Active Users:345 Time:21/04/2025 08:40:39 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I like how you don't even attempt to have a reasonable discussion The Shrike Send a noteboard - 16/02/2022 03:01:57 PM

View original post
I remember a time when some board members here used to ramble on about judicial activism, and sticking to the text of the Constitution.

After the recent order from the Supreme Court, would these folks like to prate on a little more about these values? Or is the hypocrisy too much even for them to bear?


The contempt and disdain in your post is lovely to watch. Your usage of the verb 'prate' for instance. Magnificent.

Please reply snidely to me. I need a second course.

Reply to message
Judicial activism fionwe1987 - 09/02/2022 09:33:40 PM 673 Views
Can you reference Jeordam - 09/02/2022 09:38:55 PM 376 Views
Agrees with Jeo *NM* Roland00 - 09/02/2022 09:44:46 PM 175 Views
Here fionwe1987 - 09/02/2022 11:27:15 PM 353 Views
So I can't read it Jeordam - 09/02/2022 11:52:04 PM 339 Views
Here's the opinion itself Legolas - 10/02/2022 08:51:27 AM 400 Views
I don't understand that.. fionwe1987 - 12/02/2022 06:53:06 PM 301 Views
we actually agree on this damookster - 12/02/2022 07:04:56 PM 316 Views
Not just in 2022, though fionwe1987 - 12/02/2022 07:10:48 PM 312 Views
Having grown up watching Cronkite, Huntley-Brinkley I concur with your point. damookster - 12/02/2022 07:46:26 PM 319 Views
Yep *NM* fionwe1987 - 12/02/2022 08:03:19 PM 173 Views
well I feel stupid damookster - 10/02/2022 04:08:10 AM 322 Views
You're referring to an entirely different case... see my reply to Jeo for the details on this one. Legolas - 10/02/2022 09:03:40 AM 292 Views
Oops damookster - 10/02/2022 03:32:33 PM 339 Views
Purpose achieved! I win again! *NM* fionwe1987 - 12/02/2022 06:54:36 PM 161 Views
So what's your point about activism? Cannoli - 11/02/2022 10:54:21 AM 356 Views
Hilarious that *you* would be whining about judicial activism. Shameless. *NM* TyrReborn - 12/02/2022 06:06:12 PM 175 Views
I have no issue with judicial activism, dolt. fionwe1987 - 12/02/2022 07:06:49 PM 325 Views
Not your best analogy. damookster - 12/02/2022 08:47:04 PM 310 Views
Actually, I consider it one of my best analogies. fionwe1987 - 12/02/2022 09:19:40 PM 294 Views
you've made better damookster - 12/02/2022 10:23:39 PM 328 Views
I dunno fionwe1987 - 12/02/2022 10:34:57 PM 303 Views
why do you think this is an example of judicial activism? random thoughts - 14/02/2022 09:01:40 PM 398 Views
I like how you don't even attempt to have a reasonable discussion The Shrike - 16/02/2022 03:01:57 PM 337 Views
This amused me. *NM* damookster - 16/02/2022 03:36:31 PM 166 Views
As it should The Shrike - 16/02/2022 05:43:28 PM 314 Views
I'm sure you do fionwe1987 - 16/02/2022 04:21:09 PM 315 Views
Your point is to troll The Shrike - 16/02/2022 05:41:26 PM 333 Views
I'm truly devastated... fionwe1987 - 17/02/2022 06:00:01 AM 309 Views
Will this continue? damookster - 17/02/2022 04:07:11 PM 321 Views
No The Shrike - 17/02/2022 07:11:12 PM 312 Views
Popcorn is always required! fionwe1987 - 18/02/2022 03:14:01 PM 345 Views
Nobody ever offers to do a grilling, it is always popcorn. Roland00 - 18/02/2022 06:51:17 PM 290 Views
One does not have a rational discussion if something is fundamentally "perverse" Roland00 - 17/02/2022 12:21:32 AM 339 Views
I'm glad you can't resist me The Shrike - 17/02/2022 07:09:43 PM 297 Views
Are you doing “well” in this dread of Winter? Roland00 - 17/02/2022 08:05:04 PM 323 Views
Re: Judicial activism Duke - 19/05/2022 11:16:24 PM 347 Views
He just doesn't understand what judicial activism means. Dragonsoul - 20/05/2022 03:55:24 PM 290 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes