Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 07/11/2010 07:16:20 PM
I don't remember that, I thought Yuna was the one who caused the "George Incident"
Here.
Well, yes, that's true enough but keep in mind our night 1 casualties the last few games have all been high-profile. Anyway, I'm not ruling out random, merely pointing out that I've never killed that way on night 1 or observed anyone else really do it, so its not really common, a lot of times I'll make a short list of good candidates and let the killer pick because it seems unfair and impolite to pick for them and I don't do night 1 kills, that's still not very random. Picking from a list of unlikely to be docced characters isn't random either. I know I don't do pure random period, in lynch or kill, because I feel it waters down my victory, I tend to assume everyone else feels likewise particularly in DF group think mode, so short of someone telling me that they've actually rolled the proverbial dice to pick a kill against the whole list of 'not them', I find random unlikely. Regardless, if it is random we can't track it at all. As an example, if we knew they were aiming for probable docs of the character claim table, fist could conceivably have been on that list and any we could look at as more likely character claims for that role might then be suspect. For instance if Dr. Strange - who nobody listed - had been in on there, Sorcerer Supreme and famous surgeon, one might wonder why nobody took a shot at him as a doc option, and maybe it would be because they knew it was fake.
As I said, I can't argue against the random option but we can't do any snooping off it if true and would have to call the kill a dead end, and I haven't seen a lot of random kills to indicate this is probable but it's note really something we can discuss usefully anyway. Because none of the lines of generated strike me as particularly tactically sound random is sort of appealing, but at the same time, even though its built on a lot of things I'd regard as mistakes, the "Fist told him, he told his buddies, they killed fist" scenario works, that's why I'd like to hear from others in that regard, would they tell there mason ally role info on night 1? Would they kill their mason ally on night 1 if they knew? Because I wouldn't do either and yet thus far it seems everyone else thinks that's entirely likely, in which case we have fairly logical non-random route for fist to have been killed.
As I said, I can't argue against the random option but we can't do any snooping off it if true and would have to call the kill a dead end, and I haven't seen a lot of random kills to indicate this is probable but it's note really something we can discuss usefully anyway. Because none of the lines of generated strike me as particularly tactically sound random is sort of appealing, but at the same time, even though its built on a lot of things I'd regard as mistakes, the "Fist told him, he told his buddies, they killed fist" scenario works, that's why I'd like to hear from others in that regard, would they tell there mason ally role info on night 1? Would they kill their mason ally on night 1 if they knew? Because I wouldn't do either and yet thus far it seems everyone else thinks that's entirely likely, in which case we have fairly logical non-random route for fist to have been killed.
Oh, I didn't mean completely random, but the exact reasoning behind the choice may be beyond me, so I was just pointing out that FistofPainX was a viable choice for a night kill. And you're right that it would have been a deviation from the norm, but that might just mean we have a new set of Darkfriends. This kind of choice is something I like, for example, and as I recall it was part of my recommendation to Gher when we were Space Cultists. Or it could be someone who has been a Darkfriend frequently and worries about developing a recognisable pattern.
![:P](/site_media/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
Besides, the Darkfriends might have worried about exposing their corrupt mason if they struck down for the reasoning you propose. Losing one mafia for one townie is not a good exchange. But I imagine they didn't consider this, after all if they did and ? is a Darkfriend, he wouldn't have revealed what he has.
One other possibility is that Fistofpainx used his other ability on the Darkfriend assassin, and the mafia weren't planning on killing fistofpainx at all, he was just randomly selected as an alternative. Or we have a bus driver or the like. I really wish we knew who fist had targeted yesterday.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter
Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
~Master Splinter
Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
RAFO Mafia 19: Superlative Crisis! ISSUE TWO: BLACK MAGIC- WHOA, MAN!
03/11/2010 04:59:59 AM
- 2641 Views
I see two avenues to discuss here
03/11/2010 11:41:14 AM
- 866 Views
I was thinking about number 1.
03/11/2010 10:00:57 PM
- 879 Views
Regarding 2, and let me suggets a 3
04/11/2010 02:30:41 AM
- 927 Views
I, personally, agree with Isaac so here goes.
04/11/2010 11:33:07 PM
- 857 Views
O.......K..........
05/11/2010 11:43:14 PM
- 831 Views
Did Fist use his power last Night?
06/11/2010 03:41:05 AM
- 875 Views
It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
06/11/2010 04:53:19 AM
- 854 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
06/11/2010 05:30:00 PM
- 848 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
06/11/2010 07:15:11 PM
- 896 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
07/11/2010 08:18:16 AM
- 940 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
07/11/2010 03:38:37 PM
- 903 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
07/11/2010 06:42:10 PM
- 937 Views
Huh, well Fox straight up told us his Mason group was a 3rd Fraction on Night 1
11/11/2010 12:55:50 AM
- 893 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
07/11/2010 06:16:29 PM
- 948 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
07/11/2010 07:16:20 PM
- 886 Views
Re: It's one of three plausible explanations for his death
07/11/2010 09:29:12 PM
- 961 Views
I am about 95% sure that WF targeted me last Night.
11/11/2010 01:04:34 AM
- 869 Views
Interesting.
11/11/2010 02:25:07 AM
- 905 Views
It's certainly possible.
11/11/2010 02:39:00 AM
- 896 Views
Now I'm curious
11/11/2010 03:33:46 AM
- 945 Views
Presumably because I'm not trying to get her lynched.
11/11/2010 03:53:54 AM
- 933 Views
Yeah, I'm going with that #3 there.
04/11/2010 05:41:04 AM
- 939 Views
Re: Yeah, I'm going with that #3 there.
04/11/2010 04:18:17 PM
- 950 Views
a scummer got caught on day one in the tower game
04/11/2010 06:42:15 PM
- 923 Views
also there was that time someone said they saw a black light instead of white
04/11/2010 07:52:41 PM
- 905 Views
That was Hobo in DK's crossover game. *NM*
04/11/2010 08:16:07 PM
- 493 Views
You know we could just forget about that. I wouldn't complain.
*NM*
05/11/2010 08:35:03 PM
- 538 Views
![](/site_media/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
Hypocop? *NM*
03/11/2010 03:20:17 PM
- 548 Views
So help me I will spoil the entirety of ToM, people! (not just yet, though)
10/11/2010 02:51:46 AM
- 812 Views
I'm pretty sure if you do, you'll be lynched. *NM*
10/11/2010 09:19:43 PM
- 515 Views
Vote: No Lynch
13/11/2010 12:24:43 AM
- 905 Views
I am very much opposed to this idea
13/11/2010 02:04:27 PM
- 835 Views
Then offer an alternative
13/11/2010 11:10:42 PM
- 883 Views
Why is an inactive likely to be a townie?
14/11/2010 04:03:35 AM
- 817 Views
Re: Why is an inactive likely to be a townie?
14/11/2010 04:21:12 AM
- 885 Views
I had no RBIRL because my computer died.
14/11/2010 06:52:56 AM
- 799 Views
Ah, I see you did unvote. Very well. I still got my eye on you. *NM*
14/11/2010 06:55:30 AM
- 449 Views
LOL - I guess this is also my informal defense
14/11/2010 08:52:56 AM
- 879 Views
Saying it's not out-of-character to be scummy doesn't make you any less scummy.
14/11/2010 04:33:15 PM
- 897 Views
Watch the difference between what he says and what he is accused of.
14/11/2010 07:08:08 PM
- 769 Views
After this whole argument I've had with FT...
13/11/2010 11:42:32 PM
- 841 Views
People who vote for totally random lynches don't deserve to win
14/11/2010 03:43:14 AM
- 818 Views
Re: People who vote for totally random lynches don't deserve to win
14/11/2010 02:23:04 PM
- 991 Views
Vote: Isaac
13/11/2010 11:58:56 PM
- 931 Views
Re: Vote: Isaac
14/11/2010 03:02:15 AM
- 835 Views
Re: Vote: Isaac
14/11/2010 04:02:30 AM
- 917 Views
What was scummy?
14/11/2010 04:10:12 AM
- 949 Views
Re: What was scummy?
14/11/2010 05:41:44 AM
- 865 Views
Extrmely thin
14/11/2010 06:05:32 AM
- 1020 Views
Actually...
14/11/2010 06:55:02 AM
- 924 Views
Re: Actually...
14/11/2010 07:44:33 AM
- 876 Views
Did you guys just blitz me?
14/11/2010 11:35:58 PM
- 910 Views
![](/site_media/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
Your not hammered yet are you?
14/11/2010 11:46:29 PM
- 841 Views
I think I might be, can never be sure what votes are worth in a heavy role game
14/11/2010 11:50:51 PM
- 860 Views
I'm potentially alive on a technicality
15/11/2010 12:02:36 AM
- 765 Views
Why don't you go ahead and claim then?
15/11/2010 12:11:03 AM
- 852 Views
Sure
15/11/2010 12:34:34 AM
- 824 Views
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm...
15/11/2010 02:13:23 AM
- 928 Views
I think so.
15/11/2010 01:25:46 AM
- 833 Views
Also, I must confess...
15/11/2010 01:32:44 AM
- 842 Views
Re: Also, I must confess...
15/11/2010 01:58:26 AM
- 972 Views
Yes, I would expect so.
15/11/2010 02:22:06 AM
- 777 Views
Re: Yes, I would expect so.
15/11/2010 02:35:49 AM
- 885 Views
I'm unvoting only if the defence is really foolproof, since now no-one can hammer without instantly
15/11/2010 07:18:05 AM
- 864 Views
EBWOP - The "only" in the title is rebundant, it was part of different title I abandoned. *NM*
15/11/2010 07:19:46 AM
- 528 Views
I guess the first title stands afterall I won't automatically unvote just because none should hammer
15/11/2010 08:19:00 AM
- 773 Views
I'll try to help Isaac out a bit here.
15/11/2010 01:11:11 PM
- 718 Views
Thanks, and a question too
15/11/2010 01:30:17 PM
- 785 Views
Well, I'll unvote if the third mason comes forward too. *NM*
15/11/2010 03:30:36 PM
- 490 Views
Jeez, when it rains, it pours
15/11/2010 10:34:54 PM
- 747 Views
OK Isaac
15/11/2010 11:14:45 PM
- 805 Views
My Defense Posts
16/11/2010 04:16:41 AM
- 818 Views
Defense A: The Fantastic Four
16/11/2010 04:31:11 AM
- 850 Views
Defense B: The Numbers Game
16/11/2010 04:36:59 AM
- 854 Views
"What motive would a scummer have"?
16/11/2010 05:56:04 PM
- 838 Views
Without any further questions though?
16/11/2010 11:51:42 PM
- 875 Views
If you see an avalanche coming, you hop on board (NOT a metaphor).
17/11/2010 12:12:31 AM
- 808 Views
Defense C: The Intro Flavor
16/11/2010 04:41:31 AM
- 954 Views
Eh ...
16/11/2010 10:00:21 PM
- 800 Views
Re: Eh ...
17/11/2010 02:33:27 AM
- 859 Views
We'll take a look at that in turn, but first...
16/11/2010 07:01:22 AM
- 904 Views
Re: We'll take a look at that in turn, but first...
16/11/2010 01:40:21 PM
- 790 Views
Yes, that was it.
16/11/2010 09:05:04 PM
- 831 Views
Re: Yes, that was it.
17/11/2010 02:55:58 AM
- 852 Views
Not at all.
17/11/2010 03:04:50 AM
- 841 Views
Well, that's a borderline lie
17/11/2010 04:29:47 AM
- 907 Views
How do you figure?
17/11/2010 05:46:37 AM
- 810 Views
I'd say its pretty pertinent to my defense
17/11/2010 06:49:20 AM
- 804 Views
All right, fair enough.
17/11/2010 07:19:37 AM
- 921 Views
Thanks for whakcing me before going to bed
17/11/2010 07:39:58 AM
- 830 Views
![](/site_media/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
By the way, I'd appreciate if no one had hammer till FT has a chance to reply and vice-versa
17/11/2010 07:46:18 AM
- 821 Views
I have evidence in favor of and yet against F-T's claim. Take it as you will.
17/11/2010 07:18:35 PM
- 893 Views
Slight EBWOP
17/11/2010 07:20:58 PM
- 906 Views
Re: Slight EBWOP
17/11/2010 07:24:34 PM
- 794 Views
Uh, that doesn't make a lot of sense
17/11/2010 07:22:59 PM
- 852 Views
That's fair. Sanity can actually be called into question now.
17/11/2010 07:26:34 PM
- 810 Views
Re: That's fair. Sanity can actually be called into question now.
17/11/2010 08:01:20 PM
- 898 Views
Actually that sounds a good plan
17/11/2010 08:06:50 PM
- 801 Views
Glad to hear you agree with yourself
17/11/2010 08:14:42 PM
- 910 Views
![](/site_media/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
:/ Wanna mention this before I forget. Little niggling that's been bugging me.
17/11/2010 03:03:27 AM
- 829 Views
Ah yes, I noticed that as well
17/11/2010 04:08:15 AM
- 822 Views
I just caught that
17/11/2010 04:53:16 AM
- 932 Views
No, I don't mean Cop.
17/11/2010 05:29:36 AM
- 844 Views
Re: No, I don't mean Cop.
17/11/2010 05:34:46 AM
- 858 Views
I trust him because of the way he's been acting.
17/11/2010 06:30:26 PM
- 911 Views
Complete sidetrack.
17/11/2010 07:28:31 PM
- 920 Views
Re: Complete sidetrack.
17/11/2010 07:33:51 PM
- 800 Views
I can't seem to find the post about that arrangement we had, incidentally.
17/11/2010 05:38:53 AM
- 760 Views
Re: I can't seem to find the post about that arrangement we had, incidentally.
17/11/2010 06:04:08 AM
- 785 Views
Re: I can't seem to find the post about that arrangement we had, incidentally.
17/11/2010 06:25:05 AM
- 854 Views
Re: I can't seem to find the post about that arrangement we had, incidentally.
17/11/2010 06:50:04 AM
- 806 Views
In the interests of honesty, now would probably be a good time to mention ...
17/11/2010 09:22:14 PM
- 840 Views
What the balls?
17/11/2010 09:52:04 PM
- 846 Views
I still only see one way for this day to end
18/11/2010 02:02:03 PM
- 808 Views
Re: I still only see one way for this day to end
18/11/2010 03:18:50 PM
- 785 Views
Its probably the blind mason loyalty thing, but I'm inclined to trust Isaac.
18/11/2010 05:16:28 PM
- 974 Views
Re: Its probably the blind mason loyalty thing, but I'm inclined to trust Isaac.
18/11/2010 06:00:06 PM
- 825 Views
I'd also like to point out that we know nothing about you
18/11/2010 03:37:08 PM
- 804 Views
i don't know much about comics but
18/11/2010 05:45:10 PM
- 839 Views
Re: i don't know much about comics but
18/11/2010 05:49:54 PM
- 767 Views
They're also Marvel characters
18/11/2010 06:30:11 PM
- 849 Views
LOL, duly noted
18/11/2010 06:48:08 PM
- 863 Views
![](/site_media/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
Beast is really surprisingly un-beastly.
18/11/2010 06:28:15 PM
- 866 Views
Sure
18/11/2010 06:42:01 PM
- 853 Views
Alright, to hell with this. Let's test F-T's sanity. Vote: Isaac *NM*
21/11/2010 08:29:53 PM
- 514 Views
Ah, the frustration vote, normally my best friend
21/11/2010 09:58:18 PM
- 827 Views
![](/site_media/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
OK, here's a question for beet:
21/11/2010 10:37:08 PM
- 826 Views
You're not suggesting we lynch F-T instead of Isaac, are you?
21/11/2010 11:17:19 PM
- 822 Views
But we do get information
22/11/2010 12:17:20 AM
- 844 Views
<-- Btw, first time I got the hammer vote. My life is now complete. *NM*
22/11/2010 12:20:53 AM
- 501 Views
Well, congrats
*NM*
22/11/2010 12:32:34 AM
- 528 Views
![](/site_media/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
Since this is a first for both of us...
22/11/2010 12:35:29 AM
- 827 Views
![](/site_media/images/smilies/party.gif)
When someone dies, you find out their role. "Psycho Cop" is a distinct role.
21/11/2010 11:22:50 PM
- 835 Views
Isaac wonders how he could be lynched without scum involvement...
22/11/2010 12:00:31 AM
- 789 Views
Re: Isaac wonders how he could be lynched without scum involvement...
22/11/2010 12:21:01 AM
- 897 Views
Isaac has been lynched!
22/11/2010 03:10:01 AM
- 733 Views
I can't help but feel a silver bullet would have been appropriate
22/11/2010 04:11:13 AM
- 718 Views
![](/site_media/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
I find that astounding, considering the level of suspicion generally laid upon you *NM*
22/11/2010 04:16:04 AM
- 568 Views
I might just mount your head on my wall
.
22/11/2010 05:09:45 AM
- 915 Views
![](/site_media/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
I consider myself an integral part in this group.
22/11/2010 05:27:12 AM
- 905 Views