Re: I object to outdated usage of proton counts as well
Isaac Send a noteboard - 01/12/2010 01:56:19 AM
Although I tend to agree, I must say that increasing the size of the known universe does not necessarily demand an increase in the total number of protons. The universe is, after all, primarily composed of empty space. Besides, it is still possible that objects and phenomena at the extreme ranges of our perception may actually be comprised of anti-protons instead.
Not exactly, when we reference 'expanding universe' we actually mean two different types of expansion. The Observable Universe os actually just a normal sphere some 90 billion light years across centered on Earth, this is expanding, Hubble and all, but we can only see as far as time allows... this would tend to make people think a sphere around Earth some 13.7 billion light years in radius but it's bigger than that since the observable radius is the distance that light could cover in that time, the objects moving away from each other and all. Common misconception, yes, the Universe, observable and otherwise is expanding, but totally seperate from that, the distance we can see is expanding, so a galaxy currently right outside the observable universe would eventually become visible too. It is possible there is nothing beyond the visible but this requires an violation of the Copernican Principle so that the Earth really is the center of the Universe in 3-space, obviously fairly unlikely, but more over, recent models put the actual Universe's size, in relation to the Observable Universe, at many times large, as much as 10^23 times larger.
I also feel obliged to point out that 136x2^256 might be better utilized for play purposes as a constant, which I shall name "COIN" where 1 coin is equal to approximately 0.001x136x2^256, and thus for game play purposes we would have 1000 of these "COINs"
That would work too, except that the whole point was to mix things up a little.
Truem but if you start working with anything more than 5-10 digits the ones after that are basically meaningless, people will just bet in scientific notation, and I'd guess the significant digits won't exceed telephone number length, like all 1.234567x10^big and such, might as well shave off the x10^big, I'm in regardless but in terms of boat rocking you'd almost be better off placing bids in hexidecimal or using low millions or something, IMHO
I think it will be interesting to see what effect, if any, this will have on the betting.
Probably a painfully large spreadsheet on your behalf and confusion over used notation, I'd advise letting people use E# calculator style for base ten, like a 5,000,000= 5E6 or 6,789,000,000 equal 6.789E9 and such
But yeah, I'm in
Welcome
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Coin Game V
30/11/2010 11:45:31 PM
- 2352 Views
I'm a little confused(as usual)
30/11/2010 11:50:06 PM
- 1136 Views
It's the same basic system as before. You'll just have a few more coins to play with. *NM*
01/12/2010 01:25:39 AM
- 649 Views
I object to your outdated usage of proton count
01/12/2010 01:18:29 AM
- 1149 Views
I object to outdated usage of proton counts as well
01/12/2010 01:41:14 AM
- 1253 Views
Re: I object to outdated usage of proton counts as well
01/12/2010 01:56:19 AM
- 1367 Views
People are free to submit their entries in any format they desire
01/12/2010 02:40:21 AM
- 1215 Views
So if I bet negative, assuming I'm not the lowest, do I earn coins?
01/12/2010 04:23:11 AM
- 1133 Views
Round 2!
04/12/2010 05:30:41 PM
- 1233 Views
I had no idea what I was doing and I won!! AHAHAHAHhehehehehe.... *NM*
04/12/2010 07:44:35 PM
- 756 Views
04/12/2010 07:53:42 PM
- 1076 Views
Against a force such as this, there can be no victory. *NM*
05/12/2010 06:30:15 AM
- 673 Views
We must join with him. It would be wise, my friend. *NM*
05/12/2010 07:38:53 AM
- 723 Views
Tell me, friend, when did you abandon reason for madness?? *NM*
05/12/2010 02:45:35 PM
- 691 Views
I gave you the chance of aiding me willingly, but you have elected the way of pain. *NM*
07/12/2010 02:59:35 AM
- 684 Views
Yes, I did not expect you to show wisdom, even on your own behalf;
07/12/2010 06:48:17 PM
- 934 Views
I am ashamed to admit I cannot produce the appropriate response to this.
07/12/2010 08:05:27 PM
- 1094 Views
So, a serious question about my nerd-cred.
08/12/2010 06:00:05 AM
- 1112 Views
Round 3!
06/12/2010 07:48:56 PM
- 1166 Views
Kronin's bid was gibberish and higher too
06/12/2010 09:13:08 PM
- 1230 Views
I of course meant them all in their most popular incarnations. *NM*
07/12/2010 04:44:02 AM
- 703 Views
Round 7!
15/12/2010 05:13:52 AM
- 1137 Views
Way to be a jerk, Gher. *NM*
15/12/2010 05:19:15 AM
- 651 Views
I thought it was easy enough to work with. A jerk would put down a equation...
15/12/2010 04:10:52 PM
- 938 Views
The End
18/12/2010 07:07:18 PM
- 1209 Views
I was expecting second place again, the win's nice *NM*
18/12/2010 07:52:40 PM
- 622 Views