Active Users:1277 Time:12/01/2025 03:36:04 AM
Re: Hmmm, Isaac Send a noteboard - 09/02/2010 07:20:02 AM
Boy, this reminds me of game 1B we played here at RAFO. Each of roles were killed off fairly quickly. Recent games haven't been that bad though. Game should be winnable, we just need to stay calm. In recent games we've had a bit more luck, we've lost vanillas for the first few deaths. Our biggest problem will be panic, we can't rush to lynch anyone. Yet, even with losing two of our biggest roles, I'm not too worried, we can do this. Night kills were really lucky, let's hope the other games don't end up like this.

So yeah, I don't know what we should do. I don't have any suspicions, and I don't know where we should go from here. Anyone got any ideas?


Well one silver lining with the town having taken such a pounding is that the NK factions will presumably be concentrating on trying to kill each other off, both by NK and by lynch since being in on a lynch that bags a DF or SK always helps one's claims at innocence. So we might have a bit of breathing room, while neither is likely to pass a chance ot kill a townie, they probably will be devoting efforts to ferreting each other out as opposed to framing a townie. From perosnal experience I can' testify that's it's very difficult to do both at once.

I wasn't in 1B or 2B, so I don't know the parallel, but we've hemhoraged roles before, it's always a blow but we've also had a lot of games where the roles didn't do much either and victory still happened. Quite often the doc never prevents and attack, though they do tend to let the cop RC, considering we've had DF RBers most games of late, odds are the DFs, if the cop claimed, would just RB them and whack someone else anyway, so normally of late an investigative role claiming just renders them vanilla and a townie dies anyway. Losing the back up cop only hurts us if the cop dies, and I suppose we might have a back up doc too. I'm guessing we have more roles left, besides the cop, besides the existance of a miller, just the fact that they all three deaths have been roled probably speaks to a higher density of roles, or insider knowledge. I wouldn't raise the point, but there are the MPD numbers, I don't believe Napoleon gave his and of course Blaine never said anything at all, but they may know something of what the numbers mean and had better odds by elimination. Alternatively, they might have thought players not saying anything might have indicated they were worried of exposing themselves as a role, that latter explanation holds even if the numbers really mean nothing at all... and I'd point out that we never got numbers for any of our trio of casualties, so they probably do mean notihng, however, that people thought they might mean something, and some didn't give them out, well, there are worse reasons to guess someone might be hiding themselves as roled. If nothing else, people who gave out their numbers, especially after it was raised that it might let the DFs find them, probably weren't too worried about exposure, and when you're striking basically at random anything helps, lynch or NK.

I imagine if FT hadn't dropped his bombshell, focus would have remained on MPD, and the DFs probably never shifted focus, because they didn't know if there was a SK or whatever and while they probably weren't surprised, it's likely they took FT's claim at face value and weren't very distracted by it. So they probably were trying to decipher if MPD meant anything, whereas the town and probably the SK were focused on FT and basically forgot MPD. It is fairly probable then that they might have used that as the basis for their attack. Just as reluctance to claim often highlights a DF, it also highlights roles, so I wouldn't be surprised if one or both of our night losses was targeted in whole or part for not giving a MPD number. I would guess that if that was the case, then it was probably napoleon, Blaine's silence on the matter wasn't very notable since he was just not around, so maybe the DF's killed napoleon for MPD reasons.

That seems like the likely allocation of NK regardless though, because I can't see three or four players conferencing about their NK and picking Blaine. Blaine's death just makes no sense, and that tends to indicate one player in isolation thinking something like 'The one person the doc won't protect, the watcher wouldn't watch, would be the guy who has been utterly silent, all kills benefit me anyway, maybe he's a role' whereas I'd think the DFs would have picked a target that made some sort of sense.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Reply to message
Rafo Mafia 4 Day 2 is over. - 08/02/2010 06:53:53 PM 3408 Views
List of Players - 08/02/2010 06:58:04 PM 1174 Views
This is great, thanks! *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:19:25 AM 720 Views
Vote: Hieshyn - 15/02/2010 03:25:25 AM 1272 Views
Crap! - 15/02/2010 03:26:24 AM 1176 Views
Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 08/02/2010 08:53:49 PM 1343 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 08/02/2010 09:28:57 PM 1121 Views
Hey, by the way, are you Mafia? - 08/02/2010 09:34:46 PM 1267 Views
I am not Hopper - 08/02/2010 10:37:55 PM 1181 Views
Maybe I am AWESOME - 08/02/2010 11:19:48 PM 1253 Views
Now that's a questionable claim. - 09/02/2010 02:36:25 AM 1246 Views
Hah! You underestimate my ego, madam! - 09/02/2010 06:25:28 AM 1116 Views
A few questions and comments - 08/02/2010 09:29:06 PM 1224 Views
Re: A few questions and comments - 08/02/2010 10:31:32 PM 1199 Views
Re: A few questions and comments - 08/02/2010 11:23:07 PM 996 Views
Third Party - 08/02/2010 09:43:57 PM 1064 Views
Re: Third Party - 08/02/2010 10:34:38 PM 1145 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 09/02/2010 02:47:03 AM 1177 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 09/02/2010 03:53:18 AM 1150 Views
I thinking Lynching F-T was the right thing to do. - 09/02/2010 04:45:13 AM 1161 Views
RBIRL ... test tomorrow. Probably not going to post tonight. *NM* - 09/02/2010 12:03:38 AM 721 Views
You know what? - 09/02/2010 01:17:52 AM 1143 Views
NO! - 09/02/2010 01:31:57 AM 1129 Views
Re: You know what? - 09/02/2010 01:34:42 AM 1113 Views
Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 01:57:39 AM 1130 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 02:38:45 AM 1152 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 03:29:32 AM 1197 Views
Oh, I learned all those lessons last year. - 09/02/2010 04:05:04 AM 1125 Views
Re: Oh, I learned all those lessons last year. - 09/02/2010 04:50:41 AM 1220 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 03:36:28 AM 1165 Views
Well thanks for the encouragement. - 09/02/2010 04:14:50 AM 1329 Views
Heh, Mafia: Other than the occasional lynching or assassination, we're one big supportive family. - 09/02/2010 04:24:26 AM 1138 Views
See, that way the betrayal is personal. - 09/02/2010 04:41:47 AM 1360 Views
Ouch *NM* - 09/02/2010 04:58:13 PM 703 Views
*NM* - 10/02/2010 01:02:30 AM 660 Views
Hypocop (Table) - 09/02/2010 12:59:06 AM 1216 Views
Beetnemesis, innocent. *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:17:10 AM 652 Views
Okay - 09/02/2010 01:29:09 AM 1024 Views
Kronin, innocent. *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:53:09 AM 613 Views
Isaac, Guilty *NM* - 09/02/2010 02:12:07 AM 711 Views
Isaac, innocent *NM* - 09/02/2010 02:37:54 AM 643 Views
Investigated fistofpainx, found him to be innocent *NM* - 09/02/2010 06:27:37 AM 658 Views
DK, found her innocent *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:48:11 PM 675 Views
Fox and Ravens, Guilty *NM* - 09/02/2010 03:57:50 PM 640 Views
Vote Record (Table) - 09/02/2010 01:30:51 AM 1210 Views
I'll add: list of players who did NOT vote yesterday - 09/02/2010 06:46:38 AM 1172 Views
RBIRL - 09/02/2010 04:45:19 AM 1129 Views
Hmmm, - 09/02/2010 06:18:29 AM 1132 Views
Re: Hmmm, - 09/02/2010 07:20:02 AM 1059 Views
Yeah, I agree with the Blaine rationalization - 09/02/2010 08:57:19 AM 1141 Views
Huh. Oh boy oh - 09/02/2010 06:39:15 AM 992 Views
Care to give us your thoughts? *NM* - 09/02/2010 07:26:09 AM 690 Views
Well, losing Doc and Deputy same night is bound to cause trouble. Especially losing Doc. *NM* - 09/02/2010 08:54:49 AM 650 Views
Well, yeah... - 09/02/2010 04:57:26 PM 1267 Views
Re: Well, yeah... - 09/02/2010 07:27:00 PM 1073 Views
I want to throw this out here. - 09/02/2010 07:21:04 AM 1179 Views
What changed your mind? *NM* - 09/02/2010 08:58:09 AM 633 Views
Well, I realized I was the one telling everyone to just vote for someone. - 09/02/2010 04:56:17 PM 1162 Views
*NM* - 10/02/2010 02:56:52 AM 577 Views
I thought you'd like that. *NM* - 10/02/2010 01:00:19 PM 580 Views
I was going to post a few thoughts here this morning... - 09/02/2010 01:49:26 PM 1132 Views
Why is everyone assuming we have a SK? - 10/02/2010 12:09:47 AM 1187 Views
What tips me off is the "melted plastic". - 10/02/2010 12:22:56 AM 1027 Views
Good point. Is an arsonist usually a third party? *NM* - 10/02/2010 12:28:10 AM 611 Views
That's so arbitrary, though. - 10/02/2010 12:57:09 AM 997 Views
EBWOP: It's probably not a vigilante. - 10/02/2010 01:05:57 AM 1222 Views
That seems like good reasoning - 10/02/2010 01:50:47 AM 1155 Views
Re: That seems like good reasoning - 10/02/2010 01:58:14 AM 1177 Views
That's a vig rule? I did not know that - 10/02/2010 08:16:56 PM 1167 Views
Well, it's pretty common sense. - 10/02/2010 09:09:09 PM 1240 Views
I think he might have been referring to vigilante kills being blockable - 10/02/2010 09:43:53 PM 1077 Views
Oh, my bad then! *NM* - 10/02/2010 10:19:13 PM 681 Views
As the resident expert on vigilantism - 10/02/2010 08:04:17 PM 1449 Views
Youre the resident expert on vigilantism? *NM* - 11/02/2010 11:06:24 PM 657 Views
He was a vig once or twice. *NM* - 12/02/2010 01:33:57 AM 689 Views
I was the best vigilante you guys have ever had! *NM* - 12/02/2010 02:19:57 AM 642 Views
The only vigilante we've ever had. - 12/02/2010 02:25:20 AM 1081 Views
Wait, haven't you proposed an arsonist most games. *NM* - 10/02/2010 04:37:33 AM 634 Views
Maybe it's been proposed. - 10/02/2010 05:19:10 AM 1172 Views
Re: Maybe it's been proposed. - 10/02/2010 05:56:10 AM 1108 Views
Re: Why is everyone assuming we have a SK? - 10/02/2010 12:50:51 AM 1291 Views
Re: Why is everyone assuming we have a SK? - 10/02/2010 01:11:50 AM 1086 Views
Because we have a SK *NM* - 10/02/2010 05:14:00 AM 606 Views
I agree that we probably have a SK - 10/02/2010 07:50:33 PM 1093 Views
Nah, I was just saying *NM* - 11/02/2010 05:06:54 AM 658 Views
wait a minute - 10/02/2010 01:15:32 PM 1147 Views
Sensors? *NM* - 10/02/2010 01:42:36 PM 566 Views
Another thing - 10/02/2010 04:42:50 PM 1253 Views
F-T, I assume - 10/02/2010 05:08:58 PM 1083 Views
Probably, might be a hint at an RB but I doubt it *NM* - 10/02/2010 06:57:01 PM 671 Views
I don't think it could be a RB - 10/02/2010 07:47:55 PM 1186 Views
Probably not, but not for that reason - 10/02/2010 08:32:57 PM 1154 Views
Huh. - 10/02/2010 09:11:29 PM 1154 Views
Did anyone get any messages last night? - 10/02/2010 08:23:03 PM 1119 Views
Nope *NM* - 10/02/2010 08:35:18 PM 639 Views
Me neither. - 10/02/2010 09:14:46 PM 1140 Views
Re: Me neither. - 10/02/2010 09:41:19 PM 1264 Views
RBIRL - 11/02/2010 04:52:12 PM 1095 Views
Good luck! *NM* - 11/02/2010 07:05:40 PM 606 Views
Re: RBIRL - 11/02/2010 09:59:39 PM 1302 Views
We're stalling out a bit - 11/02/2010 10:05:09 PM 1087 Views
Yep. - 12/02/2010 02:58:02 AM 1065 Views
We could talk about my heroic failure to defend the innocent some more? Fine... - 12/02/2010 07:12:51 AM 1172 Views
You seem engaged in a very active defense so far this game - 12/02/2010 09:40:23 PM 1331 Views
Yawn... - 12/02/2010 11:28:50 PM 1288 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 12:32:30 AM 1250 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 01:31:41 AM 1177 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 02:24:40 AM 1121 Views
He's brought up accusations on himself - 13/02/2010 02:40:01 AM 1283 Views
Dammit, I had a post and then it got deleted. - 14/02/2010 01:45:31 AM 1108 Views
Alrighty, let's try this again. - 14/02/2010 06:38:26 AM 1002 Views
Always happy to answer your questions - 14/02/2010 07:35:35 AM 1014 Views
Thanks for the answers. - 15/02/2010 07:29:31 PM 1132 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 02:02:34 AM 1196 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 02:48:22 AM 1084 Views
On F-T's accusations against you. - 14/02/2010 01:54:20 AM 1162 Views
Re: On F-T's accusations against you. - 14/02/2010 03:43:52 AM 1072 Views
Oh, right, I modded that one. - 14/02/2010 04:11:46 AM 1073 Views
That's right, I am the Breaker of Unbroken Records - 14/02/2010 05:56:52 AM 1153 Views
Actually, quite few of my streaks were broken on that one - 14/02/2010 08:43:09 AM 1059 Views
I'm in second? Woo! - 14/02/2010 02:46:05 PM 1129 Views
Yep, welcome to being a lightning rod - 14/02/2010 09:10:43 PM 1286 Views
I'm not gonna be as targeted as you; I've died a LOT. - 14/02/2010 11:17:24 PM 1127 Views
Ironically I don't think I've ever killed you - 14/02/2010 11:56:03 PM 1129 Views
Game 1 I remember. - 15/02/2010 12:01:21 AM 991 Views
Re: Game 1 I remember. - 15/02/2010 12:19:30 AM 1353 Views
Three stalled out over the winter holidays and we had to restart. - 15/02/2010 01:26:59 AM 1292 Views
Oh, the MHael Steve incident! - 15/02/2010 04:42:31 AM 1114 Views
The game? Oh, right, that. - 15/02/2010 04:41:43 AM 1028 Views
Actually... - 15/02/2010 04:57:50 PM 1223 Views
Sorry, it was my first game. - 16/02/2010 03:34:16 AM 1296 Views
That was my point actually. - 16/02/2010 06:25:17 AM 1200 Views
Those were the good old days. - 18/02/2010 01:21:44 AM 1164 Views
random thoughts - 15/02/2010 12:46:55 PM 1076 Views
I wasn't in that game. - 18/02/2010 01:19:06 AM 1082 Views
A second line of thought: ranagrande - 12/02/2010 07:40:37 AM 1385 Views
Argh... quote please - 12/02/2010 08:54:08 PM 1150 Views
Haha, fair enough - 12/02/2010 11:30:54 PM 998 Views
I was getting all set to defend myself - 13/02/2010 01:21:58 AM 1231 Views
RBIRL - 14/02/2010 06:11:55 AM 1175 Views
Back - 18/02/2010 02:14:25 AM 1214 Views
Vote: Hieshyn - 15/02/2010 03:27:04 AM 1005 Views
Re: Hieshyn - 15/02/2010 12:54:42 PM 1263 Views
That's giving up awfully early. - 15/02/2010 07:35:37 PM 1042 Views
Never give up! Never surrender! - 15/02/2010 08:31:19 PM 1188 Views
Well this was unexpected. - 15/02/2010 06:07:44 PM 1110 Views
Re: Well this was unexpected. - 15/02/2010 08:30:57 PM 1089 Views
I think he's saying that he's been quiet because he's busy, not a DF - 15/02/2010 08:39:53 PM 1003 Views
I don't think so - 16/02/2010 12:09:13 AM 1141 Views
I assumed - 16/02/2010 12:14:16 AM 1123 Views
Re: I assumed - 16/02/2010 01:28:43 AM 1160 Views
In a way Isaac is right - 16/02/2010 05:24:08 AM 1132 Views
If he was the SK - 15/02/2010 07:55:38 PM 1231 Views
How many games did you guys play on wotmania, anyway? - 15/02/2010 08:43:04 PM 1088 Views
9 *NM* - 15/02/2010 08:53:23 PM 683 Views
Game 9 was F-T's Cairhienen Civil War/Succession. - 15/02/2010 08:53:03 PM 1107 Views
Oh that's right! - 15/02/2010 09:03:40 PM 1088 Views
We just took that game over. - 15/02/2010 10:12:43 PM 1141 Views
Oh yeah, we owned that one - 15/02/2010 11:48:12 PM 1052 Views
Re: Game 9 was F-T's Cairhienen Civil War/Succession. - 15/02/2010 11:54:44 PM 1169 Views
Lol irony - 16/02/2010 12:16:49 AM 1125 Views
what I thought was pretty funny - 16/02/2010 12:41:47 AM 1138 Views
Heh heh the Cairhienins would be proud *NM* - 16/02/2010 01:11:13 AM 659 Views
Oh, Isaac got High Seat there, didn't he? - 16/02/2010 01:33:05 AM 1138 Views
That was a fun one. - 18/02/2010 01:32:02 AM 1170 Views
So, it's just because he hasn't been talking much? That fits a lot of people - 15/02/2010 09:31:02 PM 1188 Views
well I really dont have anything worthwhile to say *NM* - 15/02/2010 10:06:11 PM 724 Views
Eh... not good enough - 16/02/2010 12:19:22 AM 1122 Views
Holiday weekend - 15/02/2010 11:49:37 PM 1079 Views
OK, I'm glad that vote got some discussion flowing. - 16/02/2010 02:58:55 AM 1250 Views
Ooo sneaky sneaky - 16/02/2010 03:58:37 AM 1325 Views
Re: Ooo sneaky sneaky - 16/02/2010 04:25:26 AM 1148 Views
It wasn't really a big thing. - 16/02/2010 04:46:54 AM 1203 Views
Re: It wasn't really a big thing. - 16/02/2010 05:30:34 AM 1160 Views
You know doing this sort of thing can get you lynched - 16/02/2010 04:40:23 AM 1221 Views
Oh, I know it can. - 16/02/2010 05:23:13 AM 1159 Views
Re: Oh, I know it can. - 16/02/2010 07:00:53 AM 1244 Views
Since when are you against traps? - 16/02/2010 04:07:05 PM 1076 Views
Since game 4 or 5, roughly - 16/02/2010 10:57:19 PM 1124 Views
I'm glad it did too. - 16/02/2010 01:16:14 PM 1154 Views
Regarding Inactivity and whatnot - 16/02/2010 06:22:14 AM 1219 Views
RBIRL - exams Thursday *NM* - 17/02/2010 02:11:27 AM 675 Views
So, where are we at? - 18/02/2010 02:40:32 AM 1143 Views
Re: So, where are we at? - 18/02/2010 03:55:33 AM 1211 Views
EBWOP: Issac's maybe only a 5.5. No, a 5.7 - 18/02/2010 06:58:40 AM 1178 Views
OK so I apparantly lack the technical know-how to reply to myself - 18/02/2010 07:08:36 AM 1280 Views
Re: OK so I apparantly lack the technical know-how to reply to myself - 18/02/2010 07:54:05 AM 1137 Views
Well yeah, all of that is mostly why I haven't been pushing anything - 18/02/2010 08:51:14 AM 1068 Views
Uggggghhhh...Ok. This post makes me want to vote you off. - 18/02/2010 03:28:19 PM 1067 Views
You seem to have misunbderstood my question - 18/02/2010 04:28:47 PM 1080 Views
Re: You seem to have misunbderstood my question - 18/02/2010 05:10:14 PM 1240 Views
Nice little typo I have there on misundertood, that's gonna be nagging at me for all of Day 2 - 18/02/2010 05:25:49 PM 1113 Views
My post, "Re: Hieshyn" - 18/02/2010 06:32:12 PM 1296 Views
Re: Nice little typo I have there on misundertood, that's gonna be nagging at me for all of Day 2 - 19/02/2010 04:45:25 AM 1100 Views
Thanks, all right let's review it - 19/02/2010 11:41:19 AM 1142 Views
A few thoughts - 19/02/2010 03:22:32 PM 1072 Views
Alright then. - 19/02/2010 05:20:39 PM 922 Views
EBWOP - 19/02/2010 05:23:06 PM 1203 Views
Haha, I'm sorry - 19/02/2010 05:49:00 PM 1075 Views
Re: EBWOP - 19/02/2010 06:53:08 PM 1206 Views
Naive? - 19/02/2010 07:13:14 PM 1235 Views
Naive or sinister, take your pick - 19/02/2010 07:29:09 PM 1170 Views
We could go with "arrogant," instead of either of those, if you like - 20/02/2010 01:59:22 AM 978 Views
Hmm...well here's something interesting now that you reminded me of that game... - 19/02/2010 08:26:33 PM 1057 Views
That's true- I've said as much earlier in this thread - 20/02/2010 02:08:47 AM 1110 Views
Re: EBWOP - 19/02/2010 08:32:55 PM 1048 Views
Re: EBWOP - 19/02/2010 08:57:50 PM 1048 Views
Speaking of that game - 20/02/2010 06:03:18 AM 1125 Views
Re: Speaking of that game - 20/02/2010 05:24:16 PM 1104 Views
Actually, that reminds me. HEY KRONIN! - 18/02/2010 07:09:39 AM 1096 Views
Hey. - 18/02/2010 04:09:08 PM 1142 Views
Re: Hey. - 18/02/2010 05:19:30 PM 1159 Views
Re: Hey. - 18/02/2010 06:50:35 PM 1073 Views
Re: Hey. - 18/02/2010 05:37:33 PM 1249 Views
FT had no evidence one way or the other if Issac was a DF - 18/02/2010 05:44:43 PM 1044 Views
Don't put words in my mouth. - 18/02/2010 06:03:55 PM 1195 Views
Oh no, I know, I know. I'm just saying, FT has no more credibility than any of us *NM* - 18/02/2010 07:48:58 PM 665 Views
Well OK, a BIT more, because we know he was townie *NM* - 18/02/2010 07:49:34 PM 670 Views
But he IS a damn good player, and his advice, however limited, should be taken into account. *NM* - 18/02/2010 07:49:58 PM 652 Views
Fair enough *NM* - 18/02/2010 08:19:04 PM 620 Views
fistofpainx, Do you have any thoughts? - 18/02/2010 05:46:38 PM 1128 Views
I think that - 18/02/2010 09:45:56 PM 1186 Views
Well, if my combine the Vote Record with our previous suspicions... - 18/02/2010 09:48:24 PM 1102 Views
All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you? - 18/02/2010 11:32:07 PM 1105 Views
Re: All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you? - 19/02/2010 03:01:45 AM 1049 Views
Re: All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you? - 19/02/2010 04:07:03 AM 1159 Views
I think you're overestimating the appearance of your own innocence. - 19/02/2010 05:38:53 AM 1076 Views
Yeah, it's mostly just about getting the conversation going - 19/02/2010 06:40:17 AM 1121 Views
About voting - 19/02/2010 03:33:34 PM 1145 Views
Idk if that question about voting can be answered. - 20/02/2010 06:15:21 AM 1204 Views
In response to Fox and Ravens (down here to stop horizontal scroll) - 19/02/2010 09:50:16 PM 1146 Views
Re: In response to Fox and Ravens (down here to stop horizontal scroll) - 19/02/2010 10:22:37 PM 1208 Views
I agree - 20/02/2010 02:52:53 PM 1006 Views
Should be fine.. although, maybe only paraphrase? - 20/02/2010 02:03:30 AM 1089 Views
Well, the reason for the prohibition doesn't apply post-game, so I'll go with no - 20/02/2010 05:07:38 AM 1080 Views
Seems pretty thorough to me! I pretty much agree. *NM* - 20/02/2010 05:12:40 AM 641 Views
After seeing this thread.... - 20/02/2010 05:53:47 AM 1029 Views
Go ahead and start one then. - 20/02/2010 06:08:12 AM 1135 Views
Re: Go ahead and start one then. - 20/02/2010 06:47:23 AM 1231 Views
Isaac, did you say you have Cor's original rules saved somewhere? - 20/02/2010 04:50:29 PM 1228 Views
Re: Isaac, did you say you have Cor's original rules saved somewhere? - 20/02/2010 05:16:09 PM 1306 Views
Well, these are as good a starting point as any. - 20/02/2010 05:22:34 PM 1089 Views
I think quoting NBs from other games is okay. - 20/02/2010 05:15:55 AM 1129 Views
Quoting or paraphrasing is fine IMO *NM* - 20/02/2010 05:31:45 AM 705 Views
Fox and Ranagrande - 20/02/2010 06:30:53 AM 1217 Views
Some comments... - 20/02/2010 07:54:02 PM 1179 Views
Alright. - 20/02/2010 05:43:51 PM 1175 Views
Thanks - 20/02/2010 07:48:20 PM 1036 Views
Re: Thanks - 20/02/2010 10:35:26 PM 1034 Views
Ranagrande *NM* - 21/02/2010 12:55:29 AM 623 Views
Really? - 21/02/2010 01:58:24 AM 1118 Views
Go back and look at the NB for yourself. *NM* - 21/02/2010 04:29:54 AM 699 Views
That's hilarious. *NM* - 21/02/2010 06:47:57 PM 653 Views
Re: Thanks - 21/02/2010 01:57:25 AM 1121 Views
I do have a question - 21/02/2010 07:12:57 PM 1213 Views
A prosaic explanation- (and an objection) - 21/02/2010 09:13:43 PM 1170 Views
Well, you kind of said it yourself. - 21/02/2010 07:38:32 PM 1085 Views
I'm purposefully trying to not be so focussed on ranagrande - 21/02/2010 11:06:40 PM 1173 Views
Not sure I follow - 22/02/2010 06:49:11 PM 1182 Views
Because I might just be blinding myself here. - 22/02/2010 07:40:15 PM 1188 Views
Oh, okay. That does make sense. - 22/02/2010 07:52:10 PM 1311 Views
I think I do - 22/02/2010 07:47:56 PM 1043 Views
I'm purposefully trying to not be so focussed on ranagrande - 21/02/2010 11:06:40 PM 1119 Views
EBWOP - sorry, double post *NM* - 21/02/2010 11:34:21 PM 636 Views
Items of note from my NB archive: - 21/02/2010 09:37:49 PM 1253 Views
I am kind of confused about what you're doing here. - 22/02/2010 07:20:49 PM 1286 Views
I'm feeling the same thing. - 22/02/2010 07:36:46 PM 1134 Views
Re: I am kind of confused about what you're doing here. - 22/02/2010 08:07:19 PM 1132 Views
Re: Rafo Mafia 4 Day 2 - 22/02/2010 12:09:20 PM 1177 Views
Alright. Here's a quick synposis - 22/02/2010 07:54:19 PM 1176 Views
That sounds about right to me. - 22/02/2010 07:58:29 PM 1137 Views
(My two cents) - 22/02/2010 08:35:17 PM 1161 Views
Dude. - 22/02/2010 08:53:30 PM 1156 Views
Re: Dude. - 22/02/2010 09:45:52 PM 1116 Views
Thanks. - 23/02/2010 07:04:29 AM 1181 Views
Another minor piece against ranagrande - 22/02/2010 07:13:44 PM 1198 Views
You didn't read the entirety of my quote post did you? - 22/02/2010 07:42:14 PM 1183 Views
Actually, I do have a small confession to make about that... - 22/02/2010 08:14:08 PM 1269 Views
Re: Another minor piece against ranagrande - 22/02/2010 08:23:48 PM 1308 Views
Fair enough - 22/02/2010 08:38:51 PM 1249 Views
Re: Fair enough - 22/02/2010 09:07:57 PM 1156 Views
Re: Fair enough - 22/02/2010 09:07:57 PM 1107 Views
Numbers? - 22/02/2010 09:36:51 PM 1269 Views
Re: Numbers? - 22/02/2010 10:21:13 PM 1260 Views
I don't think he's innocent. OR a DF - 22/02/2010 10:42:16 PM 1082 Views
Maybe I missed it.... - 22/02/2010 09:26:47 PM 1189 Views
Re: Maybe I missed it.... - 22/02/2010 09:38:09 PM 1126 Views
Re: Maybe I missed it.... - 23/02/2010 09:38:23 PM 1084 Views
I will destroy the world - 23/02/2010 11:17:26 PM 1219 Views
And yet, that's the exact same thing you called me out on yesterday. *NM* - 24/02/2010 01:07:07 AM 547 Views
Ok, that's totally different... - 24/02/2010 06:36:00 AM 1099 Views
All that's different is the presumed final intent. - 24/02/2010 12:36:32 PM 1184 Views
Yeah ... those are pretty much the same. *NM* - 24/02/2010 03:17:25 PM 566 Views
No, this is my view: - 24/02/2010 11:23:25 PM 1227 Views
And my view was: - 25/02/2010 01:29:13 AM 1095 Views
shrug. I haven't been attacking you today, you know - 25/02/2010 01:46:39 AM 1169 Views
I'm just pointing out the irony. - 25/02/2010 01:52:07 AM 1092 Views
Re: I'm just pointing out the irony. - 25/02/2010 06:47:45 AM 1113 Views
Vote: Fox and Ravens *NM* - 24/02/2010 04:51:24 AM 647 Views
Can I ask why? - 24/02/2010 05:06:22 AM 1118 Views
I'd be very interested in seeing an explanation as well *NM* - 24/02/2010 08:04:30 PM 653 Views
Ditto. *NM* - 24/02/2010 08:09:31 PM 670 Views
My, my, how totally unexpected - 24/02/2010 01:01:42 PM 1161 Views
Reasoning would be nice *NM* - 24/02/2010 10:13:43 PM 654 Views
Eh? *NM* - 25/02/2010 01:47:19 AM 632 Views
Hieshyn I will DESTROY you - 27/02/2010 01:41:25 AM 1091 Views
We're sort of in a holding pattern here, Hieshyn - 25/02/2010 07:01:23 PM 1269 Views
You're right, Isaac. - 25/02/2010 08:47:03 PM 1269 Views
Though I presume this was already somewhat obvious, ^Seconded. *NM* - 25/02/2010 08:56:19 PM 564 Views
Hieshyns and Foxes and Beets! Oh my! - 26/02/2010 02:59:51 PM 1195 Views
At first I thought he was going for a F&R-style trap - 26/02/2010 01:44:16 AM 1168 Views
Re: At first I thought he was going for a F&R-style trap - 26/02/2010 06:10:33 AM 1181 Views
Re: At first I thought he was going for a F&R-style trap - 26/02/2010 07:00:02 AM 1231 Views
Sorry I've been insanely busy. - 27/02/2010 03:33:43 AM 1262 Views
Here's what I'm getting from this: - 27/02/2010 06:49:22 AM 1130 Views
Could be - 27/02/2010 06:16:30 PM 1140 Views
Re: Could be - 27/02/2010 07:15:07 PM 1226 Views
This seems a lot like an OMGUS. - 27/02/2010 07:02:12 AM 1068 Views
Well, we have a very weird situation here - 27/02/2010 05:13:12 PM 1163 Views
Re: Well, we have a very weird situation here - 27/02/2010 05:40:16 PM 990 Views
Re: Sorry I've been insanely busy. - 27/02/2010 07:06:39 AM 1150 Views
Re: Sorry I've been insanely busy. - 27/02/2010 07:55:13 AM 1055 Views
Gotcha, thanks. *NM* - 27/02/2010 08:07:21 AM 670 Views
Okay, let's try to finish off today - 27/02/2010 07:27:09 PM 1170 Views
Re: Okay, let's try to finish off today - 27/02/2010 08:24:14 PM 1340 Views
Interesting. - 27/02/2010 09:28:33 PM 1116 Views
I sort of assumed everyone knew where I'm aiming, I've been pretty open about it - 27/02/2010 09:45:50 PM 1126 Views
Oh, right. - 28/02/2010 04:32:13 AM 1010 Views
Vote: ranagrande - 27/02/2010 09:12:51 PM 1098 Views
Hmmm - 27/02/2010 11:31:52 PM 1012 Views
Re: Hmmm - 28/02/2010 12:41:07 AM 1156 Views
What, if anything, has changed? - 28/02/2010 03:19:49 AM 1139 Views
Dang, I didn't know you could make text larger. Fancy! *NM* - 28/02/2010 04:57:28 AM 614 Views
A little joke - 28/02/2010 05:16:14 AM 1724 Views
Haha nice. - 28/02/2010 05:41:14 AM 1249 Views
Re: Haha nice. - 28/02/2010 06:29:58 AM 1657 Views
Woah, that's a pretty sneaky trick with the quote links. - 28/02/2010 07:14:22 AM 1067 Views
Oh, and RBIRL: midterms week. *NM* - 27/02/2010 09:35:25 PM 650 Views
Yikes (warning: lots of text) - 28/02/2010 12:35:16 AM 1116 Views
Why do you keep calling my death inevitable? - 28/02/2010 02:51:26 AM 1062 Views
Because you have often said you're a lightning rod - 28/02/2010 07:48:14 AM 1204 Views
Guess I'll set up the other camp: Vote: beetnemesis - 28/02/2010 03:22:49 AM 1101 Views
fair enough - 28/02/2010 04:40:02 AM 1081 Views
Yeah, I would like an explanation. - 28/02/2010 05:00:55 AM 1081 Views
Vote: beetnemesis - 01/03/2010 03:18:00 AM 1157 Views
EBWOP - 01/03/2010 03:20:24 AM 1085 Views
"Jumpy?" - 01/03/2010 05:47:37 AM 1042 Views
Re: "Jumpy?" - 03/03/2010 05:35:50 AM 1141 Views
I GUESS I'll contribute my opinion. - 28/02/2010 06:15:36 AM 1180 Views
What a rebel - 28/02/2010 07:52:50 AM 1084 Views
me and beet - 28/02/2010 01:03:59 PM 1208 Views
my stance on voting - 01/03/2010 03:08:33 AM 1228 Views
Re: my stance on voting - 01/03/2010 03:21:32 AM 1262 Views
well the reason my not posting as much - 01/03/2010 04:03:26 AM 1159 Views
Re: well the reason my not posting as much - 01/03/2010 05:28:48 AM 1035 Views
Do you get a ring for voting abstinence? - 01/03/2010 04:56:57 AM 1253 Views
LOL *NM* - 01/03/2010 05:26:14 AM 616 Views
RBIRL until thursday. - 01/03/2010 07:06:50 AM 1065 Views
You undecided people really need to make up your minds - 01/03/2010 07:32:42 PM 1148 Views
Seriously, the suspense is killing me *NM* - 02/03/2010 05:30:26 PM 628 Views
Agreed, this is really getting ridiculous *NM* - 02/03/2010 08:06:12 PM 708 Views
Perhaps a deadline would liven things up? - 02/03/2010 08:46:35 PM 1100 Views
Please - 02/03/2010 09:12:36 PM 1156 Views
- 02/03/2010 11:20:19 PM 1253 Views
Re: - 02/03/2010 11:49:21 PM 1163 Views
Did you unvote? - 03/03/2010 04:22:52 AM 1197 Views
I always forget that! - 03/03/2010 01:04:09 PM 1093 Views
I'm sorry. - 03/03/2010 03:54:56 AM 1145 Views
But... I'm much more interesting than some stupid "book!" - 03/03/2010 04:11:02 AM 1108 Views
Its Hammer Time! - 03/03/2010 05:25:27 AM 1163 Views
Re: Its Hammer Time! - 03/03/2010 05:32:34 AM 1059 Views
I hope you all feel really guilty about this - 03/03/2010 06:22:57 AM 991 Views
Not likely, we're pretty draconian about lynches these days - 03/03/2010 09:15:00 AM 990 Views
..I can and HAVE rebutted these. - 03/03/2010 05:15:32 PM 1059 Views
EBWOP: I need to start hitting preview to make sure the formatting is right. - 03/03/2010 05:18:43 PM 1045 Views
I'm sorry, I am not convinced - 03/03/2010 11:16:36 PM 1019 Views
I figured it'd be meaningless to RC, but ok... - 04/03/2010 01:54:36 AM 1080 Views
Well you figured very wrong - 04/03/2010 01:57:09 AM 1224 Views
All right, let's look at this - 04/03/2010 02:06:58 AM 1195 Views
This is a very interesting development - 04/03/2010 02:22:46 AM 1194 Views
Ditto. - 04/03/2010 02:28:18 AM 1329 Views
Re: All right, let's look at this - 04/03/2010 03:46:38 AM 1010 Views
Gosh. - 04/03/2010 04:01:04 AM 1120 Views
I find this very, very, very, VERY unlikely. - 04/03/2010 05:25:41 AM 1218 Views
We're only waiting on Bergioyn and Fist, I believe. - 04/03/2010 05:56:36 AM 1131 Views
Now we are down to Fist - 04/03/2010 03:47:22 PM 1036 Views
At this point I feel like anything I could say would only hurt my case - 04/03/2010 06:34:43 AM 1144 Views
You brought this upon yourself. - 03/03/2010 01:06:58 PM 1079 Views
Your fencing smiley has dulled my scathing retort - 03/03/2010 05:19:49 PM 1138 Views
- 03/03/2010 05:34:11 PM 1184 Views
I'm back. - 03/03/2010 07:32:24 PM 1186 Views
I'll give it a shot - 03/03/2010 08:19:01 PM 1212 Views
Are you a Town Roleblocker? (Table) - Summary: All 'No' - 04/03/2010 02:28:55 AM 1220 Views
No. *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:29:51 AM 685 Views
No *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:31:43 AM 664 Views
Nope. *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:32:54 AM 596 Views
Re: Are you a Town Roleblocker? (Table) *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:34:19 AM 633 Views
Ignore, hit 'reply' instead of 'edit' I think *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:36:02 AM 574 Views
No *NM* - 04/03/2010 03:40:15 AM 690 Views
No *NM* - 04/03/2010 04:44:27 AM 637 Views
No, sir *NM* - 04/03/2010 05:20:43 AM 720 Views
Nope. *NM* - 04/03/2010 05:25:10 AM 606 Views
No. *NM* - 04/03/2010 01:54:15 PM 649 Views
no *NM* - 05/03/2010 03:52:07 AM 659 Views
Well, I don't think there is much point in further delay - 04/03/2010 11:44:57 PM 984 Views
To the roleblocker: - 05/03/2010 01:46:50 AM 1191 Views
That's everyone, Vote: Beetnemesis *NM* - 05/03/2010 04:06:03 AM 637 Views
I think that's everyone. - 05/03/2010 04:39:23 AM 997 Views
I wouldn't jump on fist- he seems like he just rarely posts - 05/03/2010 06:21:34 AM 1312 Views
Also: Someone kill me! Eh, screw it. - 05/03/2010 06:27:29 AM 1250 Views
RBIRL - 05/03/2010 05:17:54 AM 1053 Views
Well, Beet already hammered. - 05/03/2010 06:44:08 AM 1099 Views
Hah! It's like a ghost! Or a lame-duck president - 05/03/2010 07:22:42 AM 1170 Views
Not a bad idea - 05/03/2010 08:13:59 AM 1171 Views
Beetnemesis has been lynched - 05/03/2010 05:38:05 PM 1177 Views
Sorry Beet! *NM* - 06/03/2010 05:11:56 AM 631 Views
You shall be the only one I don't haunt *NM* - 06/03/2010 06:29:23 AM 563 Views
Yo, what did I do to you? *NM* - 06/03/2010 06:47:51 PM 696 Views
I meant of those who lynched me! You shall be EXALTED! - 06/03/2010 06:52:39 PM 1215 Views
Hmm... tell me more about this robot-heaven - 06/03/2010 09:15:57 PM 1251 Views
In both places, the humans are our slaves - 07/03/2010 06:48:29 PM 1267 Views

Reply to Message