Active Users:362 Time:21/04/2025 01:20:44 PM
Yes and unable to judge - UNC *NM* Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 02/06/2010 12:22:33 AM
In case anyone was wondering why I haven't posted yet to either game, I was gone for the holiday, I did NB both mods to let them know but it seemed rather pointless to post RBIRL into a post game or reg thread for a relative short and expected absence. Back in a different way too, as much fun as modding can be, the two month hiatus from play is thankfully over.

Okie-dokie, glutted full of barbecue foods and a bit exhausted, so may take a day or so rest up and catch up, hope everyone else enjoyed their holiday, or their weekend if not from a celebrant locale.

First thoughts, from my RM and skimming the initial posts, as expected we are in a crossover game. With 16 players that means good odds are we have at least 3-5 and as many as 16 settings involved. We may have many scenarios so let me kick out a few that pop to mind:

  • We've one setting for each mafia or other, and townies all come from those.

  • We've one setting for all those third party members, 'all' possibly being one person, but say it was the Gotham Asylum crowd and we had The Joker, Two Face, and the Penguin making up the 'Jester' faction.

  • Everybody's from completely different settings, e.g. Darth Vader but no Luke or Han, Rand but no Ishamael.

  • We have 2-5, probably 2-3 characters from any given setting, which may or may not include a hero and baddy each.

    Obviously lots of others, we don't know much yet, but if I had to guess, then assuming the 'Jester' remark wasn't a nod and wink at that role or a homicidal clown - e.g. The Joker or the thing from Stephen King's "It", then I'd guess two equally sized factions of 2-3 anti-town.

    Let's talk a bit about the Jester Role. First, for those not familiar this role, think of it as an Anti-Survivor Role. They aim to get lynched, winning if lynched (Not NK'd, specifically lynched) and the game usually continues after they die, you don't really bother thinking of those still in as fighting for second place, because no one gives a flying snot about the amazing strategy employed by the jester in getting themselves lynched, the jester is just an additional winner, who loses if they get NK'd or survive until the end of the game. So it saves time to ignore them as a concern entirely. If there is one, then there is one, personally I doubt there is and I've no problem lynching someone even if I think they're the Jester, it's no loss in my book, except it nominally wastes a lynch.

    Personally, I'm going to bet on two full factions, probably NK-capable with a role or two to power them up. Though one notes ranagrande didn't actually say there was a third faction, he just indicated a name for them, so let's not dig in our heels on that concept, it was a short name following a very long one, and could be a false flag, even the appearance of multiple NKs tonight won't definitely prove we're Tank-f, but for now that's the horse I'd put my bet on, with the plurality of 'Jesters' implying multiple.

    Okay, name wise the full "Ninja Pirate Zombie Robot Monkey Clowns" is a bit much and even NPZRMC is a bit much, so let's go with NPZ, or "Nipz" and Jesters.

    The odds are our Tank factions are the Nipz and Jesters and each side has 2 or 3 members, possibly 2 and 3, but IMO not likely 2-2, 4-4, or 4-2 so more likely 3-3. They may have identical makeup, which is likely to be chocolate with their group NK and likely a RBer.

    The bad news is this likely means we have 2 NKs a night coming our way, the good news is these are likely to take a toll on the rival Tank faction and not just the Town, and similiar with lynches. If it is 3-3 then we're 6/16 scummer, 37.5%, and a lynch or NK has roughly 20% chance each of whacking someone we want dead, higher if either faction has an edge hunting their rivals since they will want to exterminate them first, I know from multiple personal experience that when on the dark side nothing is more disturbing than the thought of a random SK or rival faction trying to off you come twilight and that the chance of using them to kill off townies is not really worth it for the risk involved. So come the first night, if a townie dies, 6/15 or 20% of the players will be scum and 2 NKs will be landing each with a 3 in 12 chance of hitting someone we want dead too, rising as townies die off from lynches and NKs. Ironically the town gets a positive edge as it dies off since prob-town are less likely to be NK'd while Tank factions try to eliminate each other as a greater threat, so good odds are we'll be taking this down to 5 or fewer players for victory, which means more days which means our regular night roles are stronger.

    Well, that's about all we know right now to speculate around, I'm guessing no deliberate red herrings, or very few. Let's try to gather some info, it won't help us much now but may later, but first some reminders:

    1. You lie, you die - Success is its own excuse, we won't auto-lynch someone who has clearly lied to the town's benefit, but I fully plan to vote for anyone who does without a A+ excuse and will likely vote for them even then.

    2. Don't RC, even truthfully, early unless you've been pressed, we don't need four or five people claiming vanilla to protect their necks from NK and lynch at the heightened odds of losing our cops, docs, etc. So with that in mind, please don't volunteer extra info to these questions unless you think it will aid the cause, and that's the 'Town wins' cause, not the 'I, personally, don't get lynched or NK'd' cause.

    Questions - Please Respond Yes, No, Uncertain (UNC), Won't Answer Currently (WUC)

    a) Are you from a setting that primarily revolves around Modern Earth, such that very little setting background is needed for an audience?

    Examples:
    I am from Twilight - Yes
    I am from James Patterson's Alex Cross Detective Series - Yes
    I am from DC Comics Batman/Superman - Yes

    I am from Star Wars - No
    I am from Wheel of Time - No
    I am from Lord of the Rings - No

    I am from Bram Stroker's Dracula - Uncertain (UNC)
    I am from a cyberpunk series - UNC
    I am from Dr. Who, but am a modern earth sidekick - UNC

    b) Are you a relatively major character from a relatively well-known series?

    Examples:
    Superman - Yes
    Batman - Yes
    Gandalf - Yes
    Darth Vader - Yes
    Captain Kirk - Yes

    Aquaman - UNC
    Dr. Strange - UNC
    Captain Janeway - UNC
    The Borg from Star Trek - UNC

    Breeze or Ham from Mistborn - No
    Sate Pestage or Admiral Thrawn from Star Wars Extended Universe - No
    Doomsday from Superman - No
    Sammael from Wheel of Time - No

    In other words, just saying the name without context is likely get recognition from most random people, then yes, saying the name with context "Robert Smith from the Cure" is likely to get a response from many people or a definite and immediate yes from anyone with an above average familiarity with the series, and saying the name with context is likely to get a blank stare form most people and maybe even a delay from fans of said series without context, e.g. me just saying Breeze or Ham outside of mentioning Mistborn is unlikely to even gain note from solid fans of the series, but in context most readers will remember immediately or need only a little prodding like "Sammael, the Forsaken from Wheel of Time" Don't worry about the relative popularity of the series, unless it's huge like Star Wars or Harry Potter.

    Okay, again, truthful answers only please, my own are UNC and UNC for both so don't be too leery of using those, this second question isn't much of a lie detector question, people could be entirely truthful and give three different answer for say, Admiral Ackbar, but if you're Han Solo you should be answering No to a) and Yes to b)
  • The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
    ~Master Splinter

    Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
    Reply to message
    RAFO Mafia 17, Day 1: Trouble in Paradise - 30/05/2010 10:43:08 PM 4127 Views
    Miscellaneous information - 30/05/2010 10:44:49 PM 1411 Views
    Epic Intro *NM* - 31/05/2010 02:26:49 AM 844 Views
    Thanks *NM* - 31/05/2010 04:00:59 AM 821 Views
    Re: Miscellaneous information - 31/05/2010 04:38:35 AM 1412 Views
    What. - 31/05/2010 02:30:11 AM 1448 Views
    Re: What. - 31/05/2010 03:01:21 AM 1485 Views
    Or maybe he just wants us to think that ... - 31/05/2010 04:08:54 AM 1412 Views
    RAFO *NM* - 31/05/2010 04:01:26 AM 820 Views
    Re: RAFO Mafia 17, Day 1: Trouble in Paradise - 31/05/2010 03:08:30 AM 1437 Views
    I'm afraid I'm already waaay in over my head - 31/05/2010 07:20:54 AM 1334 Views
    You don't need to get all the references to play though - 31/05/2010 07:31:32 AM 1315 Views
    Don't forget the 5th element *NM* - 31/05/2010 08:25:13 AM 884 Views
    and the adam's family *NM* - 31/05/2010 03:26:23 PM 860 Views
    African Rabies is World War Z. Also- DEATH UNICORN!!!! - 31/05/2010 06:06:47 PM 1424 Views
    Okay, so, let's get this started. - 31/05/2010 07:48:13 AM 1425 Views
    yes and yes *NM* - 31/05/2010 12:24:19 PM 841 Views
    Yes and Yes. Do you? *NM* - 31/05/2010 01:03:04 PM 846 Views
    Yes I do. *NM* - 31/05/2010 07:42:15 PM 871 Views
    Indeedy. *NM* - 31/05/2010 02:48:49 PM 813 Views
    Yessir *NM* - 31/05/2010 02:59:06 PM 822 Views
    Yup *NM* - 31/05/2010 06:07:41 PM 747 Views
    Well that depends. - 31/05/2010 06:53:02 PM 1266 Views
    Wow, of all the people here to be unfamiliar with a character. - 31/05/2010 07:43:54 PM 1351 Views
    Yeah, that's weird - 31/05/2010 08:02:09 PM 1307 Views
    I went with Wikipedia, actually . - 31/05/2010 08:11:31 PM 1464 Views
    I do...(for both) - 31/05/2010 07:09:06 PM 1553 Views
    I would be willing to bet that's true. - 31/05/2010 08:50:05 PM 1396 Views
    So are you saying the Tourists are also all... tourists? - 31/05/2010 08:54:31 PM 1329 Views
    EBWOP - 31/05/2010 08:57:51 PM 1326 Views
    I think the "Zombie" comes from the African Rabies reference - 31/05/2010 09:42:31 PM 1389 Views
    That's a good point. - 31/05/2010 10:09:29 PM 1363 Views
    Maybe whoever dies becomes a zombie - 02/06/2010 01:57:59 AM 1388 Views
    What's in a name? - 01/06/2010 03:09:24 AM 1320 Views
    Clever - 01/06/2010 03:37:55 AM 1212 Views
    No idea. *NM* - 31/05/2010 10:28:53 PM 808 Views
    Does that mean you're just not sure of who you are - 01/06/2010 12:51:17 AM 1245 Views
    *looks shamefully down* - 01/06/2010 07:22:16 AM 1441 Views
    Yeargh! *NM* - 31/05/2010 11:59:28 PM 806 Views
    Yes to both. *NM* - 01/06/2010 12:54:55 AM 852 Views
    Wait, scratch that. I don't have a place of origin. *NM* - 01/06/2010 03:06:49 AM 728 Views
    I didn't think he meant place but rather the work that you're from *NM* - 01/06/2010 03:20:59 AM 777 Views
    Oh. Then yeah. *NM* - 01/06/2010 03:48:21 AM 954 Views
    Yeah...i got both. *NM* - 01/06/2010 02:57:56 AM 805 Views
    yeps. *NM* - 02/06/2010 01:35:56 AM 744 Views
    Oh, and I nearly forgot ... - 31/05/2010 02:50:14 PM 1373 Views
    WOOOOOOOO *NM* - 31/05/2010 06:07:54 PM 841 Views
    If there is an Oompa Loompa song whenever someone dies, I will die happy *NM* - 31/05/2010 06:09:38 PM 772 Views
    +1 - 31/05/2010 08:35:28 PM 1397 Views
    +1 to that song. *NM* - 31/05/2010 08:46:39 PM 818 Views
    thank you, i'm here all week *NM* - 31/05/2010 09:48:53 PM 792 Views
    Re: thank you, i'm here all week *NM* - 31/05/2010 09:49:52 PM 805 Views
    people would die of hilarity. *NM* - 02/06/2010 02:03:07 AM 856 Views
    Since I tried to start a conversation, but failed (because I posted in the wrong place?) - 01/06/2010 07:25:29 AM 1254 Views
    ummm, dear? - 01/06/2010 10:49:54 AM 1300 Views
    Actually, there is. *NM* - 01/06/2010 11:27:46 AM 823 Views
    fudgemuffins *NM* - 01/06/2010 04:02:28 PM 731 Views
    Are the election rules the same? And the 96 hour deadline? - 02/06/2010 01:08:06 AM 1211 Views
    It's announced in the Miscellaneous information - 01/06/2010 03:17:06 PM 1256 Views
    ^^^Attention-seeker = Jester^^^ - 01/06/2010 11:07:44 PM 1244 Views
    Re: ^^^Attention-seeker = Jester^^^ - 02/06/2010 01:12:59 AM 1321 Views
    At least I got the discussion going. *NM* - 02/06/2010 05:58:58 PM 761 Views
    You know what? - 02/06/2010 06:11:16 PM 1370 Views
    Two can play at that game! - 03/06/2010 01:58:09 AM 1238 Views
    Some first thoughts - 01/06/2010 10:27:38 PM 1231 Views
    Current Info (Table) - 01/06/2010 10:40:41 PM 1504 Views
    Re: Current Info (Table) - 01/06/2010 10:42:17 PM 1299 Views
    UNC UNC *NM* - 01/06/2010 11:35:11 PM 828 Views
    Yes & UNC - 02/06/2010 02:14:48 AM 1413 Views
    No and yes. - 02/06/2010 02:23:49 AM 1310 Views
    OMGUS Vote: Napoleon62 *NM* - 02/06/2010 02:40:52 AM 811 Views
    Random stone throwing super dick vote - 02/06/2010 08:00:57 PM 1314 Views
    ranagrande has been lynched - 02/06/2010 09:30:53 PM 1331 Views
    ROFL - 02/06/2010 09:47:48 PM 1404 Views
    Hahaha - 03/06/2010 02:08:29 AM 1350 Views
    UNC and NO - 02/06/2010 06:05:25 PM 1330 Views
    Re: UNC and NO - 02/06/2010 06:17:14 PM 1311 Views
    UNC and NO *NM* - 03/06/2010 01:56:35 AM 765 Views
    a) Kinda - Yes/UNC. B) UNC. - 01/06/2010 10:54:32 PM 1350 Views
    Re: Some first thoughts - 01/06/2010 11:03:00 PM 1404 Views
    UNC/UNC *NM* - 01/06/2010 11:42:21 PM 867 Views
    Yes and unable to judge - UNC *NM* - 02/06/2010 12:22:33 AM 782 Views
    Just do your best on answers, the questions are deliberately vague - 02/06/2010 12:43:25 AM 1207 Views
    So... many... acronyms... - 02/06/2010 01:51:46 AM 1274 Views
    Nipz makes me think of Cheese Nips. - 03/06/2010 01:55:20 AM 1351 Views
    Yes and yes. *NM* - 02/06/2010 01:55:07 AM 802 Views
    Yes/Yes *NM* - 02/06/2010 03:46:49 PM 806 Views
    UNC and UNC *NM* - 03/06/2010 04:36:55 PM 716 Views
    OK, so we all know who we are. Now what? - 02/06/2010 05:12:38 PM 1353 Views
    We seem to have two random votes already - 02/06/2010 06:06:29 PM 1180 Views
    You mean Napoleon and Isaac? - 03/06/2010 03:07:14 AM 1356 Views
    Still, it's a start - 03/06/2010 06:40:16 PM 1292 Views
    What do y'all think? - 03/06/2010 12:36:23 AM 1276 Views
    Re: What do y'all think? - 03/06/2010 01:01:52 AM 1320 Views
    I won't be participating in that. - 03/06/2010 01:06:26 AM 1188 Views
    That's pretty legit. - 03/06/2010 02:05:50 AM 1340 Views
    We could talk about Napoleon62 and Isaac voting each other for no reason *NM* - 03/06/2010 02:43:03 AM 783 Views
    You think there are ulterior motives? - 03/06/2010 03:07:28 AM 1265 Views
    *confused* Aren't there always? *NM* - 03/06/2010 03:09:49 AM 830 Views
    Not really in this case - 03/06/2010 04:46:02 AM 1234 Views
    It was a joke - 03/06/2010 03:11:00 AM 1285 Views
    Re: It was a joke - 03/06/2010 03:14:48 AM 1191 Views
    Fair enough. Good reason not to. - 03/06/2010 03:45:35 AM 1278 Views
    I actually think it's a decent idea, just needs a modification - 03/06/2010 04:33:47 AM 1289 Views
    I remember that. - 03/06/2010 06:10:33 AM 1210 Views
    Okay, so next 'question' - 03/06/2010 07:57:08 AM 1335 Views
    Ranagrande really seemed to make an effort to go out of his way here. - 03/06/2010 01:31:03 PM 1239 Views
    But if you're from something really weird - 03/06/2010 05:54:37 PM 1335 Views
    You don't even need to pick a bunch of weird things - 03/06/2010 08:23:19 PM 1418 Views
    Is one of those two sets of 5 your answer to your 5 worlds question? - 06/06/2010 10:03:52 PM 1403 Views
    No, they were examples - 07/06/2010 12:14:03 AM 1167 Views
    Yeah, I'm still not doing it. - 03/06/2010 06:59:26 PM 1388 Views
    yeesh! - 03/06/2010 09:36:33 AM 1280 Views
    Re: yeesh! - 03/06/2010 10:41:58 AM 1250 Views
    Alright, I'll do it you fraidy catz - 03/06/2010 09:23:58 PM 1333 Views
    Re: What do y'all think? - 03/06/2010 04:28:44 AM 1295 Views
    IMPORTANT POINT - 04/06/2010 05:04:18 AM 1275 Views
    That's a good point - 04/06/2010 05:28:39 AM 1304 Views
    Who, exactly, is this warning intended for? - 04/06/2010 05:30:05 AM 1385 Views
    Re: Who, exactly, is this warning intended for? - 04/06/2010 05:37:25 AM 1345 Views
    Re: Who, exactly, is this warning intended for? - 04/06/2010 05:49:00 AM 1298 Views
    It is an interesting theory, though - 04/06/2010 07:37:30 AM 1243 Views
    Re: It is an interesting theory, though - 04/06/2010 08:41:16 AM 1348 Views
    Oh, BTW Isaac: you didn't update for my answer in your Table - 04/06/2010 09:01:00 AM 1291 Views
    Wow, that's a weird one - 04/06/2010 09:44:23 AM 1199 Views
    Re: It is an interesting theory, though - 04/06/2010 03:41:43 PM 1354 Views
    I was assuming she meant it the same way we warn hypocoppers - 04/06/2010 03:51:06 PM 1237 Views
    jargon question. - 04/06/2010 06:19:51 PM 1283 Views
    Re: jargon question. - 04/06/2010 06:37:34 PM 1259 Views
    okies thanks *NM* - 05/06/2010 03:56:31 AM 753 Views
    Sorry I screwed up your fancy plans. - 04/06/2010 08:05:18 PM 1317 Views
    I must be really tired. - 05/06/2010 02:52:32 AM 1222 Views
    Honestly, anyone trying to lynch based solely on series - 05/06/2010 04:00:13 AM 1178 Views
    or to kill? - 05/06/2010 04:05:53 AM 1284 Views
    Re: or to kill? - 05/06/2010 08:18:25 AM 1292 Views
    EBWOP: programmed, not programmer *NM* - 05/06/2010 08:21:00 AM 798 Views
    Ohhhh ok, so you assumed he was roled, not that he wa a Doc - 05/06/2010 07:37:36 PM 1362 Views
    Out of curiosity, what did he say? - 05/06/2010 06:47:43 AM 1367 Views
    He said he was programmed. - 05/06/2010 08:22:45 AM 1291 Views
    But... wasn't that the robot game, where we were all programmed? - 05/06/2010 07:37:03 PM 1367 Views
    Actually, my own RM didn't mention robots at all, so odds are neither did DK's - 05/06/2010 09:00:52 PM 1376 Views
    Yup, it was the same. *NM* - 05/06/2010 10:11:22 PM 752 Views
    Can we agree on revealing gender? *NM* - 04/06/2010 06:20:29 PM 768 Views
    Will that really help us tell who is mafia and who is not? - 04/06/2010 06:39:07 PM 1401 Views
    It'll get us info. - 04/06/2010 08:27:20 PM 1384 Views
    Will listing off five random worlds? - 05/06/2010 04:09:55 AM 1192 Views
    Re: Will listing off five random worlds? - 05/06/2010 08:25:38 AM 1347 Views
    Re: Will listing off five random worlds? - 06/06/2010 10:11:18 PM 1251 Views
    Re: Will listing off five random worlds? - 07/06/2010 10:31:21 AM 1355 Views
    Re: Will listing off five random worlds? - 07/06/2010 12:23:35 PM 1207 Views
    I think we should do this. - 05/06/2010 01:21:18 AM 1288 Views
    im definalty a man *NM* - 06/06/2010 09:07:47 PM 728 Views
    btw, what happened to the Chair election? - 04/06/2010 10:46:41 PM 1252 Views
    Artsapat has been elected Chair. - 05/06/2010 12:39:05 AM 1269 Views
    OK, since I'm apparently Chair (including a Table) *updated Jun 9th* - 06/06/2010 07:43:10 PM 1328 Views
    BlackAdder - M *NM* - 06/06/2010 10:00:38 PM 764 Views
    Isaac - M (a note on gender) - 06/06/2010 11:01:55 PM 1219 Views
    I'm a dude. *NM* - 07/06/2010 12:04:11 AM 820 Views
    Male *NM* - 07/06/2010 12:42:34 AM 737 Views
    I am female - 07/06/2010 03:11:45 AM 1276 Views
    Male. *NM* - 07/06/2010 04:52:39 AM 749 Views
    I must have been REALLY tired not having seen this yesterday - 07/06/2010 08:00:23 AM 1267 Views
    Male. . . .again. *NM* - 07/06/2010 08:37:52 AM 760 Views
    Napoleon's going to have a hard time - 07/06/2010 09:10:21 AM 1297 Views
    Let's not. *NM* - 07/06/2010 08:06:58 PM 752 Views
    I'll call you Smurfette anyway. You know, just because I can. *NM* - 07/06/2010 08:29:35 PM 729 Views
    Don't worry, Bro. We can have girl talk together *NM* - 07/06/2010 08:44:32 PM 835 Views
    Male *NM* - 07/06/2010 10:26:37 AM 765 Views
    Female. *NM* - 07/06/2010 01:21:11 PM 727 Views
    I'm all MAN!!!!! - 07/06/2010 02:04:55 PM 1334 Views
    I am a manly man! *NM* - 07/06/2010 11:57:48 PM 695 Views
    Male *NM* - 08/06/2010 03:22:47 AM 778 Views
    Male *NM* - 09/06/2010 12:19:46 AM 732 Views
    Settings (Table) - 07/06/2010 12:47:35 AM 1219 Views
    Uh - 07/06/2010 02:13:40 AM 1342 Views
    Re: Uh - 07/06/2010 03:20:53 AM 1361 Views
    Yeah, I don't get it either. - 07/06/2010 04:56:42 AM 1209 Views
    Can someone explain for the slow kids? - 08/06/2010 06:59:47 AM 1226 Views
    Short answer: click the little links at the right side of the page - 08/06/2010 10:56:37 PM 1390 Views
    Basically - 08/06/2010 11:16:26 PM 1384 Views
    Hmm... - 07/06/2010 10:49:12 AM 1295 Views
    Mine - 07/06/2010 01:54:06 PM 1333 Views
    Soooo yeah..... - 07/06/2010 02:03:19 PM 1332 Views
    Hm. Alright. - 07/06/2010 07:15:16 PM 1333 Views
    Re: Settings (Table) - 07/06/2010 08:56:30 PM 1290 Views
    Re: Settings (Table) - 07/06/2010 11:42:27 PM 1257 Views
    Anyone else get the feeling we have some "nontraditional" settings? - 08/06/2010 12:04:23 AM 1316 Views
    Didn't I suggest that from the beginning? *NM* - 08/06/2010 03:08:36 AM 747 Views
    Re: Settings (Table) - 08/06/2010 03:42:52 AM 1326 Views
    The responses of me - 09/06/2010 02:03:08 AM 1344 Views
    Mine. - 09/06/2010 08:07:17 PM 1304 Views
    Two new thoughts - 08/06/2010 07:48:24 AM 1332 Views
    Re: Two new thoughts - 09/06/2010 12:02:01 AM 1358 Views
    Re: Two new thoughts - 09/06/2010 04:31:06 AM 1304 Views
    Re: Two new thoughts - 09/06/2010 05:03:10 AM 1234 Views
    Re: Two new thoughts - 09/06/2010 12:11:51 PM 1290 Views
    Re: Two new thoughts - 09/06/2010 04:57:02 AM 1332 Views
    In which I spoil everyone's identity! (Well, maybe not) - 09/06/2010 07:34:08 AM 1191 Views
    Whoops, replied to the wrong spot... ignore this one, look below! *NM* - 09/06/2010 07:35:40 AM 755 Views
    Re: Two new thoughts - 09/06/2010 12:00:28 PM 1356 Views
    Re: Two new thoughts - 09/06/2010 03:26:16 AM 1349 Views
    Oops. - 09/06/2010 12:28:25 AM 1504 Views
    Whoa, how are we dead already? - 09/06/2010 03:28:53 AM 1247 Views
    There are still like 5 people left who haven't claimed settings - 09/06/2010 04:19:38 AM 1258 Views
    In which I spoil everyone's identity! (Well, maybe not) - 09/06/2010 07:35:10 AM 1309 Views
    Not sure about the Talic vote, but - 09/06/2010 10:35:25 AM 1303 Views
    Agree - 09/06/2010 12:24:47 PM 1314 Views
    Yeah, I'll be participating even less than before. - 09/06/2010 06:10:34 PM 1353 Views
    Re: Yeah, I'll be participating even less than before. - 09/06/2010 06:26:08 PM 1285 Views
    Re: Yeah, I'll be participating even less than before. - 09/06/2010 08:53:53 PM 1347 Views
    Eh. Let's just lynch Talic. - 09/06/2010 11:23:16 PM 1303 Views
    Maybe you should explain why you think a 'No Lynch' on Day 1 is always bad - 10/06/2010 02:05:16 AM 1306 Views
    Do we have any reason to believe that the scum are not a single united faction? *NM* - 10/06/2010 02:23:11 AM 851 Views
    I'd say so, it's indicated in the intro text and it's been normal of late - 10/06/2010 02:35:26 AM 1252 Views
    Incidentally... - 10/06/2010 04:24:23 AM 1218 Views
    Agreed. - 10/06/2010 04:31:26 AM 1249 Views
    But even if that happens - 10/06/2010 07:37:45 AM 1281 Views
    Because it is always bad. Seems like the ideal reason. - 10/06/2010 04:21:10 AM 1281 Views
    Thank you. - 10/06/2010 04:30:23 AM 1325 Views
    Good points. - 10/06/2010 04:45:24 AM 1442 Views
    Re: Good points. - 10/06/2010 04:53:22 AM 1305 Views
    Totally. *NM* - 10/06/2010 04:57:57 AM 794 Views
    Re: Because it is always bad. Seems like the ideal reason. - 10/06/2010 05:03:15 AM 1316 Views
    We might randomly lynch (or try to lynch) someone who is part of a faction - 10/06/2010 06:37:48 AM 1307 Views
    Yeah, but that isn't a voting record. - 11/06/2010 04:41:29 AM 1367 Views
    I don't believe in completely random lynches. - 10/06/2010 04:35:42 PM 1370 Views
    I feel like random lynches are a really good place for scum to hide. - 10/06/2010 06:19:22 PM 1336 Views
    'Seems' isn't 'Is', a dead townie is a dead townie - 10/06/2010 05:57:19 AM 1261 Views
    Which is pretty much the point. - 10/06/2010 05:39:36 PM 1284 Views
    Re: Which is pretty much the point. - 10/06/2010 06:31:40 PM 1382 Views
    Re: Which is pretty much the point. - 11/06/2010 01:56:41 AM 1367 Views
    Re: Which is pretty much the point. - 11/06/2010 02:18:56 AM 1242 Views
    Re: Which is pretty much the point. - 11/06/2010 02:35:14 AM 1422 Views
    Re: Which is pretty much the point. - 11/06/2010 12:58:25 AM 1339 Views
    Incidentally, how likely do you think it is that I am a Darkfriend? - 11/06/2010 01:34:55 AM 1360 Views
    Probably less than random with some caveats, over all, roughly random - 11/06/2010 02:21:24 AM 1362 Views
    Re: Probably less than random with some caveats, over all, roughly random - 11/06/2010 02:40:33 AM 1396 Views
    I suppose we're back to DefCon 5 - 11/06/2010 03:36:12 AM 1340 Views
    Re: I suppose we're back to DefCon 5 - 11/06/2010 03:48:31 AM 1299 Views
    Re: I suppose we're back to DefCon 5 - 11/06/2010 04:08:27 AM 1167 Views
    Well actually technically I am kinda new. *NM* - 12/06/2010 01:22:50 PM 769 Views
    Whoa, did I put Dark Shadows? - 09/06/2010 06:22:16 PM 1348 Views
    Yeaaah, I don't think so. - 09/06/2010 08:13:41 PM 1232 Views
    Update! Darth Katie's analysis: - 09/06/2010 11:20:36 PM 1333 Views
    So sorry guys - 10/06/2010 06:31:49 AM 1323 Views
    It happens, don't worry about it - 10/06/2010 06:35:25 AM 1393 Views
    No problem - 10/06/2010 04:17:27 PM 1396 Views
    Any chance we can get Gher to replace in? - 10/06/2010 07:30:04 PM 1517 Views
    That would be great if he wanted to - 10/06/2010 08:46:55 PM 1328 Views
    Actually... - 10/06/2010 08:52:19 PM 1290 Views
    An addition to my Talic accusation - 10/06/2010 08:48:14 AM 1336 Views
    Duffman wouldn't be awesome? - 10/06/2010 10:31:30 AM 1316 Views
    It was mostly a "slightly better than random" vote - 10/06/2010 04:42:38 PM 1219 Views
    Well, it did raise a good point for approach though - 11/06/2010 01:05:18 AM 1317 Views
    Oh come on. - 10/06/2010 05:56:54 PM 1374 Views
    I maintain it made sense - 11/06/2010 02:55:39 AM 1289 Views
    Heading rival Darkfriend factions would've been awesome. - 11/06/2010 03:02:35 AM 1240 Views
    Definitely - 11/06/2010 03:20:38 AM 1317 Views
    Re: Oh come on. - 12/06/2010 01:56:41 PM 1232 Views
    oh why so serious beet? - 10/06/2010 09:11:03 PM 1288 Views
    ...just watch? - 10/06/2010 11:15:20 PM 1458 Views
    Combined Info (Table) - 11/06/2010 04:33:01 AM 1378 Views
    The All-Seeing Eye of Sauron is upon you... let the brutal analysis begin - 11/06/2010 05:16:27 AM 1263 Views
    Hmm ... I think I am working from a different definition of Modern Real Earth. - 11/06/2010 06:37:04 AM 1281 Views
    Re: Hmm ... I think I am working from a different definition of Modern Real Earth. - 11/06/2010 12:50:16 PM 1341 Views
    Works for me. *NM* - 11/06/2010 02:19:45 PM 725 Views
    Re: The All-Seeing Eye of Sauron is upon you... let the brutal analysis begin - 12/06/2010 03:33:37 PM 1409 Views
    You have an acronym fetish, don't you? *NM* - 11/06/2010 09:02:07 AM 831 Views
    You know, just because someone is good or bad in their series, - 11/06/2010 05:35:04 AM 1326 Views
    Yep, but the individual character will control that I think - 11/06/2010 05:42:28 AM 1354 Views
    RBIRL for the weekend *NM* - 11/06/2010 12:51:17 PM 736 Views
    Me too basically. *NM* - 11/06/2010 02:24:38 PM 747 Views
    [realy busy in real life] - 12/06/2010 12:41:46 PM 1280 Views
    RBIRL for another effing week. - 13/06/2010 01:55:52 AM 1311 Views
    I'm RBIRL this week as well, through Friday. *NM* - 13/06/2010 06:40:04 AM 775 Views
    I am forced to assume - 13/06/2010 02:46:47 PM 1303 Views
    Oh, and I am semi-RBIRL until Friday too. *NM* - 13/06/2010 03:00:47 PM 757 Views
    Re: I am forced to assume - 15/06/2010 06:44:06 AM 1367 Views
    Well good luck with that too, I guess. - 15/06/2010 10:29:19 PM 1254 Views
    I'm not busy at all! Let's murder someone! - 13/06/2010 04:06:04 AM 1240 Views
    Re: I'm not busy at all! Let's murder someone! - 13/06/2010 02:16:40 PM 1255 Views
    Why Isaac? *NM* - 13/06/2010 02:47:49 PM 767 Views
    I too, unsurprisingly, would like an answer to that *NM* - 13/06/2010 05:48:29 PM 739 Views
    Good point. - 13/06/2010 06:20:55 PM 1282 Views
    Eh, do we ever get that much out of Day One? - 13/06/2010 06:46:31 PM 1449 Views
    Kinda. - 13/06/2010 09:16:56 PM 1343 Views
    Actually it's often the most productive day - 13/06/2010 09:26:25 PM 1271 Views
    Before I basically disappear from this thread for about a week... - 13/06/2010 08:55:03 PM 1384 Views
    Okay, pushing forward - 14/06/2010 04:29:20 PM 1560 Views
    Re: Okay, pushing forward - 14/06/2010 06:50:19 PM 1277 Views
    Re: Okay, pushing forward - 14/06/2010 10:27:43 PM 1307 Views
    EBWOP - 15/06/2010 12:59:20 AM 1602 Views
    Yes it's just day 1 - 15/06/2010 01:06:56 AM 1310 Views
    Pledge: No; CON: Sure - 15/06/2010 12:31:57 AM 1361 Views
    So... - 15/06/2010 01:04:11 AM 1318 Views
    If you will allow me to be pedantic. - 15/06/2010 01:24:07 AM 1195 Views
    Duly noted - 15/06/2010 01:38:34 AM 1245 Views
    Not like they were especially contributive anyway. - 15/06/2010 02:26:34 AM 1233 Views
    Re: So... - 15/06/2010 02:29:41 AM 1316 Views
    Re: So... - 15/06/2010 07:52:29 AM 1218 Views
    Re: So... - 16/06/2010 06:36:22 PM 1392 Views
    I think scum might be willing to ask some questions. - 15/06/2010 01:43:57 AM 1267 Views
    Yes, they do - 15/06/2010 02:32:57 AM 1267 Views
    The pledge I am not very enthused about. - 15/06/2010 01:42:27 AM 1321 Views
    Ok, I just want to say I'm sorry for not posting as much as I normally do - 15/06/2010 02:52:31 AM 1141 Views
    Okay, now you're just pushing for a No-Lynch in different terms. - 15/06/2010 04:49:26 AM 1317 Views
    Also... - 15/06/2010 03:12:18 PM 1362 Views
    Well, the role itself is something you would not expect. - 15/06/2010 03:36:33 PM 1405 Views
    That's an ambiguous but tantalizing statement... - 15/06/2010 03:59:29 PM 1388 Views
    my role and char are consistant - 15/06/2010 10:04:51 AM 1311 Views
    Re: my role and char are consistant - 15/06/2010 03:23:10 PM 1375 Views
    Do you have a suggestion? *NM* - 15/06/2010 06:10:25 PM 746 Views
    On that note... - 16/06/2010 07:02:12 PM 1399 Views
    Seeing hwo you're trying to protect me from getting Lynched - 15/06/2010 12:40:27 PM 1255 Views
    Re: Seeing hwo you're trying to protect me from getting Lynched - 15/06/2010 04:21:56 PM 1335 Views
    Every vanilla is supposed to say yes. - 15/06/2010 06:13:08 PM 1365 Views
    Which of course brings about the real problem, which is the opposite of what you say. - 15/06/2010 06:26:42 PM 1295 Views
    Let me hold off on answering this, if you don't mind - 15/06/2010 07:14:25 PM 1272 Views
    Fine, I'm not in a hurry. *NM* - 15/06/2010 07:17:10 PM 863 Views
    Let me run another possible question by you - 15/06/2010 08:18:33 PM 1300 Views
    By the way, this is sort of a revision of white flame's question - 15/06/2010 08:21:32 PM 1148 Views
    At first glance, I don't see any problem with it. - 15/06/2010 09:31:44 PM 1330 Views
    Let's go with it then - 15/06/2010 09:42:32 PM 1356 Views
    Sure. - 15/06/2010 11:28:10 PM 1249 Views
    Re: Sure. - 15/06/2010 11:45:37 PM 1204 Views
    Ok so I really don't like the idea of the pledge - 15/06/2010 04:27:09 PM 1313 Views
    DFs might try to skate through. - 15/06/2010 10:57:06 PM 1386 Views
    Actually Gender was mine... *NM* - 16/06/2010 06:31:02 PM 720 Views
    Also, yes to con, no to pledge. *NM* - 16/06/2010 07:03:42 PM 784 Views
    The Big Info Compilation v 1.0 (Table) - 14/06/2010 07:40:38 PM 1451 Views
    to get the game moving - 15/06/2010 08:53:38 PM 1380 Views
    go on... *NM* - 15/06/2010 09:38:13 PM 796 Views
    its day one, do i realy need a reason? *NM* - 15/06/2010 09:56:59 PM 799 Views
    It is customary *NM* - 15/06/2010 10:01:25 PM 800 Views
    well... - 15/06/2010 11:04:29 PM 1269 Views
    Eh, I think I've been pretty consistent - 16/06/2010 06:35:57 AM 1246 Views
    Yeah, I was a bit wary of the way he leapt on Talic too. - 16/06/2010 12:51:30 PM 1346 Views
    I actually would think it proves his innocence over anything - 17/06/2010 12:18:04 AM 1415 Views
    Next Question - 15/06/2010 09:56:10 PM 1267 Views
    Seriously - 15/06/2010 10:58:24 PM 1346 Views
    I am willing to answer if others are willing though *NM* - 15/06/2010 10:58:44 PM 759 Views
    It's interesting, actually. - 16/06/2010 06:37:41 AM 1375 Views
    Debatable. - 15/06/2010 11:00:39 PM 1339 Views
    Strong Yes - 16/06/2010 06:38:53 AM 1319 Views
    Didn't you already say you were a manly man? - 16/06/2010 12:52:57 PM 1322 Views
    Well, he could also be a 'neither' or 'both'. *NM* - 16/06/2010 05:24:26 PM 810 Views
    I am large; I contain multitudes - 16/06/2010 07:48:33 PM 1362 Views
    HGD- No *NM* - 16/06/2010 12:11:28 PM 699 Views
    I find the HDG question vague and polarizing... *NM* - 16/06/2010 07:04:59 PM 798 Views
    HDG- yes - 17/06/2010 11:23:18 PM 1298 Views
    Who isn't answering questions (Table) - 17/06/2010 03:13:58 PM 1253 Views
    oi! - 17/06/2010 07:43:23 PM 1343 Views
    Gotcha, fixed it - 17/06/2010 07:50:53 PM 1215 Views
    Throw in an oi for me, too - 17/06/2010 11:22:48 PM 1322 Views
    One of my answers - 18/06/2010 12:50:15 PM 1262 Views
    It won't be too much longer - 18/06/2010 05:25:36 PM 1213 Views
    Agreed - 18/06/2010 06:39:35 PM 1262 Views
    "It" being my own notes etc, off course *NM* - 18/06/2010 06:42:42 PM 771 Views
    Re: Agreed - 18/06/2010 08:02:02 PM 1494 Views
    Fox is RBIRL until after this weekend - 18/06/2010 10:06:26 PM 1524 Views
    HDG: Plead the 5th - 19/06/2010 09:49:08 AM 1384 Views
    No longer RBIRL and will be what I mostly skimmed over in a bit - 19/06/2010 10:00:12 AM 1233 Views
    Technical difficulties... back to RBIRL until fixed *NM* - 20/06/2010 12:28:41 AM 751 Views
    All right, let's do this, I have two people to accuse - 19/06/2010 08:36:14 PM 1259 Views
    why just FOS? - 19/06/2010 09:48:25 PM 1242 Views
    EBWOP Vote Artsapat - 19/06/2010 09:51:01 PM 1262 Views
    I can't vote for two people at once - 19/06/2010 10:12:10 PM 1214 Views
    Honestly, I'm in standby at this point. - 20/06/2010 09:31:42 AM 1298 Views
    Just for you Beet, a non-acronym version - 20/06/2010 05:13:07 PM 1275 Views
    Hah, nice, thanks - 20/06/2010 05:24:15 PM 1307 Views
    Welcome *NM* - 20/06/2010 05:24:57 PM 754 Views
    Interesting. - 20/06/2010 01:41:40 AM 1429 Views
    Re: All right, let's do this, I have two people to accuse - 20/06/2010 03:43:46 AM 1348 Views
    Okay, admittedly, I haven't been paying that much attention. - 20/06/2010 05:55:51 AM 1297 Views
    Re: All right, let's do this, I have two people to accuse - 20/06/2010 01:29:43 PM 1339 Views
    Re: All right, let's do this, I have two people to accuse - 20/06/2010 05:47:45 PM 1266 Views
    I'll reply to this in bits, but first: - 20/06/2010 06:09:26 PM 1303 Views
    Re: I'll reply to this in bits, but first: - 20/06/2010 06:44:33 PM 1252 Views
    I just wanted a one word thingy, so people could type it easy - 20/06/2010 08:15:57 PM 1402 Views
    No Comment *NM* - 22/06/2010 11:34:42 PM 737 Views
    Let me extend you an offer - 20/06/2010 08:24:11 PM 1383 Views
    A typo-less message implies I'm distracted? How? - 21/06/2010 04:41:17 AM 1375 Views
    No, you said you were distracted, I said the message looks like you want people to think so - 21/06/2010 04:52:36 AM 1374 Views
    I thought I did address the accusation. - 21/06/2010 05:06:41 AM 1285 Views
    See, and I know you're gonna think that was an intentional typo to prove a point. It wasn't, honest - 21/06/2010 05:09:05 AM 1431 Views
    I'm not really interested in typos one way or another - 21/06/2010 05:16:19 AM 1356 Views
    I'm a Barbie girl, in a Barbie world. - 21/06/2010 05:27:27 AM 1330 Views
    And now I'm gonna sleep. I'll get to your questions in the morning. - 21/06/2010 05:29:08 AM 1283 Views
    Aqua aside, why did you answer UNC for MRE and MCS? - 21/06/2010 05:35:31 AM 1249 Views
    Re: Aqua aside, why did you answer UNC for MRE and MCS? - 21/06/2010 02:59:05 PM 1325 Views
    MRE seems to be giving a lot of people trouble *NM* - 21/06/2010 05:40:57 PM 779 Views
    Maybe ask the question again and try to get confirmation? *NM* - 21/06/2010 06:47:51 PM 731 Views
    I think UNC is consistent for MRE for Barbie - 21/06/2010 06:51:13 PM 1303 Views
    For the record, I did eventually change my consistency to a yes. - 21/06/2010 07:17:09 PM 1292 Views
    Possible, and MCS? - 21/06/2010 07:21:29 PM 1287 Views
    Yeah, that's also sketchy. - 21/06/2010 07:28:24 PM 1260 Views
    Re: Yeah, that's also sketchy. - 21/06/2010 08:03:27 PM 1273 Views
    Kronin's Barbie, but claimed he wasn't a major character? Vote: Kronin - 21/06/2010 11:39:34 PM 1335 Views
    I'd like a roleclaim. - 22/06/2010 12:48:13 AM 1313 Views
    Honestly, looking back, consistency should've been a yes. - 22/06/2010 01:21:16 AM 1346 Views
    Oh, and don't forget about Arty. - 22/06/2010 01:21:49 AM 1326 Views
    Each day you can be a different role? That's kind of awesome *NM* - 22/06/2010 07:22:35 AM 782 Views
    Well, I knew it would come down to this, as soon as you pointed a finger to me. - 21/06/2010 08:02:42 AM 1264 Views
    Might as well explain my answers then. - 21/06/2010 08:52:46 AM 1362 Views
    Re: All right, let's do this, I have two people to accuse - 20/06/2010 06:37:50 PM 1298 Views
    Re: All right, let's do this, I have two people to accuse - 21/06/2010 07:57:59 AM 1382 Views
    Wow, so I suppose these questions can be used in a town friendly way - 20/06/2010 02:06:15 PM 1328 Views
    Ok, let's avoid the horizontal scroll - 22/06/2010 01:25:27 AM 1294 Views
    Now, I'm all in favor of lynching Isaac. - 22/06/2010 01:37:37 AM 1383 Views
    "You lie you die" is sound policy not only Day 1, but every Day. - 22/06/2010 01:40:46 AM 1268 Views
    Vote: Artsapat - 22/06/2010 05:01:31 AM 1198 Views
    Hey, that's a good idea. Vote: Artsapat *NM* - 22/06/2010 05:18:21 AM 747 Views
    Re: Ok, let's avoid the horizontal scroll - 22/06/2010 01:43:07 AM 1244 Views
    I suppose I'll join in - 22/06/2010 01:45:48 AM 1315 Views
    I'm not gonna deny that I deserve this. - 22/06/2010 03:24:38 AM 1269 Views
    - 22/06/2010 03:52:33 AM 1298 Views
    Oh man, that was hilarious. - 22/06/2010 03:54:58 AM 1251 Views
    Re: Ok, let's avoid the horizontal scroll - 22/06/2010 04:15:44 AM 1246 Views
    Re: Ok, let's avoid the horizontal scroll - 22/06/2010 04:31:27 AM 1269 Views
    Yea! Kill Kronin! - 22/06/2010 04:56:58 AM 1272 Views
    No offense meant, bro. *NM* - 22/06/2010 05:45:22 PM 753 Views
    My answers to the 2 questions asked... - 20/06/2010 05:31:22 PM 1238 Views
    Just out of curiosity... - 20/06/2010 05:57:00 PM 1220 Views
    Re: Just out of curiosity... - 20/06/2010 06:42:38 PM 1281 Views
    Vote Table - 21/06/2010 08:51:45 PM 1226 Views
    Well, I suppose the sensible thing to do here is lynch Kronin. - 22/06/2010 04:08:46 AM 1231 Views
    I told you, main character was my bad. - 22/06/2010 04:20:08 AM 1210 Views
    OK, I'll hammer this - 22/06/2010 07:29:38 AM 1208 Views
    Kronin al'Sulc has been lynched - 22/06/2010 01:44:22 PM 1322 Views
    a slight delay - 25/06/2010 05:55:03 AM 1287 Views
    Re: a slight delay - 25/06/2010 07:28:21 AM 1275 Views
    No worries, take your time - 25/06/2010 02:02:58 PM 1245 Views

    Reply to Message