Welcome to today's science lesson!
I chose to base my code on the Periodic Table of the Elements. When Isaac posted his example in his "Crypto tricks" post and used "Helium" as his key, it was such a marvelous coincidence that I couldn't resist adding in "a key such as Isaac referred to in his last post." The key that I posted in that followup post was also Helium.
"#" = "Helium"
If you look at a table of ASCII codes, # is number 35. 33 is the first number on the aforementioned table of ASCII codes that gives a non-blank character. So, let us subtract 33 from 35. That leaves 2, and 2 is the Atomic Number of Helium. And that is also a marvelous coincidence, because that is not what my code is based on. The Atomic Weight of Helium is approximately 4.0026. Let us round that to the nearest integer, and subtract the number of protons in a Helium atom which is equal to the Atomic Number, in this case 2. That gives the number of neutrons in the most common isotope of Helium, which is also 2. Now replace the "#" with the symbol for Helium, "He", and that is the basis of my code.
I used the words "positive" and "neutral" in that second post to refer to the sub-atomic particles used arrive at the correct numbers.
Now, looking at my actual code: k ? ? ) é + k é ½ ; ) ( A 1
"k" is 107 on the ASCII table. Subtract 33 and you get 74. I had anticipated an extra layer of protection here, in that even if people knew what the method was, they would be unfamiliar enough with the elements that this would be a lengthy process of trial and error as they added various Atomic Numbers until they arrived at a suitable Atomic Weight. This particular aspect of my plan was foiled by Google, who will be happy to tell you all about Iodine if you enter a search for "74 neutrons." The Atomic Number for Iodine is 53. 53 + 74 = 127 which is the Atomic Weight of that element's most common isotope. The symbol of Iodine is "I" so "k" = "I".
Moving on, "?" is 181 on the ASCII table. Subtracting 33 will give 148. If someone was still under the mistaken impression that we were dealing with Atomic Numbers at this point, this would convince them otherwise, as the Periodic Table currently only goes up to 118. Solving for neutrons, we can find that we are looking at good old Americium, symbol "Am".
Continue this for each character in the code and
k ? ? ) é + k é ½ ; ) ( A 1
becomes
I Am Am O Dy F I Dy Ac Ti O N Co P
Clean up a little spacing
I Am A mODyFIDy AcTiON CoP
and you have my role claim. I know, "modified" is incorrectly spelled as "mODyFIDy" but that was unavoidable given the limitations of the character set I was working with. I trust that it is still recognizable.
I chose to base my code on the Periodic Table of the Elements. When Isaac posted his example in his "Crypto tricks" post and used "Helium" as his key, it was such a marvelous coincidence that I couldn't resist adding in "a key such as Isaac referred to in his last post." The key that I posted in that followup post was also Helium.
"#" = "Helium"
If you look at a table of ASCII codes, # is number 35. 33 is the first number on the aforementioned table of ASCII codes that gives a non-blank character. So, let us subtract 33 from 35. That leaves 2, and 2 is the Atomic Number of Helium. And that is also a marvelous coincidence, because that is not what my code is based on. The Atomic Weight of Helium is approximately 4.0026. Let us round that to the nearest integer, and subtract the number of protons in a Helium atom which is equal to the Atomic Number, in this case 2. That gives the number of neutrons in the most common isotope of Helium, which is also 2. Now replace the "#" with the symbol for Helium, "He", and that is the basis of my code.
I used the words "positive" and "neutral" in that second post to refer to the sub-atomic particles used arrive at the correct numbers.
Now, looking at my actual code: k ? ? ) é + k é ½ ; ) ( A 1
"k" is 107 on the ASCII table. Subtract 33 and you get 74. I had anticipated an extra layer of protection here, in that even if people knew what the method was, they would be unfamiliar enough with the elements that this would be a lengthy process of trial and error as they added various Atomic Numbers until they arrived at a suitable Atomic Weight. This particular aspect of my plan was foiled by Google, who will be happy to tell you all about Iodine if you enter a search for "74 neutrons." The Atomic Number for Iodine is 53. 53 + 74 = 127 which is the Atomic Weight of that element's most common isotope. The symbol of Iodine is "I" so "k" = "I".
Moving on, "?" is 181 on the ASCII table. Subtracting 33 will give 148. If someone was still under the mistaken impression that we were dealing with Atomic Numbers at this point, this would convince them otherwise, as the Periodic Table currently only goes up to 118. Solving for neutrons, we can find that we are looking at good old Americium, symbol "Am".
Continue this for each character in the code and
k ? ? ) é + k é ½ ; ) ( A 1
becomes
I Am Am O Dy F I Dy Ac Ti O N Co P
Clean up a little spacing
I Am A mODyFIDy AcTiON CoP
and you have my role claim. I know, "modified" is incorrectly spelled as "mODyFIDy" but that was unavoidable given the limitations of the character set I was working with. I trust that it is still recognizable.
RAFO Mafia 18 - Day 2: Mystery on the High Seas
15/09/2010 05:39:03 AM
- 1738 Views
ARRRRRRR *NM*
15/09/2010 06:44:52 AM
- 549 Views
Omg. This reply cracked me up so bad.
15/09/2010 12:34:38 PM
- 900 Views
Arrrgggh
15/09/2010 12:50:18 PM
- 863 Views
Re: Arrrgggh
15/09/2010 01:29:15 PM
- 945 Views
plus...
15/09/2010 01:50:44 PM
- 829 Views
Voting Record
18/09/2010 05:41:39 AM
- 844 Views
Moving along
15/09/2010 02:47:27 PM
- 1088 Views
knife hand? *confused* *NM*
15/09/2010 10:25:01 PM
- 481 Views
Re: RAFO Mafia 18 - Day 2: Mystery on the High Seas
15/09/2010 04:06:10 PM
- 886 Views
Re: RAFO Mafia 18 - Day 2: Mystery on the High Seas
15/09/2010 06:23:19 PM
- 982 Views
my current suspects
15/09/2010 09:52:52 PM
- 982 Views
How is that a tactic? *NM*
15/09/2010 10:21:04 PM
- 507 Views
Day 2 EVENT: In High Spirits
18/09/2010 04:53:47 AM
- 934 Views
I think 'Aye' is probably the best choice, Vote: Aye
18/09/2010 05:24:24 AM
- 764 Views
I can
18/09/2010 05:35:29 AM
- 854 Views
Nay
18/09/2010 05:25:57 AM
- 890 Views
Any debate? Anyone in favor of Nay?
18/09/2010 07:53:56 AM
- 899 Views
We need to come up with a plan
19/09/2010 05:59:26 AM
- 882 Views
Well, here's who voted for BA:
19/09/2010 08:04:26 AM
- 859 Views
? is the logical target
19/09/2010 08:56:53 AM
- 838 Views
Re: ? is the logical target
20/09/2010 02:10:49 AM
- 876 Views
Re: ? is the logical target
20/09/2010 03:14:22 AM
- 818 Views
Who are your candidates for lynch?
20/09/2010 03:58:04 AM
- 860 Views
I don't have any. Especially after my fail of a push for BA
20/09/2010 04:35:23 AM
- 807 Views
I think I have a plan
20/09/2010 06:33:29 AM
- 994 Views
...erm...
20/09/2010 07:37:16 AM
- 982 Views
Crypto tricks
20/09/2010 10:13:23 AM
- 899 Views
Some thoughts...
19/09/2010 01:21:56 PM
- 793 Views
this is the first time its happened while i've been playing atleast
19/09/2010 04:52:13 PM
- 822 Views
It looks like we're proceeding with the plan so a few reminders
20/09/2010 06:35:21 PM
- 934 Views
Hmm. I don't think I did this exactly how you wanted, with the key and whatnot.
20/09/2010 06:41:22 PM
- 870 Views
Re: Hmm. I don't think I did this exactly how you wanted, with the key and whatnot.
20/09/2010 07:13:22 PM
- 849 Views
Re: Hmm. I don't think I did this exactly how you wanted, with the key and whatnot.
21/09/2010 12:04:49 AM
- 816 Views
So if I'm understanding this properly...
21/09/2010 01:38:34 AM
- 817 Views
That is correct. *NM*
21/09/2010 01:44:37 AM
- 509 Views
im still not clear on the key thing.
21/09/2010 04:38:53 PM
- 840 Views
Okay
21/09/2010 05:28:23 PM
- 854 Views
Re: Okay
21/09/2010 07:43:39 PM
- 816 Views
You wanted to hint at it, not say it..... *NM*
21/09/2010 07:46:10 PM
- 515 Views
horsefeathers
21/09/2010 07:55:44 PM
- 792 Views
It's alright. So long as no one actually tries to decode it. :/ *NM*
21/09/2010 08:00:17 PM
- 527 Views
I'm glad I'm dead so I don't have to bother with this. *NM*
21/09/2010 11:28:46 PM
- 469 Views
List of Codes and Roleclaims (Table)
21/09/2010 11:25:37 AM
- 965 Views
So I shouldn't code my Role now? *NM*
21/09/2010 01:45:10 PM
- 460 Views
A couple Questions
21/09/2010 08:53:29 PM
- 848 Views
On this whole decryption thing though...
21/09/2010 10:28:57 PM
- 906 Views
Any idea when we are gonna start decrypting?
22/09/2010 01:44:39 AM
- 820 Views
Wait why does it say and between my codes?
22/09/2010 11:00:51 PM
- 823 Views
what now?
22/09/2010 09:27:09 PM
- 755 Views
Napoleon needs to roleclaim now
22/09/2010 09:51:56 PM
- 889 Views
Arg... REALLY sorry people.
23/09/2010 08:16:00 PM
- 861 Views
You definitely do not get that in eveeeery game
23/09/2010 09:14:46 PM
- 892 Views
Why is that so suspicious?
23/09/2010 10:02:23 PM
- 845 Views
It's suspicious because it's not true
23/09/2010 10:17:43 PM
- 905 Views
Cause people tend to accentuate the negative, they seek to form patterns, and they like exaggerating *NM*
24/09/2010 05:07:13 AM
- 578 Views
Re: You definitely do not get that in eveeeery game
23/09/2010 10:27:31 PM
- 901 Views
Everyone can start decrypting now
23/09/2010 09:01:24 PM
- 860 Views
Ok, I'll go ahead and do mine too
23/09/2010 11:16:29 PM
- 902 Views
I was too lazy to verify beyond oxygen and flourine
24/09/2010 12:45:09 AM
- 905 Views
Re: I was too lazy to verify beyond oxygen and flourine
24/09/2010 02:44:11 AM
- 842 Views
eh, what the heck
24/09/2010 03:04:29 AM
- 746 Views
Just out of curiosity, why do you say townie? RB could just as easily be scum, if not more so. *NM*
24/09/2010 05:13:50 AM
- 523 Views
Just out of curiosity, why do you say townie? RB could just as easily be scum, if not more so. *NM*
24/09/2010 05:13:51 AM
- 392 Views
other factors make me think otherwise
24/09/2010 06:07:31 AM
- 734 Views
right, mine
24/09/2010 10:37:45 AM
- 898 Views
Re: right, mine
24/09/2010 10:43:26 AM
- 847 Views
EPWOP
24/09/2010 10:55:42 AM
- 856 Views
Re: EPWOP
24/09/2010 12:47:47 PM
- 888 Views
Okay, that squares
24/09/2010 01:14:31 PM
- 818 Views
Re: Okay, that squares
24/09/2010 01:22:42 PM
- 898 Views
I was lazy... I used the INTERNET
24/09/2010 06:04:26 AM
- 745 Views
Re: I was lazy... I used the INTERNET
24/09/2010 02:29:29 PM
- 821 Views
While we're waiting on White Flame
25/09/2010 08:59:09 PM
- 954 Views
Re: While we're waiting on White Flame
25/09/2010 10:47:47 PM
- 811 Views
EBWOP
25/09/2010 10:48:31 PM
- 803 Views
It's probably also worth noting
25/09/2010 11:17:19 PM
- 856 Views
Re: While we're waiting on White Flame
26/09/2010 02:47:14 AM
- 880 Views
Vote: Fox and Ravens
26/09/2010 03:15:38 AM
- 917 Views
Eh. The RC's always mess me up
26/09/2010 03:43:54 AM
- 790 Views
Yes, they can be tricky
26/09/2010 04:00:52 AM
- 829 Views
Re: Yes, they can be tricky
26/09/2010 04:33:40 AM
- 867 Views
not to mention...
26/09/2010 04:55:30 AM
- 842 Views
Vote: Fox and Ravens *NM*
26/09/2010 02:31:43 PM
- 538 Views
I mean can we just lynch him without going through the procedure if he'll just give up?
26/09/2010 07:33:38 PM
- 988 Views
Somebody want to hammer?
26/09/2010 09:02:17 PM
- 867 Views