Active Users:380 Time:27/04/2025 05:26:30 AM
Thanks, all right let's review it Isaac Send a noteboard - 19/02/2010 11:41:19 AM
He seems to be as good a candidate as any right now, and the day's discussion does seem to be winding down. I'm not going to vote just yet, as I'd like to see how he responds, but I likely will if nothing else comes up.


My first take on this (I have not yet read your comments other than a skim to see you'd made them) is that this translates as:

Townie: He's as good a candidate as any other, apparently better form what you said, I'm not ready to vote for him yet... since you emphasized you were trying to get him to talk, my saying I'm willing to vote for him as is can only furhter encourage him.

DF: He's as good a candidate as any other, apparently better form what you said, I'm not ready to vote for him yet... but if the case get's stronger, he'd make a good frame-up.

Thoughts: Comments are insufficiently long to determine specific intent, originate from a player with no established MO, and do not seem particular out of the ordinary. However, base don your own aggressive approach on it, and your comment that "While I'm not entirely suspicious of him, I really want him talking. If he doesn't talk, we might as well lynch him anyway if we end up with no one else to vote for." could easily be seen as an outright request for support, or easily be viewed by a sympathetic townie as reason to join you in taking a firm stance to get Hieshyn talking.

First thing's first. This post is my main argument here. Obviously, my point is that he jumped on it pretty strong. THere was admittedly no evidence other than lack of talking. I scrounged up what I could and put some sauce on it and that was my post of Hieshyn. Then, immediately, probably thinking he could get a quick lynch because of the inactivity (of the game and Hieshyn), he jumped right on and said he would vote for him without giving any explanation.


Well, his response is stronger than player-average, but not out of the ordinary, I've seen parallel levels of aggression from townies and DFs, no real pattern to it, I'd go so far as to say townies do this more often then DFs, of course they make up the majority of the players so it's not exactly contradictory evidence. But yes, I definetly see what is being regarded as suspicious there, but I'm inclined to think he was just engaging in active, threatening support to get Hieshyn talking than really trying to say, against all common sense, that he was fine with randomly lynching someone. DF's do make mistakes like that but I can see a pretty straight forward Occam's Razor on this one.

Just adding the text in here:

No, it's actually L-1
ranagrande Send a noteboard - 05/02/2010 03:17:32 AM
I'm still not convinced that he's a darkfriend, but as has been pointed out by several people, there are advantages here even if we do end up lynching a townie. Also, I really don't have another suspect at this time to make a case against.

So I am going to

Vote: Fanatic-Templar.

I'm sure tomorrow we will have much more to discuss.


Once again, without reading your comments first. This is certainly something a DF would say, but the reason they'd say it is because it's also something a townie would say. I know you and beet didn't vote for FT, but those of us who did, this is pretty much what we were all thinking. Probably why none of us leapt on the statement, I personally said basically the same thing.

It's just his vote for FT. He voted when everyone else was. I assumed there was bussing and IIRC, I said as much. He voted very quickly and very late for FT. While this isn't a good stand alone point, it does emphasize my first quote.


Well, I know we always say DFs tend to join a lynch late, but I'm not sure how true that's really been. That lynch went down a bit strangely because it was so WIFOM, we argued about it for days trying to come up with ideas and alternates, then we say an uptick in comments that basically were 'we're stil waiting for options, but the clocks running out and nobody's given us any' then someone voted (I think it was fist) and basically everyone else just rolled their vote in as they showed up, their wasn't really any more debate after the first vote, just people recording their reasons for the vote, mostly their excuses for voting if the vote went sour.

Take Kronin's statement, which roughly paralleled the others:

Vote: Fanatic-Templar
Kronin al'Sulc Send a noteboard - 04/02/2010 08:58:16 PM
I feel like we've just about reached a dead-end, and I feel he's a likely to be guilty as not. Hell, either way, we have some information.


Now, this is basically the same thing ranagrande said, just a couple earlier. DK just said 'for all the reasons previously stated' which had been established as basically what ranagrande and Kronin said. Now, Napoleon, who we know for sure had townie motives, said:

I agree with D_K actually
Napoleon62 Send a noteboard - 04/02/2010 08:32:09 PM
I'm not really sure that F-T is a DF but I don't really support a random lynch when we have a perfectly viable canditate right in front of us. So...

Vote: Fanatic-Templar


Which is in keeping with all the others, no different than ranagrande's. It's not that a DF might not say that too, just that it's not a comment that can be used to distinguish them from town.

Another:

This on the other hand... We can't allow ourselves to be so focused on a single target that broadening our horizons should elicit such a negative response, and especially not on Day 1.

More accusations will make the game more active and create more conversation. More conversation will create more opportunity for darkfriends to trip themselves up. Even if we don't recognize it now, that could be invaluable later on.

Also, it's not like the case against F-T will disappear just because someone named a new suspect. I said earlier that my initial response to the Miller roleclaim was to believe him, and I still do for the most part, but I would welcome any evidence or conjecture to the contrary. Again, it is more activity and more conversation, which can only help us.

And now I have to say, if I wasn't suspicious of you before, I am now.

The suspicious part is his last statement here. It was in reference to Kronin saying that he'll be focusing on beet for trying to change our targets if FT turns out to be bad. Why are you so suspicious of Kronin for saying that he'll be focusing on beet? Honestly, to me, it just looks like your trying to make us leery of Kronin because he could be a threat to you. You may have your own interpretation but this is what it says to me.


That one seems pretty clear, beet was raising other targets, and Kronin (as the other target) told beet that he'd be gunning for him next if FT turned out guilty. Ranagrande is telling Kronin why he think it's important to explore other options and maximize debate, and that Kronin's threat to beet, which gives the appearance of trying to shut down alternate debate, makes ranagrande suspicious of him. In context, it is actually a fairly pro-town comment. Now, I agree with Kronin's sentiment, obviously if FT had turned out guilty we'd have strung beet up, but it's very clear from the context that ranagrande was accusing KRonin of being suspicious because his message could easily be taken as an attempt to shut down attempts to find alternate targets. Beet was the only one really doing much on that score, at that point I'd already said I would not, as I was angry over the respons eI'd gotten from exploring FT's case, and no one was really raising anything else. No, this comment really is more of minor point in ranagrande's favor than against.

As Katie said, Blaine has yet to post in this game. I'd say we could wait a bit and see if we get a modkill, but Gher has stated that all players are accounted for so he must have messaged him or something.


There's sounds like nothing more than usual player agitation about inactivity, which I could see your viewing as suspicious when the impression was that ranagrande himself was pretty inactive, and their for might be flavoring your thoughts, but as this was not the case...

Now, this comment actually predates FT's RC, and follows MPD discussions, and is in reply to a long post by me in which I was discussing ways to avoid tampering by the DFs while narrowing odds if we were forced to use a random lynch. I was asking people for ways to narrow down random selectees, suggesting we do our nominal potluck out of inactives is hardly surprising.

Same deal here. So Blaine hasn't posted yet and you're suspicious of him?? I mean, maybe if you were frustrated or dissapointed or just straight up ready to lynch, but suspicious? I don't see why you have cause for that.


I would say I consider finding a total inactive suspicious for that reason isn't exactly the best logic, but it's also not bad either. Context being important, this comment seemed totally in place as a reply to my own comments, of course, I was getting ready to suggest we pick our 'pool of three or four' as players who posted least, as punshiment for inactivity and/or encouragement to talk more, so I viewed Blaine's comments as a handy thing that saved me having to openly say it. Now, ironically this makes his comment in reply to your Hieshyn vote more likely to have been of the 'firm support of the threat to lynch if Hieshyn doesn't speak up' scenario. Regardless of his alignment, both comments seem to indicate that ranagrande is of the 'threaten to kill people if they don't participate more' mindset (which I share, perhaps why it is easy for me to regard his comments that way) and as we've seen, his posting numbers indicate this statement is not out of place or hypocritical.

These two following posts are a big one too.

That sounds like solid reasoning to me
ranagrande Send a noteboard - 30/01/2010 10:07:05 PM
I think I might be inclined to believe you.


This is in reply to FT giving his reasoning for the Day 1 miller claim, immediatly in reply to my own comment to FT's original RC post. I had not yet inserted any of the counter-reasoning for why there were advantages for a DF to make this claim. This sounds like a townie expressing limited support, who later changed after arguments were presented and no alternates showed up, this seems quit ein keeping with his later statements. Let me point out DK rpeplied to say the same, later expressed the same doubts, and later voted for the same reasons as ranagrande. So did many other players.

Yeah it is...
ranagrande Send a noteboard - 31/01/2010 04:55:29 PM
I had stopped paying close attention after my death in the last game too, but I still noticed Yunalesca's Miller claim. I don't really see how F-T could have missed it.


I maintain that it was very weird for FT not to know that and certainly it makes sense to be surprised that he didn't. Only later, as I pointed out, did we have reaosn not to think that was surprising, that Miller never appeared in any title of a message and that FT had posted he was very busy and distracted in a different game thread at a parallel time. Considering he was agreeing with me, DK, and Kronin at the time, that the comment seemed unlikely and dubious, this doesn't seem out of place. Once again, all it seems to note is that ranagrande was apparently saying and thinking along the same lines as the other players who voted for FT and were talkative, namely, me, Kronin, and DK, I tihnk you'd agree, it is most unlikely all four of us are on the same side as DFs.

This second post is in response to a post saying that the miller thing was something FT shouldn't have missed. Basically, I'm saying that his thoughts are quite scattered. He's changing sides here, visibly, which is something DFs tend to do. It's obviously not much but in a day, he went from agreeing with FT back to saying he didn't like what he's saying to eventually voting for him. This wishy washy posting makes me quite leery.


He changed no sides. Again, his comment sparallel those of most others who expressed initial tentative support of FT's claim then withdrew it as the possibility it might be a legit DF tactic and the lack of alternate candidates became clear. Wishy=washy posting is common to DFs, but it is also common to townies, and everyone was wishy-washy on FT who voted for him, mostly in the same way and degree as ranagrande expresses just in keeping with their own style.

And I think this is enough posts to call it quits. I could probably pull out more but I was able to take some little things out of a few posts. Maybe this is enough to clarify for you.


Well, I appreciate your taking the time and yes, it definetly clarifies, and I'm glad to see I wasn't missing some buried comment of his that was supsicious. I just do not, as I wrote above, have an inclination to regard those comments as suspcious.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Reply to message
Rafo Mafia 4 Day 2 is over. - 08/02/2010 06:53:53 PM 3442 Views
List of Players - 08/02/2010 06:58:04 PM 1239 Views
This is great, thanks! *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:19:25 AM 769 Views
Vote: Hieshyn - 15/02/2010 03:25:25 AM 1332 Views
Crap! - 15/02/2010 03:26:24 AM 1217 Views
Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 08/02/2010 08:53:49 PM 1383 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 08/02/2010 09:28:57 PM 1184 Views
Hey, by the way, are you Mafia? - 08/02/2010 09:34:46 PM 1333 Views
I am not Hopper - 08/02/2010 10:37:55 PM 1252 Views
Maybe I am AWESOME - 08/02/2010 11:19:48 PM 1316 Views
Now that's a questionable claim. - 09/02/2010 02:36:25 AM 1284 Views
Hah! You underestimate my ego, madam! - 09/02/2010 06:25:28 AM 1182 Views
A few questions and comments - 08/02/2010 09:29:06 PM 1261 Views
Re: A few questions and comments - 08/02/2010 10:31:32 PM 1263 Views
Re: A few questions and comments - 08/02/2010 11:23:07 PM 1056 Views
Third Party - 08/02/2010 09:43:57 PM 1121 Views
Re: Third Party - 08/02/2010 10:34:38 PM 1199 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 09/02/2010 02:47:03 AM 1243 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 09/02/2010 03:53:18 AM 1221 Views
I thinking Lynching F-T was the right thing to do. - 09/02/2010 04:45:13 AM 1198 Views
RBIRL ... test tomorrow. Probably not going to post tonight. *NM* - 09/02/2010 12:03:38 AM 753 Views
You know what? - 09/02/2010 01:17:52 AM 1210 Views
NO! - 09/02/2010 01:31:57 AM 1166 Views
Re: You know what? - 09/02/2010 01:34:42 AM 1151 Views
Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 01:57:39 AM 1208 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 02:38:45 AM 1201 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 03:29:32 AM 1256 Views
Oh, I learned all those lessons last year. - 09/02/2010 04:05:04 AM 1161 Views
Re: Oh, I learned all those lessons last year. - 09/02/2010 04:50:41 AM 1290 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 03:36:28 AM 1235 Views
Well thanks for the encouragement. - 09/02/2010 04:14:50 AM 1396 Views
Heh, Mafia: Other than the occasional lynching or assassination, we're one big supportive family. - 09/02/2010 04:24:26 AM 1205 Views
See, that way the betrayal is personal. - 09/02/2010 04:41:47 AM 1420 Views
Ouch *NM* - 09/02/2010 04:58:13 PM 737 Views
*NM* - 10/02/2010 01:02:30 AM 685 Views
Hypocop (Table) - 09/02/2010 12:59:06 AM 1287 Views
Beetnemesis, innocent. *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:17:10 AM 685 Views
Okay - 09/02/2010 01:29:09 AM 1083 Views
Kronin, innocent. *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:53:09 AM 646 Views
Isaac, Guilty *NM* - 09/02/2010 02:12:07 AM 745 Views
Isaac, innocent *NM* - 09/02/2010 02:37:54 AM 677 Views
Investigated fistofpainx, found him to be innocent *NM* - 09/02/2010 06:27:37 AM 690 Views
DK, found her innocent *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:48:11 PM 710 Views
Fox and Ravens, Guilty *NM* - 09/02/2010 03:57:50 PM 673 Views
Vote Record (Table) - 09/02/2010 01:30:51 AM 1272 Views
I'll add: list of players who did NOT vote yesterday - 09/02/2010 06:46:38 AM 1237 Views
RBIRL - 09/02/2010 04:45:19 AM 1165 Views
Hmmm, - 09/02/2010 06:18:29 AM 1188 Views
Re: Hmmm, - 09/02/2010 07:20:02 AM 1126 Views
Yeah, I agree with the Blaine rationalization - 09/02/2010 08:57:19 AM 1178 Views
Huh. Oh boy oh - 09/02/2010 06:39:15 AM 1026 Views
Care to give us your thoughts? *NM* - 09/02/2010 07:26:09 AM 725 Views
Well, losing Doc and Deputy same night is bound to cause trouble. Especially losing Doc. *NM* - 09/02/2010 08:54:49 AM 688 Views
Well, yeah... - 09/02/2010 04:57:26 PM 1327 Views
Re: Well, yeah... - 09/02/2010 07:27:00 PM 1136 Views
I want to throw this out here. - 09/02/2010 07:21:04 AM 1242 Views
What changed your mind? *NM* - 09/02/2010 08:58:09 AM 683 Views
Well, I realized I was the one telling everyone to just vote for someone. - 09/02/2010 04:56:17 PM 1201 Views
*NM* - 10/02/2010 02:56:52 AM 615 Views
I thought you'd like that. *NM* - 10/02/2010 01:00:19 PM 606 Views
I was going to post a few thoughts here this morning... - 09/02/2010 01:49:26 PM 1191 Views
Why is everyone assuming we have a SK? - 10/02/2010 12:09:47 AM 1259 Views
What tips me off is the "melted plastic". - 10/02/2010 12:22:56 AM 1087 Views
Good point. Is an arsonist usually a third party? *NM* - 10/02/2010 12:28:10 AM 641 Views
That's so arbitrary, though. - 10/02/2010 12:57:09 AM 1060 Views
EBWOP: It's probably not a vigilante. - 10/02/2010 01:05:57 AM 1287 Views
That seems like good reasoning - 10/02/2010 01:50:47 AM 1222 Views
Re: That seems like good reasoning - 10/02/2010 01:58:14 AM 1235 Views
That's a vig rule? I did not know that - 10/02/2010 08:16:56 PM 1199 Views
Well, it's pretty common sense. - 10/02/2010 09:09:09 PM 1304 Views
I think he might have been referring to vigilante kills being blockable - 10/02/2010 09:43:53 PM 1143 Views
Oh, my bad then! *NM* - 10/02/2010 10:19:13 PM 699 Views
As the resident expert on vigilantism - 10/02/2010 08:04:17 PM 1511 Views
Youre the resident expert on vigilantism? *NM* - 11/02/2010 11:06:24 PM 684 Views
He was a vig once or twice. *NM* - 12/02/2010 01:33:57 AM 721 Views
I was the best vigilante you guys have ever had! *NM* - 12/02/2010 02:19:57 AM 671 Views
The only vigilante we've ever had. - 12/02/2010 02:25:20 AM 1144 Views
Wait, haven't you proposed an arsonist most games. *NM* - 10/02/2010 04:37:33 AM 666 Views
Maybe it's been proposed. - 10/02/2010 05:19:10 AM 1246 Views
Re: Maybe it's been proposed. - 10/02/2010 05:56:10 AM 1176 Views
Re: Why is everyone assuming we have a SK? - 10/02/2010 12:50:51 AM 1357 Views
Re: Why is everyone assuming we have a SK? - 10/02/2010 01:11:50 AM 1133 Views
Because we have a SK *NM* - 10/02/2010 05:14:00 AM 636 Views
I agree that we probably have a SK - 10/02/2010 07:50:33 PM 1155 Views
Nah, I was just saying *NM* - 11/02/2010 05:06:54 AM 696 Views
wait a minute - 10/02/2010 01:15:32 PM 1213 Views
Sensors? *NM* - 10/02/2010 01:42:36 PM 588 Views
Another thing - 10/02/2010 04:42:50 PM 1320 Views
F-T, I assume - 10/02/2010 05:08:58 PM 1145 Views
Probably, might be a hint at an RB but I doubt it *NM* - 10/02/2010 06:57:01 PM 700 Views
I don't think it could be a RB - 10/02/2010 07:47:55 PM 1249 Views
Probably not, but not for that reason - 10/02/2010 08:32:57 PM 1216 Views
Huh. - 10/02/2010 09:11:29 PM 1217 Views
Did anyone get any messages last night? - 10/02/2010 08:23:03 PM 1158 Views
Nope *NM* - 10/02/2010 08:35:18 PM 665 Views
Me neither. - 10/02/2010 09:14:46 PM 1205 Views
Re: Me neither. - 10/02/2010 09:41:19 PM 1333 Views
RBIRL - 11/02/2010 04:52:12 PM 1152 Views
Good luck! *NM* - 11/02/2010 07:05:40 PM 639 Views
Re: RBIRL - 11/02/2010 09:59:39 PM 1390 Views
We're stalling out a bit - 11/02/2010 10:05:09 PM 1158 Views
Yep. - 12/02/2010 02:58:02 AM 1101 Views
We could talk about my heroic failure to defend the innocent some more? Fine... - 12/02/2010 07:12:51 AM 1232 Views
You seem engaged in a very active defense so far this game - 12/02/2010 09:40:23 PM 1383 Views
Yawn... - 12/02/2010 11:28:50 PM 1346 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 12:32:30 AM 1312 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 01:31:41 AM 1239 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 02:24:40 AM 1188 Views
He's brought up accusations on himself - 13/02/2010 02:40:01 AM 1350 Views
Dammit, I had a post and then it got deleted. - 14/02/2010 01:45:31 AM 1175 Views
Alrighty, let's try this again. - 14/02/2010 06:38:26 AM 1043 Views
Always happy to answer your questions - 14/02/2010 07:35:35 AM 1074 Views
Thanks for the answers. - 15/02/2010 07:29:31 PM 1190 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 02:02:34 AM 1261 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 02:48:22 AM 1139 Views
On F-T's accusations against you. - 14/02/2010 01:54:20 AM 1223 Views
Re: On F-T's accusations against you. - 14/02/2010 03:43:52 AM 1116 Views
Oh, right, I modded that one. - 14/02/2010 04:11:46 AM 1142 Views
That's right, I am the Breaker of Unbroken Records - 14/02/2010 05:56:52 AM 1192 Views
Actually, quite few of my streaks were broken on that one - 14/02/2010 08:43:09 AM 1103 Views
I'm in second? Woo! - 14/02/2010 02:46:05 PM 1187 Views
Yep, welcome to being a lightning rod - 14/02/2010 09:10:43 PM 1325 Views
I'm not gonna be as targeted as you; I've died a LOT. - 14/02/2010 11:17:24 PM 1190 Views
Ironically I don't think I've ever killed you - 14/02/2010 11:56:03 PM 1170 Views
Game 1 I remember. - 15/02/2010 12:01:21 AM 1057 Views
Re: Game 1 I remember. - 15/02/2010 12:19:30 AM 1386 Views
Three stalled out over the winter holidays and we had to restart. - 15/02/2010 01:26:59 AM 1370 Views
Oh, the MHael Steve incident! - 15/02/2010 04:42:31 AM 1176 Views
The game? Oh, right, that. - 15/02/2010 04:41:43 AM 1091 Views
Actually... - 15/02/2010 04:57:50 PM 1280 Views
Sorry, it was my first game. - 16/02/2010 03:34:16 AM 1361 Views
That was my point actually. - 16/02/2010 06:25:17 AM 1237 Views
Those were the good old days. - 18/02/2010 01:21:44 AM 1231 Views
random thoughts - 15/02/2010 12:46:55 PM 1135 Views
I wasn't in that game. - 18/02/2010 01:19:06 AM 1144 Views
A second line of thought: ranagrande - 12/02/2010 07:40:37 AM 1452 Views
Argh... quote please - 12/02/2010 08:54:08 PM 1218 Views
Haha, fair enough - 12/02/2010 11:30:54 PM 1037 Views
I was getting all set to defend myself - 13/02/2010 01:21:58 AM 1297 Views
RBIRL - 14/02/2010 06:11:55 AM 1237 Views
Back - 18/02/2010 02:14:25 AM 1250 Views
Vote: Hieshyn - 15/02/2010 03:27:04 AM 1044 Views
Re: Hieshyn - 15/02/2010 12:54:42 PM 1337 Views
That's giving up awfully early. - 15/02/2010 07:35:37 PM 1115 Views
Never give up! Never surrender! - 15/02/2010 08:31:19 PM 1245 Views
Well this was unexpected. - 15/02/2010 06:07:44 PM 1149 Views
Re: Well this was unexpected. - 15/02/2010 08:30:57 PM 1165 Views
I think he's saying that he's been quiet because he's busy, not a DF - 15/02/2010 08:39:53 PM 1071 Views
I don't think so - 16/02/2010 12:09:13 AM 1179 Views
I assumed - 16/02/2010 12:14:16 AM 1166 Views
Re: I assumed - 16/02/2010 01:28:43 AM 1228 Views
In a way Isaac is right - 16/02/2010 05:24:08 AM 1197 Views
If he was the SK - 15/02/2010 07:55:38 PM 1274 Views
How many games did you guys play on wotmania, anyway? - 15/02/2010 08:43:04 PM 1147 Views
9 *NM* - 15/02/2010 08:53:23 PM 714 Views
Game 9 was F-T's Cairhienen Civil War/Succession. - 15/02/2010 08:53:03 PM 1143 Views
Oh that's right! - 15/02/2010 09:03:40 PM 1123 Views
We just took that game over. - 15/02/2010 10:12:43 PM 1211 Views
Oh yeah, we owned that one - 15/02/2010 11:48:12 PM 1111 Views
Re: Game 9 was F-T's Cairhienen Civil War/Succession. - 15/02/2010 11:54:44 PM 1231 Views
Lol irony - 16/02/2010 12:16:49 AM 1197 Views
what I thought was pretty funny - 16/02/2010 12:41:47 AM 1193 Views
Heh heh the Cairhienins would be proud *NM* - 16/02/2010 01:11:13 AM 696 Views
Oh, Isaac got High Seat there, didn't he? - 16/02/2010 01:33:05 AM 1199 Views
That was a fun one. - 18/02/2010 01:32:02 AM 1235 Views
So, it's just because he hasn't been talking much? That fits a lot of people - 15/02/2010 09:31:02 PM 1273 Views
well I really dont have anything worthwhile to say *NM* - 15/02/2010 10:06:11 PM 756 Views
Eh... not good enough - 16/02/2010 12:19:22 AM 1181 Views
Holiday weekend - 15/02/2010 11:49:37 PM 1143 Views
OK, I'm glad that vote got some discussion flowing. - 16/02/2010 02:58:55 AM 1286 Views
Ooo sneaky sneaky - 16/02/2010 03:58:37 AM 1389 Views
Re: Ooo sneaky sneaky - 16/02/2010 04:25:26 AM 1209 Views
It wasn't really a big thing. - 16/02/2010 04:46:54 AM 1264 Views
Re: It wasn't really a big thing. - 16/02/2010 05:30:34 AM 1219 Views
You know doing this sort of thing can get you lynched - 16/02/2010 04:40:23 AM 1261 Views
Oh, I know it can. - 16/02/2010 05:23:13 AM 1219 Views
Re: Oh, I know it can. - 16/02/2010 07:00:53 AM 1287 Views
Since when are you against traps? - 16/02/2010 04:07:05 PM 1114 Views
Since game 4 or 5, roughly - 16/02/2010 10:57:19 PM 1161 Views
I'm glad it did too. - 16/02/2010 01:16:14 PM 1219 Views
Regarding Inactivity and whatnot - 16/02/2010 06:22:14 AM 1278 Views
RBIRL - exams Thursday *NM* - 17/02/2010 02:11:27 AM 709 Views
So, where are we at? - 18/02/2010 02:40:32 AM 1208 Views
Re: So, where are we at? - 18/02/2010 03:55:33 AM 1242 Views
EBWOP: Issac's maybe only a 5.5. No, a 5.7 - 18/02/2010 06:58:40 AM 1235 Views
OK so I apparantly lack the technical know-how to reply to myself - 18/02/2010 07:08:36 AM 1325 Views
Re: OK so I apparantly lack the technical know-how to reply to myself - 18/02/2010 07:54:05 AM 1194 Views
Well yeah, all of that is mostly why I haven't been pushing anything - 18/02/2010 08:51:14 AM 1103 Views
Uggggghhhh...Ok. This post makes me want to vote you off. - 18/02/2010 03:28:19 PM 1132 Views
You seem to have misunbderstood my question - 18/02/2010 04:28:47 PM 1139 Views
Re: You seem to have misunbderstood my question - 18/02/2010 05:10:14 PM 1311 Views
Nice little typo I have there on misundertood, that's gonna be nagging at me for all of Day 2 - 18/02/2010 05:25:49 PM 1148 Views
My post, "Re: Hieshyn" - 18/02/2010 06:32:12 PM 1360 Views
Re: Nice little typo I have there on misundertood, that's gonna be nagging at me for all of Day 2 - 19/02/2010 04:45:25 AM 1136 Views
Thanks, all right let's review it - 19/02/2010 11:41:19 AM 1188 Views
A few thoughts - 19/02/2010 03:22:32 PM 1137 Views
Alright then. - 19/02/2010 05:20:39 PM 965 Views
EBWOP - 19/02/2010 05:23:06 PM 1278 Views
Haha, I'm sorry - 19/02/2010 05:49:00 PM 1139 Views
Re: EBWOP - 19/02/2010 06:53:08 PM 1272 Views
Naive? - 19/02/2010 07:13:14 PM 1278 Views
Naive or sinister, take your pick - 19/02/2010 07:29:09 PM 1227 Views
We could go with "arrogant," instead of either of those, if you like - 20/02/2010 01:59:22 AM 1026 Views
Hmm...well here's something interesting now that you reminded me of that game... - 19/02/2010 08:26:33 PM 1120 Views
That's true- I've said as much earlier in this thread - 20/02/2010 02:08:47 AM 1184 Views
Re: EBWOP - 19/02/2010 08:32:55 PM 1093 Views
Re: EBWOP - 19/02/2010 08:57:50 PM 1110 Views
Speaking of that game - 20/02/2010 06:03:18 AM 1166 Views
Re: Speaking of that game - 20/02/2010 05:24:16 PM 1165 Views
Actually, that reminds me. HEY KRONIN! - 18/02/2010 07:09:39 AM 1164 Views
Hey. - 18/02/2010 04:09:08 PM 1202 Views
Re: Hey. - 18/02/2010 05:19:30 PM 1219 Views
Re: Hey. - 18/02/2010 06:50:35 PM 1148 Views
Re: Hey. - 18/02/2010 05:37:33 PM 1285 Views
FT had no evidence one way or the other if Issac was a DF - 18/02/2010 05:44:43 PM 1106 Views
Don't put words in my mouth. - 18/02/2010 06:03:55 PM 1256 Views
Oh no, I know, I know. I'm just saying, FT has no more credibility than any of us *NM* - 18/02/2010 07:48:58 PM 702 Views
Well OK, a BIT more, because we know he was townie *NM* - 18/02/2010 07:49:34 PM 693 Views
But he IS a damn good player, and his advice, however limited, should be taken into account. *NM* - 18/02/2010 07:49:58 PM 677 Views
Fair enough *NM* - 18/02/2010 08:19:04 PM 655 Views
fistofpainx, Do you have any thoughts? - 18/02/2010 05:46:38 PM 1194 Views
I think that - 18/02/2010 09:45:56 PM 1252 Views
Well, if my combine the Vote Record with our previous suspicions... - 18/02/2010 09:48:24 PM 1157 Views
All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you? - 18/02/2010 11:32:07 PM 1162 Views
Re: All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you? - 19/02/2010 03:01:45 AM 1090 Views
Re: All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you? - 19/02/2010 04:07:03 AM 1229 Views
I think you're overestimating the appearance of your own innocence. - 19/02/2010 05:38:53 AM 1134 Views
Yeah, it's mostly just about getting the conversation going - 19/02/2010 06:40:17 AM 1188 Views
About voting - 19/02/2010 03:33:34 PM 1213 Views
Idk if that question about voting can be answered. - 20/02/2010 06:15:21 AM 1247 Views
In response to Fox and Ravens (down here to stop horizontal scroll) - 19/02/2010 09:50:16 PM 1211 Views
Re: In response to Fox and Ravens (down here to stop horizontal scroll) - 19/02/2010 10:22:37 PM 1249 Views
I agree - 20/02/2010 02:52:53 PM 1043 Views
Should be fine.. although, maybe only paraphrase? - 20/02/2010 02:03:30 AM 1149 Views
Well, the reason for the prohibition doesn't apply post-game, so I'll go with no - 20/02/2010 05:07:38 AM 1148 Views
Seems pretty thorough to me! I pretty much agree. *NM* - 20/02/2010 05:12:40 AM 681 Views
After seeing this thread.... - 20/02/2010 05:53:47 AM 1066 Views
Go ahead and start one then. - 20/02/2010 06:08:12 AM 1200 Views
Re: Go ahead and start one then. - 20/02/2010 06:47:23 AM 1295 Views
Isaac, did you say you have Cor's original rules saved somewhere? - 20/02/2010 04:50:29 PM 1287 Views
Re: Isaac, did you say you have Cor's original rules saved somewhere? - 20/02/2010 05:16:09 PM 1349 Views
Well, these are as good a starting point as any. - 20/02/2010 05:22:34 PM 1150 Views
I think quoting NBs from other games is okay. - 20/02/2010 05:15:55 AM 1194 Views
Quoting or paraphrasing is fine IMO *NM* - 20/02/2010 05:31:45 AM 761 Views
Fox and Ranagrande - 20/02/2010 06:30:53 AM 1283 Views
Some comments... - 20/02/2010 07:54:02 PM 1247 Views
Alright. - 20/02/2010 05:43:51 PM 1243 Views
Thanks - 20/02/2010 07:48:20 PM 1099 Views
Re: Thanks - 20/02/2010 10:35:26 PM 1094 Views
Ranagrande *NM* - 21/02/2010 12:55:29 AM 657 Views
Really? - 21/02/2010 01:58:24 AM 1186 Views
Go back and look at the NB for yourself. *NM* - 21/02/2010 04:29:54 AM 722 Views
That's hilarious. *NM* - 21/02/2010 06:47:57 PM 678 Views
Re: Thanks - 21/02/2010 01:57:25 AM 1182 Views
I do have a question - 21/02/2010 07:12:57 PM 1252 Views
A prosaic explanation- (and an objection) - 21/02/2010 09:13:43 PM 1241 Views
Well, you kind of said it yourself. - 21/02/2010 07:38:32 PM 1145 Views
I'm purposefully trying to not be so focussed on ranagrande - 21/02/2010 11:06:40 PM 1234 Views
Not sure I follow - 22/02/2010 06:49:11 PM 1247 Views
Because I might just be blinding myself here. - 22/02/2010 07:40:15 PM 1259 Views
Oh, okay. That does make sense. - 22/02/2010 07:52:10 PM 1363 Views
I think I do - 22/02/2010 07:47:56 PM 1125 Views
I'm purposefully trying to not be so focussed on ranagrande - 21/02/2010 11:06:40 PM 1159 Views
EBWOP - sorry, double post *NM* - 21/02/2010 11:34:21 PM 674 Views
Items of note from my NB archive: - 21/02/2010 09:37:49 PM 1314 Views
I am kind of confused about what you're doing here. - 22/02/2010 07:20:49 PM 1359 Views
I'm feeling the same thing. - 22/02/2010 07:36:46 PM 1194 Views
Re: I am kind of confused about what you're doing here. - 22/02/2010 08:07:19 PM 1175 Views
Re: Rafo Mafia 4 Day 2 - 22/02/2010 12:09:20 PM 1268 Views
Alright. Here's a quick synposis - 22/02/2010 07:54:19 PM 1241 Views
That sounds about right to me. - 22/02/2010 07:58:29 PM 1205 Views
(My two cents) - 22/02/2010 08:35:17 PM 1235 Views
Dude. - 22/02/2010 08:53:30 PM 1227 Views
Re: Dude. - 22/02/2010 09:45:52 PM 1177 Views
Thanks. - 23/02/2010 07:04:29 AM 1239 Views
Another minor piece against ranagrande - 22/02/2010 07:13:44 PM 1267 Views
You didn't read the entirety of my quote post did you? - 22/02/2010 07:42:14 PM 1260 Views
Actually, I do have a small confession to make about that... - 22/02/2010 08:14:08 PM 1331 Views
Re: Another minor piece against ranagrande - 22/02/2010 08:23:48 PM 1371 Views
Fair enough - 22/02/2010 08:38:51 PM 1318 Views
Re: Fair enough - 22/02/2010 09:07:57 PM 1222 Views
Re: Fair enough - 22/02/2010 09:07:57 PM 1172 Views
Numbers? - 22/02/2010 09:36:51 PM 1329 Views
Re: Numbers? - 22/02/2010 10:21:13 PM 1325 Views
I don't think he's innocent. OR a DF - 22/02/2010 10:42:16 PM 1139 Views
Maybe I missed it.... - 22/02/2010 09:26:47 PM 1289 Views
Re: Maybe I missed it.... - 22/02/2010 09:38:09 PM 1171 Views
Re: Maybe I missed it.... - 23/02/2010 09:38:23 PM 1139 Views
I will destroy the world - 23/02/2010 11:17:26 PM 1283 Views
And yet, that's the exact same thing you called me out on yesterday. *NM* - 24/02/2010 01:07:07 AM 580 Views
Ok, that's totally different... - 24/02/2010 06:36:00 AM 1136 Views
All that's different is the presumed final intent. - 24/02/2010 12:36:32 PM 1252 Views
Yeah ... those are pretty much the same. *NM* - 24/02/2010 03:17:25 PM 585 Views
No, this is my view: - 24/02/2010 11:23:25 PM 1277 Views
And my view was: - 25/02/2010 01:29:13 AM 1159 Views
shrug. I haven't been attacking you today, you know - 25/02/2010 01:46:39 AM 1232 Views
I'm just pointing out the irony. - 25/02/2010 01:52:07 AM 1158 Views
Re: I'm just pointing out the irony. - 25/02/2010 06:47:45 AM 1181 Views
Vote: Fox and Ravens *NM* - 24/02/2010 04:51:24 AM 678 Views
Can I ask why? - 24/02/2010 05:06:22 AM 1171 Views
I'd be very interested in seeing an explanation as well *NM* - 24/02/2010 08:04:30 PM 682 Views
Ditto. *NM* - 24/02/2010 08:09:31 PM 691 Views
My, my, how totally unexpected - 24/02/2010 01:01:42 PM 1235 Views
Reasoning would be nice *NM* - 24/02/2010 10:13:43 PM 678 Views
Eh? *NM* - 25/02/2010 01:47:19 AM 667 Views
Hieshyn I will DESTROY you - 27/02/2010 01:41:25 AM 1154 Views
We're sort of in a holding pattern here, Hieshyn - 25/02/2010 07:01:23 PM 1334 Views
You're right, Isaac. - 25/02/2010 08:47:03 PM 1337 Views
Though I presume this was already somewhat obvious, ^Seconded. *NM* - 25/02/2010 08:56:19 PM 586 Views
Hieshyns and Foxes and Beets! Oh my! - 26/02/2010 02:59:51 PM 1240 Views
At first I thought he was going for a F&R-style trap - 26/02/2010 01:44:16 AM 1235 Views
Re: At first I thought he was going for a F&R-style trap - 26/02/2010 06:10:33 AM 1247 Views
Re: At first I thought he was going for a F&R-style trap - 26/02/2010 07:00:02 AM 1294 Views
Sorry I've been insanely busy. - 27/02/2010 03:33:43 AM 1324 Views
Here's what I'm getting from this: - 27/02/2010 06:49:22 AM 1213 Views
Could be - 27/02/2010 06:16:30 PM 1173 Views
Re: Could be - 27/02/2010 07:15:07 PM 1264 Views
This seems a lot like an OMGUS. - 27/02/2010 07:02:12 AM 1124 Views
Well, we have a very weird situation here - 27/02/2010 05:13:12 PM 1232 Views
Re: Well, we have a very weird situation here - 27/02/2010 05:40:16 PM 1033 Views
Re: Sorry I've been insanely busy. - 27/02/2010 07:06:39 AM 1213 Views
Re: Sorry I've been insanely busy. - 27/02/2010 07:55:13 AM 1124 Views
Gotcha, thanks. *NM* - 27/02/2010 08:07:21 AM 699 Views
Okay, let's try to finish off today - 27/02/2010 07:27:09 PM 1233 Views
Re: Okay, let's try to finish off today - 27/02/2010 08:24:14 PM 1404 Views
Interesting. - 27/02/2010 09:28:33 PM 1156 Views
I sort of assumed everyone knew where I'm aiming, I've been pretty open about it - 27/02/2010 09:45:50 PM 1205 Views
Oh, right. - 28/02/2010 04:32:13 AM 1075 Views
Vote: ranagrande - 27/02/2010 09:12:51 PM 1157 Views
Hmmm - 27/02/2010 11:31:52 PM 1050 Views
Re: Hmmm - 28/02/2010 12:41:07 AM 1211 Views
What, if anything, has changed? - 28/02/2010 03:19:49 AM 1172 Views
Dang, I didn't know you could make text larger. Fancy! *NM* - 28/02/2010 04:57:28 AM 647 Views
A little joke - 28/02/2010 05:16:14 AM 1772 Views
Haha nice. - 28/02/2010 05:41:14 AM 1312 Views
Re: Haha nice. - 28/02/2010 06:29:58 AM 1728 Views
Woah, that's a pretty sneaky trick with the quote links. - 28/02/2010 07:14:22 AM 1139 Views
Oh, and RBIRL: midterms week. *NM* - 27/02/2010 09:35:25 PM 686 Views
Yikes (warning: lots of text) - 28/02/2010 12:35:16 AM 1173 Views
Why do you keep calling my death inevitable? - 28/02/2010 02:51:26 AM 1148 Views
Because you have often said you're a lightning rod - 28/02/2010 07:48:14 AM 1289 Views
Guess I'll set up the other camp: Vote: beetnemesis - 28/02/2010 03:22:49 AM 1170 Views
fair enough - 28/02/2010 04:40:02 AM 1114 Views
Yeah, I would like an explanation. - 28/02/2010 05:00:55 AM 1152 Views
Vote: beetnemesis - 01/03/2010 03:18:00 AM 1222 Views
EBWOP - 01/03/2010 03:20:24 AM 1148 Views
"Jumpy?" - 01/03/2010 05:47:37 AM 1101 Views
Re: "Jumpy?" - 03/03/2010 05:35:50 AM 1205 Views
I GUESS I'll contribute my opinion. - 28/02/2010 06:15:36 AM 1251 Views
What a rebel - 28/02/2010 07:52:50 AM 1146 Views
me and beet - 28/02/2010 01:03:59 PM 1249 Views
my stance on voting - 01/03/2010 03:08:33 AM 1291 Views
Re: my stance on voting - 01/03/2010 03:21:32 AM 1317 Views
well the reason my not posting as much - 01/03/2010 04:03:26 AM 1194 Views
Re: well the reason my not posting as much - 01/03/2010 05:28:48 AM 1098 Views
Do you get a ring for voting abstinence? - 01/03/2010 04:56:57 AM 1316 Views
LOL *NM* - 01/03/2010 05:26:14 AM 650 Views
RBIRL until thursday. - 01/03/2010 07:06:50 AM 1128 Views
You undecided people really need to make up your minds - 01/03/2010 07:32:42 PM 1204 Views
Seriously, the suspense is killing me *NM* - 02/03/2010 05:30:26 PM 655 Views
Agreed, this is really getting ridiculous *NM* - 02/03/2010 08:06:12 PM 745 Views
Perhaps a deadline would liven things up? - 02/03/2010 08:46:35 PM 1160 Views
Please - 02/03/2010 09:12:36 PM 1210 Views
- 02/03/2010 11:20:19 PM 1329 Views
Re: - 02/03/2010 11:49:21 PM 1233 Views
Did you unvote? - 03/03/2010 04:22:52 AM 1263 Views
I always forget that! - 03/03/2010 01:04:09 PM 1132 Views
I'm sorry. - 03/03/2010 03:54:56 AM 1219 Views
But... I'm much more interesting than some stupid "book!" - 03/03/2010 04:11:02 AM 1161 Views
Its Hammer Time! - 03/03/2010 05:25:27 AM 1201 Views
Re: Its Hammer Time! - 03/03/2010 05:32:34 AM 1122 Views
I hope you all feel really guilty about this - 03/03/2010 06:22:57 AM 1062 Views
Not likely, we're pretty draconian about lynches these days - 03/03/2010 09:15:00 AM 1057 Views
..I can and HAVE rebutted these. - 03/03/2010 05:15:32 PM 1131 Views
EBWOP: I need to start hitting preview to make sure the formatting is right. - 03/03/2010 05:18:43 PM 1103 Views
I'm sorry, I am not convinced - 03/03/2010 11:16:36 PM 1058 Views
I figured it'd be meaningless to RC, but ok... - 04/03/2010 01:54:36 AM 1141 Views
Well you figured very wrong - 04/03/2010 01:57:09 AM 1293 Views
All right, let's look at this - 04/03/2010 02:06:58 AM 1262 Views
This is a very interesting development - 04/03/2010 02:22:46 AM 1274 Views
Ditto. - 04/03/2010 02:28:18 AM 1393 Views
Re: All right, let's look at this - 04/03/2010 03:46:38 AM 1044 Views
Gosh. - 04/03/2010 04:01:04 AM 1182 Views
I find this very, very, very, VERY unlikely. - 04/03/2010 05:25:41 AM 1277 Views
We're only waiting on Bergioyn and Fist, I believe. - 04/03/2010 05:56:36 AM 1172 Views
Now we are down to Fist - 04/03/2010 03:47:22 PM 1103 Views
At this point I feel like anything I could say would only hurt my case - 04/03/2010 06:34:43 AM 1203 Views
You brought this upon yourself. - 03/03/2010 01:06:58 PM 1146 Views
Your fencing smiley has dulled my scathing retort - 03/03/2010 05:19:49 PM 1227 Views
- 03/03/2010 05:34:11 PM 1248 Views
I'm back. - 03/03/2010 07:32:24 PM 1256 Views
I'll give it a shot - 03/03/2010 08:19:01 PM 1274 Views
Are you a Town Roleblocker? (Table) - Summary: All 'No' - 04/03/2010 02:28:55 AM 1296 Views
No. *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:29:51 AM 717 Views
No *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:31:43 AM 703 Views
Nope. *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:32:54 AM 630 Views
Re: Are you a Town Roleblocker? (Table) *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:34:19 AM 671 Views
Ignore, hit 'reply' instead of 'edit' I think *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:36:02 AM 596 Views
No *NM* - 04/03/2010 03:40:15 AM 725 Views
No *NM* - 04/03/2010 04:44:27 AM 662 Views
No, sir *NM* - 04/03/2010 05:20:43 AM 763 Views
Nope. *NM* - 04/03/2010 05:25:10 AM 644 Views
No. *NM* - 04/03/2010 01:54:15 PM 672 Views
no *NM* - 05/03/2010 03:52:07 AM 687 Views
Well, I don't think there is much point in further delay - 04/03/2010 11:44:57 PM 1054 Views
To the roleblocker: - 05/03/2010 01:46:50 AM 1259 Views
That's everyone, Vote: Beetnemesis *NM* - 05/03/2010 04:06:03 AM 689 Views
I think that's everyone. - 05/03/2010 04:39:23 AM 1072 Views
I wouldn't jump on fist- he seems like he just rarely posts - 05/03/2010 06:21:34 AM 1373 Views
Also: Someone kill me! Eh, screw it. - 05/03/2010 06:27:29 AM 1320 Views
RBIRL - 05/03/2010 05:17:54 AM 1116 Views
Well, Beet already hammered. - 05/03/2010 06:44:08 AM 1165 Views
Hah! It's like a ghost! Or a lame-duck president - 05/03/2010 07:22:42 AM 1215 Views
Not a bad idea - 05/03/2010 08:13:59 AM 1242 Views
Beetnemesis has been lynched - 05/03/2010 05:38:05 PM 1213 Views
Sorry Beet! *NM* - 06/03/2010 05:11:56 AM 668 Views
You shall be the only one I don't haunt *NM* - 06/03/2010 06:29:23 AM 591 Views
Yo, what did I do to you? *NM* - 06/03/2010 06:47:51 PM 742 Views
I meant of those who lynched me! You shall be EXALTED! - 06/03/2010 06:52:39 PM 1281 Views
Hmm... tell me more about this robot-heaven - 06/03/2010 09:15:57 PM 1281 Views
In both places, the humans are our slaves - 07/03/2010 06:48:29 PM 1311 Views

Reply to Message