Okay, I am slightly won over by this idea...not enough to endorse it and participate yet...but enough to want to know more details.
Its big advantage, I think, is that the DFs couldn't have anticipated this outcome, scummers who aren't otherwise suspected don't make up RC's on night 1 and share and criticize around because you've no idea who is what yet. What we'll do, if we go with the plan, is ask the less frequent posters to get there's up first - their code that is - just so if we end up waiting on someone, odds are most won't have posted theirs yet, minimizes risk, we don't really need to go in strict order, then, as soon as the last one is in, we start revealing our code keys, roughly in reverse order I think, the last poster doesn't even need to code, and anyone who thinks they'll have a very hard time using the coding tricks can request to go last. If 8 or 9 of us have posted our codes, little harm is done by having someone skip the code and just state their role. Everyone posts some clear code, relatively short, no more than 20 or 30 characters, no more than maybe half a dozen padding characters, if they've got some really large hybrid role they can always drop vowels and abbreviate, which I'll put in a table, they can then litter their message giving the code with all sorts clues about the key to the code, so long as the actual code is specific, so nobody tries to overlap multiple codes they can claim out of, encoding three or four roles into one message. I'll go into some sample methods below. We'll essentially achieve simultaneous claims, which is very good to do, sort of the equivalent of having everyone write down their name and role on a piece of paper and sticking it in a hat, then when they're all in have them read and tabled.
This happens to be a ideal situation to try it out, I've considered using it generally for normal mass claims but it hasn't been in my best interests to do it for, well, since game 5 or so, lot of scummering, wasn't necessary, or I was dead, etc. IT has given me a fair amount of time to refine the idea for use
For one, I think we definitely need those suggestions and advice you mentioned because I very honestly have no clue how I would even start.
Sure thing. The biggest concern is leaving a message that can't be simply cracked while simultaneously leaving no doubt that the key to decode it was as given, so someone couldn't later manufacture a fake key to fit their clue. I'll give some examples.
I am a cop. I wish to encrypt that, just doing "dpq" is kinda obvious, one letter onto each, plus only so many roles have 3 letter names, but let's say we wanted to encode that to make it hard to extract.
"The Flower, IAEUR"
Starting with cop, the letter-number switcheroo is 3-15-16
Now, for F-L- O -U-R (flower as hint to Flour) it's 6-12-15-21-18
Making Cop 3-15-16-0-0 and adding it to 6-12-15-21-18 gives you:
9-27-31-21-18, for all numbers above 26, we simply repeat back to A=27, B=28, etc, so it turns into 9-1-5-21-18 ---> I-A-E-U-R
Now, trying to guess one's way back to cop from that clue is damn nigh impossible, and this just being a game, no one is too likely to try, you can hack any simple code given enough time and effort, but short messages like this, where one is basically trying to drop the clues needed not to decode it but to prove that that the key to decoding it was the original, not too tricky.
I can't give anyone anything specific to use, since if I do some can crack it, just give ideas. Go through anything you make and double check it to make sure its right and both obvious on explanation and arcane otherwise, nothing too heavy. Up above was one example that can be modified. And I'm sure people can come up with other. Stay simple, people don't need to have a clue that cracks it, just makes it clear your key is singular. Up above was an example, and so is this message. "BWMLFHR"
For those having doubts about how effective this is, try to crack that before going further down for the answer
I can't give anyone anything specific to use, since if I do some can crack it, just give ideas. Go through anything you make and double check it to make sure its right and both obvious on explanation and arcane otherwise, nothing too heavy. Up above was one example that can be modified. And I'm sure people can come up with other. Stay simple, people don't need to have a clue that cracks it, just makes it clear your key is singular. Up above was an example, and so is this message.
First word of every sentence "I Go Up And Stay Up" with the sentence beginning with "And" serving as an indicator this isn't an accident. What goes up and stays up? Lots of stuff, so hard to guess even if someone catches that, but in this case: Helium... note also "Nothing too heavy" which serves as another confirmation. HELIUM is the key to our code BWMLFHR
Tracker + Helium = BWMLFHR
20-18-1-3-11-5-18 + 8-5-12-9-21-3-0 = 28-23-13-12-32-8-18
Change the 28 and 32 into 2 and 6 (28-26 and 32-26) and you get
2-23-13-12-6-8-18 or BWMLFHR... by the way, one should pad these things, say use CRBWMLFHRAP instead, as CR-BWMLFHR-AP... CR-AP, crap, or rather than just encode cop, encode I am a COP - IAMACOP, or encode POCAMAI instead and use as your key REVERSE, scatter clues in the message like "I think we need to push forward with our investigations, and we're really not" and "Seems like everytime we lynch someone they're the opposite of what we expect" and so on. You want as many points of contact confirming your key as you can.
That's not the only route of course, it's just fairly straightforward and reusable. Most others, I'll ruin if I give them but people can use them for ideas, for instance, my last message had a time stamp of 013329, I could add that to "tracker" and comment on how the key was in my last message, etc, etc, nobody would be likely to guess that. Gotta be a little careful my timestamp is set to my time for me, everyone in the default site time will see 063329, but that can be explained, and a single letter off can be forgiven as a mistake so long as its still clear. I know when I left the code telling everyone (in RP Mafia) that I'd copped FT and found him loyal and we were now in discreet cahoots, to be used if I died, I was using all capital letters as the code, and accidentally capitalized someone's name out of habit, odds are if you mess up that way and your decode reads DOCVTOR you'll be good, or if it reads DOCUOR, but doubly checking is a good idea.
Our big advantage is that even if someone cracks it, they can hardly say they did or tell their allies, ideally we have the less frequent posters go first too, so we're not giving people days to try their hand at cracking codes, personally I'll try it just for fun, but mine's already up their so it shouldn't matter. IF anyone wants to go the letter-number route this app will help you can turn the word into numbers or the numbers back into letters, time consuming and easier to make a mistake otherwise. IF anyone really devotes the time to crack codes and is successful, well good for them, a little extra game for that player, most likely it would be one scummer cracking one or two codes for their own use on what to avoid claiming, they won't get them all I'm sure (and if so, they probably deserve to win) let alone aid their allies with the knowledge, so this is pretty safe.
I think I also need to hear more opinions on this.
but I like that it's a new idea that the scum won't be able to have a prediscussed offense against, especially if we can get it done before the next night phase.
Ideally we do it before we lynch anyone today, since there's a good chance we'll shake out someone doing this, its big problem is we'll be exposing our doc, cop, etc... but the cop is often exposed by day 3 and the doc too. In a game of 12 people, usually by day 4, 6 of the 12 are dead anyway, and any given player has about a 1 in 5 chance of getting snuffed during our double lynch. It's a calculated sacrifice that we may not even have to pay, though that's for later.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
RAFO Mafia 18 - Day 2: Mystery on the High Seas
15/09/2010 05:39:03 AM
- 1708 Views
ARRRRRRR *NM*
15/09/2010 06:44:52 AM
- 534 Views
Omg. This reply cracked me up so bad.
15/09/2010 12:34:38 PM
- 870 Views
Arrrgggh
15/09/2010 12:50:18 PM
- 829 Views
Re: Arrrgggh
15/09/2010 01:29:15 PM
- 907 Views
plus...
15/09/2010 01:50:44 PM
- 799 Views
Voting Record
18/09/2010 05:41:39 AM
- 810 Views
Moving along
15/09/2010 02:47:27 PM
- 1046 Views
knife hand? *confused* *NM*
15/09/2010 10:25:01 PM
- 469 Views
Re: RAFO Mafia 18 - Day 2: Mystery on the High Seas
15/09/2010 04:06:10 PM
- 852 Views
Re: RAFO Mafia 18 - Day 2: Mystery on the High Seas
15/09/2010 06:23:19 PM
- 950 Views
my current suspects
15/09/2010 09:52:52 PM
- 945 Views
How is that a tactic? *NM*
15/09/2010 10:21:04 PM
- 490 Views
Day 2 EVENT: In High Spirits
18/09/2010 04:53:47 AM
- 902 Views
I think 'Aye' is probably the best choice, Vote: Aye
18/09/2010 05:24:24 AM
- 728 Views
I can
18/09/2010 05:35:29 AM
- 820 Views
Nay
18/09/2010 05:25:57 AM
- 853 Views
Any debate? Anyone in favor of Nay?
18/09/2010 07:53:56 AM
- 863 Views
We need to come up with a plan
19/09/2010 05:59:26 AM
- 847 Views
Well, here's who voted for BA:
19/09/2010 08:04:26 AM
- 821 Views
? is the logical target
19/09/2010 08:56:53 AM
- 795 Views
Re: ? is the logical target
20/09/2010 02:10:49 AM
- 847 Views
Re: ? is the logical target
20/09/2010 03:14:22 AM
- 783 Views
Who are your candidates for lynch?
20/09/2010 03:58:04 AM
- 824 Views
I don't have any. Especially after my fail of a push for BA
20/09/2010 04:35:23 AM
- 773 Views
I think I have a plan
20/09/2010 06:33:29 AM
- 956 Views
...erm...
20/09/2010 07:37:16 AM
- 956 Views
Crypto tricks
20/09/2010 10:13:23 AM
- 864 Views
Some thoughts...
19/09/2010 01:21:56 PM
- 765 Views
this is the first time its happened while i've been playing atleast
19/09/2010 04:52:13 PM
- 797 Views
It looks like we're proceeding with the plan so a few reminders
20/09/2010 06:35:21 PM
- 898 Views
Hmm. I don't think I did this exactly how you wanted, with the key and whatnot.
20/09/2010 06:41:22 PM
- 834 Views
Re: Hmm. I don't think I did this exactly how you wanted, with the key and whatnot.
20/09/2010 07:13:22 PM
- 813 Views
Re: Hmm. I don't think I did this exactly how you wanted, with the key and whatnot.
21/09/2010 12:04:49 AM
- 781 Views
So if I'm understanding this properly...
21/09/2010 01:38:34 AM
- 778 Views
That is correct. *NM*
21/09/2010 01:44:37 AM
- 491 Views
im still not clear on the key thing.
21/09/2010 04:38:53 PM
- 804 Views
Okay
21/09/2010 05:28:23 PM
- 817 Views
Re: Okay
21/09/2010 07:43:39 PM
- 781 Views
You wanted to hint at it, not say it..... *NM*
21/09/2010 07:46:10 PM
- 500 Views
horsefeathers
21/09/2010 07:55:44 PM
- 753 Views
It's alright. So long as no one actually tries to decode it. :/ *NM*
21/09/2010 08:00:17 PM
- 514 Views
I'm glad I'm dead so I don't have to bother with this. *NM*
21/09/2010 11:28:46 PM
- 459 Views
List of Codes and Roleclaims (Table)
21/09/2010 11:25:37 AM
- 934 Views
So I shouldn't code my Role now? *NM*
21/09/2010 01:45:10 PM
- 445 Views
A couple Questions
21/09/2010 08:53:29 PM
- 819 Views
On this whole decryption thing though...
21/09/2010 10:28:57 PM
- 866 Views
Any idea when we are gonna start decrypting?
22/09/2010 01:44:39 AM
- 790 Views
Wait why does it say and between my codes?
22/09/2010 11:00:51 PM
- 782 Views
what now?
22/09/2010 09:27:09 PM
- 720 Views
Napoleon needs to roleclaim now
22/09/2010 09:51:56 PM
- 856 Views
Arg... REALLY sorry people.
23/09/2010 08:16:00 PM
- 826 Views
You definitely do not get that in eveeeery game
23/09/2010 09:14:46 PM
- 852 Views
Why is that so suspicious?
23/09/2010 10:02:23 PM
- 809 Views
It's suspicious because it's not true
23/09/2010 10:17:43 PM
- 876 Views
Cause people tend to accentuate the negative, they seek to form patterns, and they like exaggerating *NM*
24/09/2010 05:07:13 AM
- 568 Views
Re: You definitely do not get that in eveeeery game
23/09/2010 10:27:31 PM
- 864 Views
Everyone can start decrypting now
23/09/2010 09:01:24 PM
- 822 Views
Ok, I'll go ahead and do mine too
23/09/2010 11:16:29 PM
- 869 Views
I was too lazy to verify beyond oxygen and flourine
24/09/2010 12:45:09 AM
- 870 Views
Re: I was too lazy to verify beyond oxygen and flourine
24/09/2010 02:44:11 AM
- 806 Views
eh, what the heck
24/09/2010 03:04:29 AM
- 711 Views
Just out of curiosity, why do you say townie? RB could just as easily be scum, if not more so. *NM*
24/09/2010 05:13:50 AM
- 507 Views
Just out of curiosity, why do you say townie? RB could just as easily be scum, if not more so. *NM*
24/09/2010 05:13:51 AM
- 378 Views
other factors make me think otherwise
24/09/2010 06:07:31 AM
- 701 Views
right, mine
24/09/2010 10:37:45 AM
- 862 Views
Re: right, mine
24/09/2010 10:43:26 AM
- 812 Views
EPWOP
24/09/2010 10:55:42 AM
- 821 Views
Re: EPWOP
24/09/2010 12:47:47 PM
- 850 Views
Okay, that squares
24/09/2010 01:14:31 PM
- 784 Views
Re: Okay, that squares
24/09/2010 01:22:42 PM
- 865 Views
I was lazy... I used the INTERNET
24/09/2010 06:04:26 AM
- 715 Views
Re: I was lazy... I used the INTERNET
24/09/2010 02:29:29 PM
- 790 Views
While we're waiting on White Flame
25/09/2010 08:59:09 PM
- 919 Views
Re: While we're waiting on White Flame
25/09/2010 10:47:47 PM
- 776 Views
EBWOP
25/09/2010 10:48:31 PM
- 771 Views
It's probably also worth noting
25/09/2010 11:17:19 PM
- 821 Views
Re: While we're waiting on White Flame
26/09/2010 02:47:14 AM
- 844 Views
Vote: Fox and Ravens
26/09/2010 03:15:38 AM
- 883 Views
Eh. The RC's always mess me up
26/09/2010 03:43:54 AM
- 755 Views
Yes, they can be tricky
26/09/2010 04:00:52 AM
- 803 Views
Re: Yes, they can be tricky
26/09/2010 04:33:40 AM
- 834 Views
not to mention...
26/09/2010 04:55:30 AM
- 808 Views
Vote: Fox and Ravens *NM*
26/09/2010 02:31:43 PM
- 528 Views
I mean can we just lynch him without going through the procedure if he'll just give up?
26/09/2010 07:33:38 PM
- 961 Views
Somebody want to hammer?
26/09/2010 09:02:17 PM
- 835 Views