Active Users:714 Time:21/11/2024 08:57:22 PM
Yet you still refuse to roleclaim, are you suicidal? Isaac Send a noteboard - 09/08/2013 07:04:40 PM

View original post
View original post1) He was originally flagged as suspicious for minimal participation, considered an anti-town action. He came up lowest in 4 methods:


View original postI did- was busy at work, and since not much conversation had happened, I hadn't made a substantial post yet.

That's not rebuttal it is an excuse, you could have posted RBIRL, of course you might not know what the term means, it hasn't been in use quite as long as "bussing" and I'm not if you ever asked and were told what it means.


View original post
View original post2) Upon coming up topping all those methods he posted in to hypothesize about game make up, at which point I felt his suggestions strongly implied he possessed some game relevant information as the suggestions were otherwise random and counter-indicated by the minimal knowledge of the game we had. The principle theories raised focused on multiple scum factions, a rare thing in a game of this size and while grounds for a mod to want many players to help absorb the extra night kills it is very definitely not a reason for a Mod to want 12 players. All options focused on an abnormally powerful scum faction(s).


View original postWhat I find interesting is that, despite your criticisms, no one has been able to come up with a good reason that Bergioyn asked for specifically 12 players. And I stand by my point that if it was as simple as "doc, cop, and some townies" vs "scum and a roleblocker," that he would not need a specific number- 11 or 13 is just as workable.

No one knows why as we have no evidence as to why, all of us could speculate wildly about it, he may simply have wanted a classic 12 player game, there are a virtually unlimited number of scenarios which fit it, I could fill pages with them and none would have anything to back them up, hence why I haven't speculated and why I think most haven't, beyond what many of us have said which is that we don't know what is going on. You either know something and are now lying about it or were speculating totally at random to know conceivable gain for the town. You could have simply stopped at saying "12 seemed important, we might want to consider why?", now apparently some others hadn't already noticed that, I assumed most of us caught that before the game began, so I may have been overly harsh by assuming everything you said was totally pointless but your reactions after that have increasingly led me to believe you're lying.


View original postMy post was based on guesswork and extrapolation- which, for Day One, is pretty much all there is to go on.


View original post
View original post3) He accused me, on the grounds I clearly thought he knew something, though he claims to know nothing. This accusation to be logically coherent would require A) That he had guessed and guessed correctly and B) That I was a scummer and C) that I would believe he had not guessed and D) That with all of these I would tip my hand so out of character and incredibly clumsily of fashions. All 4 of these improbable conditions must be true for his accusation to be viable, and thus far he has not even confirmed the first one, he has not yet denied having extra knowledge and has IMO sought to imply he did even as he presents an accusation that can only be true if he does not.


View original postI accused you because you were being uncharacteristically aggressive. We don't need the universe to form a once in a lifetime conflux for you to be scum. It's just as simple to say:

Uncharacteristically aggressive? The overwhelming majority of Day 1 lynches has been initiated and prosecuted by either myself or FT, I suspect if you added them up we'd each have more than every other player, present or past, combined. How could I even be uncharacteristically aggressive, I have in the past actually threatened to kill players if they did not vote with me, and done it too. I'm pretty sure in order to be uncharacteristically aggressive I'd have to do as Danny suggested earlier and actually show up at a players house with baseball bat in hand.


View original posta)That you saw me post something that you thought you could seize on

Problem here, I seized on it, but not to accuse you, I considered you're remarks to be strongly indicative of more info and asked for it, if my tone was abrupt it was related to us spinning our wheels trying to find information only to find out a player who hadn't been posting seemed to have what we needed. That's not accusation, that's inquiry.


View original postb)That for whatever reason (either that I hit close to home, or that I was simply a target of opportunity) you figured the best defense was a strong offense

Best Defense? No one was even accusing me except Danny and he's been accused by others for his accusation. What could I possibly have needed to defend myself from?


View original postI haven't implied I have any extra knowledge beyond the ability to do simple arithmetic.

Well that's a lie, you've outright said you've got the special ability to read my motives and alignment, but in terms of game knowledge, I disagree. I think you intentionally were trying to call game options into play. The alternative, that you claim is true, is hardly more flattering, after being threatened with death for non-participation to avoid it you spewed out several random unsupported theories that served zero purpose but to distract us.


View original post
View original post4) He was asked by multiple players to role claim, a customary request when one is considered a primary lynch candidate, which is obviously the case. He was also reminded that any delay would damage the credibility of his claim, he has neither roleclaimed nor offered any defense or reason why he should not.


View original postI believe "roleclaim" has come up... twice? Ranagrande just (as in, TODAY) asked for one, and I believe someone mentioned it at the beginning of your attack. I'll respond to ranagrande shortly, and I ignored the original one because it was early in the day, and there was no particular push for a roleclaim (and I had other posts to respond to)

Twice? It was 7 when you wrote this and 6 when rana said 'several', 4 directly asking and two by voting with us. Ranagrande said "Several people have called for a roleclaim from beet", and he was right. Every vote on you, (4 - me, FT, Yuna, Fox ), backs a request for a roleclaim, then there's Rana, 5, and Hobo, 6, and Artsapat, 7.

That leaves Praz, ST (silent), Danny (RBIRL) and Taiga. 7 of 11 have either voted for your, demanded an RC, or both. We may safely assume the people voting for you want an RC too. That leaves 4 players, and we can drop the 2 who are both quiet and new, leaving PRaz and Taiga, neither of whom have defended you, 7-0 demanding an RC.


View original post
View original post5) In his remarks he referenced being 'bussed', a term regularly used here and exclusively to refer to when a scummer votes for another scummer. Revealing slips of this nature are not unheard of even very rare, but may be sheer accident so he was asked to explain it. Rather than claiming it was an innocent slip of words he instead claimed the term did not mean that, and replied evasively when told by the two most senior players that it only means that, including citations of the mafiascum wiki and a post where he himself asked what the term meant and was told, in absolutely unambiguous language, what the term meant, by the moderator of the game herself. He was also challenged to find any use by any player if the term in which his definition was used or even a definition other than the one given. He has not done so, instead claiming that even taking note of the usage is 'grasping at straws', this is not a proper offense but is instead an attempt to discredit the accusation rather than justify his own actions.


View original postThis entire point is laughable. What it boils down to is that I mixed up the meanings of "bussed" and "bandwagoned." I apologize that the instruction I received 4 years ago (from a mod nonwithstanding) was not seared into my brain.

I'm pretty sure I learned what the term "Internet" meant more than 4 years ago, but its constant reinforcement makes that timeline irrelevant. The word "Bussing" has been used 98 times and "bussed" 53 times since we came to RAFO, you presumably after being told what it meant might have forgotten. But bringing up the 4 year ago incident proves you inquired and were told by an unimpeachable source you'd have read, that's hwy that matters, you keep trying to wave it away but it establishes you knew, now you're claiming to have forgotten but to do that you'd have had to misundertand it being referenced 150 times since then, not even including simple uses of "Bus" which appears 100 more times. We've had about 20 games since then averaging around 4 days a game, meaning the term gets used about 3 times per game Day. You are claiming that in spite having it clearly and explicitly explained to you by the mod after you asked what it meant you not only forgot (improbable) but did so even with it coming up on average multiple times per game day.

Well, there is something laughable about the situation but I don't think it relates to my arguments.


View original post
View original post6) His entire defense now rests on a counter-accusation at myself,


View original postActually, my entire defense rests on the fact that I've done nothing wrong. My OFFENSE rests on the fact that anyone who's played with you should be able to realize that you have an agenda.

Of course I have an agenda, I should imagine everyone here does but me? Seriously? Hell, next you can defend yourself by claiming that water is wet.


View original postThis isn't an either-or, and the fact that you're trying to make it one further speaks to your duplicity.

This isn't either-or? You're the one who reacted to my - admittedly strongly worded - request for you to reveal any knowledge you had with accusations. You could have simply said, "Sorry if I implied special knowledge, I was thinking out loud. I just wanted to make sure everyone knew I was paying attention" and I would have glared at you with some suspicion, then shrugged and moved to other avenues.


View original postIsaac became aggressive towards me immediately after my big post. His entire case against me boils down to:


View original post- beetnemesis made a rambling post with some odd theories


View original postHis other points are just bits and pieces he's picked up to try to make it seem like he has a legitimate accusation.

4 votes plus 3 other players demanding an RC doesn't strike me as 'bits and pieces'

The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Reply to message
Mafia 32 - No Fancy Title - Day 1 - 28/07/2013 06:46:40 PM 2797 Views
Present *NM* - 28/07/2013 07:52:29 PM 731 Views
Reporting in *NM* - 28/07/2013 09:50:47 PM 708 Views
Here. *NM* - 28/07/2013 10:42:26 PM 728 Views
Present! *NM* - 28/07/2013 11:03:03 PM 781 Views
I stand ready. *NM* - 29/07/2013 01:36:27 AM 733 Views
Helloooooo Players! *NM* - 29/07/2013 01:54:16 AM 726 Views
So, where to begin? *NM* - 29/07/2013 02:43:48 AM 730 Views
Use lube, this is my first time! *NM* - 29/07/2013 08:26:59 AM 702 Views
I loled *NM* - 29/07/2013 10:31:08 AM 747 Views
Just because of this comment I know he'll fit right in. - 01/08/2013 10:38:01 AM 1045 Views
Fox is being triggerhappy. *NM* - 01/08/2013 06:08:21 PM 725 Views
It's always fun on day 1! *NM* - 01/08/2013 06:37:26 PM 720 Views
RBIRL from Tuesday to Sunday - 29/07/2013 01:06:35 PM 1087 Views
I'm RBIRL from friday to sunday, myself - 29/07/2013 02:10:19 PM 1193 Views
RBIRL from Wednesday to Saturday. - 29/07/2013 02:18:47 PM 1103 Views
I'm joining the RBIRL train - 31/07/2013 01:50:55 PM 1086 Views
Present *NM* - 29/07/2013 02:53:40 PM 750 Views
apparently we got no fancy fantasy theme, but straight Mafia *NM* - 29/07/2013 03:18:18 PM 716 Views
I'm actually kinda glad. I think it was getting too...complicated for me. - 29/07/2013 03:48:33 PM 1139 Views
Agreed, but I would imagine Bergioyn might have some twists in store for us. - 29/07/2013 09:52:30 PM 1059 Views
Eh, Let's just go. IT WAS YOU THAT DID IT, WASN'T IT *NM* - 29/07/2013 10:56:49 PM 700 Views
It was you that done it, now own up! *NM* - 29/07/2013 11:41:40 PM 723 Views
Okay! I admit it! It was me! Oh wait... were you talking to or him? *NM* - 30/07/2013 02:31:30 AM 575 Views
Vote: Hobo - 30/07/2013 02:43:15 AM 1105 Views
Re: Vote: Hobo - 01/08/2013 12:27:15 AM 1102 Views
Re: Vote: Hobo - 01/08/2013 10:44:27 AM 1166 Views
I don't think it was - 01/08/2013 12:50:24 PM 1104 Views
If I remember correctly he had some dastatdly plot to catch the scum. - 01/08/2013 04:32:51 PM 1074 Views
He was very unclear on tha tpoint after the fact - 01/08/2013 11:27:00 PM 1166 Views
No, his plan was actually pretty good. - 06/08/2013 01:00:31 AM 1211 Views
How is that a good plan? - 06/08/2013 06:37:24 AM 1259 Views
Well, believe it or not, I swear it wasn't me this time. I blame s *NM* - 30/07/2013 02:07:38 PM 733 Views
it was probably Isaac but in the end he'll win the game *NM* - 30/07/2013 05:37:07 PM 695 Views
Rule #1: Isaac wins *NM* - 30/07/2013 06:18:38 PM 776 Views
Rules are made to be broken. *NM* - 30/07/2013 06:51:38 PM 733 Views
But is this rule able to be broken? *NM* - 30/07/2013 06:54:22 PM 719 Views
Sure. Last time he lost was game 29. *NM* - 30/07/2013 09:32:45 PM 695 Views
Surely you recall the Marvel[ous] Siege? You were mason buddy - 01/08/2013 12:14:47 AM 1090 Views
I vaguely remember the Marvel game, but not any specifics... *NM* - 04/08/2013 09:55:24 PM 701 Views
I do... - 05/08/2013 04:25:10 AM 1083 Views
Rule #2: Isaac is always suspected, but not lynched. *NM* - 30/07/2013 10:32:57 PM 719 Views
Isaac is like the German Soccer team in this. - 01/08/2013 10:45:39 AM 985 Views
Re: Isaac is like the German Soccer team in this. - 01/08/2013 12:18:52 PM 1185 Views
(here) *NM* - 29/07/2013 11:03:26 PM 682 Views
Vote: Sacrilicious Toast - 30/07/2013 12:56:04 PM 1167 Views
Re: Vote: Sacrilicious Toast - 31/07/2013 09:19:11 AM 1210 Views
Re: Vote: Sacrilicious Toast - 01/08/2013 10:50:16 AM 1050 Views
Re: Vote: Sacrilicious Toast - 01/08/2013 12:11:33 AM 1076 Views
Activate! *NM* - 31/07/2013 03:03:50 AM 713 Views
Not too bad that you waited with the game, Berg - 01/08/2013 10:35:51 AM 1047 Views
Re: Not too bad that you waited with the game, Berg - 01/08/2013 11:06:23 AM 1070 Views
Okay, getting moving (Table) - 01/08/2013 11:45:30 PM 1174 Views
Yes, No, No. *NM* - 02/08/2013 02:32:52 AM 696 Views
Yes, No, No - 02/08/2013 08:54:12 AM 1112 Views
Re: Yes, No, No - 02/08/2013 09:50:24 AM 1043 Views
Yeah, my name's a real one too, just not logically related to anything in the game. *NM* - 02/08/2013 07:17:42 PM 689 Views
Same here. *NM* - 04/08/2013 09:54:10 PM 669 Views
Yes, No, No *NM* - 02/08/2013 01:03:24 PM 671 Views
Yes, no, no *NM* - 02/08/2013 08:26:52 PM 622 Views
yes, no, no *NM* - 03/08/2013 01:10:00 AM 699 Views
would be nice if one player answered Yes, Yes. Yes now: Lie = lynch *NM* - 03/08/2013 09:12:07 AM 676 Views
Well I'm reasonably sure some of them will either answer other then yes, no, no or lie - 03/08/2013 12:29:34 PM 1090 Views
Yes. No. No. - 04/08/2013 09:02:49 AM 1000 Views
Re: Yes. No. No. - 04/08/2013 11:19:03 AM 1061 Views
Yes, No, No *NM* - 03/08/2013 11:06:41 PM 700 Views
Yes, no, no. Also, I'm back. *NM* - 04/08/2013 09:52:11 PM 569 Views
Yes, no, no. Also, I'm back. *NM* - 04/08/2013 09:52:47 PM 659 Views
Dangit, I hate when I double post. *NM* - 04/08/2013 09:53:29 PM 715 Views
Yes, No No *NM* - 05/08/2013 03:28:03 AM 677 Views
Sorry I didn't have anything new to add... *NM* - 05/08/2013 03:29:28 AM 664 Views
Yes, No, No. *NM* - 06/08/2013 12:46:10 AM 643 Views
I might as well Unvote before I forget - 02/08/2013 03:32:43 PM 1033 Views
EBWOP - 02/08/2013 03:33:23 PM 1007 Views
Vote: Isaac - 03/08/2013 05:09:47 AM 1140 Views
Re: Vote: Isaac - 03/08/2013 07:32:48 AM 1047 Views
The "... and people die" part is probably accurate though *NM* - 03/08/2013 12:32:40 PM 673 Views
Correlation does not equal causation . *NM* - 03/08/2013 05:42:30 PM 694 Views
Precisely *NM* - 04/08/2013 11:22:52 AM 666 Views
Re: Vote: Isaac - 05/08/2013 08:31:03 PM 1135 Views
Re: Vote: Isaac - 06/08/2013 06:40:24 AM 1070 Views
Baaaack~ - 03/08/2013 11:26:57 PM 1079 Views
Although interesting, the questions don't seem to be adding much to the info - 05/08/2013 07:03:07 PM 1120 Views
Well - 05/08/2013 07:25:22 PM 1028 Views
That is correct - 05/08/2013 07:35:24 PM 1043 Views
Oh yeah, you're right - 05/08/2013 09:42:23 PM 1098 Views
Re: Oh yeah, you're right - 05/08/2013 10:09:48 PM 1098 Views
Re: Oh yeah, you're right - 05/08/2013 10:20:02 PM 1141 Views
I posted I was back.... NLRBIRL *NM* - 05/08/2013 10:25:58 PM 641 Views
Yeah, I missed that. Sorry *NM* - 06/08/2013 03:13:11 AM 679 Views
What's the NL for? RBIRL Real Busy in Real Life, NL=? - 06/08/2013 08:56:16 AM 1067 Views
Oh, duh, "No Longer" RBIRL *NM* - 06/08/2013 08:57:15 AM 656 Views
Yup *NM* - 06/08/2013 01:00:31 PM 704 Views
would be a very awkward abbreviation - 07/08/2013 10:05:17 AM 1053 Views
Re: Although interesting, the questions don't seem to be adding much to the info - 05/08/2013 08:26:01 PM 1186 Views
Agreed. Random lynches seem like a last resort to me. - 05/08/2013 08:55:59 PM 1099 Views
Now that you mention it, appearance might indeed be useful. - 06/08/2013 12:52:25 AM 1138 Views
Re: Now that you mention it, appearance might indeed be useful. - 06/08/2013 06:59:26 AM 1105 Views
Re: Now that you mention it, appearance might indeed be useful. - 06/08/2013 10:01:18 AM 1121 Views
Re: Now that you mention it, appearance might indeed be useful. - 06/08/2013 12:56:47 PM 1202 Views
I didn't have anything either. *NM* - 06/08/2013 01:02:46 PM 694 Views
No, I'm sorry, I don't - 06/08/2013 02:33:58 PM 1149 Views
No appearance was described in my role message. *NM* - 06/08/2013 08:45:51 PM 692 Views
Nope. *NM* - 07/08/2013 07:23:00 PM 699 Views
No, nothing on appearance *NM* - 07/08/2013 09:02:11 PM 702 Views
I think we may need to contemplate some semi-random options - 06/08/2013 07:55:25 AM 1063 Views
List of remarks by the 'accused', plus some remarks on them - 06/08/2013 08:51:15 AM 1272 Views
explanation - 06/08/2013 09:05:55 AM 1154 Views
Re: explanation - 06/08/2013 09:47:35 AM 1138 Views
Re: explanation - 06/08/2013 09:59:45 AM 1166 Views
Re: explanation - 06/08/2013 01:28:49 PM 1110 Views
I'm just surprised I'm not on the list. I was always a low poster... - 06/08/2013 10:00:22 AM 1137 Views
Re: I'm just surprised I'm not on the list. I was always a low poster... - 07/08/2013 07:48:34 PM 1065 Views
Your questions - 06/08/2013 02:59:16 PM 1150 Views
I apparently answered your questions backwards - 06/08/2013 03:06:06 PM 1056 Views
I would look at it a bit differently, even if the outcome doesn't change that much - 06/08/2013 03:55:12 PM 1152 Views
Well, I'm impressed - 06/08/2013 04:11:31 PM 1059 Views
I thank you for the compliment. - 06/08/2013 09:51:54 PM 1126 Views
Re: I thank you for the compliment. - 07/08/2013 01:53:25 AM 1093 Views
Those are fair points - 07/08/2013 11:08:21 AM 1101 Views
Re: Those are fair points - 07/08/2013 01:01:55 PM 1113 Views
Oh dear, this is unfortunate. - 07/08/2013 09:46:26 PM 1146 Views
I think you just killed Beetnemesis *NM* - 07/08/2013 10:56:16 PM 670 Views
Better him than me . *NM* - 07/08/2013 11:16:29 PM 676 Views
Re: Oh dear, this is unfortunate. - 07/08/2013 11:32:12 PM 1075 Views
nice analysis - 07/08/2013 10:25:20 AM 1021 Views
Like I said before, Tables=Death - 06/08/2013 07:20:07 PM 1097 Views
Re: Like I said before, Tables=Death - 06/08/2013 08:22:47 PM 1027 Views
Beware of BAMF! (Out of town till Saturday) - 07/08/2013 03:37:36 PM 1045 Views
Re: Beware of BAMF! (Out of town till Saturday) - 07/08/2013 04:11:04 PM 1104 Views
Re: Beware of BAMF! (Out of town till Saturday) - 07/08/2013 04:43:12 PM 1093 Views
Re: Beware of BAMF! (Out of town till Saturday) - 07/08/2013 05:34:04 PM 1105 Views
He really is... - 07/08/2013 04:55:59 PM 1089 Views
Re: He really is... - 07/08/2013 08:36:44 PM 1133 Views
Hm, that's not quite what I was thinking when I said that - 08/08/2013 08:49:11 PM 1015 Views
BAMF? - 07/08/2013 06:31:59 PM 1090 Views
It's the onomatopoeia nightcrawler makes when he teleports - 07/08/2013 06:38:24 PM 1086 Views
Re: It's the onomatopoeia nightcrawler makes when he teleports - 07/08/2013 06:42:30 PM 1153 Views
Re: It's the onomatopoeia nightcrawler makes when he teleports - 07/08/2013 06:45:49 PM 1124 Views
When it comes to Marvel, it's Spidey and Deadpool all the way! X-Men. Pffft. - 07/08/2013 10:38:41 PM 1038 Views
Dr Doom was always my favorite hero in Marvel, but Deadpool is pretty cool *NM* - 07/08/2013 10:52:39 PM 668 Views
Dr Doom has cool costume, but other than that I don't know much about him. - 07/08/2013 11:37:09 PM 1060 Views
He's Marvel's Lex Luthor, only much cooler - 07/08/2013 11:48:00 PM 1000 Views
I'd actually say he's a bit more like Marvel's Superman than Marvel's Lex Luthor. - 07/08/2013 11:54:14 PM 1145 Views
I'm not a Marvel fan, but Doom is amazing. - 07/08/2013 11:52:09 PM 1045 Views
OK, here I am! Some layout analysis: - 07/08/2013 04:49:33 PM 1094 Views
Re: OK, here I am! Some layout analysis: - 07/08/2013 05:44:09 PM 1150 Views
Well, you obviously know something, so out with it - 07/08/2013 06:33:04 PM 1074 Views
With that in mind... sounds like I hit too close to home, and you got sensitive - 08/08/2013 03:10:50 AM 1125 Views
Vote: Beetnemesis, Are you accusing me of being scum for pointing out your post had no substance? - 08/08/2013 03:39:25 AM 1171 Views
Re: - 08/08/2013 06:30:26 AM 1058 Views
Granted, as you yourself pointed out: attack is the best defense - 08/08/2013 08:17:31 AM 1017 Views
How often do we even have SKs? *NM* - 08/08/2013 09:39:58 AM 759 Views
This pushes it over the edge for me too. - 08/08/2013 01:13:21 PM 1060 Views
Hah. You got prickly pretty quickly. - 08/08/2013 07:39:24 PM 1090 Views
Prickly? I'm not touchy about it just suspiscious - 08/08/2013 08:01:39 PM 1047 Views
Re: OK, here I am! Some layout analysis: - 07/08/2013 06:38:45 PM 1063 Views
My feeling is that a "normal" game is pretty easy to balance - 08/08/2013 03:08:09 AM 1045 Views
re - 07/08/2013 08:36:15 PM 1079 Views
Isn't it at the very least Roleclaim time? - 08/08/2013 04:31:26 PM 1094 Views
Re: Isn't it at the very least Roleclaim time? - 08/08/2013 05:44:54 PM 1110 Views
Re: Isn't it at the very least Roleclaim time? - 08/08/2013 07:51:09 PM 1112 Views
Re: Isn't it at the very least Roleclaim time? - 08/08/2013 08:02:45 PM 1081 Views
Re: Isn't it at the very least Roleclaim time? - 08/08/2013 08:05:52 PM 1199 Views
The thing we want to avoid is MASS roleclaim - 09/08/2013 08:30:32 AM 1004 Views
Okay, almost totally off topic but... - 07/08/2013 11:40:54 PM 992 Views
The problem with that - 08/08/2013 08:09:56 AM 1085 Views
Re: The problem with that - 08/08/2013 05:02:56 PM 1050 Views
Reminds me of the Cairhien game a bit. - 08/08/2013 06:14:17 PM 1016 Views
That remains one of my favorites - 08/08/2013 07:48:42 PM 1053 Views
I haaaated the Cairhien game - 08/08/2013 08:16:57 PM 1113 Views
Re: That remains one of my favorites - 08/08/2013 09:42:25 PM 1029 Views
Does anyone else have any opinions? - 08/08/2013 05:51:23 PM 1038 Views
My take: - 08/08/2013 08:00:13 PM 1220 Views
Did you just admit to being a scummer? - 08/08/2013 08:04:21 PM 1107 Views
Hah, remember when I mentioned grasping at straws? - 08/08/2013 09:31:35 PM 1046 Views
We have always used the term that way, always, that and only that back to game 2 - 08/08/2013 09:44:20 PM 1093 Views
Holy crap, 4 years ago. - 09/08/2013 02:09:09 AM 963 Views
That's when you asked and were told by the Moderator, it has come up since then many times - 09/08/2013 04:10:28 AM 1045 Views
I can't be the only person laughing at you right now - 09/08/2013 05:44:03 PM 1048 Views
I doubt anyone is laughing including yourself - 09/08/2013 06:08:41 PM 969 Views
No, he's correct. - 08/08/2013 09:53:43 PM 1143 Views
Re: My take: - 08/08/2013 08:12:46 PM 1125 Views
To be a student of Isaac is a subtle thing - 08/08/2013 09:30:02 PM 1007 Views
sure - 08/08/2013 08:44:06 PM 1032 Views
Hmm, my thoughts, - 08/08/2013 08:56:27 PM 1127 Views
Re: Does anyone else have any opinions? - 08/08/2013 10:30:22 PM 1065 Views
Re: Does anyone else have any opinions? - 08/08/2013 11:18:56 PM 1137 Views
"Post count" usually acts as a tiebreaker - 09/08/2013 02:12:28 AM 1084 Views
I disagree - 09/08/2013 09:00:33 AM 1038 Views
Re: I disagree - 09/08/2013 11:25:29 AM 1020 Views
Several people have called for a roleclaim from beet - 09/08/2013 09:06:28 AM 1054 Views
I feel like I'm missing something really obvious here... - 09/08/2013 09:16:51 AM 1054 Views
Re: I feel like I'm missing something really obvious here... - 09/08/2013 03:18:38 PM 1098 Views
No, I meant entrails. - 09/08/2013 03:49:21 PM 1014 Views
Re: No, I meant entrails. - 09/08/2013 04:05:31 PM 1050 Views
Ah. Well that definitely explains it. *NM* - 09/08/2013 04:49:55 PM 669 Views
That's awesome. *NM* - 09/08/2013 09:21:59 PM 663 Views
Re: Does anyone else have any opinions? - 09/08/2013 11:48:13 AM 1015 Views
I'll point out that SKs were one of a few options I hypothesized - 09/08/2013 05:47:23 PM 1057 Views
Re: I'll point out that SKs were one of a few options I hypothesized - 09/08/2013 07:10:44 PM 943 Views
OK, so the smiley was a typo - 09/08/2013 07:26:58 PM 1075 Views
I do, but - 09/08/2013 03:39:28 PM 1039 Views
RBIRL - 09/08/2013 05:50:21 AM 1057 Views
The case on Beetnemesis - 09/08/2013 05:05:32 PM 1163 Views
Ah good, time for a point-by-point rebuttal - 09/08/2013 06:04:11 PM 1085 Views
EBWOP: A final point - 09/08/2013 06:14:25 PM 1123 Views
Actually... - 09/08/2013 06:38:26 PM 1089 Views
I can't see any difference with Isaac's "aggressiveness". *NM* - 09/08/2013 07:31:28 PM 739 Views
Re: EBWOP: A final point - 09/08/2013 07:55:19 PM 1183 Views
Yet you still refuse to roleclaim, are you suicidal? - 09/08/2013 07:04:40 PM 1120 Views
Shrug, I have nothing against roleclaiming. Roleclaim: Tracker - 09/08/2013 07:33:40 PM 1064 Views
Correct me if wrong... - 09/08/2013 08:39:58 PM 1103 Views
Exactly! - 09/08/2013 11:06:25 PM 1122 Views
Wow, I'm gone for 24 hours, - 11/08/2013 12:02:38 AM 1086 Views
No, you just did everything you could to avoid it, like claiming almost no one had asked... - 09/08/2013 08:42:10 PM 1150 Views
I think you're right. - 09/08/2013 11:47:32 PM 1305 Views
Re: Yet you still refuse to roleclaim, are you suicidal? - 09/08/2013 07:49:12 PM 1075 Views
Re: Yet you still refuse to roleclaim, are you suicidal? - 09/08/2013 08:04:42 PM 1117 Views
too much mud - 09/08/2013 09:50:35 PM 1162 Views
Vote: Beetnemesis - 11/08/2013 10:32:51 AM 1242 Views
@ Mod, Vote Check - 11/08/2013 04:46:16 PM 1075 Views
That's a valid vote, I had missed it. Twilight pending. - 11/08/2013 05:36:13 PM 1037 Views
Actually, so did I. Did I hammer? - 11/08/2013 05:55:14 PM 1042 Views
Yes. *NM* - 11/08/2013 05:59:47 PM 532 Views
beetnemesis has been lynched. - 11/08/2013 05:52:43 PM 1134 Views

Reply to Message