Before modification by Roland00 at 26/04/2022 07:05:02 PM
A rollback of Planned Parenthood v. Casey (or Roe, for that matter) wouldn't be denying women a fundamental right, it would be affirming no such right ever existed in the Constitution (which of course, it did not).
That is a perverts motte and bailey argument.
Nobody cares besides 15 to 20% of the population on this argument you just made. Furthermore it was not the first instinct of said 20% but they had to be sold into it, convinced into it via Repetition. And that Repetition may convince some of the population but it has a limited effect and will not convince the majority of people.
Just say the thing you care about, what is the real organizing principle here. The first principle not the second.
( if it was the real first principle there would be dozens of other court cases you would be talking about instead of Roe or Casey. )
Edit: Repetition not Reputation, but that is here too for Authority and Reputation is part of how this argument is made. People in Authority say this is the correct and valid arguement.