Re: I trust him because of the way he's been acting.
Isaac Send a noteboard - 17/11/2010 07:09:14 PM
You may not believe it, but I rarely check the hypocop table during the Day. It's all confusing misleading trails, so why bother? I had not noticed the significance or implications of him hypocopping you until you posted about it just now. Seriously.
Lord, then why? Was I right about us being almost all masoned after all? IF so then why this surety my team must be infected? Why do you apparently trust him? I cna't help but feel it might be a bit relevant to my case, you basically just said "I think I trust him, but it makes me uncomfortable for him to have my role information. He knows I'm not scum, but I have no such assurances that he is not." What do you mean by this? Why do you trust him?
In particular, the single-minded ferocity with which he's decided to bring you down. That says "town" to me. Scum don't make those kind of gambles, and bear in mind that I am speaking of my mindset before he revealed himself to be the Cop, not afterward. Though if anything, that revelation has assured my initial feelings on the matter. You are a formidable opponent, Isaac, but not such much that the scum would be willing to sacrifice F-T (also a very valuable asset) to get you lynched. Because that's pretty much exactly what's going to happen if you turn up innocent Tonight - F-T's going to get it. I don't think that's a gamble worth taking on Day 2 for the scum - the costs outweigh the benefits. There are easier far, far easier targets that can be brought down in a way that spreads the guilt for the Lynch around. Hell, that's exactly what we do every other game, and that's basically what we did Yesterday to WF.
That's a sound enough analysis, IMHO, the problem is while I don't think FT would gamble off the SPLOG claim or sacrifice himself, it is clear he thinks its him or me, personally I tihnk we'll end up going for one of the other five voters if we don't hit me. The problem is, while the FT-as-scummer option seems ludicrous for a sacrifice, the idea that my scummer allies would serve me up on a platter pre-cop admission is, well, highly unrealistic.
The SPLOG thing only cements it further. There's no way F-T is scum, unless there are two fractions. That's a ridiculous, ridiculous claim to make just to get you lynched. Totally not worth it, I am forced to assume he is telling the truth. Perhaps he is limited in some way, or insane. But he's not scum.
I don't think he's scum either, not much anyway, though I'll be happier once people confirm they don't have the SPLOG, since he seems to think he's dead if I'm not, and has ample prior evidence to believe as much, and that can apply as much to scum as town. I've been pondering my scribble note from game start, let me try for an optimal paraphrase:
"You need an access code for the SPLOG"
That's obviously not the real wording. Anyway, my intial take on that was that Hobo or Fox had the codes to open the case, which is listed as intact in the Intro, its our building so to speak. Simple easy, which is why my first NB to Hobo and Fox stressed not admitting to having the device if they did, one scummer, one cop, one hardened brute with clue made a lot of sense. However the wording could just as easily have meant that you need the right code to use the thing, its never explicitly stated the device was locked up, so maybe he didn't have to thief his way into it and just picked it up not knowing he had the right access key. Previously I'd just assumed post-WF that if it had a flaw it probably was iffy about mutant or non-human DNA, superheroes being so full of such things, and a damaged cop fits with a secondary investigator decently well. Its not surprising of course, two investigators (and we might have more, semi or full) pretty much mandated the scummers have some edge in that respect, undetectable, frame-ability, etc. I'd hardly be a surprising target for a frame-role but I'd assume the more logical explanation is that the SPLOG just doesn't work because you need a key to use it, as opposed to my original interpretation of being in a locked box, I'm picturing the thing as a gun like device, one locks such things up as opposed to sticking a keypad on it or something.
Probably the core thing to keep in mind is the numbers aspect, the lynch record just doesn't jibe with available estimates and the bulletproof watcher tossed in pretty much requires some sort of investigatory shenanigans, our cops have been damaged goods about half the time of late, pretty much since the whitecloak investigator first appeared in game 5, if FT has a fully functional device then its a safe bet the scummers have bigger numbers - screwing up the lynch numbers even worse - or they have protection or misdirection. I can produce a lot of theories, like fist used his mega-hex and they had a roled framer, target whoever you feel like and conjunction, etc, he just absorbs everything. But I think the most probable is that the thing just doesn't work properly without a code. I'd considered the probability it might have been removed from a locked case by everything from super-thief to teleportation but She-Hulk wouldn't fit that, and the case is verifiably intact, so I assume I just took the incorrect route on ambiguous wording.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
RAFO Mafia 19: Superlative Crisis! ISSUE TWO: BLACK MAGIC- WHOA, MAN!
- 03/11/2010 04:59:59 AM
2799 Views
I see two avenues to discuss here
- 03/11/2010 11:41:14 AM
1028 Views
I was thinking about number 1.
- 03/11/2010 10:00:57 PM
1045 Views
Regarding 2, and let me suggets a 3
- 04/11/2010 02:30:41 AM
1092 Views
I, personally, agree with Isaac so here goes.
- 04/11/2010 11:33:07 PM
1010 Views
O.......K..........
- 05/11/2010 11:43:14 PM
981 Views
Did Fist use his power last Night?
- 06/11/2010 03:41:05 AM
1032 Views
It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
- 06/11/2010 04:53:19 AM
1030 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
- 06/11/2010 05:30:00 PM
1012 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
- 06/11/2010 07:15:11 PM
1049 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
- 07/11/2010 08:18:16 AM
1098 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
- 07/11/2010 03:38:37 PM
1125 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
- 07/11/2010 06:42:10 PM
1087 Views
Huh, well Fox straight up told us his Mason group was a 3rd Fraction on Night 1
- 11/11/2010 12:55:50 AM
1045 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
- 07/11/2010 06:16:29 PM
1121 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
- 07/11/2010 07:16:20 PM
1047 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
- 07/11/2010 09:29:12 PM
1155 Views
I am about 95% sure that WF targeted me last Night.
- 11/11/2010 01:04:34 AM
1110 Views
Interesting.
- 11/11/2010 02:25:07 AM
1054 Views
It's certainly possible.
- 11/11/2010 02:39:00 AM
1059 Views
Now I'm curious
- 11/11/2010 03:33:46 AM
1110 Views
Presumably because I'm not trying to get her lynched.
- 11/11/2010 03:53:54 AM
1089 Views
Yeah, I'm going with that #3 there.
- 04/11/2010 05:41:04 AM
1113 Views
Re: Yeah, I'm going with that #3 there.
- 04/11/2010 04:18:17 PM
1181 Views
a scummer got caught on day one in the tower game
- 04/11/2010 06:42:15 PM
1093 Views
also there was that time someone said they saw a black light instead of white
- 04/11/2010 07:52:41 PM
1035 Views
That was Hobo in DK's crossover game. *NM*
- 04/11/2010 08:16:07 PM
576 Views
You know we could just forget about that. I wouldn't complain.
*NM*
- 05/11/2010 08:35:03 PM
629 Views
*NM*
- 05/11/2010 08:35:03 PM
629 Views
Hypocop? *NM*
- 03/11/2010 03:20:17 PM
634 Views
Hobo - Innocent + read this before you HC if you haven't already
- 04/11/2010 08:25:26 PM
1024 Views
So help me I will spoil the entirety of ToM, people! (not just yet, though)
- 10/11/2010 02:51:46 AM
981 Views
I'm pretty sure if you do, you'll be lynched. *NM*
- 10/11/2010 09:19:43 PM
580 Views
Vote: No Lynch
- 13/11/2010 12:24:43 AM
1054 Views
I am very much opposed to this idea
- 13/11/2010 02:04:27 PM
1008 Views
Then offer an alternative
- 13/11/2010 11:10:42 PM
1048 Views
Why is an inactive likely to be a townie?
- 14/11/2010 04:03:35 AM
964 Views
Re: Why is an inactive likely to be a townie?
- 14/11/2010 04:21:12 AM
1029 Views
I had no RBIRL because my computer died.
- 14/11/2010 06:52:56 AM
962 Views
Ah, I see you did unvote. Very well. I still got my eye on you. *NM*
- 14/11/2010 06:55:30 AM
525 Views
LOL - I guess this is also my informal defense
- 14/11/2010 08:52:56 AM
1017 Views
Saying it's not out-of-character to be scummy doesn't make you any less scummy.
- 14/11/2010 04:33:15 PM
1022 Views
Watch the difference between what he says and what he is accused of.
- 14/11/2010 07:08:08 PM
944 Views
After this whole argument I've had with FT...
- 13/11/2010 11:42:32 PM
990 Views
People who vote for totally random lynches don't deserve to win
- 14/11/2010 03:43:14 AM
984 Views
Re: People who vote for totally random lynches don't deserve to win
- 14/11/2010 02:23:04 PM
1156 Views
Vote: Isaac
- 13/11/2010 11:58:56 PM
1076 Views
Re: Vote: Isaac
- 14/11/2010 03:02:15 AM
1003 Views
Re: Vote: Isaac
- 14/11/2010 04:02:30 AM
1073 Views
What was scummy?
- 14/11/2010 04:10:12 AM
1098 Views
Re: What was scummy?
- 14/11/2010 05:41:44 AM
1021 Views
Extrmely thin
- 14/11/2010 06:05:32 AM
1172 Views
Actually...
- 14/11/2010 06:55:02 AM
1090 Views
Re: Actually...
- 14/11/2010 07:44:33 AM
1030 Views
Did you guys just blitz me?
- 14/11/2010 11:35:58 PM
1082 Views
- 14/11/2010 11:35:58 PM
1082 Views
Your not hammered yet are you?
- 14/11/2010 11:46:29 PM
993 Views
I think I might be, can never be sure what votes are worth in a heavy role game
- 14/11/2010 11:50:51 PM
1028 Views
I'm potentially alive on a technicality
- 15/11/2010 12:02:36 AM
906 Views
Why don't you go ahead and claim then?
- 15/11/2010 12:11:03 AM
1009 Views
Sure
- 15/11/2010 12:34:34 AM
991 Views
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm...
- 15/11/2010 02:13:23 AM
1096 Views
I think so.
- 15/11/2010 01:25:46 AM
969 Views
Also, I must confess...
- 15/11/2010 01:32:44 AM
990 Views
Re: Also, I must confess...
- 15/11/2010 01:58:26 AM
1109 Views
Yes, I would expect so.
- 15/11/2010 02:22:06 AM
933 Views
Re: Yes, I would expect so.
- 15/11/2010 02:35:49 AM
1059 Views
I'm unvoting only if the defence is really foolproof, since now no-one can hammer without instantly
- 15/11/2010 07:18:05 AM
1026 Views
EBWOP - The "only" in the title is rebundant, it was part of different title I abandoned. *NM*
- 15/11/2010 07:19:46 AM
616 Views
I guess the first title stands afterall I won't automatically unvote just because none should hammer
- 15/11/2010 08:19:00 AM
921 Views
I'll try to help Isaac out a bit here.
- 15/11/2010 01:11:11 PM
876 Views
Thanks, and a question too
- 15/11/2010 01:30:17 PM
947 Views
Well, I'll unvote if the third mason comes forward too. *NM*
- 15/11/2010 03:30:36 PM
591 Views
Jeez, when it rains, it pours
- 15/11/2010 10:34:54 PM
909 Views
OK Isaac
- 15/11/2010 11:14:45 PM
949 Views
My Defense Posts
- 16/11/2010 04:16:41 AM
949 Views
Defense A: The Fantastic Four
- 16/11/2010 04:31:11 AM
1010 Views
Defense B: The Numbers Game
- 16/11/2010 04:36:59 AM
1007 Views
"What motive would a scummer have"?
- 16/11/2010 05:56:04 PM
992 Views
Without any further questions though?
- 16/11/2010 11:51:42 PM
1065 Views
If you see an avalanche coming, you hop on board (NOT a metaphor).
- 17/11/2010 12:12:31 AM
970 Views
Defense C: The Intro Flavor
- 16/11/2010 04:41:31 AM
1110 Views
Eh ...
- 16/11/2010 10:00:21 PM
957 Views
Re: Eh ...
- 17/11/2010 02:33:27 AM
1005 Views
We'll take a look at that in turn, but first...
- 16/11/2010 07:01:22 AM
1046 Views
Re: We'll take a look at that in turn, but first...
- 16/11/2010 01:40:21 PM
966 Views
Yes, that was it.
- 16/11/2010 09:05:04 PM
964 Views
Re: Yes, that was it.
- 17/11/2010 02:55:58 AM
987 Views
Not at all.
- 17/11/2010 03:04:50 AM
993 Views
Well, that's a borderline lie
- 17/11/2010 04:29:47 AM
1060 Views
How do you figure?
- 17/11/2010 05:46:37 AM
958 Views
I'd say its pretty pertinent to my defense
- 17/11/2010 06:49:20 AM
949 Views
All right, fair enough.
- 17/11/2010 07:19:37 AM
1067 Views
Thanks for whakcing me before going to bed
- 17/11/2010 07:39:58 AM
1010 Views
- 17/11/2010 07:39:58 AM
1010 Views
By the way, I'd appreciate if no one had hammer till FT has a chance to reply and vice-versa
- 17/11/2010 07:46:18 AM
967 Views
I have evidence in favor of and yet against F-T's claim. Take it as you will.
- 17/11/2010 07:18:35 PM
1046 Views
Slight EBWOP
- 17/11/2010 07:20:58 PM
1051 Views
Re: Slight EBWOP
- 17/11/2010 07:24:34 PM
948 Views
Uh, that doesn't make a lot of sense
- 17/11/2010 07:22:59 PM
1031 Views
That's fair. Sanity can actually be called into question now.
- 17/11/2010 07:26:34 PM
969 Views
Re: That's fair. Sanity can actually be called into question now.
- 17/11/2010 08:01:20 PM
1035 Views
Actually that sounds a good plan
- 17/11/2010 08:06:50 PM
968 Views
Glad to hear you agree with yourself
- 17/11/2010 08:14:42 PM
1049 Views
- 17/11/2010 08:14:42 PM
1049 Views
:/ Wanna mention this before I forget. Little niggling that's been bugging me.
- 17/11/2010 03:03:27 AM
984 Views
Ah yes, I noticed that as well
- 17/11/2010 04:08:15 AM
972 Views
I just caught that
- 17/11/2010 04:53:16 AM
1094 Views
No, I don't mean Cop.
- 17/11/2010 05:29:36 AM
991 Views
Re: No, I don't mean Cop.
- 17/11/2010 05:34:46 AM
1005 Views
I trust him because of the way he's been acting.
- 17/11/2010 06:30:26 PM
1064 Views
Re: I trust him because of the way he's been acting.
- 17/11/2010 07:09:14 PM
1070 Views
Complete sidetrack.
- 17/11/2010 07:28:31 PM
1067 Views
Re: Complete sidetrack.
- 17/11/2010 07:33:51 PM
937 Views
I can't seem to find the post about that arrangement we had, incidentally.
- 17/11/2010 05:38:53 AM
906 Views
Re: I can't seem to find the post about that arrangement we had, incidentally.
- 17/11/2010 06:04:08 AM
924 Views
Re: I can't seem to find the post about that arrangement we had, incidentally.
- 17/11/2010 06:25:05 AM
1009 Views
Re: I can't seem to find the post about that arrangement we had, incidentally.
- 17/11/2010 06:50:04 AM
965 Views
In the interests of honesty, now would probably be a good time to mention ...
- 17/11/2010 09:22:14 PM
984 Views
What the balls?
- 17/11/2010 09:52:04 PM
1003 Views
I still only see one way for this day to end
- 18/11/2010 02:02:03 PM
963 Views
Re: I still only see one way for this day to end
- 18/11/2010 03:18:50 PM
938 Views
Its probably the blind mason loyalty thing, but I'm inclined to trust Isaac.
- 18/11/2010 05:16:28 PM
1145 Views
Re: Its probably the blind mason loyalty thing, but I'm inclined to trust Isaac.
- 18/11/2010 06:00:06 PM
954 Views
I'd also like to point out that we know nothing about you
- 18/11/2010 03:37:08 PM
943 Views
i don't know much about comics but
- 18/11/2010 05:45:10 PM
998 Views
Re: i don't know much about comics but
- 18/11/2010 05:49:54 PM
898 Views
They're also Marvel characters
- 18/11/2010 06:30:11 PM
1026 Views
LOL, duly noted
- 18/11/2010 06:48:08 PM
1024 Views
- 18/11/2010 06:48:08 PM
1024 Views
Beast is really surprisingly un-beastly.
- 18/11/2010 06:28:15 PM
1023 Views
Sure
- 18/11/2010 06:42:01 PM
997 Views
Alright, to hell with this. Let's test F-T's sanity. Vote: Isaac *NM*
- 21/11/2010 08:29:53 PM
591 Views
Ah, the frustration vote, normally my best friend
- 21/11/2010 09:58:18 PM
960 Views
- 21/11/2010 09:58:18 PM
960 Views
OK, here's a question for beet:
- 21/11/2010 10:37:08 PM
988 Views
You're not suggesting we lynch F-T instead of Isaac, are you?
- 21/11/2010 11:17:19 PM
969 Views
But we do get information
- 22/11/2010 12:17:20 AM
986 Views
<-- Btw, first time I got the hammer vote. My life is now complete. *NM*
- 22/11/2010 12:20:53 AM
587 Views
Well, congrats
*NM*
- 22/11/2010 12:32:34 AM
625 Views
*NM*
- 22/11/2010 12:32:34 AM
625 Views
Since this is a first for both of us...
- 22/11/2010 12:35:29 AM
967 Views
- 22/11/2010 12:35:29 AM
967 Views
When someone dies, you find out their role. "Psycho Cop" is a distinct role.
- 21/11/2010 11:22:50 PM
981 Views
Isaac wonders how he could be lynched without scum involvement...
- 22/11/2010 12:00:31 AM
936 Views
Re: Isaac wonders how he could be lynched without scum involvement...
- 22/11/2010 12:21:01 AM
1039 Views
Isaac has been lynched!
- 22/11/2010 03:10:01 AM
881 Views
I can't help but feel a silver bullet would have been appropriate
- 22/11/2010 04:11:13 AM
895 Views
- 22/11/2010 04:11:13 AM
895 Views
I find that astounding, considering the level of suspicion generally laid upon you *NM*
- 22/11/2010 04:16:04 AM
635 Views
I might just mount your head on my wall
.
- 22/11/2010 05:09:45 AM
1079 Views
.
- 22/11/2010 05:09:45 AM
1079 Views
I consider myself an integral part in this group.
- 22/11/2010 05:27:12 AM
1066 Views



