Active Users:722 Time:22/02/2025 08:30:11 PM
Not just in 2022, though fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 12/02/2022 07:10:48 PM

View original post
In 2022, all news articles are opinion pieces, regardless of the source.

Walter Cronkite was an opinion journalist. He chose what to report on, and what not to report on. And any number of issues and injustices were ignored by him, not even out of malice or indifference, necessarily. Just lack of awareness, which every human suffers from, is enough to make the idea of "objective" news nonsensical.

News is, and always will be, a two way street. Yes, the journalist must use the utmost caution to be factual and at least acknowledge other perspectives, if only to poke holes in them. But the news consumer must also do their due diligence. Believe no one person fully, diversify your sources, and spend the time to get as full a picture as possible

Refusing to spend that time and simply blaming the media is a chickenish way to absolve oneself of responsibility.

Reply to message
Judicial activism - 09/02/2022 09:33:40 PM 653 Views
Can you reference - 09/02/2022 09:38:55 PM 359 Views
Agrees with Jeo *NM* - 09/02/2022 09:44:46 PM 164 Views
Here - 09/02/2022 11:27:15 PM 333 Views
So I can't read it - 09/02/2022 11:52:04 PM 321 Views
Here's the opinion itself - 10/02/2022 08:51:27 AM 379 Views
I don't understand that.. - 12/02/2022 06:53:06 PM 281 Views
we actually agree on this - 12/02/2022 07:04:56 PM 300 Views
Not just in 2022, though - 12/02/2022 07:10:48 PM 294 Views
Having grown up watching Cronkite, Huntley-Brinkley I concur with your point. - 12/02/2022 07:46:26 PM 298 Views
Yep *NM* - 12/02/2022 08:03:19 PM 160 Views
well I feel stupid - 10/02/2022 04:08:10 AM 305 Views
You're referring to an entirely different case... see my reply to Jeo for the details on this one. - 10/02/2022 09:03:40 AM 274 Views
Oops - 10/02/2022 03:32:33 PM 318 Views
Purpose achieved! I win again! *NM* - 12/02/2022 06:54:36 PM 152 Views
So what's your point about activism? - 11/02/2022 10:54:21 AM 338 Views
Hilarious that *you* would be whining about judicial activism. Shameless. *NM* - 12/02/2022 06:06:12 PM 164 Views
I have no issue with judicial activism, dolt. - 12/02/2022 07:06:49 PM 308 Views
Not your best analogy. - 12/02/2022 08:47:04 PM 291 Views
Actually, I consider it one of my best analogies. - 12/02/2022 09:19:40 PM 276 Views
you've made better - 12/02/2022 10:23:39 PM 308 Views
I dunno - 12/02/2022 10:34:57 PM 285 Views
why do you think this is an example of judicial activism? - 14/02/2022 09:01:40 PM 372 Views
I like how you don't even attempt to have a reasonable discussion - 16/02/2022 03:01:57 PM 316 Views
This amused me. *NM* - 16/02/2022 03:36:31 PM 155 Views
As it should - 16/02/2022 05:43:28 PM 277 Views
I'm sure you do - 16/02/2022 04:21:09 PM 295 Views
Your point is to troll - 16/02/2022 05:41:26 PM 313 Views
I'm truly devastated... - 17/02/2022 06:00:01 AM 291 Views
Will this continue? - 17/02/2022 04:07:11 PM 301 Views
No - 17/02/2022 07:11:12 PM 294 Views
Popcorn is always required! - 18/02/2022 03:14:01 PM 323 Views
Nobody ever offers to do a grilling, it is always popcorn. - 18/02/2022 06:51:17 PM 270 Views
One does not have a rational discussion if something is fundamentally "perverse" - 17/02/2022 12:21:32 AM 318 Views
I'm glad you can't resist me - 17/02/2022 07:09:43 PM 279 Views
Are you doing “well” in this dread of Winter? - 17/02/2022 08:05:04 PM 306 Views
Re: Judicial activism - 19/05/2022 11:16:24 PM 321 Views
He just doesn't understand what judicial activism means. - 20/05/2022 03:55:24 PM 269 Views

Reply to Message