Active Users:565 Time:22/11/2024 02:27:00 AM
Since game 4 or 5, roughly Isaac Send a noteboard - 16/02/2010 10:57:19 PM
Admittedly, I can't recall a specific instance, but you often set up traps, and I do remember one time when, at the very beginning of the game, you spoke of having a few traps to lay to try and catch DFs.


IIRC, I was a DF at the time, it was game 9, yes? ;) I always have traps out when I'm a DF.

However, context is important, what I mean by trap in this context is not the same as what my brand of personal traps is. Which is basically something that really does make sense to do but gives a secret extra profit, no real chance for backfire. ALternatively, it's setting up a situation in which there are two logical courses of action, and once introduced it's almost guaranteed people will take one of those two routes. Sometimes they are long term strateies too, aimed at future games. There always simple, they're usually win-win, and they can't really backfire - or at least that's what I aim for in design.

In that game, getting everyone to put forward an ambassador was a trap. That's how, as you may recall, come night 1 I was able to tell you and Hobo which houses everyone was in with the exception of two players who were either A in X and B in Y, or A in Y and B in X. That was a 'trap', it fed us way more info than the town got out of it, info that was more useful to us then them in any event, it had no real chance of backfiring. What else did it get us? Across the board our DF faction profitted hugely from that 'trap'. I was placed in position as a de facto regent, and basically was able to set the agenda from that point on, and that's power, because you can make it that almost everything that happens is either what you propose, or specifically not that, instead of something else someone else might suggest out of left field. That's a 'trap'.

But the traps I warn people about using are different. Springing MGD instead of MPD, that could be a trap, but not a good one, because most people don't constantly refer back to their NB and an innocent townie might say, yep, MGD #X without even realizing it, and in this case would have backfired. DFs had MPD too and would have been far more likely to be wary of a mistake there, would not have been caught by it even if their letters were different. But I bet a townie would have stepped into it. What was the trap? Another win-win, we'd know that whoever answered first was clean, but there was a backfire even on that, just not a big one, the first answer came from someone who had #14, the same number of players we had, and therefore would be in a much better position, DF or town, to assume every player had one from 1-14. Hence why Hobo is just a semi-prob-town in my book, had someone answered MPD #2 first, they'd have been prob-town. Yet even that was win-win because he couldn't claim 'def-town' from it, and that was the worst case backfire, a DF acquiring a patina of townie-ness, because there really weren't any numbers that could have done that and yet would be inclined to take the risk of answering first.

ANyway, I don't call my stuff 'traps' in my own head, they're strategies. I'm methodical and often write them down, mathemetician's bias perhaps, I think better on paper. Helps me find flaws easier too, look at the notes the next time and my own personal connection is gone, it's like someone else wrote them, and it's easier for me to see the flaws.

Since so many of them are things that are likely not to even happen, usually at the bottom I write 'Trigger' (that's right where it game from for game 8 ) and a lot of times the trigger event is something like 'a player accuses X based of Y' and what you do is you just scatter half a dozen or so of these through out the game and wait till someone steps in one. But specific 'traps', these tend to backfire a lot just because when someone puts all their energy into one thing, it's often pretty obvious they are up to something, sometimes you can even see what it is. Either way, DF knows to avoid the area if they pick up on that, and often the person is so invested into that trap that they can't bring themselves to see the flaws, or if they do they try to salvage it by making it more complex which only makes it worse. They also tend to put false info into them, which hurts the town and can hurt you if you're a DF too, the difference being a DF has no choice but to lie anyway, so they may as well risk it.

It's like this whole message, it's a trap, my style of trap, see if anyone can guess one of them, see how even figuring one out probably won't blunt the trap and may even assist it. Maybe I should call them 'tarps' though, since I think I mispelled it that ways every time I used it in this message (obviously corrected in preview). I like that though, henceforth I shall refer to them as 'Tarps' :)
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Reply to message
Rafo Mafia 4 Day 2 is over. - 08/02/2010 06:53:53 PM 3384 Views
List of Players - 08/02/2010 06:58:04 PM 1144 Views
This is great, thanks! *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:19:25 AM 708 Views
Vote: Hieshyn - 15/02/2010 03:25:25 AM 1236 Views
Crap! - 15/02/2010 03:26:24 AM 1150 Views
Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 08/02/2010 08:53:49 PM 1314 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 08/02/2010 09:28:57 PM 1087 Views
Hey, by the way, are you Mafia? - 08/02/2010 09:34:46 PM 1243 Views
I am not Hopper - 08/02/2010 10:37:55 PM 1160 Views
Maybe I am AWESOME - 08/02/2010 11:19:48 PM 1227 Views
Now that's a questionable claim. - 09/02/2010 02:36:25 AM 1218 Views
Hah! You underestimate my ego, madam! - 09/02/2010 06:25:28 AM 1090 Views
A few questions and comments - 08/02/2010 09:29:06 PM 1197 Views
Re: A few questions and comments - 08/02/2010 10:31:32 PM 1176 Views
Re: A few questions and comments - 08/02/2010 11:23:07 PM 972 Views
Third Party - 08/02/2010 09:43:57 PM 1033 Views
Re: Third Party - 08/02/2010 10:34:38 PM 1120 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 09/02/2010 02:47:03 AM 1149 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 09/02/2010 03:53:18 AM 1119 Views
I thinking Lynching F-T was the right thing to do. - 09/02/2010 04:45:13 AM 1137 Views
RBIRL ... test tomorrow. Probably not going to post tonight. *NM* - 09/02/2010 12:03:38 AM 706 Views
You know what? - 09/02/2010 01:17:52 AM 1120 Views
NO! - 09/02/2010 01:31:57 AM 1106 Views
Re: You know what? - 09/02/2010 01:34:42 AM 1083 Views
Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 01:57:39 AM 1107 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 02:38:45 AM 1126 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 03:29:32 AM 1167 Views
Oh, I learned all those lessons last year. - 09/02/2010 04:05:04 AM 1100 Views
Re: Oh, I learned all those lessons last year. - 09/02/2010 04:50:41 AM 1190 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 03:36:28 AM 1132 Views
Well thanks for the encouragement. - 09/02/2010 04:14:50 AM 1298 Views
Heh, Mafia: Other than the occasional lynching or assassination, we're one big supportive family. - 09/02/2010 04:24:26 AM 1112 Views
See, that way the betrayal is personal. - 09/02/2010 04:41:47 AM 1331 Views
Ouch *NM* - 09/02/2010 04:58:13 PM 687 Views
*NM* - 10/02/2010 01:02:30 AM 650 Views
Hypocop (Table) - 09/02/2010 12:59:06 AM 1183 Views
Beetnemesis, innocent. *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:17:10 AM 638 Views
Okay - 09/02/2010 01:29:09 AM 994 Views
Kronin, innocent. *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:53:09 AM 601 Views
Isaac, Guilty *NM* - 09/02/2010 02:12:07 AM 698 Views
Isaac, innocent *NM* - 09/02/2010 02:37:54 AM 630 Views
Investigated fistofpainx, found him to be innocent *NM* - 09/02/2010 06:27:37 AM 645 Views
DK, found her innocent *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:48:11 PM 661 Views
Fox and Ravens, Guilty *NM* - 09/02/2010 03:57:50 PM 625 Views
Vote Record (Table) - 09/02/2010 01:30:51 AM 1178 Views
I'll add: list of players who did NOT vote yesterday - 09/02/2010 06:46:38 AM 1146 Views
RBIRL - 09/02/2010 04:45:19 AM 1100 Views
Hmmm, - 09/02/2010 06:18:29 AM 1109 Views
Re: Hmmm, - 09/02/2010 07:20:02 AM 1030 Views
Yeah, I agree with the Blaine rationalization - 09/02/2010 08:57:19 AM 1106 Views
Huh. Oh boy oh - 09/02/2010 06:39:15 AM 966 Views
Care to give us your thoughts? *NM* - 09/02/2010 07:26:09 AM 677 Views
Well, losing Doc and Deputy same night is bound to cause trouble. Especially losing Doc. *NM* - 09/02/2010 08:54:49 AM 634 Views
Well, yeah... - 09/02/2010 04:57:26 PM 1235 Views
Re: Well, yeah... - 09/02/2010 07:27:00 PM 1039 Views
I want to throw this out here. - 09/02/2010 07:21:04 AM 1145 Views
What changed your mind? *NM* - 09/02/2010 08:58:09 AM 621 Views
Well, I realized I was the one telling everyone to just vote for someone. - 09/02/2010 04:56:17 PM 1136 Views
*NM* - 10/02/2010 02:56:52 AM 563 Views
I thought you'd like that. *NM* - 10/02/2010 01:00:19 PM 568 Views
I was going to post a few thoughts here this morning... - 09/02/2010 01:49:26 PM 1101 Views
Why is everyone assuming we have a SK? - 10/02/2010 12:09:47 AM 1159 Views
What tips me off is the "melted plastic". - 10/02/2010 12:22:56 AM 998 Views
Good point. Is an arsonist usually a third party? *NM* - 10/02/2010 12:28:10 AM 601 Views
That's so arbitrary, though. - 10/02/2010 12:57:09 AM 970 Views
EBWOP: It's probably not a vigilante. - 10/02/2010 01:05:57 AM 1196 Views
That seems like good reasoning - 10/02/2010 01:50:47 AM 1126 Views
Re: That seems like good reasoning - 10/02/2010 01:58:14 AM 1149 Views
That's a vig rule? I did not know that - 10/02/2010 08:16:56 PM 1137 Views
Well, it's pretty common sense. - 10/02/2010 09:09:09 PM 1210 Views
I think he might have been referring to vigilante kills being blockable - 10/02/2010 09:43:53 PM 1049 Views
Oh, my bad then! *NM* - 10/02/2010 10:19:13 PM 669 Views
As the resident expert on vigilantism - 10/02/2010 08:04:17 PM 1415 Views
Youre the resident expert on vigilantism? *NM* - 11/02/2010 11:06:24 PM 641 Views
He was a vig once or twice. *NM* - 12/02/2010 01:33:57 AM 660 Views
I was the best vigilante you guys have ever had! *NM* - 12/02/2010 02:19:57 AM 626 Views
The only vigilante we've ever had. - 12/02/2010 02:25:20 AM 1050 Views
Wait, haven't you proposed an arsonist most games. *NM* - 10/02/2010 04:37:33 AM 618 Views
Maybe it's been proposed. - 10/02/2010 05:19:10 AM 1123 Views
Re: Maybe it's been proposed. - 10/02/2010 05:56:10 AM 1079 Views
Re: Why is everyone assuming we have a SK? - 10/02/2010 12:50:51 AM 1264 Views
Re: Why is everyone assuming we have a SK? - 10/02/2010 01:11:50 AM 1057 Views
Because we have a SK *NM* - 10/02/2010 05:14:00 AM 587 Views
I agree that we probably have a SK - 10/02/2010 07:50:33 PM 1066 Views
Nah, I was just saying *NM* - 11/02/2010 05:06:54 AM 642 Views
wait a minute - 10/02/2010 01:15:32 PM 1116 Views
Sensors? *NM* - 10/02/2010 01:42:36 PM 556 Views
Another thing - 10/02/2010 04:42:50 PM 1223 Views
F-T, I assume - 10/02/2010 05:08:58 PM 1059 Views
Probably, might be a hint at an RB but I doubt it *NM* - 10/02/2010 06:57:01 PM 660 Views
I don't think it could be a RB - 10/02/2010 07:47:55 PM 1156 Views
Probably not, but not for that reason - 10/02/2010 08:32:57 PM 1128 Views
Huh. - 10/02/2010 09:11:29 PM 1120 Views
Did anyone get any messages last night? - 10/02/2010 08:23:03 PM 1093 Views
Nope *NM* - 10/02/2010 08:35:18 PM 626 Views
Me neither. - 10/02/2010 09:14:46 PM 1109 Views
Re: Me neither. - 10/02/2010 09:41:19 PM 1236 Views
RBIRL - 11/02/2010 04:52:12 PM 1068 Views
Good luck! *NM* - 11/02/2010 07:05:40 PM 592 Views
Re: RBIRL - 11/02/2010 09:59:39 PM 1266 Views
We're stalling out a bit - 11/02/2010 10:05:09 PM 1057 Views
Yep. - 12/02/2010 02:58:02 AM 1041 Views
We could talk about my heroic failure to defend the innocent some more? Fine... - 12/02/2010 07:12:51 AM 1140 Views
You seem engaged in a very active defense so far this game - 12/02/2010 09:40:23 PM 1299 Views
Yawn... - 12/02/2010 11:28:50 PM 1255 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 12:32:30 AM 1213 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 01:31:41 AM 1131 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 02:24:40 AM 1090 Views
He's brought up accusations on himself - 13/02/2010 02:40:01 AM 1238 Views
Dammit, I had a post and then it got deleted. - 14/02/2010 01:45:31 AM 1076 Views
Alrighty, let's try this again. - 14/02/2010 06:38:26 AM 978 Views
Always happy to answer your questions - 14/02/2010 07:35:35 AM 987 Views
Thanks for the answers. - 15/02/2010 07:29:31 PM 1094 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 02:02:34 AM 1167 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 02:48:22 AM 1052 Views
On F-T's accusations against you. - 14/02/2010 01:54:20 AM 1132 Views
Re: On F-T's accusations against you. - 14/02/2010 03:43:52 AM 1046 Views
Oh, right, I modded that one. - 14/02/2010 04:11:46 AM 1043 Views
That's right, I am the Breaker of Unbroken Records - 14/02/2010 05:56:52 AM 1132 Views
Actually, quite few of my streaks were broken on that one - 14/02/2010 08:43:09 AM 1030 Views
I'm in second? Woo! - 14/02/2010 02:46:05 PM 1098 Views
Yep, welcome to being a lightning rod - 14/02/2010 09:10:43 PM 1259 Views
I'm not gonna be as targeted as you; I've died a LOT. - 14/02/2010 11:17:24 PM 1095 Views
Ironically I don't think I've ever killed you - 14/02/2010 11:56:03 PM 1102 Views
Game 1 I remember. - 15/02/2010 12:01:21 AM 964 Views
Re: Game 1 I remember. - 15/02/2010 12:19:30 AM 1329 Views
Three stalled out over the winter holidays and we had to restart. - 15/02/2010 01:26:59 AM 1263 Views
Oh, the MHael Steve incident! - 15/02/2010 04:42:31 AM 1081 Views
The game? Oh, right, that. - 15/02/2010 04:41:43 AM 997 Views
Actually... - 15/02/2010 04:57:50 PM 1191 Views
Sorry, it was my first game. - 16/02/2010 03:34:16 AM 1259 Views
That was my point actually. - 16/02/2010 06:25:17 AM 1176 Views
Those were the good old days. - 18/02/2010 01:21:44 AM 1136 Views
random thoughts - 15/02/2010 12:46:55 PM 1047 Views
I wasn't in that game. - 18/02/2010 01:19:06 AM 1058 Views
A second line of thought: ranagrande - 12/02/2010 07:40:37 AM 1351 Views
Argh... quote please - 12/02/2010 08:54:08 PM 1124 Views
Haha, fair enough - 12/02/2010 11:30:54 PM 972 Views
I was getting all set to defend myself - 13/02/2010 01:21:58 AM 1202 Views
RBIRL - 14/02/2010 06:11:55 AM 1145 Views
Back - 18/02/2010 02:14:25 AM 1186 Views
Vote: Hieshyn - 15/02/2010 03:27:04 AM 978 Views
Re: Hieshyn - 15/02/2010 12:54:42 PM 1231 Views
That's giving up awfully early. - 15/02/2010 07:35:37 PM 1011 Views
Never give up! Never surrender! - 15/02/2010 08:31:19 PM 1161 Views
Well this was unexpected. - 15/02/2010 06:07:44 PM 1085 Views
Re: Well this was unexpected. - 15/02/2010 08:30:57 PM 1059 Views
I think he's saying that he's been quiet because he's busy, not a DF - 15/02/2010 08:39:53 PM 970 Views
I don't think so - 16/02/2010 12:09:13 AM 1114 Views
I assumed - 16/02/2010 12:14:16 AM 1101 Views
Re: I assumed - 16/02/2010 01:28:43 AM 1128 Views
In a way Isaac is right - 16/02/2010 05:24:08 AM 1103 Views
If he was the SK - 15/02/2010 07:55:38 PM 1207 Views
How many games did you guys play on wotmania, anyway? - 15/02/2010 08:43:04 PM 1055 Views
9 *NM* - 15/02/2010 08:53:23 PM 668 Views
Game 9 was F-T's Cairhienen Civil War/Succession. - 15/02/2010 08:53:03 PM 1082 Views
Oh that's right! - 15/02/2010 09:03:40 PM 1059 Views
We just took that game over. - 15/02/2010 10:12:43 PM 1111 Views
Oh yeah, we owned that one - 15/02/2010 11:48:12 PM 1024 Views
Re: Game 9 was F-T's Cairhienen Civil War/Succession. - 15/02/2010 11:54:44 PM 1140 Views
Lol irony - 16/02/2010 12:16:49 AM 1093 Views
what I thought was pretty funny - 16/02/2010 12:41:47 AM 1112 Views
Heh heh the Cairhienins would be proud *NM* - 16/02/2010 01:11:13 AM 645 Views
Oh, Isaac got High Seat there, didn't he? - 16/02/2010 01:33:05 AM 1106 Views
That was a fun one. - 18/02/2010 01:32:02 AM 1139 Views
So, it's just because he hasn't been talking much? That fits a lot of people - 15/02/2010 09:31:02 PM 1158 Views
well I really dont have anything worthwhile to say *NM* - 15/02/2010 10:06:11 PM 710 Views
Eh... not good enough - 16/02/2010 12:19:22 AM 1071 Views
Holiday weekend - 15/02/2010 11:49:37 PM 1047 Views
OK, I'm glad that vote got some discussion flowing. - 16/02/2010 02:58:55 AM 1216 Views
Ooo sneaky sneaky - 16/02/2010 03:58:37 AM 1293 Views
Re: Ooo sneaky sneaky - 16/02/2010 04:25:26 AM 1119 Views
It wasn't really a big thing. - 16/02/2010 04:46:54 AM 1173 Views
Re: It wasn't really a big thing. - 16/02/2010 05:30:34 AM 1131 Views
You know doing this sort of thing can get you lynched - 16/02/2010 04:40:23 AM 1192 Views
Oh, I know it can. - 16/02/2010 05:23:13 AM 1133 Views
Re: Oh, I know it can. - 16/02/2010 07:00:53 AM 1213 Views
Since when are you against traps? - 16/02/2010 04:07:05 PM 1050 Views
Since game 4 or 5, roughly - 16/02/2010 10:57:19 PM 1098 Views
I'm glad it did too. - 16/02/2010 01:16:14 PM 1121 Views
Regarding Inactivity and whatnot - 16/02/2010 06:22:14 AM 1189 Views
RBIRL - exams Thursday *NM* - 17/02/2010 02:11:27 AM 660 Views
So, where are we at? - 18/02/2010 02:40:32 AM 1117 Views
Re: So, where are we at? - 18/02/2010 03:55:33 AM 1186 Views
EBWOP: Issac's maybe only a 5.5. No, a 5.7 - 18/02/2010 06:58:40 AM 1148 Views
OK so I apparantly lack the technical know-how to reply to myself - 18/02/2010 07:08:36 AM 1249 Views
Re: OK so I apparantly lack the technical know-how to reply to myself - 18/02/2010 07:54:05 AM 1107 Views
Well yeah, all of that is mostly why I haven't been pushing anything - 18/02/2010 08:51:14 AM 1041 Views
Uggggghhhh...Ok. This post makes me want to vote you off. - 18/02/2010 03:28:19 PM 1039 Views
You seem to have misunbderstood my question - 18/02/2010 04:28:47 PM 1049 Views
Re: You seem to have misunbderstood my question - 18/02/2010 05:10:14 PM 1210 Views
Nice little typo I have there on misundertood, that's gonna be nagging at me for all of Day 2 - 18/02/2010 05:25:49 PM 1084 Views
My post, "Re: Hieshyn" - 18/02/2010 06:32:12 PM 1267 Views
Re: Nice little typo I have there on misundertood, that's gonna be nagging at me for all of Day 2 - 19/02/2010 04:45:25 AM 1065 Views
Thanks, all right let's review it - 19/02/2010 11:41:19 AM 1110 Views
A few thoughts - 19/02/2010 03:22:32 PM 1041 Views
Alright then. - 19/02/2010 05:20:39 PM 897 Views
EBWOP - 19/02/2010 05:23:06 PM 1175 Views
Haha, I'm sorry - 19/02/2010 05:49:00 PM 1044 Views
Re: EBWOP - 19/02/2010 06:53:08 PM 1175 Views
Naive? - 19/02/2010 07:13:14 PM 1201 Views
Naive or sinister, take your pick - 19/02/2010 07:29:09 PM 1141 Views
We could go with "arrogant," instead of either of those, if you like - 20/02/2010 01:59:22 AM 956 Views
Hmm...well here's something interesting now that you reminded me of that game... - 19/02/2010 08:26:33 PM 1030 Views
That's true- I've said as much earlier in this thread - 20/02/2010 02:08:47 AM 1078 Views
Re: EBWOP - 19/02/2010 08:32:55 PM 1017 Views
Re: EBWOP - 19/02/2010 08:57:50 PM 1014 Views
Speaking of that game - 20/02/2010 06:03:18 AM 1094 Views
Re: Speaking of that game - 20/02/2010 05:24:16 PM 1071 Views
Actually, that reminds me. HEY KRONIN! - 18/02/2010 07:09:39 AM 1066 Views
Hey. - 18/02/2010 04:09:08 PM 1113 Views
Re: Hey. - 18/02/2010 05:19:30 PM 1126 Views
Re: Hey. - 18/02/2010 06:50:35 PM 1038 Views
Re: Hey. - 18/02/2010 05:37:33 PM 1222 Views
FT had no evidence one way or the other if Issac was a DF - 18/02/2010 05:44:43 PM 1015 Views
Don't put words in my mouth. - 18/02/2010 06:03:55 PM 1166 Views
Oh no, I know, I know. I'm just saying, FT has no more credibility than any of us *NM* - 18/02/2010 07:48:58 PM 651 Views
Well OK, a BIT more, because we know he was townie *NM* - 18/02/2010 07:49:34 PM 656 Views
But he IS a damn good player, and his advice, however limited, should be taken into account. *NM* - 18/02/2010 07:49:58 PM 638 Views
Fair enough *NM* - 18/02/2010 08:19:04 PM 604 Views
fistofpainx, Do you have any thoughts? - 18/02/2010 05:46:38 PM 1095 Views
I think that - 18/02/2010 09:45:56 PM 1151 Views
Well, if my combine the Vote Record with our previous suspicions... - 18/02/2010 09:48:24 PM 1066 Views
All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you? - 18/02/2010 11:32:07 PM 1076 Views
Re: All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you? - 19/02/2010 03:01:45 AM 1015 Views
Re: All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you? - 19/02/2010 04:07:03 AM 1134 Views
I think you're overestimating the appearance of your own innocence. - 19/02/2010 05:38:53 AM 1047 Views
Yeah, it's mostly just about getting the conversation going - 19/02/2010 06:40:17 AM 1089 Views
About voting - 19/02/2010 03:33:34 PM 1113 Views
Idk if that question about voting can be answered. - 20/02/2010 06:15:21 AM 1177 Views
In response to Fox and Ravens (down here to stop horizontal scroll) - 19/02/2010 09:50:16 PM 1117 Views
Re: In response to Fox and Ravens (down here to stop horizontal scroll) - 19/02/2010 10:22:37 PM 1179 Views
I agree - 20/02/2010 02:52:53 PM 978 Views
Should be fine.. although, maybe only paraphrase? - 20/02/2010 02:03:30 AM 1061 Views
Well, the reason for the prohibition doesn't apply post-game, so I'll go with no - 20/02/2010 05:07:38 AM 1051 Views
Seems pretty thorough to me! I pretty much agree. *NM* - 20/02/2010 05:12:40 AM 626 Views
After seeing this thread.... - 20/02/2010 05:53:47 AM 998 Views
Go ahead and start one then. - 20/02/2010 06:08:12 AM 1106 Views
Re: Go ahead and start one then. - 20/02/2010 06:47:23 AM 1199 Views
Isaac, did you say you have Cor's original rules saved somewhere? - 20/02/2010 04:50:29 PM 1201 Views
Re: Isaac, did you say you have Cor's original rules saved somewhere? - 20/02/2010 05:16:09 PM 1275 Views
Well, these are as good a starting point as any. - 20/02/2010 05:22:34 PM 1055 Views
I think quoting NBs from other games is okay. - 20/02/2010 05:15:55 AM 1097 Views
Quoting or paraphrasing is fine IMO *NM* - 20/02/2010 05:31:45 AM 689 Views
Fox and Ranagrande - 20/02/2010 06:30:53 AM 1184 Views
Some comments... - 20/02/2010 07:54:02 PM 1146 Views
Alright. - 20/02/2010 05:43:51 PM 1138 Views
Thanks - 20/02/2010 07:48:20 PM 1000 Views
Re: Thanks - 20/02/2010 10:35:26 PM 1004 Views
Ranagrande *NM* - 21/02/2010 12:55:29 AM 607 Views
Really? - 21/02/2010 01:58:24 AM 1086 Views
Go back and look at the NB for yourself. *NM* - 21/02/2010 04:29:54 AM 687 Views
That's hilarious. *NM* - 21/02/2010 06:47:57 PM 637 Views
Re: Thanks - 21/02/2010 01:57:25 AM 1083 Views
I do have a question - 21/02/2010 07:12:57 PM 1187 Views
A prosaic explanation- (and an objection) - 21/02/2010 09:13:43 PM 1141 Views
Well, you kind of said it yourself. - 21/02/2010 07:38:32 PM 1054 Views
I'm purposefully trying to not be so focussed on ranagrande - 21/02/2010 11:06:40 PM 1145 Views
Not sure I follow - 22/02/2010 06:49:11 PM 1154 Views
Because I might just be blinding myself here. - 22/02/2010 07:40:15 PM 1156 Views
Oh, okay. That does make sense. - 22/02/2010 07:52:10 PM 1270 Views
I think I do - 22/02/2010 07:47:56 PM 1014 Views
I'm purposefully trying to not be so focussed on ranagrande - 21/02/2010 11:06:40 PM 1088 Views
EBWOP - sorry, double post *NM* - 21/02/2010 11:34:21 PM 619 Views
Items of note from my NB archive: - 21/02/2010 09:37:49 PM 1216 Views
I am kind of confused about what you're doing here. - 22/02/2010 07:20:49 PM 1257 Views
I'm feeling the same thing. - 22/02/2010 07:36:46 PM 1104 Views
Re: I am kind of confused about what you're doing here. - 22/02/2010 08:07:19 PM 1100 Views
Re: Rafo Mafia 4 Day 2 - 22/02/2010 12:09:20 PM 1145 Views
Alright. Here's a quick synposis - 22/02/2010 07:54:19 PM 1138 Views
That sounds about right to me. - 22/02/2010 07:58:29 PM 1104 Views
(My two cents) - 22/02/2010 08:35:17 PM 1127 Views
Dude. - 22/02/2010 08:53:30 PM 1126 Views
Re: Dude. - 22/02/2010 09:45:52 PM 1091 Views
Thanks. - 23/02/2010 07:04:29 AM 1152 Views
Another minor piece against ranagrande - 22/02/2010 07:13:44 PM 1168 Views
You didn't read the entirety of my quote post did you? - 22/02/2010 07:42:14 PM 1144 Views
Actually, I do have a small confession to make about that... - 22/02/2010 08:14:08 PM 1240 Views
Re: Another minor piece against ranagrande - 22/02/2010 08:23:48 PM 1272 Views
Fair enough - 22/02/2010 08:38:51 PM 1220 Views
Re: Fair enough - 22/02/2010 09:07:57 PM 1123 Views
Re: Fair enough - 22/02/2010 09:07:57 PM 1072 Views
Numbers? - 22/02/2010 09:36:51 PM 1236 Views
Re: Numbers? - 22/02/2010 10:21:13 PM 1228 Views
I don't think he's innocent. OR a DF - 22/02/2010 10:42:16 PM 1047 Views
Maybe I missed it.... - 22/02/2010 09:26:47 PM 1160 Views
Re: Maybe I missed it.... - 22/02/2010 09:38:09 PM 1092 Views
Re: Maybe I missed it.... - 23/02/2010 09:38:23 PM 1052 Views
I will destroy the world - 23/02/2010 11:17:26 PM 1190 Views
And yet, that's the exact same thing you called me out on yesterday. *NM* - 24/02/2010 01:07:07 AM 528 Views
Ok, that's totally different... - 24/02/2010 06:36:00 AM 1068 Views
All that's different is the presumed final intent. - 24/02/2010 12:36:32 PM 1147 Views
Yeah ... those are pretty much the same. *NM* - 24/02/2010 03:17:25 PM 553 Views
No, this is my view: - 24/02/2010 11:23:25 PM 1198 Views
And my view was: - 25/02/2010 01:29:13 AM 1061 Views
shrug. I haven't been attacking you today, you know - 25/02/2010 01:46:39 AM 1139 Views
I'm just pointing out the irony. - 25/02/2010 01:52:07 AM 1062 Views
Re: I'm just pointing out the irony. - 25/02/2010 06:47:45 AM 1081 Views
Vote: Fox and Ravens *NM* - 24/02/2010 04:51:24 AM 632 Views
Can I ask why? - 24/02/2010 05:06:22 AM 1085 Views
I'd be very interested in seeing an explanation as well *NM* - 24/02/2010 08:04:30 PM 639 Views
Ditto. *NM* - 24/02/2010 08:09:31 PM 652 Views
My, my, how totally unexpected - 24/02/2010 01:01:42 PM 1134 Views
Reasoning would be nice *NM* - 24/02/2010 10:13:43 PM 642 Views
Eh? *NM* - 25/02/2010 01:47:19 AM 616 Views
Hieshyn I will DESTROY you - 27/02/2010 01:41:25 AM 1066 Views
We're sort of in a holding pattern here, Hieshyn - 25/02/2010 07:01:23 PM 1233 Views
You're right, Isaac. - 25/02/2010 08:47:03 PM 1237 Views
Though I presume this was already somewhat obvious, ^Seconded. *NM* - 25/02/2010 08:56:19 PM 550 Views
Hieshyns and Foxes and Beets! Oh my! - 26/02/2010 02:59:51 PM 1167 Views
At first I thought he was going for a F&R-style trap - 26/02/2010 01:44:16 AM 1144 Views
Re: At first I thought he was going for a F&R-style trap - 26/02/2010 06:10:33 AM 1147 Views
Re: At first I thought he was going for a F&R-style trap - 26/02/2010 07:00:02 AM 1202 Views
Sorry I've been insanely busy. - 27/02/2010 03:33:43 AM 1212 Views
Here's what I'm getting from this: - 27/02/2010 06:49:22 AM 1093 Views
Could be - 27/02/2010 06:16:30 PM 1112 Views
Re: Could be - 27/02/2010 07:15:07 PM 1197 Views
This seems a lot like an OMGUS. - 27/02/2010 07:02:12 AM 1037 Views
Well, we have a very weird situation here - 27/02/2010 05:13:12 PM 1133 Views
Re: Well, we have a very weird situation here - 27/02/2010 05:40:16 PM 965 Views
Re: Sorry I've been insanely busy. - 27/02/2010 07:06:39 AM 1120 Views
Re: Sorry I've been insanely busy. - 27/02/2010 07:55:13 AM 1031 Views
Gotcha, thanks. *NM* - 27/02/2010 08:07:21 AM 656 Views
Okay, let's try to finish off today - 27/02/2010 07:27:09 PM 1137 Views
Re: Okay, let's try to finish off today - 27/02/2010 08:24:14 PM 1310 Views
Interesting. - 27/02/2010 09:28:33 PM 1085 Views
I sort of assumed everyone knew where I'm aiming, I've been pretty open about it - 27/02/2010 09:45:50 PM 1099 Views
Oh, right. - 28/02/2010 04:32:13 AM 978 Views
Vote: ranagrande - 27/02/2010 09:12:51 PM 1063 Views
Hmmm - 27/02/2010 11:31:52 PM 988 Views
Re: Hmmm - 28/02/2010 12:41:07 AM 1128 Views
What, if anything, has changed? - 28/02/2010 03:19:49 AM 1107 Views
Dang, I didn't know you could make text larger. Fancy! *NM* - 28/02/2010 04:57:28 AM 595 Views
A little joke - 28/02/2010 05:16:14 AM 1693 Views
Haha nice. - 28/02/2010 05:41:14 AM 1218 Views
Re: Haha nice. - 28/02/2010 06:29:58 AM 1630 Views
Woah, that's a pretty sneaky trick with the quote links. - 28/02/2010 07:14:22 AM 1038 Views
Oh, and RBIRL: midterms week. *NM* - 27/02/2010 09:35:25 PM 634 Views
Yikes (warning: lots of text) - 28/02/2010 12:35:16 AM 1087 Views
Why do you keep calling my death inevitable? - 28/02/2010 02:51:26 AM 1025 Views
Because you have often said you're a lightning rod - 28/02/2010 07:48:14 AM 1176 Views
Guess I'll set up the other camp: Vote: beetnemesis - 28/02/2010 03:22:49 AM 1069 Views
fair enough - 28/02/2010 04:40:02 AM 1054 Views
Yeah, I would like an explanation. - 28/02/2010 05:00:55 AM 1044 Views
Vote: beetnemesis - 01/03/2010 03:18:00 AM 1126 Views
EBWOP - 01/03/2010 03:20:24 AM 1052 Views
"Jumpy?" - 01/03/2010 05:47:37 AM 1009 Views
Re: "Jumpy?" - 03/03/2010 05:35:50 AM 1113 Views
I GUESS I'll contribute my opinion. - 28/02/2010 06:15:36 AM 1146 Views
What a rebel - 28/02/2010 07:52:50 AM 1057 Views
me and beet - 28/02/2010 01:03:59 PM 1177 Views
my stance on voting - 01/03/2010 03:08:33 AM 1197 Views
Re: my stance on voting - 01/03/2010 03:21:32 AM 1230 Views
well the reason my not posting as much - 01/03/2010 04:03:26 AM 1131 Views
Re: well the reason my not posting as much - 01/03/2010 05:28:48 AM 1004 Views
Do you get a ring for voting abstinence? - 01/03/2010 04:56:57 AM 1224 Views
LOL *NM* - 01/03/2010 05:26:14 AM 600 Views
RBIRL until thursday. - 01/03/2010 07:06:50 AM 1031 Views
You undecided people really need to make up your minds - 01/03/2010 07:32:42 PM 1115 Views
Seriously, the suspense is killing me *NM* - 02/03/2010 05:30:26 PM 612 Views
Agreed, this is really getting ridiculous *NM* - 02/03/2010 08:06:12 PM 694 Views
Perhaps a deadline would liven things up? - 02/03/2010 08:46:35 PM 1065 Views
Please - 02/03/2010 09:12:36 PM 1122 Views
- 02/03/2010 11:20:19 PM 1221 Views
Re: - 02/03/2010 11:49:21 PM 1134 Views
Did you unvote? - 03/03/2010 04:22:52 AM 1167 Views
I always forget that! - 03/03/2010 01:04:09 PM 1064 Views
I'm sorry. - 03/03/2010 03:54:56 AM 1117 Views
But... I'm much more interesting than some stupid "book!" - 03/03/2010 04:11:02 AM 1078 Views
Its Hammer Time! - 03/03/2010 05:25:27 AM 1137 Views
Re: Its Hammer Time! - 03/03/2010 05:32:34 AM 1026 Views
I hope you all feel really guilty about this - 03/03/2010 06:22:57 AM 960 Views
Not likely, we're pretty draconian about lynches these days - 03/03/2010 09:15:00 AM 961 Views
..I can and HAVE rebutted these. - 03/03/2010 05:15:32 PM 1025 Views
EBWOP: I need to start hitting preview to make sure the formatting is right. - 03/03/2010 05:18:43 PM 1015 Views
I'm sorry, I am not convinced - 03/03/2010 11:16:36 PM 992 Views
I figured it'd be meaningless to RC, but ok... - 04/03/2010 01:54:36 AM 1055 Views
Well you figured very wrong - 04/03/2010 01:57:09 AM 1195 Views
All right, let's look at this - 04/03/2010 02:06:58 AM 1168 Views
This is a very interesting development - 04/03/2010 02:22:46 AM 1162 Views
Ditto. - 04/03/2010 02:28:18 AM 1301 Views
Re: All right, let's look at this - 04/03/2010 03:46:38 AM 981 Views
Gosh. - 04/03/2010 04:01:04 AM 1087 Views
I find this very, very, very, VERY unlikely. - 04/03/2010 05:25:41 AM 1189 Views
We're only waiting on Bergioyn and Fist, I believe. - 04/03/2010 05:56:36 AM 1111 Views
Now we are down to Fist - 04/03/2010 03:47:22 PM 1000 Views
At this point I feel like anything I could say would only hurt my case - 04/03/2010 06:34:43 AM 1114 Views
You brought this upon yourself. - 03/03/2010 01:06:58 PM 1050 Views
Your fencing smiley has dulled my scathing retort - 03/03/2010 05:19:49 PM 1106 Views
- 03/03/2010 05:34:11 PM 1149 Views
I'm back. - 03/03/2010 07:32:24 PM 1155 Views
I'll give it a shot - 03/03/2010 08:19:01 PM 1186 Views
Are you a Town Roleblocker? (Table) - Summary: All 'No' - 04/03/2010 02:28:55 AM 1184 Views
No. *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:29:51 AM 671 Views
No *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:31:43 AM 652 Views
Nope. *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:32:54 AM 580 Views
Re: Are you a Town Roleblocker? (Table) *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:34:19 AM 619 Views
Ignore, hit 'reply' instead of 'edit' I think *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:36:02 AM 560 Views
No *NM* - 04/03/2010 03:40:15 AM 674 Views
No *NM* - 04/03/2010 04:44:27 AM 623 Views
No, sir *NM* - 04/03/2010 05:20:43 AM 703 Views
Nope. *NM* - 04/03/2010 05:25:10 AM 591 Views
No. *NM* - 04/03/2010 01:54:15 PM 637 Views
no *NM* - 05/03/2010 03:52:07 AM 647 Views
Well, I don't think there is much point in further delay - 04/03/2010 11:44:57 PM 957 Views
To the roleblocker: - 05/03/2010 01:46:50 AM 1160 Views
That's everyone, Vote: Beetnemesis *NM* - 05/03/2010 04:06:03 AM 624 Views
I think that's everyone. - 05/03/2010 04:39:23 AM 965 Views
I wouldn't jump on fist- he seems like he just rarely posts - 05/03/2010 06:21:34 AM 1284 Views
Also: Someone kill me! Eh, screw it. - 05/03/2010 06:27:29 AM 1227 Views
RBIRL - 05/03/2010 05:17:54 AM 1024 Views
Well, Beet already hammered. - 05/03/2010 06:44:08 AM 1069 Views
Hah! It's like a ghost! Or a lame-duck president - 05/03/2010 07:22:42 AM 1143 Views
Not a bad idea - 05/03/2010 08:13:59 AM 1139 Views
Beetnemesis has been lynched - 05/03/2010 05:38:05 PM 1144 Views
Sorry Beet! *NM* - 06/03/2010 05:11:56 AM 614 Views
You shall be the only one I don't haunt *NM* - 06/03/2010 06:29:23 AM 549 Views
Yo, what did I do to you? *NM* - 06/03/2010 06:47:51 PM 684 Views
I meant of those who lynched me! You shall be EXALTED! - 06/03/2010 06:52:39 PM 1185 Views
Hmm... tell me more about this robot-heaven - 06/03/2010 09:15:57 PM 1223 Views
In both places, the humans are our slaves - 07/03/2010 06:48:29 PM 1240 Views

Reply to Message