Sounds like you need to become a whistleblower and go talk to the FBI yourself, then?
Legolas Send a noteboard - 06/12/2024 11:37:00 AM
View original postI can't say how I know due to attorney-client privilege, but I know that Joe Biden took money from Burisma personally. They'll never actually find the real transfers for a lot of reasons. The "10% for the big guy" might be the closest we get in open source documents.
If you have such information, why aren't you telling that to law enforcement instead of on a random message board read by about 10 people?
View original postAs for Shokin, the EU wasn't investigating him. It was only after Polish ex-president Alexander Kwasniewski pushed them that they and the IMF "agreed" with Ukraine liaison Joe Biden. Kwasniewski was on the board of Burisma, too. Funny, that.
So if I understand it right, you expect me to believe all of the following:
- Contrary to what the US, EU, IMF and Ukrainian parliament all stated, and despite having no tangible results to show for it, Shokin was actually achieving a lot during his brief term in office and scaring Burisma so much that they were willing to spend huge sums on getting him fired and replaced by someone else.
- When British law enforcement opened its own investigation into Burisma's owner at that time and got no cooperation whatsoever from Shokin's office, there was some sort of brilliant master plan behind that, instead of the obvious explanation of Shokin dragging his feet on investigating Burisma.
- Despite all evidence to the contrary before, during and after his term in office, Shokin is not in fact personally corrupt, or alternatively is corrupt but still remains a more credible witness about the reason for his firing than, well, pretty much everybody else.
- Biden and Kwasniewski had enough power to singlehandedly determine the position of the US, EU and IMF about Shokin, or bribed enough people to make that happen
- The US establishment in general is so corrupt and its law enforcement so supremely useless that Joe Biden felt confident enough to loudly boast about his actions, despite his corrupt reasons for them
I'm sure you can see why I would need to see a LOT of hard evidence before believing any of those things, never mind all of them.
View original postOh, and let's not forget what the Ukrainian parliament did - they couldn't find a reputable attorney willing to act as chief prosecutor and not investigate Burisma, so they CHANGED THE UKRAINIAN LAW ON THE CHIEF PROSECUTOR TO REMOVE THE REQUIREMENT THAT HE HAVE ANY LEGAL BACKGROUND WHATSOEVER, in an emergency session, to find a hack willing to play along with Biden's demand.
I don't know about this part, but I'm sure you can see why I don't consider it relevant until I see reason to believe that Shokin was actually making more progress on the Burisma case than the people who came after him.
View original postThere aren't any conspiracy theories there. It's all pretty open and brazen. Kwasniewski lobbied the EU and IMF, Biden lobbied the US, suddenly everyone speaks "in unison" and then suddenly Ukraine has to replace him with a political hack with no legal experience or law degree.
Apart from your claim to have personal knowledge based on attorney-client privilege, which obviously I have no way of verifying either way, most of the rest of what you say is pure conspiracy theory - claiming that the established facts as reported by the media are completely wrong and providing alternative explanations without any actual proof.
No Fucks Left to Give Joe tosses Hunter a blanket pardon
02/12/2024 09:23:33 PM
- 439 Views
I think if he hadn't said he wouldn't pardon his son, then this would be a non-issue.
03/12/2024 12:53:15 PM
- 234 Views
Re: I think if he hadn't said he wouldn't pardon his son, then this would be a non-issue.
03/12/2024 01:32:17 PM
- 157 Views
I don't agree with that - it would've been a serious issue still.
03/12/2024 05:56:18 PM
- 153 Views
How about this?
04/12/2024 03:43:52 AM
- 150 Views
I don't believe he'd been sentenced for those crimes, yet, had he?
04/12/2024 07:14:04 AM
- 157 Views
Per 'old news', his sentencing dates were Dec 12 for the gun charge and 16 for tax evasion
04/12/2024 01:30:11 PM
- 149 Views
Trump was already going to pardon all the J6 defendants, though.
04/12/2024 07:18:56 AM
- 173 Views
Re: Trump was already going to pardon all the J6 defendants, though.
04/12/2024 02:07:41 PM
- 158 Views
Ugh, I hate this 'they're all the same' rhetoric.
04/12/2024 09:22:38 PM
- 220 Views
I respectfully disagree.
04/12/2024 11:09:07 PM
- 142 Views
Seems like we're kind of talking past each other here.
05/12/2024 11:39:02 PM
- 157 Views
Trump had quite a few successes in his first term
06/12/2024 02:45:32 PM
- 222 Views
You mean his administration and Congress had those successes.
06/12/2024 10:12:25 PM
- 166 Views
No, I mean him. *NM*
07/12/2024 12:38:27 AM
- 137 Views
Okay, then I guess we're not debating it, as you like. *NM*
07/12/2024 08:54:03 AM
- 128 Views
The achievements of the administration are attributed to the President.
08/12/2024 10:50:43 AM
- 219 Views
Some people also think the earth is flat.
08/12/2024 06:29:37 PM
- 192 Views
Le sigh
08/12/2024 09:03:01 PM
- 215 Views
Make up your mind already.
08/12/2024 10:30:11 PM
- 198 Views
I listed his/the administration's achievements. What is there to debate?
08/12/2024 11:03:15 PM
- 225 Views
Debate tends to involve a back and forth, not just one side stating their views.
09/12/2024 05:58:22 PM
- 210 Views

Re: You mean his administration and Congress had those successes.
09/12/2024 04:28:58 AM
- 178 Views
That, and way overpromise on what can actually be achieved by cracking down on China.
09/12/2024 05:12:49 PM
- 230 Views
Re: That, and way overpromise on what can actually be achieved by cracking down on China.
10/12/2024 06:55:27 PM
- 176 Views
Hm. It doesn't seem like we disagree that much on the 'true partnerships' then.
10/12/2024 07:52:39 PM
- 204 Views
Re: Hm. It doesn't seem like we disagree that much on the 'true partnerships' then.
10/12/2024 10:46:13 PM
- 189 Views
I see what you're saying, but I think that approach only works in the short term
10/12/2024 11:54:59 PM
- 217 Views
Re: I see what you're saying, but I think that approach only works in the short term
11/12/2024 04:11:09 AM
- 211 Views
I mostly agree, with one giant caveat
05/12/2024 02:56:02 PM
- 219 Views
We've been over this - some of this is true, some is, at a minimum, not proven that I ever saw.
05/12/2024 11:18:24 PM
- 143 Views
I know it was factually true
06/12/2024 12:46:44 AM
- 233 Views
Sounds like you need to become a whistleblower and go talk to the FBI yourself, then?
06/12/2024 11:37:00 AM
- 152 Views
Typically, whistle blower and attorney client privilege are not viewed as compatible.
06/12/2024 03:57:12 PM
- 144 Views
I have a clearance
06/12/2024 05:01:07 PM
- 150 Views
Re: I have a clearance
06/12/2024 08:08:50 PM
- 156 Views
Seriously?
06/12/2024 10:28:07 PM
- 222 Views
I can't believe I'm siding with Tom here
07/12/2024 01:50:15 AM
- 166 Views

I guess you kinda have to with your profession.
07/12/2024 07:46:01 PM
- 202 Views

You're CLEARLY a Harris plant
06/12/2024 01:07:07 AM
- 162 Views
Hah, you got me!
06/12/2024 11:49:19 AM
- 157 Views
Re: Hah, you got me!
07/12/2024 04:52:06 AM
- 146 Views
It's true that both parties have contributed to the decline of political norms/courtesies, yes.
07/12/2024 09:42:18 PM
- 214 Views
Re: It's true that both parties have contributed to the decline of political norms/courtesies, yes.
10/12/2024 11:18:52 AM
- 146 Views