Active Users:1126 Time:22/11/2024 08:09:05 PM
I've long been confused by the 'literally' debate. Legolas Send a noteboard - 12/04/2024 09:32:29 PM

View original postYes, devolving language bothers me in certain instances. That some dictionaries have given up and begun including "irregardless" infuriates me. Also, as mentioned before, I call bullshit on the so called explanation for misusing literally as an intentional form of hyperbole. Bah. Someone got called out for it and came up with that rather than simply admitting they made an error.

If you're annoyed by people going way overboard with the hyperbole in their speech lately, okay, I get that. But I don't get why 'literally' is any worse than so many other offenders in that regard (I almost wrote 'than the million other offenders in that regard ' ).

And yes, I take it for granted that hyperbole is the explanation - what other possible explanation is there? Someone mistakenly using 'literally' instead of 'figuratively' - why would they ever have wanted to use 'figuratively' in such a sentence? It's clear to all parties involved that the statement made is, in fact, figurative and not literally true (except maybe if you're talking to small children or neurodiverse people who struggle to understand figurative speech), there is no reason to add that except for purposes of hyperbole. And the usage arose, not coincidentally, at the same time that hyperbole became more popular in all sorts of other ways too.

As for 'umbraphile', I wasn't familiar with the word, but then again the most recent big eclipse hype in this part of Europe was 25 years ago. So can't say I've thought about it before now - but as you, Greg and Joe have pointed out, languages evolve and all sorts of words or phrases that we now use without thinking were once considered incorrect or at least frowned upon, or have illogical etymologies.

This message last edited by Legolas on 12/04/2024 at 09:32:40 PM
Reply to message
A gift for any umbraphiles among us - 06/04/2024 02:21:05 PM 305 Views
Umbraphile isn't a word - 08/04/2024 05:12:05 AM 119 Views
It is a word. It exists. - 08/04/2024 02:31:49 PM 101 Views
No it doesn't. Any retard can pretend a word exists but that doesn't make it so. *NM* - 08/04/2024 05:26:30 PM 52 Views
It does if enough people use it. That's how new words get created and enter a language. - 08/04/2024 05:32:46 PM 94 Views
Not exactly - 09/04/2024 01:30:30 AM 97 Views
Honey, the speakers of our language don't care about the "rules". - 09/04/2024 07:28:30 AM 123 Views
Bah - 09/04/2024 09:29:40 PM 119 Views
No, you're still wrong - 12/04/2024 12:56:49 AM 89 Views
I can see your recalcitrance won't be alleviated by logic or history. - 12/04/2024 11:49:44 AM 109 Views
You're the one ignoring logic and history - have some standards, man! - 12/04/2024 02:13:19 PM 101 Views
Can I have it both ways? - 12/04/2024 06:04:23 PM 98 Views
I've long been confused by the 'literally' debate. - 12/04/2024 09:32:29 PM 95 Views
I think perhaps it comes down to intent and knowledge. - 12/04/2024 10:42:09 PM 110 Views
I'm afraid I have to agree with Joe. - 12/04/2024 11:28:44 PM 107 Views
See my reply to Joe above, but regarding your specific example... - 13/04/2024 12:55:11 PM 96 Views
Yes you can have it both ways - 12/04/2024 11:16:55 PM 82 Views
One thing I won’t miss around here are the holier-than-thou pseudo-intellectuals. - 09/04/2024 08:11:57 PM 134 Views
You did *NM* - 10/04/2024 01:56:14 AM 60 Views

Reply to Message