First off, your roleclaim. You roleclaimed bulletproof with some exceptions. That's just disappointingly suspicious, really. "Bulletproof" is a favourite roleclaim for scum because it doesn't require to do anything on behalf of the town, and it can be used to excuse the fact that the claimant somehow never gets night killed. The "with exceptions" is also part of a scum favourite - because claiming an exact role leaves you open to counterclaim. This is not helping your situation at all.
Second, you've got some evidence pointing to you being the Thing and part of a Fantastic Four mason group. I don't doubt either of those, but they're both irrelevant given the realities of infiltrated mason groups and shapeshifters.
Third, and finally getting into the interesting part, there's your justification for your scummy actions that brought this about in the first place. I admit I'm impressed, I didn't think you could come up with something believable, but your explanation is actually a possibility. I don't believe it of course, I knew from the moment I promised you some time to prepare that you were going to try to find some explanation of this kind, and possible though it may be, there's no evidence for it. There is no sign that this was your plan before your actions, you only posted them after you were called out on your mafia dodging lynch votes. Obviously, that's the way it usually is, players rarely give out their plans beforehand. But then, if we operate on the basis that you are mafia, what are you expected to do? Just confess to your blatant scummy behaviour, or make up some story explaining it away? So really, I'm impressed by the explanation you've thought up, but it changes nothing. There's no way to know if it is true, and we can be sure you would have done the same thing as mafia.
Fourth and finally, there's the numbers. Very interesting, aren't they?
There are of course four possibilities for your mason group:
1- You are actually all innocent townies.
2- You are mafia and your masonic allies are innocent.
3- You are innocent but one of your allies is mafia.
4- You are all mafia, attempting some bold feint based on our acceptance of the assumption that you are an actual mason group.
I'm going to dismiss #4 due to yesterday's claimlist, either the lot of you were exceedingly lucky or exceedingly clever, but most probably you actually are a mason group.
I'm also going to not bother with #3 for now, because you're the likeliest suspect in the group for now. I won't really consider the others unless one of them does something even more dramatically scummy than you, or you get lynched and actually turn out innocent.
The interesting part about this is that if you are a mafia, as it seems you are, then this does indeed clear Fox and Ravens and Hobo - barring the unlikely #4 possibility above - because mods simply don't go for redundant mason infiltrations. One of them should eventually, just to mess with us, but until then I am comfortable with the assumption that there is 1 or 0 mafia in your group.
So if you die and are demonstrated as mafia, we can list those two as nearly certain townies.
That leaves us with Yunalesca and Darth_Katie. As I've indicated earlier, I have an inkling that Darth_Katie is innocent. I think I know her character and her role, though I can't be certain. If I survive the Night, I'll probably ask her about those tomorrow, I don't think it is especially relevant today. So in the meantime, again barring the unlikely "full mafia mason group feint" I outlined above, that means that if I am correct, one of your mafia allies assuredly bussed you. Going up the list, that would likely be Amys, then ?, ranagrande, Kronin, Bergioyn and myself.
Certainly, if you are mafia, we've got enough info there that we can almost assuredly win the game near instantly. When I get you lynched - and I do intend to get you lynched today - supposing you are as I suspect mafia, I would suggest everybody to hypocop Yunalesca. From there I'll ask the cop to reveal himself so we can get the true result, and assuming he isn't dead or roleblocked that'll give us an almost definite reading on most everybody.
If Yunalesca ends up being mafia, then your last ally (or allies, I suspect 3, especially without a Serial Killer, but could be wrong) will likely be in the tail end of that vote list, or Darth_Katie supposing I'm actually wrong about my expectations regarding her.
If Yunalesca and Darth_Katie both turn out innocent, then I'd reconsider the "full mafia mason group feint".
Your death and revelation as mafia could win us the game right here.
And with you scummy behaviour, I'm very confident that you are mafia. You claim it is unlikely the entire town (or the entire town -1) would vote for you, but it shouldn't be that unlikely. Barring players who have suicided or admitted to lying, your behaviour this game is probably the scummiest that I've seen. You're the scummiest player to deny your scumminess. And you are excepting your mason allies, when instead you should be glad that they're following that strange "masonic blind loyalty" thing I mentioned earlier. Really, they should be voting for you too.
But anyway, if I'm somehow wrong, if all your scummy antics were actually honest mistakes or unfortunately unfulfilled plans or innocent misunderstandings, all we lose is one townie. A good player, certainly, but still just one townie.
As players we must accept the risk of mislynch. It's happened before, it will happen again. To sit on our hands and do nothing is to give the mafia victory. You are by far the scummiest player alive right now, you are by far our best target for a lynch, and your death, if we are right could give us the game.
It would be foolish for the town not to lynch you.
Second, you've got some evidence pointing to you being the Thing and part of a Fantastic Four mason group. I don't doubt either of those, but they're both irrelevant given the realities of infiltrated mason groups and shapeshifters.
Third, and finally getting into the interesting part, there's your justification for your scummy actions that brought this about in the first place. I admit I'm impressed, I didn't think you could come up with something believable, but your explanation is actually a possibility. I don't believe it of course, I knew from the moment I promised you some time to prepare that you were going to try to find some explanation of this kind, and possible though it may be, there's no evidence for it. There is no sign that this was your plan before your actions, you only posted them after you were called out on your mafia dodging lynch votes. Obviously, that's the way it usually is, players rarely give out their plans beforehand. But then, if we operate on the basis that you are mafia, what are you expected to do? Just confess to your blatant scummy behaviour, or make up some story explaining it away? So really, I'm impressed by the explanation you've thought up, but it changes nothing. There's no way to know if it is true, and we can be sure you would have done the same thing as mafia.
Fourth and finally, there's the numbers. Very interesting, aren't they?
There are of course four possibilities for your mason group:
1- You are actually all innocent townies.
2- You are mafia and your masonic allies are innocent.
3- You are innocent but one of your allies is mafia.
4- You are all mafia, attempting some bold feint based on our acceptance of the assumption that you are an actual mason group.
I'm going to dismiss #4 due to yesterday's claimlist, either the lot of you were exceedingly lucky or exceedingly clever, but most probably you actually are a mason group.
I'm also going to not bother with #3 for now, because you're the likeliest suspect in the group for now. I won't really consider the others unless one of them does something even more dramatically scummy than you, or you get lynched and actually turn out innocent.
The interesting part about this is that if you are a mafia, as it seems you are, then this does indeed clear Fox and Ravens and Hobo - barring the unlikely #4 possibility above - because mods simply don't go for redundant mason infiltrations. One of them should eventually, just to mess with us, but until then I am comfortable with the assumption that there is 1 or 0 mafia in your group.
So if you die and are demonstrated as mafia, we can list those two as nearly certain townies.
That leaves us with Yunalesca and Darth_Katie. As I've indicated earlier, I have an inkling that Darth_Katie is innocent. I think I know her character and her role, though I can't be certain. If I survive the Night, I'll probably ask her about those tomorrow, I don't think it is especially relevant today. So in the meantime, again barring the unlikely "full mafia mason group feint" I outlined above, that means that if I am correct, one of your mafia allies assuredly bussed you. Going up the list, that would likely be Amys, then ?, ranagrande, Kronin, Bergioyn and myself.
Certainly, if you are mafia, we've got enough info there that we can almost assuredly win the game near instantly. When I get you lynched - and I do intend to get you lynched today - supposing you are as I suspect mafia, I would suggest everybody to hypocop Yunalesca. From there I'll ask the cop to reveal himself so we can get the true result, and assuming he isn't dead or roleblocked that'll give us an almost definite reading on most everybody.
If Yunalesca ends up being mafia, then your last ally (or allies, I suspect 3, especially without a Serial Killer, but could be wrong) will likely be in the tail end of that vote list, or Darth_Katie supposing I'm actually wrong about my expectations regarding her.
If Yunalesca and Darth_Katie both turn out innocent, then I'd reconsider the "full mafia mason group feint".
Your death and revelation as mafia could win us the game right here.
And with you scummy behaviour, I'm very confident that you are mafia. You claim it is unlikely the entire town (or the entire town -1) would vote for you, but it shouldn't be that unlikely. Barring players who have suicided or admitted to lying, your behaviour this game is probably the scummiest that I've seen. You're the scummiest player to deny your scumminess. And you are excepting your mason allies, when instead you should be glad that they're following that strange "masonic blind loyalty" thing I mentioned earlier. Really, they should be voting for you too.
But anyway, if I'm somehow wrong, if all your scummy antics were actually honest mistakes or unfortunately unfulfilled plans or innocent misunderstandings, all we lose is one townie. A good player, certainly, but still just one townie.
As players we must accept the risk of mislynch. It's happened before, it will happen again. To sit on our hands and do nothing is to give the mafia victory. You are by far the scummiest player alive right now, you are by far our best target for a lynch, and your death, if we are right could give us the game.
It would be foolish for the town not to lynch you.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter
Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
~Master Splinter
Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
RAFO Mafia 19: Superlative Crisis! ISSUE TWO: BLACK MAGIC- WHOA, MAN!
03/11/2010 04:59:59 AM
- 2667 Views
I see two avenues to discuss here
03/11/2010 11:41:14 AM
- 897 Views
I was thinking about number 1.
03/11/2010 10:00:57 PM
- 916 Views
Regarding 2, and let me suggets a 3
04/11/2010 02:30:41 AM
- 953 Views
I, personally, agree with Isaac so here goes.
04/11/2010 11:33:07 PM
- 884 Views
O.......K..........
05/11/2010 11:43:14 PM
- 865 Views
Did Fist use his power last Night?
06/11/2010 03:41:05 AM
- 906 Views
It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
06/11/2010 04:53:19 AM
- 881 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
06/11/2010 05:30:00 PM
- 877 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
06/11/2010 07:15:11 PM
- 926 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
07/11/2010 08:18:16 AM
- 969 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
07/11/2010 03:38:37 PM
- 931 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
07/11/2010 06:42:10 PM
- 967 Views
Huh, well Fox straight up told us his Mason group was a 3rd Fraction on Night 1
11/11/2010 12:55:50 AM
- 923 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
07/11/2010 06:16:29 PM
- 974 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
07/11/2010 07:16:20 PM
- 913 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
07/11/2010 09:29:12 PM
- 990 Views
I am about 95% sure that WF targeted me last Night.
11/11/2010 01:04:34 AM
- 898 Views
Interesting.
11/11/2010 02:25:07 AM
- 930 Views
It's certainly possible.
11/11/2010 02:39:00 AM
- 923 Views
Now I'm curious
11/11/2010 03:33:46 AM
- 971 Views
Presumably because I'm not trying to get her lynched.
11/11/2010 03:53:54 AM
- 960 Views
Yeah, I'm going with that #3 there.
04/11/2010 05:41:04 AM
- 968 Views
Re: Yeah, I'm going with that #3 there.
04/11/2010 04:18:17 PM
- 979 Views
a scummer got caught on day one in the tower game
04/11/2010 06:42:15 PM
- 950 Views
also there was that time someone said they saw a black light instead of white
04/11/2010 07:52:41 PM
- 923 Views
That was Hobo in DK's crossover game. *NM*
04/11/2010 08:16:07 PM
- 507 Views
You know we could just forget about that. I wouldn't complain.
*NM*
05/11/2010 08:35:03 PM
- 549 Views

Hypocop? *NM*
03/11/2010 03:20:17 PM
- 560 Views
So help me I will spoil the entirety of ToM, people! (not just yet, though)
10/11/2010 02:51:46 AM
- 839 Views
I'm pretty sure if you do, you'll be lynched. *NM*
10/11/2010 09:19:43 PM
- 525 Views
Vote: No Lynch
13/11/2010 12:24:43 AM
- 935 Views
I am very much opposed to this idea
13/11/2010 02:04:27 PM
- 863 Views
Then offer an alternative
13/11/2010 11:10:42 PM
- 915 Views
Why is an inactive likely to be a townie?
14/11/2010 04:03:35 AM
- 841 Views
Re: Why is an inactive likely to be a townie?
14/11/2010 04:21:12 AM
- 905 Views
I had no RBIRL because my computer died.
14/11/2010 06:52:56 AM
- 827 Views
Ah, I see you did unvote. Very well. I still got my eye on you. *NM*
14/11/2010 06:55:30 AM
- 460 Views
LOL - I guess this is also my informal defense
14/11/2010 08:52:56 AM
- 907 Views
Saying it's not out-of-character to be scummy doesn't make you any less scummy.
14/11/2010 04:33:15 PM
- 915 Views
Watch the difference between what he says and what he is accused of.
14/11/2010 07:08:08 PM
- 795 Views
After this whole argument I've had with FT...
13/11/2010 11:42:32 PM
- 871 Views
People who vote for totally random lynches don't deserve to win
14/11/2010 03:43:14 AM
- 842 Views
Re: People who vote for totally random lynches don't deserve to win
14/11/2010 02:23:04 PM
- 1016 Views
Vote: Isaac
13/11/2010 11:58:56 PM
- 957 Views
Re: Vote: Isaac
14/11/2010 03:02:15 AM
- 860 Views
Re: Vote: Isaac
14/11/2010 04:02:30 AM
- 946 Views
What was scummy?
14/11/2010 04:10:12 AM
- 979 Views
Re: What was scummy?
14/11/2010 05:41:44 AM
- 893 Views
Extrmely thin
14/11/2010 06:05:32 AM
- 1048 Views
Actually...
14/11/2010 06:55:02 AM
- 950 Views
Re: Actually...
14/11/2010 07:44:33 AM
- 906 Views
Did you guys just blitz me?
14/11/2010 11:35:58 PM
- 937 Views

Your not hammered yet are you?
14/11/2010 11:46:29 PM
- 866 Views
I think I might be, can never be sure what votes are worth in a heavy role game
14/11/2010 11:50:51 PM
- 890 Views
I'm potentially alive on a technicality
15/11/2010 12:02:36 AM
- 789 Views
Why don't you go ahead and claim then?
15/11/2010 12:11:03 AM
- 883 Views
Sure
15/11/2010 12:34:34 AM
- 854 Views
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm...
15/11/2010 02:13:23 AM
- 956 Views
I think so.
15/11/2010 01:25:46 AM
- 857 Views
Also, I must confess...
15/11/2010 01:32:44 AM
- 868 Views
Re: Also, I must confess...
15/11/2010 01:58:26 AM
- 1000 Views
Yes, I would expect so.
15/11/2010 02:22:06 AM
- 812 Views
Re: Yes, I would expect so.
15/11/2010 02:35:49 AM
- 917 Views
I'm unvoting only if the defence is really foolproof, since now no-one can hammer without instantly
15/11/2010 07:18:05 AM
- 897 Views
EBWOP - The "only" in the title is rebundant, it was part of different title I abandoned. *NM*
15/11/2010 07:19:46 AM
- 551 Views
I guess the first title stands afterall I won't automatically unvote just because none should hammer
15/11/2010 08:19:00 AM
- 801 Views
I'll try to help Isaac out a bit here.
15/11/2010 01:11:11 PM
- 734 Views
Thanks, and a question too
15/11/2010 01:30:17 PM
- 807 Views
Well, I'll unvote if the third mason comes forward too. *NM*
15/11/2010 03:30:36 PM
- 503 Views
Jeez, when it rains, it pours
15/11/2010 10:34:54 PM
- 775 Views
OK Isaac
15/11/2010 11:14:45 PM
- 830 Views
My Defense Posts
16/11/2010 04:16:41 AM
- 849 Views
Defense A: The Fantastic Four
16/11/2010 04:31:11 AM
- 880 Views
Defense B: The Numbers Game
16/11/2010 04:36:59 AM
- 882 Views
"What motive would a scummer have"?
16/11/2010 05:56:04 PM
- 877 Views
Without any further questions though?
16/11/2010 11:51:42 PM
- 904 Views
If you see an avalanche coming, you hop on board (NOT a metaphor).
17/11/2010 12:12:31 AM
- 839 Views
Defense C: The Intro Flavor
16/11/2010 04:41:31 AM
- 984 Views
Eh ...
16/11/2010 10:00:21 PM
- 830 Views
Re: Eh ...
17/11/2010 02:33:27 AM
- 887 Views
We'll take a look at that in turn, but first...
16/11/2010 07:01:22 AM
- 930 Views
Re: We'll take a look at that in turn, but first...
16/11/2010 01:40:21 PM
- 821 Views
Yes, that was it.
16/11/2010 09:05:04 PM
- 858 Views
Re: Yes, that was it.
17/11/2010 02:55:58 AM
- 877 Views
Not at all.
17/11/2010 03:04:50 AM
- 857 Views
Well, that's a borderline lie
17/11/2010 04:29:47 AM
- 937 Views
How do you figure?
17/11/2010 05:46:37 AM
- 839 Views
I'd say its pretty pertinent to my defense
17/11/2010 06:49:20 AM
- 833 Views
All right, fair enough.
17/11/2010 07:19:37 AM
- 947 Views
Thanks for whakcing me before going to bed
17/11/2010 07:39:58 AM
- 854 Views

By the way, I'd appreciate if no one had hammer till FT has a chance to reply and vice-versa
17/11/2010 07:46:18 AM
- 851 Views
I have evidence in favor of and yet against F-T's claim. Take it as you will.
17/11/2010 07:18:35 PM
- 930 Views
Slight EBWOP
17/11/2010 07:20:58 PM
- 930 Views
Re: Slight EBWOP
17/11/2010 07:24:34 PM
- 822 Views
Uh, that doesn't make a lot of sense
17/11/2010 07:22:59 PM
- 899 Views
That's fair. Sanity can actually be called into question now.
17/11/2010 07:26:34 PM
- 835 Views
Re: That's fair. Sanity can actually be called into question now.
17/11/2010 08:01:20 PM
- 922 Views
Actually that sounds a good plan
17/11/2010 08:06:50 PM
- 833 Views
Glad to hear you agree with yourself
17/11/2010 08:14:42 PM
- 936 Views

All right then.
17/11/2010 12:27:49 AM
- 942 Views
:/ Wanna mention this before I forget. Little niggling that's been bugging me.
17/11/2010 03:03:27 AM
- 856 Views
Ah yes, I noticed that as well
17/11/2010 04:08:15 AM
- 852 Views
I just caught that
17/11/2010 04:53:16 AM
- 956 Views
No, I don't mean Cop.
17/11/2010 05:29:36 AM
- 877 Views
Re: No, I don't mean Cop.
17/11/2010 05:34:46 AM
- 885 Views
I trust him because of the way he's been acting.
17/11/2010 06:30:26 PM
- 935 Views
Complete sidetrack.
17/11/2010 07:28:31 PM
- 950 Views
Re: Complete sidetrack.
17/11/2010 07:33:51 PM
- 826 Views
I can't seem to find the post about that arrangement we had, incidentally.
17/11/2010 05:38:53 AM
- 787 Views
Re: I can't seem to find the post about that arrangement we had, incidentally.
17/11/2010 06:04:08 AM
- 810 Views
Re: I can't seem to find the post about that arrangement we had, incidentally.
17/11/2010 06:25:05 AM
- 905 Views
Re: I can't seem to find the post about that arrangement we had, incidentally.
17/11/2010 06:50:04 AM
- 836 Views
In the interests of honesty, now would probably be a good time to mention ...
17/11/2010 09:22:14 PM
- 866 Views
What the balls?
17/11/2010 09:52:04 PM
- 871 Views
I still only see one way for this day to end
18/11/2010 02:02:03 PM
- 834 Views
Re: I still only see one way for this day to end
18/11/2010 03:18:50 PM
- 810 Views
Its probably the blind mason loyalty thing, but I'm inclined to trust Isaac.
18/11/2010 05:16:28 PM
- 1007 Views
Re: Its probably the blind mason loyalty thing, but I'm inclined to trust Isaac.
18/11/2010 06:00:06 PM
- 850 Views
I'd also like to point out that we know nothing about you
18/11/2010 03:37:08 PM
- 830 Views
i don't know much about comics but
18/11/2010 05:45:10 PM
- 870 Views
Re: i don't know much about comics but
18/11/2010 05:49:54 PM
- 788 Views
They're also Marvel characters
18/11/2010 06:30:11 PM
- 875 Views
LOL, duly noted
18/11/2010 06:48:08 PM
- 891 Views

Beast is really surprisingly un-beastly.
18/11/2010 06:28:15 PM
- 897 Views
Sure
18/11/2010 06:42:01 PM
- 880 Views
Alright, to hell with this. Let's test F-T's sanity. Vote: Isaac *NM*
21/11/2010 08:29:53 PM
- 523 Views
Ah, the frustration vote, normally my best friend
21/11/2010 09:58:18 PM
- 853 Views

OK, here's a question for beet:
21/11/2010 10:37:08 PM
- 851 Views
You're not suggesting we lynch F-T instead of Isaac, are you?
21/11/2010 11:17:19 PM
- 850 Views
But we do get information
22/11/2010 12:17:20 AM
- 868 Views
<-- Btw, first time I got the hammer vote. My life is now complete. *NM*
22/11/2010 12:20:53 AM
- 520 Views
Well, congrats
*NM*
22/11/2010 12:32:34 AM
- 541 Views

Since this is a first for both of us...
22/11/2010 12:35:29 AM
- 854 Views

When someone dies, you find out their role. "Psycho Cop" is a distinct role.
21/11/2010 11:22:50 PM
- 864 Views
Isaac wonders how he could be lynched without scum involvement...
22/11/2010 12:00:31 AM
- 816 Views
Re: Isaac wonders how he could be lynched without scum involvement...
22/11/2010 12:21:01 AM
- 924 Views
Isaac has been lynched!
22/11/2010 03:10:01 AM
- 762 Views
I can't help but feel a silver bullet would have been appropriate
22/11/2010 04:11:13 AM
- 750 Views

I find that astounding, considering the level of suspicion generally laid upon you *NM*
22/11/2010 04:16:04 AM
- 579 Views
I might just mount your head on my wall
.
22/11/2010 05:09:45 AM
- 943 Views

I consider myself an integral part in this group.
22/11/2010 05:27:12 AM
- 933 Views