Day 1 Lunch Interlude
The young officer enters near noon, and whispers to Hieshyn, who frowns, nods, and rises from the table to leave, a pair of guards trailing him.
“Ladies and Gentlemen, I apologize for the interruption in your deliberations.” Says the young man, “... however this seems to be a good time to have lunch and let everyone stretch their legs.”
He nods toward the guard by the glass doors to the courtyard, letting in a draft of crisp spring air. Servants enter baring trays and tables and begin setting them up. Several of the guest rise and stretch, helping themselves to food or returning to their rooms or walking in the well-tended gardens of the courtyard.
“Well, our deliberations seem on hiatus.” Says a woman dressed all in black with black hair as she rises from the table. “Hopefully when Hieshyn returns we will have all eighteen pairs of eyes left to examine this situation with.”
A fat man dressed in red and gold waves a hand covered in rings at her as he begins eating with enthusiasm. “Seventeen and a half, by my count, and that do be assuming no one is killed walking in the garden.”
“Or poisoned at the table.” Says a red-headed woman as she pats the fat man on the shoulder, her green riding dress shifting in the breeze as she joins two men by the doorway to the courtyard. The fat man lowers the fork halfway to his mouth with a grimace.
After an hour or so of people eating, walking, and otherwise refreshing themselves the guest begin gathering again in the room. An older man in gray with a sword on his hip stands and motions to gain everyone's attention. “I would like to raise this point again, that we have an even number, though odd at the moment, and if we are to do this process of elimination we may have even numbers again, we should have a way to establish how we will deal with a tie-breaking vote.”
“I second that.” Says the Andoran man further down the table. “We should have rules for how to deal with these sort of eventualities. I propose we select someone each day, by vote, to serve as a tie-breaker and generally assist in making sure everyone gets a chance to have their say, and someone should defend the accused too.”
“Agreed” Says a Saldaean man who is cleaning his nails with a boot dagger. “We aren't a bunch of peasants acting like a mob after all, but I don't want it to be the same person every day.”
“Without any objection...” The older man in gray says, scanning the room for dissent, getting mostly shrugs and nods, “Very well, I open the floor to nominations.”
The Title “Chair” is now in play, it functions as follows:
The Chair is elected by vote of the players, a plurality rather than a majority is needed to elect, though the vote ends as soon as a majority is reached if other players have not voted. The position is vacated if a majority of players vote to do so and at dawn every day. Once a person has served, they can not serve the next day. This position exists as long as there are seven living players in the game.
Ability: The chair has a tie-breaking vote, which is represented in the game by that player having an extra vote, the 'chair vote' which is automatically cast with their own vote. This vote does not count towards the VNTL.
The Title 'Advocate' is now in play, it functions as follows:
The Advocate is elected, serves a term, and is removed as the chair, and the role exists the same, until only seven players remain in the game, active, RBIRL, inactive, or not, just as the chair. They can not serve consecutively, same as the Chair.
Ability: The Advocate can cast a 'defense vote' removing a vote from one player once and only once in a day. They do so under the normal voting rules (bold in message, but not in title) but for this vote they use “Defense Vote: Name”, they still have their normal vote, and can even if they choose defense vote and vote for the same person, though this would of course cancel out. The player targeted with the ability is considered to have had the number of votes needed to lynch them raised by one, so that with 13 players, where 7 is needed, 8 will now be needed, and at 14 players, where 8 is needed, 9 would be needed. An advocate who votes his/her defense vote for someone may not later remove it that day, they have effectively 'convinced' someone not to vote for that person, they may of course vote for that person themselves later, but they can not un-defend them, the argument in their defense has stuck in people's minds.
Both abilities are unaffected by any other voting restrictions or enhancements a player may have, counting as a single stand alone power.
To cast a vote for either position people must use the normal voting format, but use “Chair Vote: name” or “Advocate vote: name” to have their vote count. Although the moderator will likely formally comment that someone has been elected to either position, the players are expected to keep track of this themselves. Again, to gain the ability, only a plurality is necessary, not a majority, a majority will simply end the process. Once a player votes for either position, they can not unvote for it or vote for someone else. At the end of a 96 hour period, if not all votes have been cast, the winner will be whoever has the most votes, in event of a tie for the most, whoever received their last vote first will be the winner, to encourage haste in voting.
These rules are subject to change for the next 48 hours in event some flaw is found, players may making suggestions or arguments regarding it on the board or to the Moderator via NB during that time, however voting is now open and the 96 deadline to vote for either title has begun. Needless to say no one can hold both simultaneously, and this is only a one day position, both become open again at dawn of day 2, and voting open immediately thereafter.
Again, the format to vote is:
Chair Vote: Name
Advocate Vote: Name
This format is required for posting in titles of messages too, but need not be bold, you do not have to vote for both positions at once though that is probably preferable, and you can vote for the same person for both jobs. Votes for someone who is not a valid candidate (i.e. having served in the position the day before) will not count, you may still vote for someone else as the vote is simply considered meaningless.
In event someone receives a plurality of vote for both positions, they may pick which one they wish, and the runner up for the un-chosen position will assume the title.
Feel free to ask questions, and answer them if someone asks and you feel sure of the answer though I will try to answer any I see in a timely manner, I leave this to your better judgement, enjoy... this concludes the lunch interlude.
Update: To remove someone from a position on the same day they were elected, a majority of players must vote for it, as mentioned above, the format for that will be:
Vote: Remove Chair
Vote: Remove Advocate
Once vacated a new election initiates, with a 96 hour deadline starting from the time of the hammer vote, the new chair receives the extra vote and the old one loses it, but a new advocate only gains the defense vote if the old one has not yet used it. Players can not serve in the same position on consecutive days not terms, so if two people serve as chair on day 4, neither could serve on day 5. An obvious result of this is that the advocate could easily be the only person who voted for them self and immediately spend the defense vote on them self, essentially gaining the advantage of the position before they could be removed.
The young officer enters near noon, and whispers to Hieshyn, who frowns, nods, and rises from the table to leave, a pair of guards trailing him.
“Ladies and Gentlemen, I apologize for the interruption in your deliberations.” Says the young man, “... however this seems to be a good time to have lunch and let everyone stretch their legs.”
He nods toward the guard by the glass doors to the courtyard, letting in a draft of crisp spring air. Servants enter baring trays and tables and begin setting them up. Several of the guest rise and stretch, helping themselves to food or returning to their rooms or walking in the well-tended gardens of the courtyard.
“Well, our deliberations seem on hiatus.” Says a woman dressed all in black with black hair as she rises from the table. “Hopefully when Hieshyn returns we will have all eighteen pairs of eyes left to examine this situation with.”
A fat man dressed in red and gold waves a hand covered in rings at her as he begins eating with enthusiasm. “Seventeen and a half, by my count, and that do be assuming no one is killed walking in the garden.”
“Or poisoned at the table.” Says a red-headed woman as she pats the fat man on the shoulder, her green riding dress shifting in the breeze as she joins two men by the doorway to the courtyard. The fat man lowers the fork halfway to his mouth with a grimace.
After an hour or so of people eating, walking, and otherwise refreshing themselves the guest begin gathering again in the room. An older man in gray with a sword on his hip stands and motions to gain everyone's attention. “I would like to raise this point again, that we have an even number, though odd at the moment, and if we are to do this process of elimination we may have even numbers again, we should have a way to establish how we will deal with a tie-breaking vote.”
“I second that.” Says the Andoran man further down the table. “We should have rules for how to deal with these sort of eventualities. I propose we select someone each day, by vote, to serve as a tie-breaker and generally assist in making sure everyone gets a chance to have their say, and someone should defend the accused too.”
“Agreed” Says a Saldaean man who is cleaning his nails with a boot dagger. “We aren't a bunch of peasants acting like a mob after all, but I don't want it to be the same person every day.”
“Without any objection...” The older man in gray says, scanning the room for dissent, getting mostly shrugs and nods, “Very well, I open the floor to nominations.”
The Title “Chair” is now in play, it functions as follows:
The Chair is elected by vote of the players, a plurality rather than a majority is needed to elect, though the vote ends as soon as a majority is reached if other players have not voted. The position is vacated if a majority of players vote to do so and at dawn every day. Once a person has served, they can not serve the next day. This position exists as long as there are seven living players in the game.
Ability: The chair has a tie-breaking vote, which is represented in the game by that player having an extra vote, the 'chair vote' which is automatically cast with their own vote. This vote does not count towards the VNTL.
The Title 'Advocate' is now in play, it functions as follows:
The Advocate is elected, serves a term, and is removed as the chair, and the role exists the same, until only seven players remain in the game, active, RBIRL, inactive, or not, just as the chair. They can not serve consecutively, same as the Chair.
Ability: The Advocate can cast a 'defense vote' removing a vote from one player once and only once in a day. They do so under the normal voting rules (bold in message, but not in title) but for this vote they use “Defense Vote: Name”, they still have their normal vote, and can even if they choose defense vote and vote for the same person, though this would of course cancel out. The player targeted with the ability is considered to have had the number of votes needed to lynch them raised by one, so that with 13 players, where 7 is needed, 8 will now be needed, and at 14 players, where 8 is needed, 9 would be needed. An advocate who votes his/her defense vote for someone may not later remove it that day, they have effectively 'convinced' someone not to vote for that person, they may of course vote for that person themselves later, but they can not un-defend them, the argument in their defense has stuck in people's minds.
Both abilities are unaffected by any other voting restrictions or enhancements a player may have, counting as a single stand alone power.
To cast a vote for either position people must use the normal voting format, but use “Chair Vote: name” or “Advocate vote: name” to have their vote count. Although the moderator will likely formally comment that someone has been elected to either position, the players are expected to keep track of this themselves. Again, to gain the ability, only a plurality is necessary, not a majority, a majority will simply end the process. Once a player votes for either position, they can not unvote for it or vote for someone else. At the end of a 96 hour period, if not all votes have been cast, the winner will be whoever has the most votes, in event of a tie for the most, whoever received their last vote first will be the winner, to encourage haste in voting.
These rules are subject to change for the next 48 hours in event some flaw is found, players may making suggestions or arguments regarding it on the board or to the Moderator via NB during that time, however voting is now open and the 96 deadline to vote for either title has begun. Needless to say no one can hold both simultaneously, and this is only a one day position, both become open again at dawn of day 2, and voting open immediately thereafter.
Again, the format to vote is:
Chair Vote: Name
Advocate Vote: Name
This format is required for posting in titles of messages too, but need not be bold, you do not have to vote for both positions at once though that is probably preferable, and you can vote for the same person for both jobs. Votes for someone who is not a valid candidate (i.e. having served in the position the day before) will not count, you may still vote for someone else as the vote is simply considered meaningless.
In event someone receives a plurality of vote for both positions, they may pick which one they wish, and the runner up for the un-chosen position will assume the title.
Feel free to ask questions, and answer them if someone asks and you feel sure of the answer though I will try to answer any I see in a timely manner, I leave this to your better judgement, enjoy... this concludes the lunch interlude.
Update: To remove someone from a position on the same day they were elected, a majority of players must vote for it, as mentioned above, the format for that will be:
Vote: Remove Chair
Vote: Remove Advocate
Once vacated a new election initiates, with a 96 hour deadline starting from the time of the hammer vote, the new chair receives the extra vote and the old one loses it, but a new advocate only gains the defense vote if the old one has not yet used it. Players can not serve in the same position on consecutive days not terms, so if two people serve as chair on day 4, neither could serve on day 5. An obvious result of this is that the advocate could easily be the only person who voted for them self and immediately spend the defense vote on them self, essentially gaining the advantage of the position before they could be removed.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
This message last edited by Isaac on 30/03/2010 at 03:24:39 AM
Game 16, Day 1: In the Manor of Mad Muad (Ended)
25/03/2010 12:50:23 AM
- 22589 Views
General Info from the Moderator - Update 8
25/03/2010 12:50:48 AM
- 12202 Views
This needs to be done.
25/03/2010 02:50:28 AM
- 1652 Views
Vote: Isaac
25/03/2010 03:13:23 AM
- 1734 Views
Hey, I brought up your point, at least.
25/03/2010 03:21:45 AM
- 1625 Views
It was about Isaac's ridiculous 'lie' witch hunt.
25/03/2010 03:56:13 AM
- 1820 Views
Ahh, so you're not going to volunteer to be our Day 1 lynchee again? *NM*
25/03/2010 04:22:07 AM
- 1083 Views
I'm still annoyed my valient, yet unsuccessful, defense impressed no one.
25/03/2010 06:08:36 AM
- 1563 Views
I can't fault you
25/03/2010 06:32:40 AM
- 1746 Views
*Cough*
25/03/2010 04:14:31 AM
- 1853 Views
Yeah, amulet's gotta be a cop of some sort
25/03/2010 06:14:28 AM
- 1709 Views
What says the amulet does anything at all?
25/03/2010 12:56:14 PM
- 1626 Views
*sips ale*
25/03/2010 02:00:22 PM
- 1659 Views
You mean like when he found that "Power wrought" sword?
25/03/2010 02:24:00 PM
- 1686 Views
Re: You mean like when he found that "Power wrought" sword?
25/03/2010 02:54:26 PM
- 1678 Views
Re: *sips ale*
25/03/2010 02:46:26 PM
- 1665 Views
Hmmmm
26/03/2010 01:43:06 AM
- 1741 Views
Re: *Cough*
25/03/2010 06:57:32 AM
- 1585 Views
Probably not from Shadar Logoth
25/03/2010 03:24:55 PM
- 1587 Views
Re: Probably not from Shadar Logoth
25/03/2010 04:23:24 PM
- 1711 Views
i wouldn't count that out
25/03/2010 04:34:47 PM
- 1756 Views
I'm not counting Shadar Logoth things out, just saying the amulet is probably not. *NM*
25/03/2010 04:39:58 PM
- 973 Views
Ok! When it rains, it pours.
25/03/2010 07:29:16 AM
- 1545 Views
Another flavor question...
25/03/2010 03:45:48 PM
- 1708 Views
Maud's faking, and the guards think he's ridiculous?
25/03/2010 04:14:58 PM
- 1607 Views
Well, even Isaac refers to him as "Mad Muad"; all the more reason to keep an eye on him. *NM*
25/03/2010 10:01:23 PM
- 1030 Views
Anyone notice how slow the conversation is without Isaac? *NM*
25/03/2010 12:20:28 PM
- 972 Views
I think we're skirting around the best thing to think about: role messages
25/03/2010 04:24:29 PM
- 1588 Views
FT, jumping right in! I like it.
25/03/2010 06:48:55 PM
- 1714 Views
Hmph
25/03/2010 10:33:47 PM
- 1674 Views
EBWOP
25/03/2010 10:37:33 PM
- 1617 Views
I'm a soldier from the France of WoT -- Cairhien
25/03/2010 08:29:34 PM
- 1686 Views
What's with the quotes?
29/03/2010 07:11:23 PM
- 1669 Views
Mine doesn't say.
25/03/2010 09:00:26 PM
- 1455 Views
Are you sure it doesn't say?
25/03/2010 11:16:01 PM
- 1594 Views
I searched for it. It does not say where I am from. *NM*
25/03/2010 11:18:01 PM
- 1006 Views
This is just reminding me of the whole black/white light incident.
25/03/2010 11:30:06 PM
- 1664 Views
btw, is there a "Notes" section on this website? There are so many people to keep track of. *NM*
25/03/2010 08:30:56 PM
- 1053 Views
Re: btw, is there a "Notes" section on this website? There are so many people to keep track of.
26/03/2010 05:44:17 AM
- 1555 Views
Re: btw, is there a "Notes" section on this website? There are so many people to keep track of.
26/03/2010 07:59:32 PM
- 1662 Views
Re: Game 16, Day 1: In the Manor of Mad Muad *NM*
25/03/2010 10:19:22 PM
- 1002 Views
Well, some small supiciousness...
26/03/2010 01:28:20 AM
- 1739 Views
Re: Well, some small supiciousness...
26/03/2010 01:41:52 AM
- 1625 Views
Re: Well, some small supiciousness...
26/03/2010 05:34:33 AM
- 1653 Views
RBIRL
26/03/2010 02:06:43 AM
- 1676 Views
I think we should have some kind of RBIRL thread outside this main thread
26/03/2010 10:49:12 PM
- 1695 Views
I don't agree
26/03/2010 10:56:22 PM
- 1611 Views
Not outside of this thread, but maybe up top Isaac could put an Activity thread under his General
27/03/2010 12:07:13 AM
- 1513 Views
Origin Chart (Table)
26/03/2010 06:00:15 AM
- 1686 Views
Since everyone else seems to have told occupation/whatnot, I'm noble. *NM*
26/03/2010 12:21:03 PM
- 864 Views
Re: Origin Chart
26/03/2010 07:20:07 PM
- 1602 Views
Hah, thanks- I was editing from a Blackberry
27/03/2010 07:00:59 PM
- 1617 Views
What? Your Blackberry doesn't have Cairhienin in the spell checker?
28/03/2010 08:50:13 AM
- 1686 Views
Pretty sure the Droid has every made-up sf word ever created in its database
28/03/2010 06:33:12 PM
- 1555 Views
Let's quickly go over this point:
26/03/2010 07:17:24 PM
- 1765 Views
Sounds right to me
27/03/2010 07:07:49 PM
- 1812 Views
Let us concentrate on the threat we know of before being distracted by ghosts, shall we? *NM*
27/03/2010 09:52:50 PM
- 1010 Views
soooooo
27/03/2010 08:53:56 PM
- 1749 Views
Well, I brought up a topic above that only beet replied to.
27/03/2010 09:09:13 PM
- 1756 Views
Re: Well, I brought up a topic above that only beet replied to.
27/03/2010 09:43:11 PM
- 1675 Views
Actually, IIRC, this is the second time he's done this.
27/03/2010 10:04:19 PM
- 1637 Views
If he was a DF, he'd probably have posted at least once
27/03/2010 10:09:59 PM
- 1594 Views
Re: If he was a DF, he'd probably have posted at least once
27/03/2010 10:51:46 PM
- 1684 Views
No clue. It's something new Isaac's doing
28/03/2010 12:43:10 AM
- 1454 Views
I agree...
27/03/2010 10:38:48 PM
- 1641 Views
:o
28/03/2010 02:35:50 AM
- 1672 Views
you're kidding right
28/03/2010 03:02:40 AM
- 1649 Views
Re: you're kidding right
28/03/2010 03:19:18 AM
- 1623 Views
Re: you're kidding right
28/03/2010 03:50:25 AM
- 1615 Views
Isn't Muad himself a Saldaean?
28/03/2010 04:09:05 AM
- 1528 Views
How does that work?
28/03/2010 08:48:49 AM
- 1648 Views
Re: How does that work?
28/03/2010 08:33:21 PM
- 1811 Views
Re: How does that work?
28/03/2010 10:59:53 PM
- 1710 Views
i feel obligated to point this out
28/03/2010 11:26:29 PM
- 1792 Views
You misunderstand.
29/03/2010 12:02:39 AM
- 1704 Views
Well, why not? I'll go down the list and give my impressions of everyone.
28/03/2010 03:59:19 AM
- 1659 Views
Oops, not sure I can edit, but that second person is obviously supposed to be Artsapat. *NM*
28/03/2010 04:00:26 AM
- 1013 Views
Huh...
28/03/2010 07:59:49 AM
- 1724 Views
Re: Huh...
28/03/2010 09:01:22 AM
- 1693 Views
That is an evil thing for a Mod to do, and not boring at all.
28/03/2010 06:57:07 PM
- 1619 Views
There are Darkfriends here.
28/03/2010 08:14:45 PM
- 1663 Views
I repeat a thousand times, there are Darkfriends
29/03/2010 05:56:03 PM
- 1730 Views
Remind me never to play in a game you mod again. *NM*
29/03/2010 06:12:51 PM
- 1070 Views
Hey!
29/03/2010 09:32:25 PM
- 1676 Views
Lol I totally considered that as a possibility for all the freakiness!!
29/03/2010 11:07:55 PM
- 1625 Views
Yeah, changing the basic assumptions of the game can cause trouble...
29/03/2010 11:46:17 PM
- 1674 Views
Re: Yeah, changing the basic assumptions of the game can cause trouble...
30/03/2010 12:36:18 AM
- 1616 Views
Re: Well, why not? I'll go down the list and give my impressions of everyone.
28/03/2010 12:15:08 PM
- 1654 Views
Once again, I'm back. What the hELL is going on? *NM*
28/03/2010 05:06:10 AM
- 1067 Views
Ok, some thoughts:
28/03/2010 06:48:55 PM
- 1720 Views
Okay, I need 3 numbers... thank you
28/03/2010 08:36:22 PM
- 1567 Views
Do we ever find out what these numbers were for? *NM*
29/03/2010 09:22:36 PM
- 989 Views
It was randomly selecting certain things for the lunch interlude *NM*
29/03/2010 09:59:15 PM
- 999 Views
General Notes on RBIRL and VNTL
29/03/2010 02:13:05 AM
- 1677 Views
Re: General Notes on RBIRL and VNTL
29/03/2010 03:20:35 AM
- 1480 Views
Re: General Notes on RBIRL and VNTL
29/03/2010 04:55:55 AM
- 1773 Views
Event: Lunch Interlude
29/03/2010 06:12:01 AM
- 1752 Views
OK, so lets discuss this...
29/03/2010 08:18:46 AM
- 1639 Views
I like the idea of the Chair role
29/03/2010 07:15:03 PM
- 1488 Views
The persons at our lunch table
29/03/2010 09:16:29 AM
- 1664 Views
A couple of things...
29/03/2010 11:03:25 AM
- 1687 Views
Let's all just share our descriptions, shall we?
29/03/2010 12:47:39 PM
- 1613 Views
On that note.
29/03/2010 04:57:19 PM
- 1672 Views
Descriptions are probably random if they are not flavor-appropriate.
29/03/2010 06:24:15 PM
- 1639 Views
That's a good idea, actually
29/03/2010 05:24:07 PM
- 1625 Views
Sidenote: I'm still updating the "Origin" chart with the info you guts post.
29/03/2010 05:25:58 PM
- 1569 Views
i wasn't in the interlude but i have dark, slightly grey hair and wearing a pale red dress *NM*
29/03/2010 10:08:42 PM
- 950 Views
Wait
29/03/2010 06:06:06 PM
- 1778 Views
EBWOP: I ought to read all the posts before I start posting, shouldn't I?
29/03/2010 06:15:09 PM
- 1664 Views
Isaac: Can our vote to elect people to Chair and Advocate be unvoted? Or is it binding?
29/03/2010 06:43:01 PM
- 1629 Views
Apparently not.
29/03/2010 07:38:45 PM
- 1675 Views
If they're not binding, I'm just about ready to cast two random votes
29/03/2010 09:42:06 PM
- 1699 Views
They are binding, since a majority in unnecessary...
29/03/2010 10:03:35 PM
- 1428 Views
Does it even matter right now? Let's just lynch someone and worry about it later...
29/03/2010 10:07:42 PM
- 1654 Views
Re: Does it even matter right now? Let's just lynch someone and worry about it later...
29/03/2010 10:11:04 PM
- 1728 Views
If none else has more by a deadline?
30/03/2010 02:08:52 AM
- 1545 Views
Covered that in the rules
30/03/2010 02:24:15 AM
- 1525 Views
Chair Vote: Fanatic Templar - Advocate Vote: White Flame of Tar Valon
30/03/2010 08:19:25 AM
- 1723 Views
I have a proposal. I think we can assume Hieshyn's been modkilled,
29/03/2010 05:38:31 PM
- 1671 Views
Let's not get too caught up in descriptions
29/03/2010 06:31:02 PM
- 1638 Views
on a slightly more benign note
29/03/2010 07:25:15 PM
- 1818 Views
EBWOP
29/03/2010 07:31:46 PM
- 1641 Views
Exactly.
29/03/2010 09:37:43 PM
- 1621 Views
Yeah, unfortunately I don't think it's going to be as easy as identifying DFs by description.
29/03/2010 08:20:43 PM
- 1533 Views
Sure they can change clothes and stuff, but aside from Aes Sedai using MoM
29/03/2010 09:18:43 PM
- 1643 Views
Darkfriends out on a kill are going to disguise themselves though.
29/03/2010 11:20:23 PM
- 1549 Views
List of Mod-Mentioned Appearances (Table)
29/03/2010 06:04:27 PM
- 1725 Views
The fat man in red and gold is Illianer, too (fistofpain
29/03/2010 08:30:53 PM
- 1550 Views
I'm putting people on the list when their description matches the mod's.
30/03/2010 01:59:49 AM
- 1654 Views
Saldean nobles are still soldiers
29/03/2010 09:41:06 PM
- 1679 Views
I have just found out that I am in fact not the man cleaning my nails with the dagger
30/03/2010 04:31:43 AM
- 1734 Views
So it's Bergioyn then, since Yunalesca is a nobleWOman. Good to know... *NM*
30/03/2010 04:33:41 AM
- 998 Views
But Bergioyn is the redhead. *NM*
30/03/2010 04:50:24 AM
- 998 Views
O_o
30/03/2010 05:38:38 AM
- 1908 Views
Oh now, that is interesting.
30/03/2010 07:03:43 AM
- 1649 Views
Well, I don't think isaac really made a mistake, since I got the NB from him.
30/03/2010 08:35:49 PM
- 1729 Views
Candidates for Chair and Advocate
30/03/2010 12:05:01 AM
- 1658 Views
Why those two? *NM*
30/03/2010 12:27:52 AM
- 1027 Views
At this point, a better question might be "why NOT those two?" *NM*
30/03/2010 12:38:49 AM
- 1019 Views
Yeah, I'll do it.
30/03/2010 02:30:28 AM
- 1645 Views
Isaac, can we vote No-Chair and No-Advocate like we can vote No-Lynch? *NM*
30/03/2010 09:22:55 PM
- 1020 Views
Actually, I think it might be even better to put a DF in the position of holding chair or advocate.
31/03/2010 05:25:20 AM
- 1622 Views
Okay, I got a little busy, but I'm here.
30/03/2010 03:15:51 AM
- 1712 Views
Alright, you sound like that dude from the interlude. I'm putting you on. *NM*
30/03/2010 03:21:41 AM
- 973 Views
Sure, FT can have the chair- I don't object. Day 1, I don't think it matters. *NM*
30/03/2010 05:44:50 AM
- 915 Views
A substitution will occur
30/03/2010 01:53:48 PM
- 1739 Views
So, no Modkill, but rather a replacement.
30/03/2010 02:46:28 PM
- 1721 Views
Hieshyn's role is irrelevant in the switching (transmigration?) process.
30/03/2010 06:26:47 PM
- 1689 Views
First things we need from Blaine/Hieshyn are his nationality and description.
30/03/2010 08:59:57 PM
- 1558 Views
Thoughts on lynching?
30/03/2010 08:57:21 PM
- 1553 Views
ghost busters?
30/03/2010 09:37:46 PM
- 1664 Views
Hm. "Former Tinker" could be suspicious
30/03/2010 11:19:44 PM
- 1820 Views
That claim actually doesn't sound that good.
31/03/2010 01:19:12 AM
- 1603 Views
Yup. That's why I was hoping for an explanation...
31/03/2010 01:27:13 AM
- 1669 Views
Has he posted since you asked him?
31/03/2010 01:57:00 AM
- 1726 Views
EBWOP
31/03/2010 02:02:26 AM
- 1656 Views
Re: EBWOP
31/03/2010 03:09:03 AM
- 1667 Views
You can say "Who would be stupid enough to do that"
31/03/2010 03:14:13 AM
- 1589 Views
And another experienced player...
31/03/2010 04:53:40 AM
- 1666 Views
Aram isn't the only former tinker in the books
31/03/2010 01:58:45 AM
- 1574 Views
I believe they may still consider themselves Tinkers.
31/03/2010 02:53:43 AM
- 1719 Views
Re: Thoughts on lynching?
31/03/2010 04:53:09 AM
- 1645 Views
My only "thought about it" suspect is Talic. As for gut feelings...
31/03/2010 07:20:56 AM
- 1639 Views
Advocate Vote: beetnemesis
31/03/2010 08:03:23 PM
- 1603 Views
Yeah, that was my main objective
01/04/2010 11:19:37 PM
- 1571 Views
Substitution Made - Quick Summary of Game Events
31/03/2010 08:39:08 AM
- 1653 Views
Player overview (Table)
31/03/2010 09:37:11 AM
- 1630 Views
When did we meet
31/03/2010 09:52:00 PM
- 1611 Views
RBIRL and votes
31/03/2010 09:23:39 AM
- 1821 Views
Re: RBIRL and votes
31/03/2010 01:05:40 PM
- 1584 Views
Plus, obviously if we KNOW someone's a DF, we'll lynch them
31/03/2010 06:12:36 PM
- 1689 Views
Exactly
31/03/2010 09:31:36 PM
- 1634 Views
Re: Exactly
02/04/2010 02:01:27 AM
- 1640 Views
Hypothetical scenario:
02/04/2010 04:30:45 AM
- 1667 Views
The DFs aren't dumb though. It's naive to think they'll simply do the town's bidding.
31/03/2010 09:43:04 PM
- 1471 Views
Re: The DFs aren't dumb though. It's naive to think they'll simply do the town's bidding.
31/03/2010 09:51:34 PM
- 1630 Views
Plus, there's ALWAYS the chance of giving letting the DFs manipulate us
31/03/2010 11:18:17 PM
- 1570 Views
So, Blaine- what's your nationality, appearance, and reason for being here? *NM*
31/03/2010 11:19:26 PM
- 971 Views
Not sure what's up with the site
01/04/2010 10:48:35 AM
- 1540 Views
I'm almost certain it's just an evil April Fools joke á Ben. *NM*
01/04/2010 11:20:16 AM
- 825 Views
Okay, after I checked the Community board, I'm ceratin it's ajoke. A great one at that too, IMO. *NM*
01/04/2010 11:30:15 AM
- 925 Views
Argh. *I'm certain it's a joke* not ceratin and ajoke. Damn typos! *NM*
01/04/2010 11:31:51 AM
- 977 Views
Probably a prank, of course the site wasn't loading at all for a bit
01/04/2010 12:10:48 PM
- 1699 Views
My/Hieshyn's nationality + description
01/04/2010 09:42:47 PM
- 1643 Views
Hmm...
02/04/2010 01:30:48 AM
- 1687 Views
Hm... well, we have three claimed Saldaeans
02/04/2010 01:55:04 AM
- 1611 Views
Re: Hm... well, we have three claimed Saldaeans
02/04/2010 02:10:28 AM
- 1571 Views
Doesn't sound like a cop. Probably a DF.
02/04/2010 04:34:18 AM
- 1658 Views
Re: Doesn't sound like a cop. Probably a DF.
02/04/2010 05:28:21 AM
- 1574 Views
979 NE, friends. No Asha'man here.
02/04/2010 05:56:36 AM
- 1670 Views
Re: My/Hieshyn's nationality + description
03/04/2010 01:47:08 AM
- 1528 Views
Re: My/Hieshyn's nationality + description
03/04/2010 02:35:11 AM
- 1530 Views
Vote: Blaine
03/04/2010 03:48:04 AM
- 1559 Views
Also, you just claimed to be a Whitecloak for basically no reason. *NM*
03/04/2010 05:39:08 AM
- 1035 Views
Besides the fact that it's the truth?
03/04/2010 08:30:00 AM
- 1524 Views
Hmm, I was under the assumption that the Whitecloak might have a role or something
03/04/2010 09:12:14 AM
- 1579 Views
Re: Hmm, I was under the assumption that the Whitecloak might have a role or something
03/04/2010 09:22:24 AM
- 1418 Views
Fanatic-Templar and White Flame have been elected Chair and Advocate respectively
02/04/2010 08:29:32 AM
- 1552 Views
OK, can we kill someone now?
02/04/2010 08:43:33 AM
- 1489 Views
You could before
02/04/2010 08:53:40 AM
- 1488 Views
Oh, that wasn't a mod question
02/04/2010 04:17:25 PM
- 1588 Views
Our voter turnout was pitiful...
02/04/2010 11:02:49 AM
- 1586 Views
Well, I didn't really care that much
02/04/2010 02:46:14 PM
- 1543 Views
white on rice? i don't get it *NM*
02/04/2010 04:37:17 PM
- 940 Views
Vote: Talic
02/04/2010 06:02:28 PM
- 1614 Views
Re: Vote: Talic
02/04/2010 08:11:34 PM
- 1597 Views
Aram did not turn out all that well.
03/04/2010 01:50:26 AM
- 1515 Views
So did Masema. And he was Shienar. As are you. Should I jump to a conclusion here? *NM*
03/04/2010 01:53:56 AM
- 830 Views
Well, technically, I'm Malkieri.
03/04/2010 03:31:40 AM
- 1476 Views
We know a few more Malkieri.
03/04/2010 05:19:55 AM
- 1576 Views
Oh, and Bukama.
03/04/2010 05:23:14 AM
- 1577 Views
Yeah, but Bukama's dead.
03/04/2010 08:05:41 AM
- 1548 Views
Time-wise I'm not sure Bukama or Ryne would be dead yet
03/04/2010 08:51:34 AM
- 1669 Views
Most of New Spring was immediately after the Aiel War, though. *NM*
03/04/2010 09:09:18 AM
- 1640 Views
Yes, but a few months passed before Moraine was raised, IIRC
03/04/2010 09:23:53 AM
- 1531 Views
Not sure how accurate it is, but according to the timeline at encyclopedia-wot
03/04/2010 10:30:59 AM
- 1637 Views
Re: Not sure how accurate it is, but according to the timeline at encyclopedia-wot
03/04/2010 10:41:55 AM
- 1344 Views
Re: Well, technically, I'm Malkieri.
03/04/2010 09:17:34 PM
- 1515 Views
This thread
03/04/2010 06:28:13 AM
- 1673 Views
We could post on the Commie Board to gloat .
03/04/2010 09:37:38 AM
- 1718 Views
How many did the Scratch thread have? *NM*
06/04/2010 03:30:28 AM
- 904 Views
After they started spam hundred-posting? I don't really want to know. *NM*
06/04/2010 06:00:01 AM
- 879 Views
Vote Table: 5 Apr, Monday 11:37 AM EST
03/04/2010 09:48:46 AM
- 1586 Views
Everyone! Let's kill Blaine! Hooray!
03/04/2010 09:59:50 AM
- 1568 Views
Actually, I'd like to hear from Talic before the day ends. Otherwise, I hope he is replaced/modkilld
03/04/2010 10:25:59 AM
- 1400 Views
Maybe replaced by Blaine?
03/04/2010 11:10:48 AM
- 1564 Views
On substitution
03/04/2010 11:58:35 AM
- 1498 Views
What the heck is a Tank-F? *NM*
03/04/2010 06:29:02 PM
- 899 Views
A protective screen for me and Ranagrande last game *NM*
03/04/2010 06:40:44 PM
- 929 Views
Internet has been down
03/04/2010 03:46:14 PM
- 1531 Views
Ok, I'm caught up and....
03/04/2010 05:41:11 PM
- 1539 Views
Isaac seems to like redheads. I approve. *NM*
03/04/2010 05:47:18 PM
- 835 Views
anyone else feeling slightly confused? *NM*
03/04/2010 09:14:32 PM
- 907 Views
Yes ma'am
03/04/2010 09:26:27 PM
- 1523 Views
don't call me ma'am, i am a miss.
03/04/2010 10:22:37 PM
- 1436 Views
And I am a damoiseau .
04/04/2010 12:09:04 AM
- 1357 Views
So can I then finally put you down as a woman?
04/04/2010 03:40:29 PM
- 1486 Views
Damoiseau is male
04/04/2010 06:28:05 PM
- 1559 Views
Woah...
03/04/2010 09:54:54 PM
- 1511 Views
So what can I do to alleviate your suspicions ?
04/04/2010 03:44:11 AM
- 1485 Views
Grrr. Ok, here are my thoughts (in short, kill him)
04/04/2010 07:32:56 AM
- 1677 Views
He already claimed to be vanilla, right after he claimed to be a Whitecloak.
04/04/2010 07:49:10 AM
- 1612 Views
Re: He already claimed to be vanilla, right after he claimed to be a Whitecloak.
04/04/2010 07:55:56 AM
- 1576 Views
Blaine already roleclaimed
04/04/2010 07:51:33 AM
- 1532 Views
What? What tone?
04/04/2010 08:37:22 AM
- 1572 Views
You come across as more than a little bloodthirsty sometimes. *NM*
05/04/2010 04:17:36 AM
- 860 Views
Bloooooooooood
05/04/2010 05:49:00 AM
- 1602 Views
Actually, the Shaido DID invade Amadicia, but it was only mentioned in passing.
06/04/2010 11:24:39 PM
- 1436 Views
Even if he is a Darkfriend, it's a simple mistake.
04/04/2010 08:08:36 AM
- 1482 Views
Re: Even if he is a Darkfriend, it's a simple mistake.
04/04/2010 08:45:33 AM
- 1407 Views
Enough of this nonsense.
04/04/2010 06:22:51 PM
- 1529 Views
Hm. Remember, we don't really "roleplay" here, Talic. Now gang, what do we do?
05/04/2010 02:34:54 AM
- 1473 Views
I'm actually curious to see what the Darkfriends do about it during the Night. *NM*
05/04/2010 03:01:30 AM
- 828 Views
Re: Hm. Remember, we don't really "roleplay" here, Talic. Now gang, what do we do?
06/04/2010 11:30:26 PM
- 1394 Views
An AS could really be anything. Hell, anyone can be pretty much everything.
07/04/2010 06:49:53 AM
- 1459 Views
But we can't know that.
04/04/2010 06:32:16 PM
- 1434 Views
Re: But we can't know that.
04/04/2010 08:58:43 PM
- 1582 Views
No, I don't believe that, but this has, again, nothing to do with my beliefs.
05/04/2010 02:33:29 AM
- 1460 Views
So, for clarification: Blaine's caught in a lie, therefore he dies- end of story?
05/04/2010 02:42:16 AM
- 1679 Views
Pretty much it, yes.
05/04/2010 02:59:01 AM
- 1505 Views
Right. So, the Aiel never actually attacked Amadecia
05/04/2010 05:38:51 AM
- 1367 Views
I think I agree
06/04/2010 11:36:38 PM
- 1560 Views
Basically, if he could screw up his real role message, he could screw up a fake one
07/04/2010 06:44:36 AM
- 1590 Views
Vote: Fox and Ravens
04/04/2010 07:53:58 PM
- 1641 Views
I feel like people are reading a lot more into that than they should
05/04/2010 02:25:49 AM
- 1384 Views
Oh, I don't really think he was trying to nefariously manipulate the town.
05/04/2010 02:57:47 AM
- 1505 Views
I think we're getting some weird mixups in votes here.
05/04/2010 04:27:28 PM
- 1483 Views
Re: I think we're getting some weird mixups in votes here.
05/04/2010 05:13:23 PM
- 1475 Views
Re: I think we're getting some weird mixups in votes here.
05/04/2010 06:30:00 PM
- 1484 Views
Eh. I feel Talic's situation at least makes sense
05/04/2010 07:03:17 PM
- 1400 Views
Well if he's an Aes Sedai, he can't lie. Three Oaths, etc. (unless they're Black Ajah) *NM*
06/04/2010 11:47:36 PM
- 827 Views
Nope, not how it works
07/04/2010 06:30:51 AM
- 1568 Views
it was set just after the trolloc wars, the oaths wern't around then *NM*
07/04/2010 01:30:35 PM
- 830 Views
Timeline wise, it's about five months after the Aiel War ended and Rand was born
05/04/2010 07:15:12 PM
- 1496 Views
The bottom line is...
05/04/2010 03:24:44 AM
- 1563 Views
Re: The bottom line is...
05/04/2010 04:57:02 AM
- 1335 Views
He's not saying "please don't kill me"
05/04/2010 05:01:41 AM
- 1296 Views
Pretty much
05/04/2010 05:27:12 AM
- 1465 Views
I'd agree- except, your explanation also has a hole
05/04/2010 05:42:20 AM
- 1515 Views
Yup, this pretty much sums it up.
05/04/2010 06:40:08 AM
- 1333 Views
Re: I'd agree- except, your explanation also has a hole
05/04/2010 07:50:54 AM
- 1594 Views
Yes, but you said you joined because they invaded your country
05/04/2010 08:36:45 AM
- 1527 Views
Exactly, I made a mistake and thought our game was set during the time of the novels.
06/04/2010 01:36:44 AM
- 1660 Views
My issue was with the reason you say you joined the Whitecloaks
06/04/2010 06:43:00 AM
- 1478 Views
I'm going to risk giving Blaine a lifeline to hide behind, but...
06/04/2010 03:51:42 PM
- 1467 Views
But...doesn't something still not even add up here?
06/04/2010 08:44:43 PM
- 1322 Views
I don't see why not
06/04/2010 10:10:22 PM
- 1435 Views
This really works either way, though. And... where does this leave us?
07/04/2010 06:37:30 AM
- 1366 Views
Well
07/04/2010 12:16:41 AM
- 1539 Views
But you don't have to take my word for it. Hobo also specifically mentioned the "Aiel War"
07/04/2010 01:22:47 AM
- 1463 Views
As I said above, the Shaido DID invade Amadicia. But it was not a big, medium, or even small deal. *NM*
06/04/2010 11:54:28 PM
- 863 Views
Vote: Blaine
06/04/2010 05:12:08 AM
- 1480 Views
Actually, I'm witholding judgment on Talic, now that he's explained himself
06/04/2010 06:35:48 AM
- 1440 Views
Re: Actually, I'm witholding judgment on Talic, now that he's explained himself
07/04/2010 12:24:46 AM
- 1407 Views
Re: Actually, I'm witholding judgment on Talic, now that he's explained himself
07/04/2010 01:57:01 AM
- 1519 Views
Does someone feel like hammering? Or being really eloquent, and getting us a new target?
07/04/2010 07:31:32 AM
- 1540 Views
RBIRL - I'm super sick right now, and I propably won't be much online. I'll try though. *NM*
08/04/2010 09:01:28 AM
- 833 Views