Active Users:1138 Time:22/11/2024 10:29:25 PM
Vote: Beetnemesis Isaac Send a noteboard - 09/11/2011 10:24:06 PM
Okay, I’ve been giving this some thought, and I’ve decided that a claim is the only option today, as I’ve tended to be a night 2 target a lot of late and there’s no HCing to protect my data. My role says cop, I’ll provide the proper decryption for that in a follow up. Incidentally the main motivator for the earlier role comparison plan was that being the cop, and with the poems being identical and our roles not being revealed, and my first night yielding a scummer… which always brings the possibility of psycho-cop to mind… I wondered about the off possibility of us having multiple cops or lots of twinned roles, ?’s presumably truthful claim of yesterday meant we couldn’t all be, on reflection, but I still expect there’s a real chance off role weirdness.

The person, of course, was Beetnemesis. I’d decided when I got the hit back I’d need to claim today, so if I got murdered tonight that wouldn’t be lost. I wanted to get as much data as possible though about who he did or did not favor or vote for, as there’s a real chance it would be our last hard data. If there’s only two scum, and he is one, then the survivor might have a RB/NK choice each night and we’d have a good shot at bulling through. If there are three, and he’s not a RBer but they have one, they’ll lock me down after this, or try for a NK, or both. We don’t know if we have a doc amongst the living, but neither do the scum, and odds favor it right now so the RB if they’ve got one tonight would seem probable, and the NK would be the usual guessing game between them and the doc.

So, assuming my copping is valid, which we’ll know when beet dies… he’ll either die scum or town and if the latter I’ll know he was a miller or I’m psycho, of course he’ll claim and if he claims town and says he’s a miller we’ll all know I’m sane but barring that… anyone he’ll have a RC to decode for us or just fess up to being scum. If he claims town, non-miller, and dies as town I’ll know I’m probably psycho and you’ll know I’m psycho or scum and can act accordingly tomorrow. We all know the various options and improbabilities that can be involved but unless Beet’s decode is miller I think we can assume we’ll lynch him today, if he does decode as miller then we’ll have to consider the options but probably the same.

So, there’s the pre-amble, but what do we know? As I said, I’d have liked to suck more data out of this Day where beet’s concerned but I doubt we’d get too much, and for the rest of this message I will assume Beet is scum. Thus far he pressed strongly for a claim from ?, and I doubt he’d have done that from another scummer, so I’m going to assume for now that ? is town, which his readiness to claim indicates… as I said to Rana, I’d find that an improbable behavior from a scummer fresh into a new role and I doubt if scum he had a chance to talk to his allies, having been their night victim, but it is always possible beet was given permission to send ? a NB or two come dawn, that wouldn’t be too improbable with a sub going on, and sent him some slam dunk RC knowing ? would have a chance to make a knew RC on Kronin’s. In my experience, when scum I usually try to develop good RC for myself an allies on night 1 and I often want them in play publicly ASAP, so this may have happened. I don’t consider this too improbable, but also not too likely. So for now, I think the odds are very strong Beet is scum and ? is town.

Now, Rana was ?’s accuser, but that doesn’t mean much to me yet. We have only two others who really weighed in on ?, and that’s Yuna and Hieshyn. My feeling from their responses is that neither is too likely to be scum, especially Yuna, who seemed particularly miffed about the accusation on ?, which seems like more disapproval than a scummer would apply to a townie who was being accused. My current impression, as the most probable scenario, is:

Beet – Scum
? – Town
Yuna – Prob-Town
Hieshyn – Prob-ish-town
… and Fox, Stephen, and Ranagrande basically neutral.

Our next step would be for me to decode, for beet to decode, and for us to wait a bit for everyone to confirm they aren’t a cop… if someone claims cop and decodes as such we probably axe beet anyway, and his alignment will tell the doc what to do tonight and everyone else what to do tomorrow. Nobody else should RC, pretty much for the foreseeable future, as that will protect us a bit, the scum will have no idea if we have a doc and if they got them, we’ll take RC’s from future lynch choices of course. During the interregnum while beet and I decode and we wait for possible cop claims I suggest everyone look through Beet’s message and try to find everything, day 1 or two, indicating who he may have favored or not, annotate messages for review, etc. I will reply shortly with my own decode, and I know there’s a case for me waiting longer to have RC’d but I think we now have enough data to have a good shot at a straight attrition victory if beet dies scum and I get no more investigations by dint of being RB’s or dead.

If all goes according to plan, we start tomorrow with 6 players, 7 if we’re lucky, but I’m a pessimist, down a townie and a scummer either 5-1 or 4-2 if there were 3 scum. If Yuna, Hieshyn, and ? and myself are town, presumably one of us will be the NK tonight and the surviving three will need to guess right amongst Fox, Stpehne, and Rana, with a 2 in 3 random chance at LyLo if there are 2 scummers, or with multiple non-LyLo 1 in 3 chances if there’s just 1 scum left after Beet. Better than 50/50 odds for either option and that doesn’t include any evidence we might be able to cobble together or any extra investigations or docings we might get. My loose advice if I get axed tonight and beet dies scum is to probable have everyone decode their RC’s, odds are good the scum claimed vanilla or less common roles, and that will likely make the difference. The tone and flavor of a lot of those random and self-selected RC’s might make a difference, we’ll also want Beet to decode his self-selected accusation if he hasn’t already, as well as everyone else, I’d didn’t see anyway to do that for him specifically without raising an eyebrow or would have done it already.

And Yes, there are a lot of different ways I could play this, many possibly getting us even more info, but I don't want a long day and I also expect to be fairly busy and distracted for the next couple of weeks, active in the game but not with my head entirely into it, so this seemed the best option, particularly since we're small enough in number that a bad lynch could go down while I wasn't looking.

Anyway, that’s where we stand at the moment, thoughts?
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Reply to message
Game 24, Day 2 - Game has ended - 06/11/2011 06:04:27 PM 1173 Views
I'm actually a bit surprised by the choice of ? - 06/11/2011 07:34:57 PM 1083 Views
Yes, it was an oversight. He was a townie. *NM* - 06/11/2011 08:01:11 PM 438 Views
Voting record: - 07/11/2011 05:25:40 PM 950 Views
Was he suspicious of anyone yesterday? - 07/11/2011 02:52:26 PM 753 Views
Re: Was he suspicious of anyone yesterday? - 07/11/2011 03:36:31 PM 908 Views
I think a second look at our poetry is in order too, now we have more of it - 07/11/2011 12:43:21 AM 892 Views
... and the two things - 07/11/2011 01:29:31 AM 907 Views
I object to this plan. - 07/11/2011 02:07:35 AM 807 Views
UM UM UM ALERT ALERT ALERT - 07/11/2011 02:59:27 PM 686 Views
Re: UM UM UM ALERT ALERT ALERT - 07/11/2011 06:23:42 PM 823 Views
Re: UM UM UM ALERT ALERT ALERT - 07/11/2011 08:17:53 PM 724 Views
Wait, would everyone be picking their own two letters? Ah, ok, it's not as dangerous as I thought - 07/11/2011 08:20:32 PM 722 Views
Yes *NM* - 07/11/2011 08:41:04 PM 427 Views
and follow that to the logical conclusion... - 07/11/2011 08:40:43 PM 977 Views
no *NM* - 07/11/2011 06:19:20 PM 459 Views
FT already banned it *NM* - 07/11/2011 06:20:45 PM 417 Views
I know, I'm just voicing my opinion *NM* - 07/11/2011 06:27:34 PM 349 Views
Besides the ban, I can't see why you'd object - 07/11/2011 06:44:14 PM 755 Views
errrm, i don't think no is a strong enough word for this *NM* - 07/11/2011 06:58:09 PM 556 Views
? will be replacing Kronin... - 07/11/2011 01:56:08 AM 779 Views
Vote: ? - 07/11/2011 02:33:43 PM 949 Views
Re: Vote: ? - 07/11/2011 02:42:15 PM 1072 Views
I'll echo that vote. - 07/11/2011 06:15:21 PM 940 Views
He could have just been being polite - 07/11/2011 06:34:30 PM 1113 Views
Very good point, I think a roleclaim from ?, using Kronin's coded roleclaim from yesterday - 07/11/2011 08:22:45 PM 888 Views
? can't decode Kronin's RC, and he wouldn't be allowed to give his own - 07/11/2011 08:45:50 PM 833 Views
yeah I could go ahead and roleclaim if you want... - 07/11/2011 08:56:41 PM 801 Views
No, I don't want you to claim - 07/11/2011 08:57:47 PM 709 Views
Wait what's the difference? - 07/11/2011 09:06:06 PM 737 Views
Re: Wait what's the difference? - 07/11/2011 09:06:23 PM 786 Views
Re: Wait what's the difference? - 07/11/2011 09:09:04 PM 767 Views
I oh got confused. - 08/11/2011 02:41:46 AM 830 Views
That is not the case against Kronin. - 07/11/2011 09:48:52 PM 652 Views
I don't think substitution is enough - 07/11/2011 10:25:27 PM 893 Views
Anybody else get a chuckle out of this? *NM* - 07/11/2011 06:36:28 PM 396 Views
Ignore the *NM* *NM* - 07/11/2011 06:43:16 PM 406 Views
doubly so... - 07/11/2011 06:49:05 PM 914 Views
out of what? *NM* - 07/11/2011 07:51:06 PM 392 Views
Shrug, I think we should still get a roleclaim from ?/Kronin - 08/11/2011 01:51:24 PM 867 Views
I coded a claim above...in response to Isaac I think... - 08/11/2011 08:46:07 PM 804 Views
Re: I coded a claim above...in response to Isaac I think... - 08/11/2011 09:39:45 PM 860 Views
Heh. Die? Die! His username makes that weird. *NM* - 08/11/2011 10:55:22 PM 448 Views
eh - 08/11/2011 10:40:47 PM 834 Views
What am I missing here? - 08/11/2011 02:32:14 PM 840 Views
Re: What am I missing here? - 08/11/2011 08:38:19 PM 873 Views
Semi-RBIRL - 09/11/2011 05:26:11 AM 765 Views
Vote: Beetnemesis - 09/11/2011 10:24:06 PM 938 Views
RC decode - 09/11/2011 10:35:52 PM 912 Views
Bah, now I have to claim as well - 09/11/2011 10:46:37 PM 791 Views
All right, let's proceed sanely then - 09/11/2011 10:51:12 PM 791 Views
OK, Unvote - 09/11/2011 11:23:35 PM 689 Views
decoding: - 09/11/2011 11:22:31 PM 830 Views
Would you mind walking through that last step? - 09/11/2011 11:44:30 PM 797 Views
Not at all. - 10/11/2011 12:09:09 AM 791 Views
Okay I confirm your decode then - 10/11/2011 12:16:22 AM 764 Views
... *NM* - 10/11/2011 01:59:58 PM 494 Views
Woah. Problems. - 09/11/2011 11:32:40 PM 728 Views
there is something really fishy going on... *NM* - 09/11/2011 11:34:09 PM 407 Views
what? - 09/11/2011 11:32:45 PM 618 Views
Re: what? - 09/11/2011 11:34:16 PM 666 Views
Actually, there's a strong chance neither is lying - 09/11/2011 11:53:35 PM 971 Views
So, what now? - 10/11/2011 12:49:12 AM 1062 Views
Is or Is Not a Cop (Table) - 10/11/2011 12:52:52 AM 822 Views
I am not a cop. *NM* - 10/11/2011 01:04:38 AM 327 Views
I'm the daycop. Vote: Ranagrande. - 10/11/2011 01:41:59 AM 775 Views
EBWOP: here's the code. - 10/11/2011 01:43:00 AM 647 Views
Decode confirmed - 10/11/2011 02:08:26 AM 653 Views
Yeah, forgot to say I used Vignere. *NM* - 10/11/2011 02:18:31 AM 402 Views
EBWOP again - 10/11/2011 01:44:04 AM 622 Views
Stand by for the moment - 10/11/2011 01:49:38 AM 815 Views
Jesus...I REALLY need to read everything before I start posting. - 10/11/2011 01:54:11 AM 800 Views
Add to that the next follow up, that ? might previously have been a Day Cop too - 10/11/2011 02:04:29 AM 836 Views
It's possible... - 10/11/2011 02:18:02 AM 764 Views
Re: It's possible... - 10/11/2011 02:30:00 AM 1102 Views
I am a daycop. I found Isaac innocent. *NM* - 10/11/2011 02:02:05 PM 441 Views
We still need you role decode *NM* - 10/11/2011 06:19:53 PM 371 Views
(I did, in my other message) - 10/11/2011 07:18:43 PM 615 Views
Okay, got ya, decode confirmed *NM* - 10/11/2011 08:02:55 PM 384 Views
i am a cop - 10/11/2011 07:00:14 PM 633 Views
and my decode - 10/11/2011 07:14:38 PM 805 Views
Yep, decode confirmed *NM* - 10/11/2011 08:06:16 PM 454 Views
Also, which ? did you check? - 10/11/2011 08:08:05 PM 719 Views
original ? - 10/11/2011 08:10:30 PM 823 Views
Thanks *NM* - 10/11/2011 08:11:13 PM 364 Views
Not a cop *NM* - 10/11/2011 11:48:27 PM 621 Views
To the decode-mobile! *plays 60s Batman music* - 11/11/2011 02:32:06 PM 705 Views
Let's take another look at that poem - 10/11/2011 01:44:36 AM 892 Views
Hahaha I have to read all of these posts, but FT, you're insane. - 10/11/2011 01:58:01 PM 854 Views
FT IS insane. Turns out I was missing something after all. *NM* - 10/11/2011 09:59:56 PM 352 Views
OK! Here we go: - 10/11/2011 02:23:10 PM 865 Views
Re: OK! Here we go: - 10/11/2011 05:52:25 PM 934 Views
I think it's time to consider mass RC - 10/11/2011 08:15:36 PM 714 Views
Sure... - 10/11/2011 09:19:49 PM 992 Views
There's a lot of options still, and decode confirmed by the way - 10/11/2011 09:48:05 PM 962 Views
I have been nominated! - 10/11/2011 10:30:37 PM 838 Views
Thanks - 10/11/2011 10:36:36 PM 892 Views
My pleasure *NM* - 10/11/2011 10:44:23 PM 334 Views
*NM* - 10/11/2011 11:21:59 PM 373 Views
Not saying that that is right of course... - 10/11/2011 11:23:23 PM 798 Views
Hmm... - 10/11/2011 11:20:50 PM 681 Views
I totally agree. - 10/11/2011 09:54:25 PM 702 Views
The wasy I see it, anybody not claiming cop is going to get lynched - 10/11/2011 11:57:24 PM 880 Views
Lying and claiming cop when you can't decode your RC will get you lynched faster. *NM* - 11/11/2011 12:33:05 AM 373 Views
Which I didn't do *NM* - 11/11/2011 02:05:30 AM 415 Views
I know, I know. - 11/11/2011 03:57:51 AM 697 Views
Fox, did you get a response on your investigation? *NM* - 11/11/2011 12:20:12 AM 466 Views
I hadn't performed one yet. - 11/11/2011 12:34:48 AM 792 Views
Isaac - 11/11/2011 02:00:18 AM 901 Views
Or me - 11/11/2011 02:07:10 AM 815 Views
I'd recommend ? - 11/11/2011 02:15:24 AM 676 Views
Bring it. - 11/11/2011 03:10:14 AM 715 Views
Someone who has already been copped - 11/11/2011 03:57:08 AM 660 Views
I'll investigate ? because yuna's the other daycop - 11/11/2011 04:00:49 AM 672 Views
Wait a minute....I meant that I would be testing it against rana. Not yuna - 11/11/2011 01:39:16 PM 937 Views
no i'm not, im a normal cop *NM* - 11/11/2011 09:18:23 PM 445 Views
I had everything messed up anyway *NM* - 12/11/2011 10:45:54 PM 387 Views
Vote: Beetnemisis/RBIRL - 11/11/2011 02:04:35 AM 743 Views
Hey people sorry for the unexpected RBIRL - 11/11/2011 11:47:11 AM 905 Views
RBIRL here too. - 11/11/2011 01:34:45 PM 650 Views
I'm thinking either Hieshyn or ? - 11/11/2011 04:32:16 PM 799 Views
It kinda seems like Hieshyn and ? are our logical lynch targets, plus Cop (Table) - 11/11/2011 10:09:52 PM 1014 Views
Fox investigated ? and found him innocent *NM* - 11/11/2011 10:41:39 PM 372 Views
Vote: ? - 11/11/2011 10:46:43 PM 674 Views
Yeah, that seems logical next step, Vote: ? - 13/11/2011 02:59:25 AM 988 Views
mrr, vote ? then *NM* - 13/11/2011 10:27:49 AM 549 Views
Think my vote was on ? already. - 13/11/2011 04:26:49 PM 785 Views
Vote: ? *NM* - 14/11/2011 02:27:20 AM 488 Views
That should be lynch with yours, so... - 14/11/2011 03:07:36 AM 724 Views
? Has been lynched - 14/11/2011 03:50:31 AM 877 Views
Game ends. - 14/11/2011 10:25:04 PM 757 Views
Role list: - 14/11/2011 10:26:32 PM 801 Views
Jeeez. - 14/11/2011 11:43:47 PM 763 Views
Kronin originally RC as a Tracker so we might have done better if we had been able to continue *NM* - 15/11/2011 12:06:07 AM 385 Views
Not even cause tracker is still the odd man out. - 15/11/2011 12:20:17 AM 755 Views
That might have worked but everyone would have had targets - 15/11/2011 02:20:43 AM 847 Views
Maybe, but I still would have known he was guilty. *NM* - 15/11/2011 02:55:43 AM 350 Views
You were paranoid, amusingly enough. - 15/11/2011 02:59:43 AM 770 Views
Ya there was no hope for us *NM* - 15/11/2011 12:04:06 AM 393 Views
YAY! - 14/11/2011 10:48:54 PM 745 Views
Wow. *NM* - 15/11/2011 01:09:28 AM 454 Views
Also I would like to be added to the list of future Moderator - 15/11/2011 12:07:51 AM 632 Views
You'd have first dibs via our order of precedence system - 15/11/2011 02:05:04 AM 885 Views
Also whoever Mods should probably post a recruitment thread on some other NBs - 15/11/2011 02:50:02 AM 804 Views
I expect my next game to draw in some new players. - 15/11/2011 02:58:59 AM 760 Views
More is better, okay that would be Hieshyn or Beet then, unless ? wants to toss in - 15/11/2011 03:26:25 AM 746 Views
Nope I'm not ready to mod yet... - 15/11/2011 08:29:24 PM 685 Views
hey - 15/11/2011 09:46:28 PM 615 Views
It's Hieshyn's if he wants it, otherwise I can go next. - 15/11/2011 12:40:13 PM 808 Views
I'm not ready to go next - 15/11/2011 02:43:07 PM 874 Views
Aight, I think it's me then. - 15/11/2011 03:15:21 PM 642 Views
Re: Aight, I think it's me then. - 15/11/2011 04:09:07 PM 837 Views
Deathless Mafia? Is that a thing? SQUEE, Mistborn! *NM* - 15/11/2011 10:15:49 PM 353 Views
If it wasn't a thing before, it is now! *NM* - 15/11/2011 10:53:14 PM 345 Views
ooooh - 15/11/2011 11:27:26 PM 683 Views
You've got a week to read the last 2....GO, GO, GO!! *NM* - 15/11/2011 11:43:21 PM 372 Views
hah! i could read both in two days - 16/11/2011 07:56:58 PM 711 Views
Just for you, the game shall be spoiler free! *NM* - 16/11/2011 12:12:24 AM 342 Views
Speaking of which, any timeline yet? - 19/11/2011 07:25:11 PM 706 Views
Sounds fantastic - 16/11/2011 12:10:06 AM 844 Views
That could also be fantastic. *NM* - 16/11/2011 12:13:29 AM 388 Views
I AM ALL SORTS OF PUMPED. *NM* - 16/11/2011 09:11:38 PM 413 Views
Though may or may not actually be playing... *NM* - 16/11/2011 09:11:58 PM 354 Views
Before the next game starts, we probably need to discuss RC coding - 15/11/2011 02:15:27 AM 983 Views
Yeah, I really didn't like that idea. - 15/11/2011 02:58:21 AM 1065 Views
An informal agreement is probably the way to go then - 15/11/2011 03:08:17 AM 877 Views
Re: An informal agreement is probably the way to go then - 15/11/2011 03:36:38 AM 777 Views
Re: An informal agreement is probably the way to go then - 15/11/2011 03:43:39 AM 1120 Views
I really didn't like it either. - 16/11/2011 06:20:33 PM 766 Views
I liked my plan: Random voting ftw! *NM* - 16/11/2011 06:29:07 PM 390 Views

Reply to Message