- So we got option 1 (sacrilicious toast), which did obviously nothing)
- 2 times option 3 (? and yuna) in which Yuna was succesful and got 'proof' that the collapsed bridge was dwarven work
I also successfully followed a Dwarf and heard him talking to another Dwarf. They seem to be certain a Dwarven Smith is behind it. Yuna mentioned that the Dwarfs will deal internally with him, but I never got that statement. Instead I only sensed ambiguity about the stance of the Dwarfs against the actions of the smith. This is something really different, I think. Although I doubt it's significant.
Taiga: can you tell me why you put proof in parentheses? Do you have counter-proof? Don't you trust Yuna? Because you seem to have no such reservations with rana's claim that no magic was used, or Berg's that the Hippos are not behind it. For all we know either could be lying to save their own group.
(They, or you, could even be lying about what option they had...)
- option 5 (Bergioyn): the hippo's did not collapse the bridge themselves
- option 8 (rana): no magic was used
- option 9 Beet, Prazi, FT and me subdued a real life hippo. Oh joy, we're good...
we only got no info on what artsapat did this event yet.
Why would any of you Final Four try to capture a Hippo? Don't you even want to know anything more about the game? What's the rationale?
FT was probably correct that people are waiting for the event resolution. Well: here it is. Can we now continue with the real game? Let's start with the people who can win without voting. This intrigues me. Who were that again? And what kind of roles can you have to win without Lynching or voting?
~Master Splinter
Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*