Active Users:437 Time:08/09/2024 12:25:39 AM
When the NYT Editorial Board calls for the incumbent President to step down... damookster Send a noteboard - 29/06/2024 02:51:38 PM

you know the Thursday debate was an absolute disaster.


The Editorial Board
To Serve His Country, President Biden Should Leave the Race


President Biden has repeatedly and rightfully described the stakes in this November’s presidential election as nothing less than the future of American democracy.

Donald Trump has proved himself to be a significant jeopardy to that democracy — an erratic and self-interested figure unworthy of the public trust. He systematically attempted to undermine the integrity of elections. His supporters have described, publicly, a 2025 agenda that would give him the power to carry out the most extreme of his promises and threats. If he is returned to office, he has vowed to be a different kind of president, unrestrained by the checks on power built into the American political system.

Mr. Biden has said that he is the candidate with the best chance of taking on this threat of tyranny and defeating it. His argument rests largely on the fact that he beat Mr. Trump in 2020. That is no longer a sufficient rationale for why Mr. Biden should be the Democratic nominee this year.

At Thursday’s debate, the president needed to convince the American public that he was equal to the formidable demands of the office he is seeking to hold for another term. Voters, however, cannot be expected to ignore what was instead plain to see: Mr. Biden is not the man he was four years ago.

The president appeared on Thursday night as the shadow of a great public servant. He struggled to explain what he would accomplish in a second term. He struggled to respond to Mr. Trump’s provocations. He struggled to hold Mr. Trump accountable for his lies, his failures and his chilling plans. More than once, he struggled to make it to the end of a sentence.

Mr. Biden has been an admirable president. Under his leadership, the nation has prospered and begun to address a range of long-term challenges, and the wounds ripped open by Mr. Trump have begun to heal. But the greatest public service Mr. Biden can now perform is to announce that he will not continue to run for re-election.

As it stands, the president is engaged in a reckless gamble. There are Democratic leaders better equipped to present clear, compelling and energetic alternatives to a second Trump presidency. There is no reason for the party to risk the stability and security of the country by forcing voters to choose between Mr. Trump’s deficiencies and those of Mr. Biden. It’s too big a bet to simply hope Americans will overlook or discount Mr. Biden’s age and infirmity that they see with their own eyes.

If the race comes down to a choice between Mr. Trump and Mr. Biden, the sitting president would be this board’s unequivocal pick. That is how much of a danger Mr. Trump poses. But given that very danger, the stakes for the country and the uneven abilities of Mr. Biden, the United States needs a stronger opponent to the presumptive Republican nominee. To make a call for a new Democratic nominee this late in a campaign is a decision not taken lightly, but it reflects the scale and seriousness of Mr. Trump’s challenge to the values and institutions of this country and the inadequacy of Mr. Biden to confront him.

Ending his candidacy would be against all of Mr. Biden’s personal and political instincts. He has picked himself up from tragedies and setbacks in the past and clearly believes he can do so again. Supporters of the president are already explaining away Thursday’s debate as one data point compared with three years of accomplishments. But the president’s performance cannot be written off as a bad night or blamed on a supposed cold, because it affirmed concerns that have been mounting for months or even years. Even when Mr. Biden tried to lay out his policy proposals, he stumbled. It cannot be outweighed by other public appearances because he has limited and carefully controlled his public appearances.

It should be remembered that Mr. Biden challenged Mr. Trump to this verbal duel. He set the rules, and he insisted on a date months earlier than any previous general election debate. He understood that he needed to address longstanding public concerns about his mental acuity and that he needed to do so as soon as possible.

The truth Mr. Biden needs to confront now is that he failed his own test.

In polls and interviews, voters say they are seeking fresh voices to take on Mr. Trump. And the consolation for Mr. Biden and his supporters is that there is still time to rally behind a different candidate. While Americans are conditioned to the long slog of multiyear presidential elections, in many democracies, campaigns are staged in the space of a few months.

It is a tragedy that Republicans themselves are not engaged in deeper soul-searching after Thursday’s debate. Mr. Trump’s own performance ought to be regarded as disqualifying. He lied brazenly and repeatedly about his own actions, his record as president and his opponent. He described plans that would harm the American economy, undermine civil liberties and fray America’s relationships with other nations. He refused to promise that he would accept defeat, returning instead to the kind of rhetoric that incited the Jan. 6 attack on Congress.

The Republican Party, however, has been co-opted by Mr. Trump’s ambitions. The burden rests on the Democratic Party to put the interests of the nation above the ambitions of a single man.

Democrats who have deferred to Mr. Biden must now find the courage to speak plain truths to the party’s leader. The confidants and aides who have encouraged the president’s candidacy and who sheltered him from unscripted appearances in public should recognize the damage to Mr. Biden’s standing and the unlikelihood that he can repair it.

Mr. Biden answered an urgent question on Thursday night. It was not the answer that he and his supporters were hoping for. But if the risk of a second Trump term is as great as he says it is — and we agree with him that the danger is enormous — then his dedication to this country leaves him and his party only one choice.

The clearest path for Democrats to defeat a candidate defined by his lies is to deal truthfully with the American public: acknowledge that Mr. Biden can’t continue his race, and create a process to select someone more capable to stand in his place to defeat Mr. Trump in November.

It is the best chance to protect the soul of the nation — the cause that drew Mr. Biden to run for the presidency in 2019 — from the malign warping of Mr. Trump. And it is the best service that Mr. Biden can provide to a country that he has nobly served for so long.

Mook

*MySmiley*



"Bustin' makes me feel good!"

Ghostbusters, by Ray Parker Jr.
This message last edited by damookster on 29/06/2024 at 02:52:33 PM
Reply to message
When the NYT Editorial Board calls for the incumbent President to step down... - 29/06/2024 02:51:38 PM 387 Views
Yeah, pretty crazy stuff... - 30/06/2024 12:53:46 AM 60 Views
Not competent to run for president - 30/06/2024 03:46:13 AM 55 Views
Was Biden ever really competent, though? - 30/06/2024 01:33:00 PM 58 Views
Re: Was Biden ever really competent, though? - 01/07/2024 04:48:04 PM 49 Views
the slip - 30/06/2024 11:06:40 PM 56 Views
Now the Biden campaign is calling the people who are sounding these alarms 'bedwetters' - 01/07/2024 05:16:12 PM 53 Views
That term has been used for months if not years, they didn't just make it up... - 01/07/2024 11:52:54 PM 54 Views
How can you say this with a straight face? - 04/07/2024 03:24:48 PM 55 Views
Very easily, I assure you - though there's a difference between 'did' (past) and 'would' (future) - 04/07/2024 07:23:44 PM 63 Views
Re: Very easily, I assure you - 08/07/2024 05:35:19 PM 48 Views
I'm not fool enough to think I can go toe to toe with you on the Russian-American relationship. - 08/07/2024 09:33:57 PM 50 Views
Security doesn't exist in a vacuum - 09/07/2024 02:42:36 AM 60 Views
Sure, but Russia is a threat to others far more than others threaten it. - 10/07/2024 09:45:58 PM 43 Views
That's actually empirically not true - 11/07/2024 02:35:23 PM 52 Views
You're right that I was thinking of Eastern Europe re: NATO, not Central Asia or the Caucasus. - 12/07/2024 04:07:43 PM 41 Views
Let's not fool ourselves about Montenegro and Macedonia - 15/07/2024 03:41:14 PM 57 Views
A smarter NATO - 16/07/2024 11:35:46 AM 44 Views
I agree with most of this. - 16/07/2024 06:14:07 PM 37 Views
I don't think there's any issue to Ukraine joining the EU - 16/07/2024 06:42:27 PM 39 Views
I agree with this 100% - 16/07/2024 06:41:20 PM 41 Views
Sure, for those two it was clearly more the political factors. For others not, it varied. - 16/07/2024 06:02:47 PM 37 Views
You sound so naive there - 16/07/2024 06:57:38 PM 41 Views
It was a bad debate, but I can't imagine a lot of people are actually swayed by it. - 07/07/2024 01:56:44 AM 53 Views
I'm centrist enough to consider voting Red over voting Blue this year due to - 08/07/2024 10:51:46 AM 50 Views
I've voted Libertarian for President the last two times - 08/07/2024 02:55:35 PM 52 Views
You make a good point about the popular vote. - 08/07/2024 03:01:42 PM 48 Views
Re: You make a good point about the popular vote. - 08/07/2024 03:26:20 PM 48 Views
This is the part that bothers me as well. - 08/07/2024 03:46:15 PM 49 Views
Re: This is the part that bothers me as well. - 08/07/2024 04:00:14 PM 47 Views
Re: I've voted Libertarian for President the last two times - 08/07/2024 03:23:12 PM 40 Views
Your analogy is pretty poor honestly. - 08/07/2024 04:54:45 PM 52 Views
You also are trying to redefine how the score is kept - 08/07/2024 05:44:02 PM 50 Views
Sure, that's how it has always been - doesn't mean it's fair or that the popular vote is irrelevant. - 08/07/2024 08:06:01 PM 45 Views
If popular votes were paramount then Rassemblement National - 08/07/2024 08:29:13 PM 49 Views
FPTP sucks in general, yes, whether in the US, in France, or elsewhere. - 08/07/2024 09:53:57 PM 45 Views
Re: FPTP sucks in general, yes, whether in the US, in France, or elsewhere. - 08/07/2024 10:34:12 PM 45 Views
To be clear I didn't say it should be eliminated entirely, but as for what would happen if it was... - 08/07/2024 10:50:57 PM 45 Views
You're wrong. - 09/07/2024 01:19:30 AM 46 Views
You're still looking at it from the current two-party system framework. - 09/07/2024 07:17:39 AM 47 Views
Re: You're still looking at it from the current two-party system framework. - 09/07/2024 01:45:33 PM 44 Views
It doesn't necessarily require amending the constitution. - 10/07/2024 03:03:19 AM 45 Views
Re: It doesn't necessarily require amending the constitution. - 10/07/2024 04:13:02 PM 39 Views
I meant California - 08/07/2024 08:43:35 PM 49 Views
I'm concerned about a lot of things. - 09/07/2024 04:41:03 AM 50 Views
From a left of center/liberalish substack author about the Republican national platform - 09/07/2024 11:15:00 AM 47 Views
It's an interesting read. - 09/07/2024 09:46:47 PM 46 Views
Trump is a Trumpist. Republicans are Republicans. - 10/07/2024 11:09:05 AM 45 Views
I think a significant wing of the party has become Trumpist. - 10/07/2024 02:23:45 PM 42 Views
The most interesting thing to me, so far, about this debate - 08/07/2024 10:54:50 AM 51 Views
Re: The most interesting thing to me, so far, about this debate - 08/07/2024 02:58:44 PM 48 Views
Re: The most interesting thing to me, so far, about this debate - 08/07/2024 03:20:14 PM 53 Views

Reply to Message