Active Users:364 Time:14/03/2025 01:32:55 PM
General Info from the Moderator: Update 14 Isaac Send a noteboard - 09/04/2010 07:03:06 PM
This is General Info from the Moderator, subsequent threads may be posted under this heading. As before, the update counter at the top says which one I'm on, so you should keep an open eye for changes to that and look in on this message when it changes.

Update 14: 18 Apr - Couple quick notes on activity and votes updates. First, if you don't see it updated very recently, one of two things have happened. Either I forgot to update the date under 'last updated' or I haven't actually updated yet. When a lynch isn't obviously in the offing I don't check the game much, I doubt there's many days I don't check the thread at least once, but the VNTL only comes into play when a lynch is ramping up so I don't always take the time on a given day to update it, since I like to send out NBs to the inactives when I do. That 'last updated' number means a rigorous check was done recently, though often when people get the NB they'll respond to the board and if I see that I'll take them off the update, but that doesn't mean I've rechecked everyone so someone might have slid over 72 hours. Obviously when lynch tallies are fairly close to the VNTL I check more often, though of course sometimes I am busy and really only have time to peak in to make sure nothing incredibly momentous has happened. I will always update it before officially announcing a lynch though, which is why you may see 'lynch pending' go up on the board, I'm checking to make sure no one unvoted or spoke up in the meantime who was inactive. The big thing to remember, inactivity-wise is that you need to be posting some new message in the thread at least every 72 hours or have a RBIRL thread title. Even if you really have nothing to say you need to make a point of saying something so people know you are still around answering questions, I'm not expecting at this stage to lose any players to modkill and we'll have a decent pool of subs as the game progresses anyway, but lynches of less active players are common enough, and lesser activity is often the deciding factor between which of probable candidates gets someone's vote, so it's worth keeping in mind, as an added benefit of active posting... it is also worth remembering that players who are only posting 'Hi I'm here' comments tend to be more likely to be lynched too, so substantive posting is advised. It doesn't actually have to be incredibly long, as I myself tend to favor, but one-sentence posts don't typically advance a faction's cause very much nor convince other players of your heavy involvement, ironically lurking - which is nominally done as a form of self-defense - tends to result in lynch and NK more often then average posting, in my not-very-limited experience.

Update 13: 13 Apr - A little note on these events, they are effectively pre-randomized and set to go off if certain things happen, I'll probably post the ones that are typed and not hand-written at the end of the game, but to give you some idea how this works, this event had the criteria, or 'trigger' of: "Election for day 2 complete, previous chair voted for day 1 lynch, chair and advocate titles in play." and it selected people off "Obtain two non-identical random numbers from players, using an alpha roster, go the first random number [3] down from the newly elected advocate [beetnemsis to Fanatic-Templar], and the second number [13] up from the first selectee [Fanatic-Templar to Fox and Ravens]". I won't give the exacts here on what then occurred, except that the event called for the release of gender info from the newly elected positions as well as from the selectees, and various other pre-selected info to be released. The randomness, essentially using the numbers given by players as a seed, shifts and changes a lot from event to event, for instance 1-20 for yesterday was a table compiled from using a d20 die, with some repeats with minor variation on the list. Another not used called for two random numbers to go off the fifth person to post a direct reply to the original thread of that day, skipping repeats, using an Alpha Roster, whereas another used upside-down registration order for the list and dead players would be left on. I raise this because as I've mentioned, I pretty much refuse to have any involvement in the game, such as myself randomly determining outcomes, once a player roster for the game has been generated, so I use players instead, with pre-selected determination from their number/response (some call for letters or a choice of rock-paper-scissors) to determine what happens, but I list the method in this case to curb anyone's desire to try to guess what target will be from their number selected. The point is not to allow anyone, myself included, to be able to deliberately or subconsciously pick the outcome of a random event, and I think that as the criteria for this specific event indicate, there was no way for anyone to knowingly influence it.

Update 12: 9 Apr - As per BlackAdder's suggestion, the Inactivity Roster, which serves the dual purposes of tracking dead players, now includes annotations next to players who have either replaced or been replaced by another, indicating who they replaced or were replaced by. The strikethrough on Player Name indicates the player was in the game at some point holding a role, and is not currently in the game.

Update 11: 9 Apr - Probably best to clarify the sub rules again, to avoid confusion. Gameplay is damaged by modkills, which represent an unfair disadvantage to whatever group they belonged to, hence substitution is preferable. To sub someone in requires only one core thing, that the substitute holds no knowledge from a previous role that will give them any advantage, so a player who was not previously in the game, or a player who on their death no longer has unique knowledge that represents an advantage of any sort, is suitable. Blaine was not usuable to replace Napoleon as he had knowledge of ally names or an ally's name. Hobo also can not be used, since using him would either leave him knowing the name of a previous allies, if any remain, or if none did, prove to players that none did. A cop who has received a result can not substitute, a doc who has used their power and gotten a result could not, a serial killer could if their knowledge of who they killed did not advantage anyone, a darkfriend could not, a vanilla could, etc. The role they take over is irrelevant, and could be darkfriend, vanilla, cult leader, etc, because they take over the role with no knowledge from their previous role to benefit them. As most cases where substitution is necessary occur early in the game, by and large many who later be disqualified for special knowledge are initially safe to be used, should they be lynched or NK'd.

Update 10: 9 Apr - Have moved all the various links, logs, votes records and so on over to new thread, people can begin posting into the game any time they want now. Incidentally, although this may not always be the case, everyone got a 'dawn 2 message - name', and while I thoroughly check these many times before sending, on the off chance you ever get a message with someone else's name on it, don't open it and inform me. I can tell when someone opens a NB from me so if you've got the wrong info and leave it unopened, we can continue play with no harm no foul and I'll just peak to make sure it's unopened every so often until the game ends. This hasn't happened by the way, just general paranoia, but you can probably expect any message from me in the future to that isn't a direct reply to something you sent to have your name on it.

Update 9: 9 Apr - Okay, Fanatic-Templar has accepted sub for Napoleon, so he will be assuming that role, as mentioned, he doesn't IMO have any info from his previous role that could effect things but to avoid any mistakes or for that matter tactics implying he might have info, our subbing rule - which should be moot from this point on in the game I hope - includes a loose ban on discussing your previous role or asking people about their previous role if they've been subbed posthumously.

Link to previous Info and Updates on Day 1
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
This message last edited by Isaac on 18/04/2010 at 09:28:24 AM
Reply to message
Game 16, Day 2: In the Manor of Mad Muad (Ended) - 09/04/2010 06:59:52 PM 4385 Views
Official Vote Count - Fox and Ravens has been lynched - 09/04/2010 07:01:43 PM 1763 Views
Chair and Advocate Vote Record - 09/04/2010 07:02:19 PM 1493 Views
General Info from the Moderator: Update 14 - 09/04/2010 07:03:06 PM 1370 Views
Inactivity Tracker - VNTL: 7 - 09/04/2010 08:10:05 PM 1504 Views
Beetnemesis- Active *NM* - 09/04/2010 11:30:39 PM 856 Views
White Flame- semiRBIRL *NM* - 10/04/2010 04:02:44 AM 838 Views
BlackAdder: Active! *NM* - 10/04/2010 04:04:36 AM 866 Views
Fox and Ravens - active *NM* - 10/04/2010 04:21:54 AM 858 Views
Bergioyn - Active *NM* - 10/04/2010 08:34:13 AM 940 Views
Gher: Active *NM* - 10/04/2010 07:22:16 PM 870 Views
Amys: Active but with limited computer access *NM* - 10/04/2010 08:35:04 PM 831 Views
Darth_Katie: Semi-RBIRL *NM* - 11/04/2010 03:36:00 AM 890 Views
Re: Darth_Katie: RBIRL *NM* - 21/04/2010 05:31:42 AM 917 Views
RBIRL for realsies. - 21/04/2010 05:34:51 AM 1280 Views
Wait... what? - 09/04/2010 11:36:10 PM 1325 Views
OK, I think I see. - 09/04/2010 11:40:28 PM 1248 Views
ta for simplifying, it all makes sence now *NM* - 09/04/2010 11:55:24 PM 845 Views
Re: OK, I think I see. - 10/04/2010 12:12:47 AM 1427 Views
Sounds good. With that said... - 10/04/2010 01:47:17 AM 1171 Views
Re: Sounds good. With that said... - 10/04/2010 09:58:41 AM 1371 Views
Good point - 10/04/2010 11:52:13 AM 1291 Views
Hm. So, FT- did you do anything to inform us that you were the cop? - 10/04/2010 01:52:23 AM 1279 Views
He's not supposed to talk about this previous role - 10/04/2010 01:56:41 AM 1316 Views
Whoops. I meant *NOW* the Andoran Merchant - 10/04/2010 04:15:37 AM 1303 Views
I am the wealthy Andoran merchant. - 10/04/2010 04:34:57 AM 1349 Views
Wow... - 10/04/2010 01:54:05 AM 1412 Views
Re: Wow... - 10/04/2010 03:03:21 AM 1331 Views
Well I can't speak for BlackAdder... - 10/04/2010 07:37:15 AM 1254 Views
Re: Well I can't speak for BlackAdder... - 10/04/2010 09:28:02 PM 1352 Views
Re: Wow... - 10/04/2010 03:03:21 AM 1186 Views
EBWOP - sorry double post *NM* - 10/04/2010 03:03:48 AM 839 Views
Why were those two killed? - 10/04/2010 03:12:49 AM 1231 Views
It's pretty obvious why Hobo was killed after Blaine was found to be a Mason. - 10/04/2010 03:51:17 AM 1375 Views
Re: It's pretty obvious why Hobo was killed after Blaine was found to be a Mason. - 10/04/2010 04:20:37 AM 1209 Views
Well, he was revealed to be a Whitecloak, with a tacked-on ability - 10/04/2010 04:29:34 AM 1193 Views
Re: Well, he was revealed to be a Whitecloak, with a tacked-on ability - 10/04/2010 05:15:45 AM 1302 Views
Re: Well, he was revealed to be a Whitecloak, with a tacked-on ability - 10/04/2010 05:23:51 AM 1279 Views
Re: Well, he was revealed to be a Whitecloak, with a tacked-on ability - 10/04/2010 05:27:49 AM 1381 Views
Re: Well, he was revealed to be a Whitecloak, with a tacked-on ability - 10/04/2010 05:44:59 AM 1288 Views
Careful, that's been Beetnemesis' strategy the past few games. Doesn't work so well *NM* - 10/04/2010 07:14:55 PM 788 Views
Bah! *NM* - 10/04/2010 11:23:05 PM 846 Views
Explain? *NM* - 11/04/2010 01:01:59 AM 860 Views
He got the entire town against him by digging himself a deeper and deeper hole. - 11/04/2010 01:40:46 AM 1269 Views
He'd still be a Mason even if he could talk at night - 10/04/2010 04:40:32 AM 1236 Views
"... even if he COULDN'T talk at night" that is. - 10/04/2010 04:41:12 AM 1328 Views
Two main venues of inquiry: - 10/04/2010 05:12:46 AM 1380 Views
Re: Two main venues of inquiry: - 10/04/2010 05:25:43 AM 1254 Views
I'm curious if he is really worth keeping around - 10/04/2010 05:34:50 AM 1280 Views
I certainly oppose a roleclaim at this point... - 10/04/2010 05:42:55 AM 1245 Views
Yes, but - 10/04/2010 05:56:32 AM 1254 Views
Meh, I'd expect him to tell us if we were wrong... - 10/04/2010 06:09:13 AM 1262 Views
Only if he were pro-Light. - 10/04/2010 06:23:01 AM 1150 Views
Actually, screw this. - 10/04/2010 06:32:30 AM 1302 Views
Flavor in Hobo's death scene. - 10/04/2010 08:13:03 AM 1301 Views
first off - 10/04/2010 11:25:23 AM 1170 Views
Re: first off - 10/04/2010 11:59:27 AM 1222 Views
one possiblity - 10/04/2010 03:36:06 PM 1135 Views
The Janitor role prevents us from finding out the victims role and affiliation though. - 10/04/2010 07:20:16 PM 1255 Views
hmmmn - 10/04/2010 10:29:14 PM 1225 Views
Let's try to find out reasons why the body was hidden - 11/04/2010 06:53:23 PM 1245 Views
It was probably balefire - 11/04/2010 07:08:55 PM 1173 Views
It could be important. - 12/04/2010 01:56:12 AM 1054 Views
People know balefire - 10/04/2010 05:49:19 PM 1318 Views
Also, twilight and dawn scenes - 10/04/2010 08:27:55 AM 1353 Views
You got twilight AND dawn? Fancy. - 10/04/2010 06:01:44 PM 1253 Views
I'm guessing it had to do with me being the hammer vote on Blaine. - 11/04/2010 12:44:09 AM 1237 Views
I think we should hypocop, in any case - 10/04/2010 08:14:52 PM 1295 Views
IF YOU ARE NOT THE COP: - 10/04/2010 08:29:50 PM 1229 Views
I really think this is completely unnecessary. - 10/04/2010 09:20:46 PM 1342 Views
Hrm... - 10/04/2010 11:08:44 PM 1335 Views
Re: Hrm... - 11/04/2010 01:53:18 AM 1265 Views
FT doesn't know the results of the investigation- the deputy may - 10/04/2010 11:30:26 PM 1205 Views
Re: FT doesn't know the results of the investigation- the deputy may - 11/04/2010 01:44:01 AM 1431 Views
Fair enough. Those can be misleading, anyway - 11/04/2010 01:48:55 AM 1212 Views
How could this possibly do us harm? - 11/04/2010 05:18:55 PM 1198 Views
All I'm saying is the possibilty is there. *NM* - 11/04/2010 06:56:20 PM 759 Views
Where? *NM* - 12/04/2010 04:13:05 PM 796 Views
If somebody takes the investigation as truth when it's not *NM* - 12/04/2010 04:32:25 PM 691 Views
Hypocop table- Night One [Table] - 10/04/2010 08:19:21 PM 1316 Views
I found Bergioyn to be Innocent *NM* - 10/04/2010 08:20:02 PM 766 Views
I found beetnemesis to be innocent. *NM* - 10/04/2010 08:30:16 PM 824 Views
I found Talic to be innocent. *NM* - 10/04/2010 08:34:07 PM 813 Views
I found Talic to be guilty *NM* - 10/04/2010 08:53:45 PM 887 Views
I found Amys to be innocent. *NM* - 10/04/2010 09:03:51 PM 796 Views
There's really no reason for me to be on that list, you know. - 10/04/2010 09:55:41 PM 1179 Views
i found Artsapat to be guilty *NM* - 10/04/2010 10:33:21 PM 856 Views
I found Talic to be innocent. *NM* - 10/04/2010 11:10:19 PM 753 Views
I found Amys to be innocent *NM* - 11/04/2010 01:56:14 AM 791 Views
I found Artsapat innocent. *NM* - 11/04/2010 04:03:51 AM 820 Views
I found Napoleon62 to be guilty *NM* - 11/04/2010 07:04:13 PM 815 Views
Isaac: quick clarification. - 11/04/2010 07:15:58 PM 1219 Views
Yes *NM* - 11/04/2010 07:25:46 PM 756 Views
Is he a man or woman? - 12/04/2010 01:24:37 AM 1238 Views
I found Talic to be for the Light *NM* - 11/04/2010 09:44:20 PM 784 Views
I found Fox to be guilty *NM* - 12/04/2010 12:50:51 AM 762 Views
I found White Flame innocent *NM* - 14/04/2010 05:30:49 AM 733 Views
Chair Vote: ranagrande - 10/04/2010 11:14:56 PM 1199 Views
Re: Chair Vote: ranagrande - 10/04/2010 11:31:07 PM 1169 Views
I think it's because no one really has a feel for the roles, yet Advocate Vote: beetnemesis - 10/04/2010 11:38:56 PM 1281 Views
I need someone else to vote against you with. - 11/04/2010 12:54:56 AM 1111 Views
Anything specific? - 11/04/2010 01:47:48 AM 1235 Views
If only because the role is mostly useless - 11/04/2010 01:08:19 AM 1256 Views
Where are all the people who used the "it's Day 1" excuse to not talk yesterday? - 11/04/2010 12:52:27 AM 1273 Views
Re: Where are all the people who used the "it's Day 1" excuse to not talk yesterday? - 11/04/2010 01:59:01 AM 1095 Views
Psst: Bergoiyn's a dude. *NM* - 11/04/2010 04:11:38 AM 846 Views
My bad *NM* - 11/04/2010 06:31:22 PM 806 Views
Was this just a mix up, or didn't you know? *NM* - 11/04/2010 08:45:11 PM 724 Views
I think it was just a mixup. Not really sure what I was thinking. *NM* - 11/04/2010 09:47:51 PM 798 Views
ahhh noobs - 11/04/2010 02:14:26 AM 1204 Views
Of course, but it hardly takes much time to read/post. *NM* - 11/04/2010 06:12:32 AM 1287 Views
Re: ahhh noobs - 12/04/2010 02:51:33 PM 1166 Views
Re: ahhh noobs - 12/04/2010 04:54:26 PM 1208 Views
Re: ahhh noobs - 12/04/2010 05:56:22 PM 1368 Views
Do you want to explain what I did to make you so suspicious? - 11/04/2010 04:09:51 AM 1201 Views
I didn't use "Day 1 excuse". I've been sick, and really haven't got the energy to do anything. - 11/04/2010 10:16:10 AM 1203 Views
That's fine - 11/04/2010 11:19:46 AM 1273 Views
Hmm. - 11/04/2010 12:53:43 AM 1333 Views
Hm? - 11/04/2010 12:56:20 AM 1185 Views
Ah, yes. - 11/04/2010 02:37:24 AM 1449 Views
It's legal - 11/04/2010 03:00:56 AM 1177 Views
Is that a vote, or just a suggestion? *NM* - 11/04/2010 01:03:31 AM 813 Views
Well, he phrased it as a vote, so it's a vote - 11/04/2010 01:51:27 AM 1258 Views
<b>Chair Vote: Gher</b> *NM* - 12/04/2010 02:01:09 AM 761 Views
EBWOP - 12/04/2010 02:03:05 AM 1280 Views
Just so you know, I would have taken that - 12/04/2010 02:17:59 AM 1278 Views
Player analysis - 11/04/2010 07:09:58 AM 1251 Views
fistofpainx - 11/04/2010 07:13:17 AM 1260 Views
So, any suspicions? - 11/04/2010 03:15:53 PM 1235 Views
Here's my take on Talic: - 11/04/2010 07:13:58 PM 1204 Views
Let's rip out mine - 11/04/2010 07:18:38 PM 1198 Views
Yesterday you said you trusted White Flame - 11/04/2010 07:31:20 PM 1249 Views
Re: Yesterday you said you trusted White Flame - 11/04/2010 08:29:13 PM 1349 Views
That's actually quite good point. *NM* - 11/04/2010 08:41:26 PM 783 Views
Well, from what I can gather... - 11/04/2010 08:49:14 PM 1320 Views
Oddly enough, I said something similar yesterday - 12/04/2010 08:00:17 AM 1228 Views
As I mentioned above, I'm suspicious of Fox - 11/04/2010 10:54:48 PM 1260 Views
Re: As I mentioned above, I'm suspicious of Fox - 11/04/2010 11:08:26 PM 1284 Views
You may think your actions are justified - 11/04/2010 11:44:47 PM 1172 Views
I dunno - 11/04/2010 11:37:44 PM 1255 Views
Advocate Vote: beetnemesis | Chair Vote: Gher *NM* - 11/04/2010 05:26:39 PM 671 Views
Advocate Vote: beetnemesis | Chair Vote: Gher - 11/04/2010 07:24:55 PM 1725 Views
I approve of everyone giving me power - 11/04/2010 07:32:35 PM 1229 Views
Best thing to go off of now, I suppose. - 11/04/2010 09:50:08 PM 1327 Views
I still don't want beet having power. But Chair Vote: Gher is acceptable. *NM* - 11/04/2010 11:26:46 PM 825 Views
Maybe I wasn't paying attention ... - 12/04/2010 01:32:51 AM 1134 Views
Sheer animal magnetism - 12/04/2010 08:21:14 AM 1258 Views
Obviously, of course. - 12/04/2010 12:24:47 PM 1320 Views
In that case - 12/04/2010 02:08:47 PM 1104 Views
What Beet said - 12/04/2010 04:11:26 PM 1281 Views
Okay, thanks. *NM* - 13/04/2010 12:20:57 AM 785 Views
Finally here - 11/04/2010 09:52:46 PM 1234 Views
110 new posts later.... - 12/04/2010 12:49:51 AM 1304 Views
Re: 110 new posts later.... - 12/04/2010 01:49:46 AM 1282 Views
This last bit is honestly the part that might convince me - 12/04/2010 08:17:55 AM 1364 Views
Oh! And the hypocopping thing! I don't know what was up with that. - 12/04/2010 08:20:22 AM 1273 Views
That's the one that bugs me the most. - 12/04/2010 04:06:31 PM 1251 Views
Wait, are you suspicious of Fox or not? - 13/04/2010 12:35:07 AM 1294 Views
Yes, I am. - 13/04/2010 01:41:00 AM 1309 Views
Re: Yes, I am. - 13/04/2010 05:29:27 AM 1216 Views
A quick argument for why there's likely still some type of cop - 13/04/2010 08:01:24 AM 1142 Views
Re: A quick argument for why there's likely still some type of cop - 13/04/2010 09:39:31 AM 1209 Views
I disagree with the "F-T hid it" theory. - 13/04/2010 09:53:46 AM 1170 Views
That would be hilarious though. - 13/04/2010 09:59:06 AM 1220 Views
It would be - 13/04/2010 04:11:41 PM 1212 Views
My point was, storywise, we wouldn't KNOW if the darkfriends were killed - 14/04/2010 04:12:49 AM 1264 Views
Yeah, but storywise... - 14/04/2010 05:27:05 AM 1235 Views
Yeah, that bugs me too - 14/04/2010 07:00:08 AM 1140 Views
Need to correct you on your terminology. - 14/04/2010 12:35:34 PM 1154 Views
Hm... Point *NM* - 14/04/2010 04:51:13 PM 819 Views
We can agree on all of your points, but it only argues in favor of Fox's reasoning. *NM* - 13/04/2010 09:48:39 AM 801 Views
That's because my reasoning makes sense. - 13/04/2010 08:36:13 PM 1079 Views
I think you've been acting weird, if not neccessarily Dark - 14/04/2010 01:57:41 AM 1251 Views
Here's my thoughts on the cop situation - 13/04/2010 08:42:24 PM 1296 Views
Re: Yes, I am. - 13/04/2010 07:35:54 AM 1115 Views
Here's the deal with hypocopping: - 13/04/2010 07:54:36 AM 1297 Views
What do events have to do with it? - 13/04/2010 10:01:28 AM 1296 Views
Because "Events" obviously don't conform to standard rules - 14/04/2010 01:55:22 AM 1179 Views
Hypocopping isn't foolproof. - 13/04/2010 10:08:32 PM 1165 Views
Re: Oh! And the hypocopping thing! I don't know what was up with that. - 12/04/2010 04:08:10 PM 1146 Views
Yeah but so what? - 12/04/2010 04:16:00 PM 1078 Views
Re: Yeah but so what? - 12/04/2010 04:23:28 PM 1121 Views
Re: 110 new posts later.... - 12/04/2010 06:51:14 AM 1174 Views
Re: 110 new posts later.... - 12/04/2010 07:58:08 PM 1204 Views
Ok. *NM* - 12/04/2010 09:58:56 PM 694 Views
So, any other avenues of investigation that we need to attack? - 13/04/2010 03:37:39 PM 1324 Views
Sorry, haven't been able to get up the other posts - 13/04/2010 05:49:30 PM 1177 Views
Yearp - 14/04/2010 06:12:08 AM 1253 Views
I think that's pretty fair. - 14/04/2010 12:27:55 PM 1364 Views
Fine with me. *NM* - 14/04/2010 03:36:41 PM 779 Views
Re: Yearp - 14/04/2010 04:48:58 PM 1201 Views
Okay I need 2 Random numbers between 1-15 please - got 3 and 13, thanks - 13/04/2010 06:45:43 PM 1142 Views
3 *NM* - 13/04/2010 07:35:56 PM 802 Views
13 *NM* - 13/04/2010 07:39:10 PM 777 Views
Event: Lunch Interlude - 13/04/2010 10:00:19 PM 1321 Views
You see that? Black and Red. - 13/04/2010 11:12:07 PM 1029 Views
Taimens? *NM* - 13/04/2010 11:26:01 PM 737 Views
Taim + Ravens. *NM* - 14/04/2010 01:20:15 AM 733 Views
LOL. Nice try. *NM* - 14/04/2010 01:55:33 AM 780 Views
I was going to point that out yesterday - 14/04/2010 12:16:46 AM 1440 Views
lots of people like black and red tho - 14/04/2010 12:44:38 AM 1245 Views
I know. I didn't mean it as true evidence. - 14/04/2010 03:41:06 PM 1205 Views
So... there's that - 13/04/2010 11:39:23 PM 1160 Views
prolly a puzzle peice - 14/04/2010 12:12:08 AM 1266 Views
Piece of the puzzle, I'd say. - 14/04/2010 12:54:11 AM 1159 Views
Re: So... there's that - 14/04/2010 01:57:17 AM 1236 Views
do the numbers match up with the player list? - 14/04/2010 02:30:03 AM 1246 Views
Re: do the numbers match up with the player list? - 14/04/2010 02:48:33 AM 1221 Views
No, I actually discuss methodology in the Update section *NM* - 14/04/2010 02:54:37 AM 733 Views
Origin Chart (Table) - 14/04/2010 05:05:14 PM 1215 Views
Idea. - 14/04/2010 05:32:10 PM 1186 Views
...I did, didn't I? - 14/04/2010 11:22:09 PM 1246 Views
I was thinking note something like fist's - 15/04/2010 01:36:36 AM 1177 Views
So... does anyone have any bursts of insight? - 15/04/2010 04:21:20 AM 1245 Views
Yes, I think I've figured out who the Darkfriends are *NM* - 15/04/2010 05:10:06 AM 754 Views
You think? - 15/04/2010 06:04:58 AM 1168 Views
Care to share? *NM* - 15/04/2010 05:21:39 PM 749 Views
Yes, vote fistofpainx. He's a DF. *NM* - 15/04/2010 07:04:36 AM 759 Views
Actually, I'm starting to agree with this. - 15/04/2010 07:38:43 AM 1306 Views
Personally... - 15/04/2010 08:32:15 PM 1173 Views
Yeah fist is (and has been) very quiet. Hey! Wake up! - 15/04/2010 11:24:29 PM 1135 Views
Re: Yeah fist is (and has been) very quiet. Hey! Wake up! - 16/04/2010 02:15:50 AM 1233 Views
And what about YOU? - 16/04/2010 04:09:55 AM 1214 Views
Re: Yeah fist is (and has been) very quiet. Hey! Wake up! - 16/04/2010 04:31:36 AM 1141 Views
Two votes is considered enough of a direct question? *NM* - 16/04/2010 08:00:16 AM 749 Views
Good idea, Pal! *NM* - 15/04/2010 02:52:46 PM 823 Views
*Prods Players* - 16/04/2010 08:23:01 AM 1166 Views
*wakes up* - 16/04/2010 11:33:16 AM 1372 Views
We were voting - 16/04/2010 12:03:02 PM 1262 Views
if it gets the game moving, fine. Vote: fistofpainx - 16/04/2010 06:11:57 PM 1393 Views
This is where I'd vote for fistofpainx... - 16/04/2010 06:47:57 PM 1238 Views
I, however , am not thus bound. Vote: fistofpainx - 16/04/2010 11:21:14 PM 1145 Views
Nah, he doesn't need to roleclaim yet - 17/04/2010 12:20:12 AM 1286 Views
oh and btw - 17/04/2010 12:24:37 AM 1219 Views
Not right away, no. - 17/04/2010 01:04:43 AM 1207 Views
He's already got a lot of votes against him. - 17/04/2010 06:21:42 PM 1343 Views
I Agree. - 18/04/2010 08:56:59 AM 1238 Views
Personal activity for next two weeks - 17/04/2010 10:06:07 AM 1184 Views
We'll see if we can manage that *NM* - 17/04/2010 06:53:30 PM 723 Views
Finally back - 17/04/2010 07:40:35 PM 1277 Views
That sucks, sorry - 17/04/2010 07:42:40 PM 1073 Views
Re: Finally back - 17/04/2010 09:53:08 PM 1200 Views
Er... - 18/04/2010 01:56:29 AM 1121 Views
meh I don't have any feelings *NM* - 18/04/2010 02:25:03 AM 699 Views
A sure sign of a Darkfriend. *NM* - 18/04/2010 02:49:30 AM 720 Views
EBWOP: *NM* - 18/04/2010 02:50:02 AM 700 Views
I agree - 18/04/2010 03:29:30 AM 1177 Views
Talic was suspicious because he was cagey about his origin - 18/04/2010 08:28:34 AM 1179 Views
No, not really... - 18/04/2010 06:23:42 PM 1101 Views
I don't find that suspicious at all - 18/04/2010 07:11:01 PM 1193 Views
You make a lot of assumptions. - 18/04/2010 09:00:11 PM 1214 Views
Re: You make a lot of assumptions. - 18/04/2010 09:44:22 PM 1240 Views
But which assumption is more likely? - 19/04/2010 12:55:28 AM 1249 Views
I think they're both pretty likely, actually... - 19/04/2010 01:36:49 AM 1088 Views
Exactly, which means Talic is supicious. - 19/04/2010 02:41:43 AM 1265 Views
Speaking of assumptions, why are you assuming they didn't? - 19/04/2010 03:34:36 AM 1225 Views
I never did. - 19/04/2010 03:45:27 AM 1266 Views
they're all fairly reasonable ones though - 18/04/2010 11:08:22 PM 1299 Views
Why not? - 19/04/2010 12:52:43 AM 1322 Views
I'd be willing to bet we have a Doc. - 19/04/2010 08:32:21 PM 1061 Views
But the assumptions are all (or mostly) completely rational. *NM* - 19/04/2010 02:12:28 AM 714 Views
Really? Why? - 19/04/2010 02:42:52 AM 1256 Views
Talic is definitely supicious. - 18/04/2010 06:01:23 AM 1196 Views
Fox is the only one I'm really suspicious of so far - 18/04/2010 07:31:09 AM 1127 Views
It's like...backwards from last game. *NM* - 18/04/2010 07:23:37 PM 763 Views
It is! *NM* - 18/04/2010 07:27:29 PM 674 Views
OK, so here are my (new) candidates) - 18/04/2010 08:48:22 AM 1331 Views
I do have an opinion on one of those - 18/04/2010 12:37:34 PM 1139 Views
Atleast you have some ideas. - 18/04/2010 03:24:14 PM 1332 Views
Re: OK, so here are my (new) candidates) - 18/04/2010 06:48:10 PM 1210 Views
Re: OK, so here are my (new) candidates) - 18/04/2010 07:29:07 PM 1193 Views
At this point, it's almost painfully obvious that fistofpainx is a DF. *NM* - 18/04/2010 08:10:06 PM 699 Views
Can you elaborate on why? - 18/04/2010 10:09:27 PM 1162 Views
Oh? - 19/04/2010 01:28:23 AM 1234 Views
That's a pretty bold claim. - 19/04/2010 08:35:28 PM 1212 Views
Oh, btw, even though Isaac hasn't updated yet, you're still voting for fistofpainx *NM* - 18/04/2010 08:12:25 PM 785 Views
Eh. Didn't feel like unvoting. *NM* - 19/04/2010 01:26:50 AM 772 Views
These three are not very suspicous to me - 19/04/2010 05:44:28 AM 1166 Views
I don't know who to kill Today. - 19/04/2010 05:14:19 PM 1265 Views
F-T makes good points about Talic. - 19/04/2010 09:38:38 PM 1311 Views
we are gonna have to do something guys - 19/04/2010 10:24:30 PM 1210 Views
Someone bring me solid evidence about fist. I suggest BlackAdder for this - 20/04/2010 12:19:12 AM 1247 Views
here's some evidence - 20/04/2010 12:49:29 AM 1290 Views
Re: here's some evidence - 20/04/2010 04:54:54 AM 1318 Views
Maybe - 20/04/2010 07:15:01 AM 1480 Views
Re: Maybe - 20/04/2010 03:25:16 PM 1241 Views
Re: Maybe - 20/04/2010 03:43:21 PM 1206 Views
Eh, FT's thing was that Talic didn't get NK'd - 20/04/2010 01:50:50 AM 1165 Views
Why would you want him to roleclaim? - 20/04/2010 03:34:46 AM 1168 Views
Re: Why would you want him to roleclaim? - 20/04/2010 04:45:46 AM 1055 Views
I'd rather not trust that he'll screw up a roleclaim. - 20/04/2010 04:59:54 AM 1289 Views
Re: Eh, FT's thing was that Talic didn't get NK'd - 20/04/2010 04:54:04 AM 1153 Views
Er, I was saying that the chances WEREN'T equal - 20/04/2010 05:22:23 PM 1187 Views
Day 2 Deadline Extension: Friday 2 PM EST - 20/04/2010 02:45:25 AM 1277 Views
Whoa. - 20/04/2010 03:42:07 PM 1296 Views
I'll wait for him to post his reasons. *NM* - 20/04/2010 04:22:20 PM 704 Views
I've waited. - 20/04/2010 05:09:40 PM 1274 Views
You vote me for 2 days of inactivity? lolwut. *NM* - 20/04/2010 05:39:54 PM 639 Views
I have to agree with Kronin here - 20/04/2010 04:31:24 PM 1372 Views
same here - 20/04/2010 05:21:23 PM 1229 Views
Slightly ironic. *NM* - 20/04/2010 05:38:39 PM 797 Views
Yeah, I've been RBIRL and informed everyone of it. Reading is tech. - 20/04/2010 05:36:11 PM 1139 Views
Re: Yeah, I've been RBIRL and informed everyone of it. Reading is tech. - 20/04/2010 06:02:45 PM 1195 Views
Dude, rly? - 20/04/2010 06:07:44 PM 1163 Views
btw, what is the case against me anyway? That I have a case against fist? *NM* - 20/04/2010 06:11:01 PM 786 Views
An unsupported case against fist. - 20/04/2010 06:20:21 PM 1182 Views
...? - 20/04/2010 06:24:19 PM 1337 Views
Re: ...? - 20/04/2010 08:37:07 PM 1203 Views
I don't see what your points are. - 20/04/2010 06:12:49 PM 1197 Views
Re: I don't see what your points are. - 20/04/2010 06:22:19 PM 1283 Views
First off, stop with the eye rolls. - 20/04/2010 06:27:48 PM 1046 Views
I can't help it - 20/04/2010 06:33:05 PM 1277 Views
Re: I can't help it - 20/04/2010 06:46:25 PM 1210 Views
meh, your case against fist just seems really weak - 21/04/2010 01:03:17 AM 1097 Views
Re: meh, your case against fist just seems really weak - 21/04/2010 03:29:08 AM 1169 Views
I just didn't agree with the conclusion you drew.... - 21/04/2010 04:07:34 AM 1323 Views
just because someone has a non-vanilla role - 20/04/2010 06:53:39 PM 1355 Views
Re: just because someone has a non-vanilla role - 20/04/2010 07:11:59 PM 1223 Views
Re: just because someone has a non-vanilla role - 20/04/2010 07:23:21 PM 1194 Views
Re: just because someone has a non-vanilla role - 20/04/2010 07:27:48 PM 1295 Views
I'm not voting for Blackadder Today. - 20/04/2010 08:34:21 PM 1208 Views
Re: I'm not voting for Blackadder Today. - 20/04/2010 08:44:25 PM 1227 Views
I wasn't jumping to lynch him, I was just putting pressure. - 20/04/2010 09:51:17 PM 1207 Views
Yeah, I thought that was interesting too. - 21/04/2010 12:46:01 AM 1270 Views
Bandwagon votes - 21/04/2010 12:41:33 PM 1250 Views
Post counts - 21/04/2010 01:30:07 PM 1097 Views
Really, now. Yuna, ranagrande, Amys, fist, White Flame, and Talic: The MOD has more posts than you. *NM* - 21/04/2010 01:33:57 PM 720 Views
Isaac does love the sound of his own voice *NM* - 21/04/2010 02:28:58 PM 671 Views
'tis true - 21/04/2010 02:53:51 PM 1332 Views
Cosequences? - 21/04/2010 06:27:29 PM 1285 Views
Well, Yuna's spoken up... - 21/04/2010 06:29:51 PM 1235 Views
Re: Well, Yuna's spoken up... - 21/04/2010 07:58:24 PM 1118 Views
Re: Bandwagon votes - 22/04/2010 12:29:28 AM 1290 Views
Re: Bandwagon votes - 22/04/2010 12:48:23 AM 1343 Views
Personally I think it's weird that people are jumping on blackadder - 21/04/2010 12:23:06 AM 1420 Views
Re: Personally I think it's weird that people are jumping on blackadder - 21/04/2010 03:34:46 AM 1301 Views
Vote Table: 21 Apr, Wednesday 11:46 PM EST - 21/04/2010 01:58:55 AM 1248 Views
Hey, Talic, Yuna, and Artsapat! - 21/04/2010 01:14:54 PM 1244 Views
Re: Hey, Talic, Yuna, and Artsapat! - 21/04/2010 01:35:13 PM 1315 Views
Yea, I saw right after I posted this. Still doesn't exclude the other two! - 21/04/2010 01:39:07 PM 1271 Views
mrrr - 21/04/2010 01:44:01 PM 1268 Views
That seems awfully familiar to my reasoning. - 21/04/2010 01:46:29 PM 1202 Views
bleh - 21/04/2010 02:00:08 PM 1267 Views
It's not that you agreed with someone. - 21/04/2010 02:01:25 PM 1197 Views
Re: It's not that you agreed with someone. - 21/04/2010 02:15:44 PM 1427 Views
I agree. *NM* - 21/04/2010 02:24:11 PM 735 Views
All right, lets do this. Vote: Fox and Ravens - 21/04/2010 05:37:05 PM 1342 Views
Has anything happened in the last few days to increase your suspicion? - 21/04/2010 06:27:43 PM 1173 Views
The deadline? - 21/04/2010 06:57:52 PM 1196 Views
Re: The deadline? - 21/04/2010 07:22:19 PM 1223 Views
Yeah, sorry man. - 21/04/2010 09:08:46 PM 1223 Views
OK...so here are my thoughts up to this point... - 22/04/2010 01:24:02 AM 1255 Views
I'm disinclined to go along with this. - 22/04/2010 02:16:28 AM 1155 Views
Somehow, I disagree with both of you - 22/04/2010 02:56:45 AM 1189 Views
The problem is.... - 22/04/2010 03:30:12 AM 1207 Views
To Kronin, ranagrande, and Darth Katie - 22/04/2010 03:22:26 PM 1165 Views
He doesn't quite "go with the most popular option". - 22/04/2010 09:10:59 PM 1163 Views
more the posting rate - 23/04/2010 02:50:25 AM 1227 Views
Hmm. That reminds me of something. - 22/04/2010 02:43:35 AM 1151 Views
Oh, and I forgot to add... - 22/04/2010 02:45:37 AM 1335 Views
So what you're saying is that there's no way I could be vanilla? - 22/04/2010 03:06:31 AM 1166 Views
Don't be absurd. - 22/04/2010 04:14:36 AM 1208 Views
For SCIENCE! *NM* - 22/04/2010 04:24:39 AM 684 Views
That's a terrible reason. - 22/04/2010 02:35:53 PM 1253 Views
Btw, Isaac, I voted for fist in my long post *NM* - 22/04/2010 02:59:38 PM 637 Views
Buried it a bit there, got it now *NM* - 22/04/2010 03:41:07 PM 806 Views
Another question - 22/04/2010 03:46:16 PM 1374 Views
The deadline was adjusted last night - it is now Friday - 22/04/2010 03:58:12 PM 1279 Views
OK, thanks *NM* - 22/04/2010 04:02:05 PM 1163 Views
So you really don't have any abilities, restrictions, or anything? - 22/04/2010 03:35:39 PM 1113 Views
So you agree with F-T, then? - 22/04/2010 03:44:24 PM 1182 Views
Got nothing...sorry. *NM* - 22/04/2010 05:07:07 PM 651 Views
Well, it's not really an awful reason - 22/04/2010 04:25:49 PM 1200 Views
Meh, I don't have any particular suspicions about anybody. - 22/04/2010 06:11:06 PM 1112 Views
Re: Hmm. That reminds me of something. - 22/04/2010 03:28:37 PM 1288 Views
If Fox is lying about his roleclaim, that's only more reason to lynch him. - 22/04/2010 06:18:41 PM 1157 Views
Also, if the whole town has powers - 22/04/2010 03:37:26 PM 1382 Views
No, we shouldn't - 22/04/2010 03:48:30 PM 1231 Views
Re: No, we shouldn't - 22/04/2010 04:00:33 PM 1271 Views
What is it you want to hear from me? - 22/04/2010 06:17:39 PM 1223 Views
Re: What is it you want to hear from me? - 22/04/2010 09:04:22 PM 1153 Views
Well, it depends. - 22/04/2010 10:56:39 PM 1196 Views
Re: Well, it depends. - 22/04/2010 11:21:47 PM 1259 Views
This isn't the only reason - 23/04/2010 02:59:35 AM 1191 Views
Re: Well, it depends. - 23/04/2010 04:58:40 AM 1282 Views
Re: No, we shouldn't - 22/04/2010 06:42:52 PM 1233 Views
See my reply to ranagrande below *NM* - 22/04/2010 09:02:06 PM 768 Views
and how will coordination help? - 22/04/2010 08:23:27 PM 1129 Views
P.S. could you also answer my question above to you, Kronin and Darth Katie? - 22/04/2010 09:05:47 PM 1236 Views
Both, I'd say. - 23/04/2010 05:25:38 AM 1100 Views
I'm pretty sure you can't change your vote, being Chair and all. *NM* - 21/04/2010 10:20:14 PM 753 Views
It's not explicitly stated, but - 22/04/2010 12:39:39 AM 1182 Views
Ya, I think you're right. Gher has a doublevote, but I have a one-time defense. - 22/04/2010 01:49:29 AM 1234 Views
I must've been mistaken. - 22/04/2010 02:29:19 AM 1172 Views
He can move his and the chair vote anywhere, just like normal - 22/04/2010 04:36:21 AM 1117 Views
So, Fox: What's up with this? - 22/04/2010 05:07:21 PM 1210 Views
Re: So, Fox: What's up with this? - 22/04/2010 07:24:46 PM 1324 Views
Clarify please. - 23/04/2010 05:18:20 AM 1281 Views
Re: Clarify please. - 23/04/2010 07:17:07 AM 1270 Views
Note from Moderator: Deadline Approaches, Current Vote Table - 23/04/2010 12:30:22 PM 1293 Views
So what will it take to get you abstainees into a vote today? - 23/04/2010 03:49:56 PM 1248 Views
Looks like fox is what everyone wants - 23/04/2010 04:02:56 PM 1237 Views
So Fox is at L-1 - 23/04/2010 04:39:25 PM 1209 Views
Re: So Fox is at L-1 - 23/04/2010 04:42:13 PM 1259 Views
Man, I don't like this at all. - 23/04/2010 05:27:58 PM 1247 Views
Fox and Ravens has been Lynched *NM* - 23/04/2010 05:56:19 PM 721 Views
Wait, isn't that 6 votes, not 7? *NM* - 23/04/2010 06:25:58 PM 629 Views
Well, in any case, I will Vote: Fox and Ravens - 23/04/2010 06:28:59 PM 1200 Views
I don't see how I could have been in your twilight message... - 23/04/2010 06:50:46 PM 1136 Views
Damn! - 23/04/2010 06:49:28 PM 1326 Views
Pardon my french please *NM* - 23/04/2010 07:01:31 PM 667 Views
Science triumphs again ! *NM* - 23/04/2010 07:25:36 PM 822 Views
Re: Damn! - 23/04/2010 08:11:58 PM 1281 Views
Day 2 Twilight – Fox and Ravens Lynched - 23/04/2010 06:46:43 PM 1209 Views
Hah! - 23/04/2010 07:12:38 PM 1343 Views
Whoa. . . - 24/04/2010 01:49:09 AM 1204 Views
And I shouldn't trust mine. I seriously thought Fox was innocent. *NM* - 24/04/2010 06:53:46 AM 703 Views
And I never trust my instincts, I trust Science! - 24/04/2010 08:47:16 AM 1185 Views
As well you should! - 24/04/2010 12:56:25 PM 1179 Views
*pokes the ghost* - 25/04/2010 01:16:28 AM 1182 Views
Re: *pokes the ghost* - 25/04/2010 01:24:13 AM 1254 Views
Re: *pokes the ghost* - 25/04/2010 05:55:39 AM 1150 Views
Wow, you were serious. - 25/04/2010 02:11:43 AM 1210 Views
Yes. Yes I am. - 25/04/2010 05:53:20 AM 1224 Views
Cheers! *NM* - 25/04/2010 03:12:32 AM 671 Views
Re: *pokes the ghost* - 25/04/2010 03:27:56 AM 1089 Views
Yay! - 25/04/2010 05:51:00 AM 1153 Views
Happy Birthday! *NM* - 25/04/2010 05:25:49 PM 645 Views
Happy Birthday!! Party hard! *NM* - 25/04/2010 07:37:49 AM 664 Views
Happy birthday!! *NM* - 25/04/2010 05:13:52 PM 632 Views
Happy birthday *NM* - 25/04/2010 07:06:56 PM 582 Views

Reply to Message