Just wanted to review notation a little bit, through out the come, on the board or in NBs, you'll see me use stuff like 0+RPs, 1+RPS, 2+RPS... and my own notes currently have a lot of shorthand like 1+RPSW, or RPSE, RPSS, RPSF
That's short hand, I generally try to make sure I don't use it in message to people, but if you see it, or if someone gets tired of typing out the full versions and wants to use it instead, there you go.
RPS - Rock, Paper, Scissors
RPSW - RPS that targets the Will attribute
RPSS - RPS that targets the Skill attribute
RPSE - RPS that targets the Energy attribute
RPSF - RPS that targets the Flesh attribute
RPSX - RPS that targets the attribute of your choice
And #+RPS or #+RPSX just means your score, like 1+RPSW, is 1 plus the RPS result (-1, 0, +1) against your target player's Will.
The default for the game equivalent of a 'normal role' is 1+RPS where one of the four attributes is pre-determined as the target. Their own attributes don't factor in to their 'attack' though there is generally some relation to it, a wizard throwing lightning bolts at you against your Energy skill is not likely to have a 0 in Energy, even though his Energy Score isn't a factor in things for the default normal role conversion for the game.
Not everything is 1+RPS though, for one thing, not everything uses RPS, but of those that do some might be 0+RPS or 2+RPS. To give you an idea here, stats can be from 0-2, nobody has a 0-0-0-0 stat going in, and everyone has that free point, so you can assume every player has at least a total of 2, and I'd say most characters on the master list have a total of 3 or 4 including free point... and stats were primarily attached to character, not to their role.
Now how this breaks down in terms of odds is that if you have a normal 1+RPS action, where you succeed if you tie or beat them, and where RPS=[-1,0,1] targeting someone with the following stats has the following odds of success:
1+RPS against attribute of:
O: 100% chance of success
1: 67% chance of success
2: 33% chance of success
0+RPS
O: 67% chance of success
1: 33% chance of success
2: 0% chance of success
2+RPS
O: 100% chance of success
1: 100% chance of success
2: 67% chance of success
So there's a little bit more flexibility here for use of normal roles, kinda why I like it, and there's also good room for tactics, and anything that let players gain advantage from deduction and cleverness always seems good to me. Because if you figure out what someone's RPS isn't, say rock, those odds above are going to change noticeably in your favor, and if you know what they have as opposed to what they don't, it's a done deal unless you're aiming a 0+RPS at someone with a 2.
Example
Johnny, a wizard has a 1+RPSE chance to track people, he targets Bob who has a E of 0, sending the mod Track Bob - Rock, unless Bob has Paper Johnny wins.
That's short hand, I generally try to make sure I don't use it in message to people, but if you see it, or if someone gets tired of typing out the full versions and wants to use it instead, there you go.
RPS - Rock, Paper, Scissors
RPSW - RPS that targets the Will attribute
RPSS - RPS that targets the Skill attribute
RPSE - RPS that targets the Energy attribute
RPSF - RPS that targets the Flesh attribute
RPSX - RPS that targets the attribute of your choice
And #+RPS or #+RPSX just means your score, like 1+RPSW, is 1 plus the RPS result (-1, 0, +1) against your target player's Will.
The default for the game equivalent of a 'normal role' is 1+RPS where one of the four attributes is pre-determined as the target. Their own attributes don't factor in to their 'attack' though there is generally some relation to it, a wizard throwing lightning bolts at you against your Energy skill is not likely to have a 0 in Energy, even though his Energy Score isn't a factor in things for the default normal role conversion for the game.
Not everything is 1+RPS though, for one thing, not everything uses RPS, but of those that do some might be 0+RPS or 2+RPS. To give you an idea here, stats can be from 0-2, nobody has a 0-0-0-0 stat going in, and everyone has that free point, so you can assume every player has at least a total of 2, and I'd say most characters on the master list have a total of 3 or 4 including free point... and stats were primarily attached to character, not to their role.
Now how this breaks down in terms of odds is that if you have a normal 1+RPS action, where you succeed if you tie or beat them, and where RPS=[-1,0,1] targeting someone with the following stats has the following odds of success:
1+RPS against attribute of:
O: 100% chance of success
1: 67% chance of success
2: 33% chance of success
0+RPS
O: 67% chance of success
1: 33% chance of success
2: 0% chance of success
2+RPS
O: 100% chance of success
1: 100% chance of success
2: 67% chance of success
So there's a little bit more flexibility here for use of normal roles, kinda why I like it, and there's also good room for tactics, and anything that let players gain advantage from deduction and cleverness always seems good to me. Because if you figure out what someone's RPS isn't, say rock, those odds above are going to change noticeably in your favor, and if you know what they have as opposed to what they don't, it's a done deal unless you're aiming a 0+RPS at someone with a 2.
Example
Johnny, a wizard has a 1+RPSE chance to track people, he targets Bob who has a E of 0, sending the mod Track Bob - Rock, unless Bob has Paper Johnny wins.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
This message last edited by Isaac on 26/07/2011 at 12:00:47 AM
Game 23: The Dresden Files Day 1 - Stormfront (Day Over)
25/07/2011 12:52:19 AM
- 2599 Views
Notes from Mod: Update 3
25/07/2011 12:52:45 AM
- 1559 Views
Why do I have 'stats'?
25/07/2011 12:53:10 AM
- 1573 Views
Some RPS Notes
25/07/2011 11:59:50 PM
- 1420 Views
Er. OK. Well, to start things off...
25/07/2011 03:32:21 AM
- 1273 Views
I'd actually like to say that I'm guessing half-humans and half-whatever might as well choose human
25/07/2011 07:14:15 PM
- 1186 Views
I'm human.
25/07/2011 09:49:57 PM
- 1213 Views
I agree, especially because Isaac has specifically countered this type of thinking.
26/07/2011 02:02:30 AM
- 1191 Views
Speaking of sides
26/07/2011 03:32:10 AM
- 1235 Views
Hm. OK, without spoilers, here's some background information
26/07/2011 01:56:43 PM
- 1459 Views
Oh, I'll also note that not everything supernatural is malicious
26/07/2011 02:06:22 PM
- 1215 Views
You know, I've never understood that.
26/07/2011 07:35:47 PM
- 1154 Views
I think it was that movie Brotherhood of the Wolf (Le pacte des loups)
26/07/2011 09:18:54 PM
- 1183 Views
Right then, some more thoughts
27/07/2011 02:20:32 PM
- 1179 Views
Re: Right then, some more thoughts
27/07/2011 03:50:51 PM
- 1242 Views
Hm. What are some other avenues?
27/07/2011 02:23:36 PM
- 1125 Views
I don't think random qquestion would be great here
27/07/2011 03:29:05 PM
- 1197 Views
Should we ask that? "On a scale of 1-10, how familiar are you with the books?"
27/07/2011 06:28:18 PM
- 1087 Views
Re: Should we ask that? "On a scale of 1-10, how familiar are you with the books?"
27/07/2011 06:33:32 PM
- 1182 Views
Should we ask that? "On a scale of 1-10, how familiar are you with the books?"
27/07/2011 06:35:25 PM
- 1142 Views
On a scale of 1-10, how familiar are you with the books? (CHART)
27/07/2011 06:40:15 PM
- 1187 Views
Like I said in an earlier thread, I've read the first book and watched 2/3 the series. *NM*
28/07/2011 12:07:06 AM
- 788 Views
Interlude 1
28/07/2011 02:08:46 AM
- 1277 Views
Interlude Conclusion
29/07/2011 02:23:35 AM
- 1043 Views
*cough*
30/07/2011 10:02:50 PM
- 1231 Views
Very confused right now...
30/07/2011 10:47:31 PM
- 1087 Views
This is discussed in the updates, particular #2... the posts with the lightsabers *NM*
30/07/2011 11:37:41 PM
- 722 Views
Did any of you have a reason for following who you did or was it just a random choice?
01/08/2011 01:14:13 PM
- 1240 Views
So, where did you go? *NM*
01/08/2011 09:21:05 PM
- 724 Views
Derp, for some reason I missed your response above. Ignore, please. *NM*
01/08/2011 09:21:47 PM
- 683 Views
I followed Sheridan...
01/08/2011 09:44:42 PM
- 1103 Views
Well, OK- we've got 5 more days, let's try to make some headway.
01/08/2011 01:39:48 PM
- 1165 Views
Re: Well, OK- we've got 5 more days, let's try to make some headway.
01/08/2011 01:56:45 PM
- 1178 Views
It might be me...
01/08/2011 03:51:50 PM
- 1199 Views
If you're constantly RBIRL, why would lynching you be a mistake?
01/08/2011 03:55:42 PM
- 1147 Views
Re: If you're constantly RBIRL, why would lynching you be a mistake?
01/08/2011 11:51:39 PM
- 1165 Views
Seems suboptimal.
01/08/2011 09:50:38 PM
- 1177 Views
Re: Seems suboptimal.
01/08/2011 11:52:55 PM
- 1225 Views
Everybody.
02/08/2011 04:08:53 AM
- 1205 Views
How about this?
02/08/2011 01:41:57 PM
- 1160 Views
Fair enough. I forgot we had a deadline.
02/08/2011 06:28:04 PM
- 1136 Views
Re: Fair enough. I forgot we had a deadline.
02/08/2011 06:33:46 PM
- 1090 Views
someone was in the room with him when i got there
02/08/2011 10:31:35 PM
- 1173 Views
What were they doing?
02/08/2011 11:11:56 PM
- 1122 Views
i don't know
02/08/2011 11:18:37 PM
- 1152 Views
Ooh. That sounds like a good basis for a semi-random lynch right there.
01/08/2011 11:56:20 PM
- 1108 Views
Also though, I do agree with your conclusions to a point,
01/08/2011 11:58:37 PM
- 1116 Views
Another possibility
02/08/2011 01:47:07 AM
- 1206 Views
Re: Another possibility
02/08/2011 01:40:23 PM
- 1200 Views
True- he DID have a "Ritual Knife," after all
02/08/2011 01:59:43 PM
- 1189 Views
I'm under the impression someone is lying out of Sheridan's group.
03/08/2011 02:18:45 AM
- 1087 Views
My thoughts are quite similar.
03/08/2011 03:41:15 AM
- 1174 Views
Re: My thoughts are quite similar.
03/08/2011 01:25:59 PM
- 1186 Views
That's not how initiative worked- rana could have shown up first
03/08/2011 02:25:24 PM
- 1199 Views
Re: That's not how initiative worked- rana could have shown up first
03/08/2011 03:47:17 PM
- 1208 Views
Would you mind breaking it down into a simple timeline?
03/08/2011 04:08:52 AM
- 1139 Views
Re: Would you mind breaking it down into a simple timeline?
03/08/2011 01:19:34 PM
- 1151 Views
Cool, thanks. Unfortunately, I still think anyone could be guilty.
03/08/2011 02:33:06 PM
- 1163 Views
Right now, we have about 2.5 days left.
04/08/2011 01:12:06 PM
- 1185 Views
Hm. I honestly suspect everyone pretty equally
04/08/2011 02:10:59 PM
- 1138 Views
im holding my vote for now
04/08/2011 11:41:10 PM
- 1162 Views
I would but I feel like that woul dbe irrelevant for this lynch anyway so why bother?
05/08/2011 01:21:29 AM
- 1143 Views
Right, so we're down to the wire- ranagrande or Yuna? *NM*
05/08/2011 01:45:55 PM
- 703 Views
Not sure, though I'd err toward rana.
05/08/2011 02:00:29 PM
- 1178 Views
Ok, I think its time we try and do something
05/08/2011 06:43:37 PM
- 1182 Views
I'm calling for a RC of ranagrande before we pull the trigger.
05/08/2011 06:58:26 PM
- 1187 Views
As I said, lynching me would be a mistake.
06/08/2011 01:41:31 PM
- 1220 Views
Haha, what?
06/08/2011 02:14:51 PM
- 1121 Views
I think he's trying to say he's a notorious busser. *NM*
06/08/2011 02:54:29 PM
- 613 Views
what a thing to be proud of *waggles finger at rana* boo hiss boo *NM*
06/08/2011 05:03:03 PM
- 713 Views
Vote: ranagrande
06/08/2011 08:50:40 PM
- 1101 Views
I won't stand for this! I challenge you to a duel! *NM*
06/08/2011 08:51:12 PM
- 631 Views
Very well. I accept. *NM*
06/08/2011 08:51:30 PM
- 695 Views
Huh, I confess I didn't actually think of that
06/08/2011 08:57:32 PM
- 1168 Views
...
06/08/2011 09:03:20 PM
- 1124 Views
lol you could just make it so a play can't vote for themselves.
06/08/2011 09:17:08 PM
- 1213 Views
That's probably what I'll have to do
06/08/2011 09:33:55 PM
- 1202 Views
Ha, ha, ha! Genius! *NM*
06/08/2011 10:08:30 PM
- 682 Views
clearly Genius has turned to madness *NM*
06/08/2011 10:13:58 PM
- 679 Views
Same thing really. Genius is madness to those who can't appreciate it .
06/08/2011 10:18:26 PM
- 1117 Views
Roleclaim.
06/08/2011 09:12:29 PM
- 1140 Views
Re: Roleclaim.
07/08/2011 02:34:35 AM
- 1165 Views
True. Actions speak louder than words, in this case.
07/08/2011 09:25:26 PM
- 1211 Views
Lynch Reached - Duel Pending
08/08/2011 12:26:25 AM
- 1148 Views
Eh, I'm busy anyway.
08/08/2011 01:50:30 AM
- 1349 Views