Active Users:745 Time:09/09/2026 08:02:13 AM
Re: It's true that both parties have contributed to the decline of political norms/courtesies, yes. Cannoli Send a noteboard - 10/12/2024 11:18:52 AM


Let's be serious here, whatever arguments McConnell had at the time he refused to even consider Merrick Garland's nomination (as opposed to voting him down) in 2016 were shown to be utterly meaningless when he chose to ram through Amy Coney Barrett's nomination so shortly before the 2020 presidential election. Even though I actually like Coney Barrett and think she's shown herself a valuable asset to the SC.

They are not the same thing. Trump was not known to be at the end of his term and they had the Senate. Obama lost the Senate and was about to leave office. Again, at the time they rejected Garland, it was widely believed that Clinton was going to be the next president. Trump was the GOP front-runner by then and no one believed he was a serious threat to win. McConnell & co refusing Garland on their stated grounds was a case of actually staking a principle, even at greater risk to their interests, as many Democratic pundits gleefully pointed out at the time, certain that Hillary was going to ram a worse (from the Republican point of view) nominee down their throats in 2017. Voting Garland down would have been mere partisanship. Even if their motives for what they actually did were partisan, they still did so over a principle that applied both ways and would have benefitted the Democrats had they won the election. As it was, in 2020, it was possible that Trump was going to win, and seen as likely, hence the disbelief at the outcome (I posted at the time how unusual his defeat was against so many factors), and furthermore, the Republicans seemed likely to retain control of the Senate. As it was, Trump's high-handed and self-serving attempts to claim Georgia's electoral votes probably cost the Republicans both Senate seats in the post-election runoff, and control of the Senate with them.

The motive for "pushing Barrett through" before the election was that voters were disappointed with Trump and he needed a win. Some people were talking about a delay in the appointment as an effort to hold the nomination hostage to a Republican turnout. There was already a sense that Trump was taking the base for granted, and leaving the SCOTUS open until after the election might have been perceived as a deliberate tactic, saying "vote for me, or a Democrat is going to fill that seat instead..." Or maybe McConnell had repented and taken to heart the Democrats' assertions that it's 100% on the President and the Senate should just shut up and do what he says.

Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Reply to message
No Fucks Left to Give Joe tosses Hunter a blanket pardon - 02/12/2024 09:23:33 PM 635 Views
I think if he hadn't said he wouldn't pardon his son, then this would be a non-issue. - 03/12/2024 12:53:15 PM 436 Views
I don't agree with that - it would've been a serious issue still. - 03/12/2024 05:56:18 PM 368 Views
How about this? - 04/12/2024 03:43:52 AM 350 Views
Fully agree. *NM* - 04/12/2024 06:40:15 AM 166 Views
I don't believe he'd been sentenced for those crimes, yet, had he? - 04/12/2024 07:14:04 AM 369 Views
Per 'old news', his sentencing dates were Dec 12 for the gun charge and 16 for tax evasion - 04/12/2024 01:30:11 PM 357 Views
In that case, yes, your solution is a good one. - 04/12/2024 03:58:32 PM 382 Views
Trump was already going to pardon all the J6 defendants, though. - 04/12/2024 07:18:56 AM 380 Views
Re: Trump was already going to pardon all the J6 defendants, though. - 04/12/2024 02:07:41 PM 392 Views
Ugh, I hate this 'they're all the same' rhetoric. - 04/12/2024 09:22:38 PM 414 Views
I respectfully disagree. - 04/12/2024 11:09:07 PM 319 Views
Seems like we're kind of talking past each other here. - 05/12/2024 11:39:02 PM 366 Views
Trump had quite a few successes in his first term - 06/12/2024 02:45:32 PM 443 Views
You mean his administration and Congress had those successes. - 06/12/2024 10:12:25 PM 379 Views
No, I mean him. *NM* - 07/12/2024 12:38:27 AM 262 Views
Okay, then I guess we're not debating it, as you like. *NM* - 07/12/2024 08:54:03 AM 222 Views
The achievements of the administration are attributed to the President. - 08/12/2024 10:50:43 AM 428 Views
Some people also think the earth is flat. - 08/12/2024 06:29:37 PM 371 Views
Le sigh - 08/12/2024 09:03:01 PM 420 Views
Make up your mind already. - 08/12/2024 10:30:11 PM 387 Views
I mostly agree, with one giant caveat - 05/12/2024 02:56:02 PM 424 Views
Re: I mostly agree, with one giant caveat - 05/12/2024 03:49:00 PM 330 Views
I take a bit of umbrage at that assignment personally - 06/12/2024 12:37:40 AM 414 Views
We've been over this - some of this is true, some is, at a minimum, not proven that I ever saw. - 05/12/2024 11:18:24 PM 336 Views
I know it was factually true - 06/12/2024 12:46:44 AM 444 Views
Sounds like you need to become a whistleblower and go talk to the FBI yourself, then? - 06/12/2024 11:37:00 AM 347 Views
Typically, whistle blower and attorney client privilege are not viewed as compatible. - 06/12/2024 03:57:12 PM 326 Views
I have a clearance - 06/12/2024 05:01:07 PM 379 Views
Re: I have a clearance - 06/12/2024 08:08:50 PM 356 Views
Secret evidence doesn't have to be believed - 07/12/2024 09:31:10 PM 366 Views
Re: Secret evidence doesn't have to be believed - 08/12/2024 03:46:54 PM 362 Views
Seriously? - 06/12/2024 10:28:07 PM 429 Views
Re: Seriously? - 06/12/2024 11:33:59 PM 449 Views
Did you even read that earlier post? - 07/12/2024 08:53:15 AM 419 Views
I can't believe I'm siding with Tom here - 07/12/2024 01:50:15 AM 359 Views
I guess you kinda have to with your profession. - 07/12/2024 07:46:01 PM 381 Views
Re: I guess you kinda have to with your profession. - 07/12/2024 08:07:28 PM 356 Views
See my other reply above then. *NM* - 07/12/2024 09:43:37 PM 222 Views
You're CLEARLY a Harris plant - 06/12/2024 01:07:07 AM 366 Views
Hah, you got me! - 06/12/2024 11:49:19 AM 351 Views
Re: Hah, you got me! - 07/12/2024 04:52:06 AM 348 Views
It's true that both parties have contributed to the decline of political norms/courtesies, yes. - 07/12/2024 09:42:18 PM 428 Views
Re: It's true that both parties have contributed to the decline of political norms/courtesies, yes. - 10/12/2024 11:18:52 AM 363 Views
I'd be hesitant to link Biden with the Democrats anymore - 06/12/2024 01:24:44 AM 376 Views
Re: I'd be hesitant to link Biden with the Democrats anymore - 06/12/2024 01:47:08 AM 432 Views

Reply to Message