Active Users:755 Time:03/04/2025 10:13:54 AM
Re: I object to outdated usage of proton counts as well Isaac Send a noteboard - 01/12/2010 01:56:19 AM
Although I tend to agree, I must say that increasing the size of the known universe does not necessarily demand an increase in the total number of protons. The universe is, after all, primarily composed of empty space. Besides, it is still possible that objects and phenomena at the extreme ranges of our perception may actually be comprised of anti-protons instead.


Not exactly, when we reference 'expanding universe' we actually mean two different types of expansion. The Observable Universe os actually just a normal sphere some 90 billion light years across centered on Earth, this is expanding, Hubble and all, but we can only see as far as time allows... this would tend to make people think a sphere around Earth some 13.7 billion light years in radius but it's bigger than that since the observable radius is the distance that light could cover in that time, the objects moving away from each other and all. Common misconception, yes, the Universe, observable and otherwise is expanding, but totally seperate from that, the distance we can see is expanding, so a galaxy currently right outside the observable universe would eventually become visible too. It is possible there is nothing beyond the visible but this requires an violation of the Copernican Principle so that the Earth really is the center of the Universe in 3-space, obviously fairly unlikely, but more over, recent models put the actual Universe's size, in relation to the Observable Universe, at many times large, as much as 10^23 times larger.

I also feel obliged to point out that 136x2^256 might be better utilized for play purposes as a constant, which I shall name "COIN" where 1 coin is equal to approximately 0.001x136x2^256, and thus for game play purposes we would have 1000 of these "COINs" :P

That would work too, except that the whole point was to mix things up a little. :P


Truem but if you start working with anything more than 5-10 digits the ones after that are basically meaningless, people will just bet in scientific notation, and I'd guess the significant digits won't exceed telephone number length, like all 1.234567x10^big and such, might as well shave off the x10^big, I'm in regardless but in terms of boat rocking you'd almost be better off placing bids in hexidecimal or using low millions or something, IMHO

I think it will be interesting to see what effect, if any, this will have on the betting.


Probably a painfully large spreadsheet on your behalf and confusion over used notation, I'd advise letting people use E# calculator style for base ten, like a 5,000,000= 5E6 or 6,789,000,000 equal 6.789E9 and such

But yeah, I'm in

Welcome :)
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Reply to message
Coin Game V - 30/11/2010 11:45:31 PM 2431 Views
I'm a little confused(as usual) - 30/11/2010 11:50:06 PM 1210 Views
It's the same basic system as before. You'll just have a few more coins to play with. *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:25:39 AM 683 Views
Oh ok cool stuff. *NM* - 02/12/2010 12:28:43 AM 688 Views
I object to your outdated usage of proton count - 01/12/2010 01:18:29 AM 1218 Views
I object to outdated usage of proton counts as well - 01/12/2010 01:41:14 AM 1328 Views
Re: I object to outdated usage of proton counts as well - 01/12/2010 01:56:19 AM 1447 Views
People are free to submit their entries in any format they desire - 01/12/2010 02:40:21 AM 1293 Views
Hoo boy, this is going to be fun. *NM* - 01/12/2010 02:59:30 AM 697 Views
whole real numbers only? *NM* - 01/12/2010 03:41:19 AM 721 Views
Ah, thanks, that does need some clarification - 01/12/2010 04:08:33 AM 1109 Views
So if I bet negative, assuming I'm not the lowest, do I earn coins? - 01/12/2010 04:23:11 AM 1218 Views
Thanks for pointing out the necessity for another rule! - 01/12/2010 04:34:43 AM 1301 Views
*NM* - 01/12/2010 04:37:16 AM 714 Views
Ooh, interesting... I'm in *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:25:44 AM 783 Views
Yes, I shall play - 01/12/2010 01:30:11 AM 1164 Views
I'm in. This will definitely be interesting. - 01/12/2010 01:38:04 AM 1163 Views
Yes'm *NM* - 01/12/2010 03:27:26 AM 781 Views
I am totally in for this. - 01/12/2010 03:37:43 AM 1202 Views
I'll do it. This could be fun. *NM* - 01/12/2010 06:15:48 AM 733 Views
I think I need to join this game. - 01/12/2010 06:44:18 AM 1090 Views
Let's begin Round 1! - 02/12/2010 01:19:33 PM 1222 Views
Round 2! - 04/12/2010 05:30:41 PM 1322 Views
lol *NM* - 04/12/2010 05:58:16 PM 882 Views
Ha ha, awesome - 04/12/2010 07:28:30 PM 1183 Views
I had no idea what I was doing and I won!! AHAHAHAHhehehehehe.... *NM* - 04/12/2010 07:44:35 PM 793 Views
- 04/12/2010 07:53:42 PM 1150 Views
Against a force such as this, there can be no victory. *NM* - 05/12/2010 06:30:15 AM 701 Views
*NM* - 05/12/2010 07:09:41 AM 745 Views
Of course not... - 05/12/2010 07:22:41 AM 1328 Views
We must join with him. It would be wise, my friend. *NM* - 05/12/2010 07:38:53 AM 756 Views
Tell me, friend, when did you abandon reason for madness?? *NM* - 05/12/2010 02:45:35 PM 721 Views
Who me? Or are you asking BA?? *NM* - 07/12/2010 02:22:51 AM 684 Views
*NM* - 07/12/2010 03:11:19 AM 709 Views
*NM* - 07/12/2010 10:11:12 PM 705 Views
It's a scene from Lord of the Rings! - 07/12/2010 03:06:28 PM 1166 Views
I gave you the chance of aiding me willingly, but you have elected the way of pain. *NM* - 07/12/2010 02:59:35 AM 722 Views
Nooooo! - 07/12/2010 03:35:21 AM 1212 Views
Yes, I did not expect you to show wisdom, even on your own behalf; - 07/12/2010 06:48:17 PM 1017 Views
I am ashamed to admit I cannot produce the appropriate response to this. - 07/12/2010 08:05:27 PM 1169 Views
That's fine. - 08/12/2010 03:26:23 AM 1136 Views
*NM* - 08/12/2010 04:00:20 AM 677 Views
So, a serious question about my nerd-cred. - 08/12/2010 06:00:05 AM 1187 Views
MORE of a nerd. - 08/12/2010 01:50:47 PM 1192 Views
MUCH more. HILARIOUSLY more. - 08/12/2010 03:35:47 PM 1357 Views
Round 3! - 06/12/2010 07:48:56 PM 1238 Views
Dangit! I had my bid planned, but forgot to submit it. *NM* - 06/12/2010 07:54:15 PM 750 Views
Kronin's bid was gibberish and higher too - 06/12/2010 09:13:08 PM 1318 Views
I of course meant them all in their most popular incarnations. *NM* - 07/12/2010 04:44:02 AM 740 Views
Actually, they combine fairly easily. - 08/12/2010 01:22:08 PM 1113 Views
This is absurd. *NM* - 06/12/2010 09:59:55 PM 693 Views
This post does not belong here. *NM* - 08/12/2010 10:17:37 PM 658 Views
Round 4! - 09/12/2010 02:12:20 AM 1358 Views
Yes, I am lucking out majorly! - 09/12/2010 02:42:34 AM 1123 Views
Round 5! - 10/12/2010 03:34:00 PM 1291 Views
Round 6! - 12/12/2010 08:14:21 PM 1172 Views
Wow, completely forgot *NM* - 13/12/2010 10:45:45 AM 754 Views
Round 7! - 15/12/2010 05:13:52 AM 1207 Views
Way to be a jerk, Gher. *NM* - 15/12/2010 05:19:15 AM 687 Views
I thought it was easy enough to work with. A jerk would put down a equation... - 15/12/2010 04:10:52 PM 1011 Views
I don't mind either way. - 16/12/2010 04:03:43 AM 1454 Views
Shoot I totally forgot about this game... *NM* - 15/12/2010 09:47:55 PM 668 Views
The End - 18/12/2010 07:07:18 PM 1280 Views
I knew this was going to happen *NM* - 18/12/2010 07:46:58 PM 628 Views
I was expecting second place again, the win's nice *NM* - 18/12/2010 07:52:40 PM 662 Views
Oh, that's right, so did I. - 19/12/2010 06:42:10 AM 1064 Views
Heh heh heh - 19/12/2010 03:30:03 PM 1123 Views
Re: Heh heh heh - 19/12/2010 10:34:49 PM 1205 Views
D'oh! - 19/12/2010 05:19:32 AM 1054 Views

Reply to Message