Before modification by Roland00 at 26/04/2022 07:04:30 PM
A rollback of Planned Parenthood v. Casey (or Roe, for that matter) wouldn't be denying women a fundamental right, it would be affirming no such right ever existed in the Constitution (which of course, it did not).
That is a perverts motte and bailey argument.
Nobody cares besides 15 to 20% of the population on this argument you just made. Furthermore it was not the first instinct of said 20% but they had to be sold into it, convinced into it via reputation. And that reputation may convince some of the population but it has a limited effect and will not convince the majority of people.
Just say the thing you care about, what is the real organizing principle here. The first principle not the second.
( if it was the real first principle there would be dozens of other court cases you would be talking about instead of Roe or Casey. )