I believe you all received the same perspective, minus POV. From their perspectives they were both being hinted that something else could have interfered, but that they were pretty evenly matched, both roles were entitled to know which is why they even got the 'slightly weakened' descriptors. It was built in for Bergioyn and DK to know that 'something power based but not a standard saidar weave' had interfered with their attacks if you docced their target whereas the channelers, if you docced them against an attack that occured, would know the power help foil it. But the language was 'Docced them on a night they were attacked' not 'stopped the attack', this would tend to be the same thing, this just happened to be the exception, since ranagrande beat back the attack on his own from tying on the RPS as an equally powerful channeler to the attacker. Writing flavor can always be a bit ambigous, but the important things that had to put ito the mssages were:

1. DK must know she got a tie result
2. Ranagrande must know he could beat the attack on his own
3. DK must know something OP-based and not likely a weave of ranagrande's interfered in the attack
4. Ranagrande must know something OP-based not of his doing or his attackers interfered, with strong hints of saidin but nothing conclusive.
5. BlackAdder must know his doc-target survived
6. BlackAdder must know his ward was punctured with foreign Saidar, e.g. not his or his ward's personal channeling
7. BlackAdder should know that his doc ability was not specifically the reason why his doc-target didn't die.
8. Neither DK or Ranagrande should see BlackAdder
9. Neither BlackAdder or ranagrande should see DK
10. Neither BlackAdder or DK were seen and should be told so

That's the mechanics that went down based off the roles and rules, the flavor was written to meet that, apparently it left people unclear about what happened but that was fine just so long as those 10 stipulations were used.

Your full dawn 5 NBs, flavor plus notes form mod in those NBs:



Note that even on top of the flavor you were told that you could have saved his life but it wasn't necessary. Stipulation 5, 6, 7, and 10 were all met.



Similiarly all conditions were met




So as you can see, the flavor text was not all people got, they also got very clear explanations of what happened, at least the parts they were allowed to know. I tried to make the flavor as clear as possible but made sure to include rule-mechanic specific translations. Now you drew a legitimate assumption, Ranagrande was a SK, he did not tell anyone he'd been involved in a RPS event, and that was not something you'd get to know from your insider knowledge, both ranagrande and DK knew there was a RPS event and ranagrande was not entitled to explicitly know he'd tied, though it's hinted at by 'equal to the attack' since the result was unique to a tie RPS by a roughly equally powerful channeler. HE would know and should know that Talic could not have been the attacker because Talic was weak in the power and he knew this.