Active Users:766 Time:22/02/2025 08:31:32 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I like how you don't even attempt to have a reasonable discussion The Shrike Send a noteboard - 16/02/2022 03:01:57 PM

View original post
I remember a time when some board members here used to ramble on about judicial activism, and sticking to the text of the Constitution.

After the recent order from the Supreme Court, would these folks like to prate on a little more about these values? Or is the hypocrisy too much even for them to bear?


The contempt and disdain in your post is lovely to watch. Your usage of the verb 'prate' for instance. Magnificent.

Please reply snidely to me. I need a second course.

Reply to message
Judicial activism fionwe1987 - 09/02/2022 09:33:40 PM 653 Views
Can you reference Jeordam - 09/02/2022 09:38:55 PM 359 Views
Agrees with Jeo *NM* Roland00 - 09/02/2022 09:44:46 PM 164 Views
Here fionwe1987 - 09/02/2022 11:27:15 PM 333 Views
So I can't read it Jeordam - 09/02/2022 11:52:04 PM 321 Views
Here's the opinion itself Legolas - 10/02/2022 08:51:27 AM 379 Views
I don't understand that.. fionwe1987 - 12/02/2022 06:53:06 PM 281 Views
we actually agree on this damookster - 12/02/2022 07:04:56 PM 300 Views
Not just in 2022, though fionwe1987 - 12/02/2022 07:10:48 PM 294 Views
Having grown up watching Cronkite, Huntley-Brinkley I concur with your point. damookster - 12/02/2022 07:46:26 PM 298 Views
Yep *NM* fionwe1987 - 12/02/2022 08:03:19 PM 160 Views
well I feel stupid damookster - 10/02/2022 04:08:10 AM 305 Views
You're referring to an entirely different case... see my reply to Jeo for the details on this one. Legolas - 10/02/2022 09:03:40 AM 274 Views
Oops damookster - 10/02/2022 03:32:33 PM 318 Views
Purpose achieved! I win again! *NM* fionwe1987 - 12/02/2022 06:54:36 PM 152 Views
So what's your point about activism? Cannoli - 11/02/2022 10:54:21 AM 338 Views
Hilarious that *you* would be whining about judicial activism. Shameless. *NM* TyrReborn - 12/02/2022 06:06:12 PM 164 Views
I have no issue with judicial activism, dolt. fionwe1987 - 12/02/2022 07:06:49 PM 308 Views
Not your best analogy. damookster - 12/02/2022 08:47:04 PM 291 Views
Actually, I consider it one of my best analogies. fionwe1987 - 12/02/2022 09:19:40 PM 277 Views
you've made better damookster - 12/02/2022 10:23:39 PM 308 Views
I dunno fionwe1987 - 12/02/2022 10:34:57 PM 285 Views
why do you think this is an example of judicial activism? random thoughts - 14/02/2022 09:01:40 PM 372 Views
I like how you don't even attempt to have a reasonable discussion The Shrike - 16/02/2022 03:01:57 PM 317 Views
This amused me. *NM* damookster - 16/02/2022 03:36:31 PM 155 Views
As it should The Shrike - 16/02/2022 05:43:28 PM 277 Views
I'm sure you do fionwe1987 - 16/02/2022 04:21:09 PM 295 Views
Your point is to troll The Shrike - 16/02/2022 05:41:26 PM 313 Views
I'm truly devastated... fionwe1987 - 17/02/2022 06:00:01 AM 291 Views
Will this continue? damookster - 17/02/2022 04:07:11 PM 301 Views
No The Shrike - 17/02/2022 07:11:12 PM 294 Views
Popcorn is always required! fionwe1987 - 18/02/2022 03:14:01 PM 323 Views
Nobody ever offers to do a grilling, it is always popcorn. Roland00 - 18/02/2022 06:51:17 PM 270 Views
One does not have a rational discussion if something is fundamentally "perverse" Roland00 - 17/02/2022 12:21:32 AM 318 Views
I'm glad you can't resist me The Shrike - 17/02/2022 07:09:43 PM 279 Views
Are you doing “well” in this dread of Winter? Roland00 - 17/02/2022 08:05:04 PM 306 Views
Re: Judicial activism Duke - 19/05/2022 11:16:24 PM 321 Views
He just doesn't understand what judicial activism means. Dragonsoul - 20/05/2022 03:55:24 PM 269 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes