I didn't vote for someone on evidence that proposing a no lynch was massive proof of scum-dom, though I can see why FT did obviously and why you would with tracking and his HC. Out of everyone else, BErgioyn as vote 2, a sort of reluctant 'yeah lets put the heat on and ask questions' vote from its placements and his commentary, is the only one that makes a whole lot of sense to me. I'm pretty sure at least two and probably 3 votes on me are scum so that doesn't leave me a huge pool of suspects



It will be a guessing game to a degree, because most superheroes have some way they could pull that off, but generally speaking I've never seen quicksilver do that sort of thing, I'd expect him to wrap someone up like a mummy to suffocate or slice someone into a thousands little bits. Same, Thor could rip someone in half but it would be more likely we'd have found a blunt force trauma case or pancake or electrocution or such. Heck, Batman could rip someone in half in one of his various exo-skeleton suits, a telekinetic could rip them in half too, that one's more probable than Batman for instance. I'd say if it sounds like a reasonable mode of kill for that person, as opposed to a 'technically possible' one, we probably can leave them on the list. It could make a big difference in a 50/50 case if nothing else. A lot of characters that mode of death is probable, some its reasonable, others it vaguely possible and some its just ridiculous,