anyway, but lynches of less active players are common enough, and lesser activity is often the deciding factor between which of probable candidates gets someone's vote, so it's worth keeping in mind, as an added benefit of active posting... it is also worth remembering that players who are only posting 'Hi I'm here' comments tend to be more likely to be lynched too, so substantive posting is advised. It doesn't actually have to be incredibly long, as I myself tend to favor, but one-sentence posts don't typically advance a faction's cause very much nor convince other players of your heavy involvement, ironically lurking - which is nominally done as a form of self-defense - tends to result in lynch and NK more often then average posting, in my not-very-limited experience.
Update 13: 13 Apr - A little note on these events, they are effectively pre-randomized and set to go off if certain things happen, I'll probably post the ones that are typed and not hand-written at the end of the game, but to give you some idea how this works, this event had the criteria, or 'trigger' of: "Election for day 2 complete, previous chair voted for day 1 lynch, chair and advocate titles in play." and it selected people off "Obtain two non-identical random numbers from players, using an alpha roster, go the first random number [3] down from the newly elected advocate [beetnemsis to Fanatic-Templar], and the second number [13] up from the first selectee [Fanatic-Templar to Fox and Ravens]". I won't give the exacts here on what then occurred, except that the event called for the release of gender info from the newly elected positions as well as from the selectees, and various other pre-selected info to be released. The randomness, essentially using the numbers given by players as a seed, shifts and changes a lot from event to event, for instance 1-20 for yesterday was a table compiled from using a d20 die, with some repeats with minor variation on the list. Another not used called for two random numbers to go off the fifth person to post a direct reply to the original thread of that day, skipping repeats, using an Alpha Roster, whereas another used upside-down registration order for the list and dead players would be left on. I raise this because as I've mentioned, I pretty much refuse to have any involvement in the game, such as myself randomly determining outcomes, once a player roster for the game has been generated, so I use players instead, with pre-selected determination from their number/response (some call for letters or a choice of rock-paper-scissors) to determine what happens, but I list the method in this case to curb anyone's desire to try to guess what target will be from their number selected. The point is not to allow anyone, myself included, to be able to deliberately or subconsciously pick the outcome of a random event, and I think that as the criteria for this specific event indicate, there was no way for anyone to knowingly influence it.
Update 12: 9 Apr - As per BlackAdder's suggestion, the Inactivity Roster, which serves the dual purposes of tracking dead players, now includes annotations next to players who have either replaced or been replaced by another, indicating who they replaced or were replaced by. The strikethrough onPlayer Name indicates the player was in the game at some point holding a role, and is not currently in the game.
Update 11: 9 Apr - Probably best to clarify the sub rules again, to avoid confusion. Gameplay is damaged by modkills, which represent an unfair disadvantage to whatever group they belonged to, hence substitution is preferable. To sub someone in requires only one core thing, that the substitute holds no knowledge from a previous role that will give them any advantage, so a player who was not previously in the game, or a player who on their death no longer has unique knowledge that represents an advantage of any sort, is suitable. Blaine was not usuable to replace Napoleon as he had knowledge of ally names or an ally's name. Hobo also can not be used, since using him would either leave him knowing the name of a previous allies, if any remain, or if none did, prove to players that none did. A cop who has received a result can not substitute, a doc who has used their power and gotten a result could not, a serial killer could if their knowledge of who they killed did not advantage anyone, a darkfriend could not, a vanilla could, etc. The role they take over is irrelevant, and could be darkfriend, vanilla, cult leader, etc, because they take over the role with no knowledge from their previous role to benefit them. As most cases where substitution is necessary occur early in the game, by and large many who later be disqualified for special knowledge are initially safe to be used, should they be lynched or NK'd.
Update 10: 9 Apr - Have moved all the various links, logs, votes records and so on over to new thread, people can begin posting into the game any time they want now. Incidentally, although this may not always be the case, everyone got a 'dawn 2 message - name', and while I thoroughly check these many times before sending, on the off chance you ever get a message with someone else's name on it, don't open it and inform me. I can tell when someone opens a NB from me so if you've got the wrong info and leave it unopened, we can continue play with no harm no foul and I'll just peak to make sure it's unopened every so often until the game ends. This hasn't happened by the way, just general paranoia, but you can probably expect any message from me in the future to that isn't a direct reply to something you sent to have your name on it.
Update 9: 9 Apr - Okay, Fanatic-Templar has accepted sub for Napoleon, so he will be assuming that role, as mentioned, he doesn't IMO have any info from his previous role that could effect things but to avoid any mistakes or for that matter tactics implying he might have info, our subbing rule - which should be moot from this point on in the game I hope - includes a loose ban on discussing your previous role or asking people about their previous role if they've been subbed posthumously.
Update 14: 18 Apr - Couple quick notes on activity and votes updates. First, if you don't see it updated very recently, one of two things have happened. Either I forgot to update the date under 'last updated' or I haven't actually updated yet. When a lynch isn't obviously in the offing I don't check the game much, I doubt there's many days I don't check the thread at least once, but the VNTL only comes into play when a lynch is ramping up so I don't always take the time on a given day to update it, since I like to send out NBs to the inactives when I do. That 'last updated' number means a rigorous check was done recently, though often when people get the NB they'll respond to the board and if I see that I'll take them off the update, but that doesn't mean I've rechecked everyone so someone might have slid over 72 hours. Obviously when lynch tallies are fairly close to the VNTL I check more often, though of course sometimes I am busy and really only have time to peak in to make sure nothing incredibly momentous has happened. I will always update it before officially announcing a lynch though, which is why you may see 'lynch pending' go up on the board, I'm checking to make sure no one unvoted or spoke up in the meantime who was inactive. The big thing to remember, inactivity-wise is that you need to be posting some new message in the thread at least every 72 hours or have a RBIRL thread title. Even if you really have nothing to say you need to make a point of saying something so people know you are still around answering questions, I'm not expecting at this stage to lose any players to modkill and we'll have a decent pool of subs as the game progresses anyway, but lynches of less active players are common enough, and lesser activity is often the deciding factor between which of probable candidates gets someone's vote, so it's worth keeping in mind, as an added benefit of active posting... it is also worth remembering that players who are only posting 'Hi I'm here' comments tend to be more likely to be lynched too, so substantive posting is advised. It doesn't actually have to be incredibly long, as I myself tend to favor, but one-sentence posts don't typically advance a faction's cause very much nor convince other players of your heavy involvement, ironically lurking - which is nominally done as a form of self-defense - tends to result in lynch and NK more often then average posting, in my not-very-limited experience.
Update 13: 13 Apr - A little note on these events, they are effectively pre-randomized and set to go off if certain things happen, I'll probably post the ones that are typed and not hand-written at the end of the game, but to give you some idea how this works, this event had the criteria, or 'trigger' of: "Election for day 2 complete, previous chair voted for day 1 lynch, chair and advocate titles in play." and it selected people off "Obtain two non-identical random numbers from players, using an alpha roster, go the first random number [3] down from the newly elected advocate [beetnemsis to Fanatic-Templar], and the second number [13] up from the first selectee [Fanatic-Templar to Fox and Ravens]". I won't give the exacts here on what then occurred, except that the event called for the release of gender info from the newly elected positions as well as from the selectees, and various other pre-selected info to be released. The randomness, essentially using the numbers given by players as a seed, shifts and changes a lot from event to event, for instance 1-20 for yesterday was a table compiled from using a d20 die, with some repeats with minor variation on the list. Another not used called for two random numbers to go off the fifth person to post a direct reply to the original thread of that day, skipping repeats, using an Alpha Roster, whereas another used upside-down registration order for the list and dead players would be left on. I raise this because as I've mentioned, I pretty much refuse to have any involvement in the game, such as myself randomly determining outcomes, once a player roster for the game has been generated, so I use players instead, with pre-selected determination from their number/response (some call for letters or a choice of rock-paper-scissors) to determine what happens, but I list the method in this case to curb anyone's desire to try to guess what target will be from their number selected. The point is not to allow anyone, myself included, to be able to deliberately or subconsciously pick the outcome of a random event, and I think that as the criteria for this specific event indicate, there was no way for anyone to knowingly influence it.
Update 12: 9 Apr - As per BlackAdder's suggestion, the Inactivity Roster, which serves the dual purposes of tracking dead players, now includes annotations next to players who have either replaced or been replaced by another, indicating who they replaced or were replaced by. The strikethrough on
Update 11: 9 Apr - Probably best to clarify the sub rules again, to avoid confusion. Gameplay is damaged by modkills, which represent an unfair disadvantage to whatever group they belonged to, hence substitution is preferable. To sub someone in requires only one core thing, that the substitute holds no knowledge from a previous role that will give them any advantage, so a player who was not previously in the game, or a player who on their death no longer has unique knowledge that represents an advantage of any sort, is suitable. Blaine was not usuable to replace Napoleon as he had knowledge of ally names or an ally's name. Hobo also can not be used, since using him would either leave him knowing the name of a previous allies, if any remain, or if none did, prove to players that none did. A cop who has received a result can not substitute, a doc who has used their power and gotten a result could not, a serial killer could if their knowledge of who they killed did not advantage anyone, a darkfriend could not, a vanilla could, etc. The role they take over is irrelevant, and could be darkfriend, vanilla, cult leader, etc, because they take over the role with no knowledge from their previous role to benefit them. As most cases where substitution is necessary occur early in the game, by and large many who later be disqualified for special knowledge are initially safe to be used, should they be lynched or NK'd.
Update 10: 9 Apr - Have moved all the various links, logs, votes records and so on over to new thread, people can begin posting into the game any time they want now. Incidentally, although this may not always be the case, everyone got a 'dawn 2 message - name', and while I thoroughly check these many times before sending, on the off chance you ever get a message with someone else's name on it, don't open it and inform me. I can tell when someone opens a NB from me so if you've got the wrong info and leave it unopened, we can continue play with no harm no foul and I'll just peak to make sure it's unopened every so often until the game ends. This hasn't happened by the way, just general paranoia, but you can probably expect any message from me in the future to that isn't a direct reply to something you sent to have your name on it.
Update 9: 9 Apr - Okay, Fanatic-Templar has accepted sub for Napoleon, so he will be assuming that role, as mentioned, he doesn't IMO have any info from his previous role that could effect things but to avoid any mistakes or for that matter tactics implying he might have info, our subbing rule - which should be moot from this point on in the game I hope - includes a loose ban on discussing your previous role or asking people about their previous role if they've been subbed posthumously.
Link to previous Info and Updates on Day 1
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
This message last edited by Isaac on 18/04/2010 at 09:28:24 AM
Game 16, Day 2: In the Manor of Mad Muad (Ended)
09/04/2010 06:59:52 PM
- 4325 Views
General Info from the Moderator: Update 14
09/04/2010 07:03:06 PM
- 1313 Views
Inactivity Tracker - VNTL: 7
09/04/2010 08:10:05 PM
- 1409 Views
Artsapat - RBIRL. Sorry: need to finish work before my week long holiday *NM*
09/04/2010 08:25:47 PM
- 774 Views
Darth_Katie: Semi-RBIRL *NM*
11/04/2010 03:36:00 AM
- 847 Views
Wait... what?
09/04/2010 11:36:10 PM
- 1282 Views
OK, I think I see.
09/04/2010 11:40:28 PM
- 1197 Views
Re: OK, I think I see.
10/04/2010 12:12:47 AM
- 1372 Views
Sounds good. With that said...
10/04/2010 01:47:17 AM
- 1100 Views
Hm. So, FT- did you do anything to inform us that you were the cop?
10/04/2010 01:52:23 AM
- 1208 Views
Wow...
10/04/2010 01:54:05 AM
- 1320 Views
Re: Wow...
10/04/2010 03:03:21 AM
- 1256 Views
Why were those two killed?
10/04/2010 03:12:49 AM
- 1174 Views
It's pretty obvious why Hobo was killed after Blaine was found to be a Mason.
10/04/2010 03:51:17 AM
- 1290 Views
Re: It's pretty obvious why Hobo was killed after Blaine was found to be a Mason.
10/04/2010 04:20:37 AM
- 1160 Views
Well, he was revealed to be a Whitecloak, with a tacked-on ability
10/04/2010 04:29:34 AM
- 1105 Views
Re: Well, he was revealed to be a Whitecloak, with a tacked-on ability
10/04/2010 05:15:45 AM
- 1251 Views
Re: Well, he was revealed to be a Whitecloak, with a tacked-on ability
10/04/2010 05:23:51 AM
- 1227 Views
Re: Well, he was revealed to be a Whitecloak, with a tacked-on ability
10/04/2010 05:27:49 AM
- 1298 Views
Re: Well, he was revealed to be a Whitecloak, with a tacked-on ability
10/04/2010 05:44:59 AM
- 1204 Views
Careful, that's been Beetnemesis' strategy the past few games. Doesn't work so well *NM*
10/04/2010 07:14:55 PM
- 748 Views
Explain? *NM*
11/04/2010 01:01:59 AM
- 815 Views
He got the entire town against him by digging himself a deeper and deeper hole.
11/04/2010 01:40:46 AM
- 1190 Views
Two main venues of inquiry:
10/04/2010 05:12:46 AM
- 1293 Views
I'm curious if he is really worth keeping around
10/04/2010 05:34:50 AM
- 1200 Views
I certainly oppose a roleclaim at this point...
10/04/2010 05:42:55 AM
- 1198 Views
Yes, but
10/04/2010 05:56:32 AM
- 1205 Views
Meh, I'd expect him to tell us if we were wrong...
10/04/2010 06:09:13 AM
- 1196 Views
Flavor in Hobo's death scene.
10/04/2010 08:13:03 AM
- 1221 Views
first off
10/04/2010 11:25:23 AM
- 1114 Views
Re: first off
10/04/2010 11:59:27 AM
- 1145 Views
one possiblity
10/04/2010 03:36:06 PM
- 1087 Views
The Janitor role prevents us from finding out the victims role and affiliation though.
10/04/2010 07:20:16 PM
- 1197 Views
hmmmn
10/04/2010 10:29:14 PM
- 1169 Views
Let's try to find out reasons why the body was hidden
11/04/2010 06:53:23 PM
- 1197 Views
People know balefire
10/04/2010 05:49:19 PM
- 1234 Views
I think she learned it from Adaleas and/or Vandene, but I'm not really sure of that *NM*
10/04/2010 11:11:57 PM
- 625 Views
Also, twilight and dawn scenes
10/04/2010 08:27:55 AM
- 1299 Views
You got twilight AND dawn? Fancy.
10/04/2010 06:01:44 PM
- 1190 Views
Could be his clothes in his wardrobe that were left behind, not the ones he was wearing. *NM*
10/04/2010 07:21:54 PM
- 678 Views
Oh. Duh. It says his possessions, not a heap of clothes on the floor
10/04/2010 08:05:14 PM
- 1261 Views
I'm guessing it had to do with me being the hammer vote on Blaine.
11/04/2010 12:44:09 AM
- 1150 Views
I think we should hypocop, in any case
10/04/2010 08:14:52 PM
- 1239 Views
I really think this is completely unnecessary.
10/04/2010 09:20:46 PM
- 1255 Views
FT doesn't know the results of the investigation- the deputy may
10/04/2010 11:30:26 PM
- 1127 Views
Re: FT doesn't know the results of the investigation- the deputy may
11/04/2010 01:44:01 AM
- 1346 Views
I agree, our Cop is dead and F-T kept a journal, which revealed no new investigation. *NM*
11/04/2010 12:32:21 AM
- 722 Views
How could this possibly do us harm?
11/04/2010 05:18:55 PM
- 1147 Views
All I'm saying is the possibilty is there. *NM*
11/04/2010 06:56:20 PM
- 731 Views
Hypocop table- Night One [Table]
10/04/2010 08:19:21 PM
- 1262 Views
I found Napoleon62 to be guilty *NM*
11/04/2010 07:04:13 PM
- 781 Views
Isaac: quick clarification.
11/04/2010 07:15:58 PM
- 1169 Views
Is he a man or woman?
12/04/2010 01:24:37 AM
- 1159 Views
His character is a red haired Saldean noblewoman, who likes to wear green. *NM*
12/04/2010 01:33:29 AM
- 809 Views
Ooah this ended up in the wrong place. I meant White Flame, but that question's been answered. *NM*
12/04/2010 01:40:33 AM
- 740 Views
Chair Vote: ranagrande
10/04/2010 11:14:56 PM
- 1109 Views
Re: Chair Vote: ranagrande
10/04/2010 11:31:07 PM
- 1096 Views
I think it's because no one really has a feel for the roles, yet Advocate Vote: beetnemesis
10/04/2010 11:38:56 PM
- 1208 Views
Where are all the people who used the "it's Day 1" excuse to not talk yesterday?
11/04/2010 12:52:27 AM
- 1184 Views
Re: Where are all the people who used the "it's Day 1" excuse to not talk yesterday?
11/04/2010 01:59:01 AM
- 1042 Views
Psst: Bergoiyn's a dude. *NM*
11/04/2010 04:11:38 AM
- 808 Views
My bad *NM*
11/04/2010 06:31:22 PM
- 775 Views
Was this just a mix up, or didn't you know? *NM*
11/04/2010 08:45:11 PM
- 680 Views
I think it was just a mixup. Not really sure what I was thinking. *NM*
11/04/2010 09:47:51 PM
- 742 Views
Re: Where are all the people who used the "it's Day 1" excuse to not talk yesterday?
11/04/2010 06:15:37 AM
- 1240 Views
Actually I did post RBIRL at the very end of Day 1. And it came that late because
11/04/2010 10:21:54 AM
- 1112 Views
ahhh noobs
11/04/2010 02:14:26 AM
- 1150 Views
Re: ahhh noobs
12/04/2010 02:51:33 PM
- 1108 Views
I didn't use "Day 1 excuse". I've been sick, and really haven't got the energy to do anything.
11/04/2010 10:16:10 AM
- 1134 Views
Hmm.
11/04/2010 12:53:43 AM
- 1263 Views
And I thought you'd try to make another bid for the Chair, being "new" and all. *NM*
11/04/2010 05:23:26 PM
- 720 Views
So, any suspicions?
11/04/2010 03:15:53 PM
- 1158 Views
EBWOP - It's supposed to read "who people have suspicions about and why." *NM*
11/04/2010 03:17:33 PM
- 725 Views
Let's rip out mine
11/04/2010 07:18:38 PM
- 1108 Views
Yesterday you said you trusted White Flame
11/04/2010 07:31:20 PM
- 1174 Views
As I mentioned above, I'm suspicious of Fox
11/04/2010 10:54:48 PM
- 1210 Views
Advocate Vote: beetnemesis | Chair Vote: Gher *NM*
11/04/2010 05:26:39 PM
- 631 Views
Best thing to go off of now, I suppose.
11/04/2010 09:50:08 PM
- 1240 Views
I still don't want beet having power. But Chair Vote: Gher is acceptable. *NM*
11/04/2010 11:26:46 PM
- 755 Views
Maybe I wasn't paying attention ...
12/04/2010 01:32:51 AM
- 1060 Views
Sheer animal magnetism
12/04/2010 08:21:14 AM
- 1209 Views
110 new posts later....
12/04/2010 12:49:51 AM
- 1218 Views
Re: 110 new posts later....
12/04/2010 01:49:46 AM
- 1208 Views
This last bit is honestly the part that might convince me
12/04/2010 08:17:55 AM
- 1282 Views
Oh! And the hypocopping thing! I don't know what was up with that.
12/04/2010 08:20:22 AM
- 1187 Views
That's the one that bugs me the most.
12/04/2010 04:06:31 PM
- 1174 Views
Wait, are you suspicious of Fox or not?
13/04/2010 12:35:07 AM
- 1215 Views
Yes, I am.
13/04/2010 01:41:00 AM
- 1238 Views
Re: Yes, I am.
13/04/2010 05:29:27 AM
- 1164 Views
A quick argument for why there's likely still some type of cop
13/04/2010 08:01:24 AM
- 1087 Views
Re: A quick argument for why there's likely still some type of cop
13/04/2010 09:39:31 AM
- 1156 Views
I disagree with the "F-T hid it" theory.
13/04/2010 09:53:46 AM
- 1078 Views
My point was, storywise, we wouldn't KNOW if the darkfriends were killed
14/04/2010 04:12:49 AM
- 1218 Views
We can agree on all of your points, but it only argues in favor of Fox's reasoning. *NM*
13/04/2010 09:48:39 AM
- 773 Views
Re: Yes, I am.
13/04/2010 07:35:54 AM
- 1043 Views
Here's the deal with hypocopping:
13/04/2010 07:54:36 AM
- 1218 Views
Re: Oh! And the hypocopping thing! I don't know what was up with that.
12/04/2010 04:08:10 PM
- 1098 Views
Re: 110 new posts later....
12/04/2010 06:51:14 AM
- 1097 Views
So, any other avenues of investigation that we need to attack?
13/04/2010 03:37:39 PM
- 1246 Views
Okay I need 2 Random numbers between 1-15 please - got 3 and 13, thanks
13/04/2010 06:45:43 PM
- 1068 Views
Event: Lunch Interlude
13/04/2010 10:00:19 PM
- 1251 Views
You see that? Black and Red.
13/04/2010 11:12:07 PM
- 945 Views
Taimens? *NM*
13/04/2010 11:26:01 PM
- 706 Views
I was going to point that out yesterday
14/04/2010 12:16:46 AM
- 1365 Views
So... there's that
13/04/2010 11:39:23 PM
- 1080 Views
Origin Chart (Table)
14/04/2010 05:05:14 PM
- 1163 Views
So... does anyone have any bursts of insight?
15/04/2010 04:21:20 AM
- 1193 Views
Yes, vote fistofpainx. He's a DF. *NM*
15/04/2010 07:04:36 AM
- 726 Views
Actually, I'm starting to agree with this.
15/04/2010 07:38:43 AM
- 1227 Views
Personally...
15/04/2010 08:32:15 PM
- 1094 Views
Yeah fist is (and has been) very quiet. Hey! Wake up!
15/04/2010 11:24:29 PM
- 1078 Views
*Prods Players*
16/04/2010 08:23:01 AM
- 1112 Views
This is where I'd vote for fistofpainx...
16/04/2010 06:47:57 PM
- 1186 Views
Nah, he doesn't need to roleclaim yet
17/04/2010 12:20:12 AM
- 1205 Views
Not right away, no.
17/04/2010 01:04:43 AM
- 1130 Views
Er...
18/04/2010 01:56:29 AM
- 1070 Views
meh I don't have any feelings *NM*
18/04/2010 02:25:03 AM
- 658 Views
I agree
18/04/2010 03:29:30 AM
- 1101 Views
Talic was suspicious because he was cagey about his origin
18/04/2010 08:28:34 AM
- 1134 Views
No, not really...
18/04/2010 06:23:42 PM
- 1028 Views
I don't find that suspicious at all
18/04/2010 07:11:01 PM
- 1108 Views
You make a lot of assumptions.
18/04/2010 09:00:11 PM
- 1134 Views
Re: You make a lot of assumptions.
18/04/2010 09:44:22 PM
- 1149 Views
But which assumption is more likely?
19/04/2010 12:55:28 AM
- 1173 Views
But the assumptions are all (or mostly) completely rational. *NM*
19/04/2010 02:12:28 AM
- 685 Views
Fox is the only one I'm really suspicious of so far
18/04/2010 07:31:09 AM
- 1050 Views
OK, so here are my (new) candidates)
18/04/2010 08:48:22 AM
- 1252 Views
At this point, it's almost painfully obvious that fistofpainx is a DF. *NM*
18/04/2010 08:10:06 PM
- 664 Views
Oh, btw, even though Isaac hasn't updated yet, you're still voting for fistofpainx *NM*
18/04/2010 08:12:25 PM
- 743 Views
I don't know who to kill Today.
19/04/2010 05:14:19 PM
- 1213 Views
F-T makes good points about Talic.
19/04/2010 09:38:38 PM
- 1251 Views
we are gonna have to do something guys
19/04/2010 10:24:30 PM
- 1130 Views
Someone bring me solid evidence about fist. I suggest BlackAdder for this
20/04/2010 12:19:12 AM
- 1158 Views
here's some evidence
20/04/2010 12:49:29 AM
- 1201 Views
Eh, FT's thing was that Talic didn't get NK'd
20/04/2010 01:50:50 AM
- 1114 Views
Why would you want him to roleclaim?
20/04/2010 03:34:46 AM
- 1076 Views
Re: Why would you want him to roleclaim?
20/04/2010 04:45:46 AM
- 975 Views
I'd rather not trust that he'll screw up a roleclaim.
20/04/2010 04:59:54 AM
- 1213 Views
Just saying that it has changed the situation before and very well can again. *NM*
20/04/2010 03:42:06 PM
- 601 Views
Whoa.
20/04/2010 03:42:07 PM
- 1216 Views
I'll wait for him to post his reasons. *NM*
20/04/2010 04:22:20 PM
- 665 Views
Yeah, I've been RBIRL and informed everyone of it. Reading is tech.
20/04/2010 05:36:11 PM
- 1089 Views
Re: Yeah, I've been RBIRL and informed everyone of it. Reading is tech.
20/04/2010 06:02:45 PM
- 1110 Views
btw, what is the case against me anyway? That I have a case against fist? *NM*
20/04/2010 06:11:01 PM
- 750 Views
I don't see what your points are.
20/04/2010 06:12:49 PM
- 1116 Views
Re: I don't see what your points are.
20/04/2010 06:22:19 PM
- 1205 Views
First off, stop with the eye rolls.
20/04/2010 06:27:48 PM
- 985 Views
I can't help it
20/04/2010 06:33:05 PM
- 1202 Views
Re: I can't help it
20/04/2010 06:46:25 PM
- 1119 Views
meh, your case against fist just seems really weak
21/04/2010 01:03:17 AM
- 1055 Views
just because someone has a non-vanilla role
20/04/2010 06:53:39 PM
- 1277 Views
Re: just because someone has a non-vanilla role
20/04/2010 07:11:59 PM
- 1170 Views
I'm not voting for Blackadder Today.
20/04/2010 08:34:21 PM
- 1161 Views
I wasn't jumping to lynch him, I was just putting pressure.
20/04/2010 09:51:17 PM
- 1134 Views
Yeah, I thought that was interesting too.
21/04/2010 12:46:01 AM
- 1178 Views
Bandwagon votes
21/04/2010 12:41:33 PM
- 1171 Views
Post counts
21/04/2010 01:30:07 PM
- 1035 Views
Really, now. Yuna, ranagrande, Amys, fist, White Flame, and Talic: The MOD has more posts than you. *NM*
21/04/2010 01:33:57 PM
- 684 Views
Cosequences?
21/04/2010 06:27:29 PM
- 1230 Views
I'm not in the end, but in the middle of the list? This demands celebration! *NM*
21/04/2010 08:42:36 PM
- 662 Views
Personally I think it's weird that people are jumping on blackadder
21/04/2010 12:23:06 AM
- 1325 Views
Re: Personally I think it's weird that people are jumping on blackadder
21/04/2010 03:34:46 AM
- 1214 Views
Vote Table: 21 Apr, Wednesday 11:46 PM EST
21/04/2010 01:58:55 AM
- 1201 Views
Hey, Talic, Yuna, and Artsapat!
21/04/2010 01:14:54 PM
- 1187 Views
Re: Hey, Talic, Yuna, and Artsapat!
21/04/2010 01:35:13 PM
- 1269 Views
Yea, I saw right after I posted this. Still doesn't exclude the other two!
21/04/2010 01:39:07 PM
- 1182 Views
mrrr
21/04/2010 01:44:01 PM
- 1183 Views
That seems awfully familiar to my reasoning.
21/04/2010 01:46:29 PM
- 1148 Views
bleh
21/04/2010 02:00:08 PM
- 1205 Views
It's not that you agreed with someone.
21/04/2010 02:01:25 PM
- 1116 Views
All right, lets do this. Vote: Fox and Ravens
21/04/2010 05:37:05 PM
- 1249 Views
Has anything happened in the last few days to increase your suspicion?
21/04/2010 06:27:43 PM
- 1114 Views
The deadline?
21/04/2010 06:57:52 PM
- 1139 Views
Re: The deadline?
21/04/2010 07:22:19 PM
- 1172 Views
Yeah, sorry man.
21/04/2010 09:08:46 PM
- 1164 Views
OK...so here are my thoughts up to this point...
22/04/2010 01:24:02 AM
- 1179 Views
I'm disinclined to go along with this.
22/04/2010 02:16:28 AM
- 1093 Views
Hmm. That reminds me of something.
22/04/2010 02:43:35 AM
- 1102 Views
Oh, and I forgot to add...
22/04/2010 02:45:37 AM
- 1239 Views
So what you're saying is that there's no way I could be vanilla?
22/04/2010 03:06:31 AM
- 1108 Views
Don't be absurd.
22/04/2010 04:14:36 AM
- 1128 Views
That's a terrible reason.
22/04/2010 02:35:53 PM
- 1170 Views
Btw, Isaac, I voted for fist in my long post *NM*
22/04/2010 02:59:38 PM
- 597 Views
Buried it a bit there, got it now *NM*
22/04/2010 03:41:07 PM
- 772 Views
Another question
22/04/2010 03:46:16 PM
- 1315 Views
So you really don't have any abilities, restrictions, or anything?
22/04/2010 03:35:39 PM
- 1055 Views
So you agree with F-T, then?
22/04/2010 03:44:24 PM
- 1124 Views
About lynching Fox to determine whether we have Vanillas or not? Yes.
22/04/2010 04:11:44 PM
- 1128 Views
Re: Hmm. That reminds me of something.
22/04/2010 03:28:37 PM
- 1196 Views
If Fox is lying about his roleclaim, that's only more reason to lynch him.
22/04/2010 06:18:41 PM
- 1097 Views
Also, if the whole town has powers
22/04/2010 03:37:26 PM
- 1292 Views
No, we shouldn't
22/04/2010 03:48:30 PM
- 1148 Views
Re: No, we shouldn't
22/04/2010 04:00:33 PM
- 1215 Views
What is it you want to hear from me?
22/04/2010 06:17:39 PM
- 1138 Views
Re: What is it you want to hear from me?
22/04/2010 09:04:22 PM
- 1090 Views
Well, it depends.
22/04/2010 10:56:39 PM
- 1113 Views
and how will coordination help?
22/04/2010 08:23:27 PM
- 1045 Views
Obviously we don't have time for this Today, just keep in mind for Tomorrow.
22/04/2010 09:01:16 PM
- 1091 Views
The trick of this game is to never appear too obviously town, and definitely not too obviously scum.
22/04/2010 10:51:12 PM
- 1188 Views
Re: Obviously we don't have time for this Today, just keep in mind for Tomorrow.
23/04/2010 02:47:15 AM
- 1169 Views
P.S. could you also answer my question above to you, Kronin and Darth Katie?
22/04/2010 09:05:47 PM
- 1160 Views
I'm pretty sure you can't change your vote, being Chair and all. *NM*
21/04/2010 10:20:14 PM
- 721 Views
I can probably change my vote, even if the Chair vote doesn't move along with me.
22/04/2010 12:05:31 AM
- 1138 Views
It's not explicitly stated, but
22/04/2010 12:39:39 AM
- 1094 Views
Ya, I think you're right. Gher has a doublevote, but I have a one-time defense.
22/04/2010 01:49:29 AM
- 1153 Views
So, Fox: What's up with this?
22/04/2010 05:07:21 PM
- 1159 Views
Re: So, Fox: What's up with this?
22/04/2010 07:24:46 PM
- 1240 Views
Note from Moderator: Deadline Approaches, Current Vote Table
23/04/2010 12:30:22 PM
- 1238 Views
Fox and Ravens has been Lynched *NM*
23/04/2010 05:56:19 PM
- 690 Views
Wait, isn't that 6 votes, not 7? *NM*
23/04/2010 06:25:58 PM
- 586 Views
As has been mentioned, it records the number of people who voted, not the number of votes
23/04/2010 06:34:45 PM
- 1354 Views
Re: As has been mentioned, it records the number of people who voted, not the number of votes
23/04/2010 06:41:57 PM
- 1206 Views
Day 2 Twilight – Fox and Ravens Lynched
23/04/2010 06:46:43 PM
- 1134 Views
Whoa. . .
24/04/2010 01:49:09 AM
- 1114 Views
And I shouldn't trust mine. I seriously thought Fox was innocent. *NM*
24/04/2010 06:53:46 AM
- 665 Views
And I never trust my instincts, I trust Science!
24/04/2010 08:47:16 AM
- 1104 Views
As well you should!
24/04/2010 12:56:25 PM
- 1104 Views
*pokes the ghost*
25/04/2010 01:16:28 AM
- 1100 Views