Active Users:495 Time:03/03/2026 10:57:22 AM
Not just in 2022, though fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 12/02/2022 07:10:48 PM

View original post
In 2022, all news articles are opinion pieces, regardless of the source.

Walter Cronkite was an opinion journalist. He chose what to report on, and what not to report on. And any number of issues and injustices were ignored by him, not even out of malice or indifference, necessarily. Just lack of awareness, which every human suffers from, is enough to make the idea of "objective" news nonsensical.

News is, and always will be, a two way street. Yes, the journalist must use the utmost caution to be factual and at least acknowledge other perspectives, if only to poke holes in them. But the news consumer must also do their due diligence. Believe no one person fully, diversify your sources, and spend the time to get as full a picture as possible

Refusing to spend that time and simply blaming the media is a chickenish way to absolve oneself of responsibility.

Reply to message
Judicial activism - 09/02/2022 09:33:40 PM 944 Views
Can you reference - 09/02/2022 09:38:55 PM 652 Views
Agrees with Jeo *NM* - 09/02/2022 09:44:46 PM 347 Views
Here - 09/02/2022 11:27:15 PM 623 Views
So I can't read it - 09/02/2022 11:52:04 PM 608 Views
Here's the opinion itself - 10/02/2022 08:51:27 AM 698 Views
I don't understand that.. - 12/02/2022 06:53:06 PM 578 Views
we actually agree on this - 12/02/2022 07:04:56 PM 574 Views
Not just in 2022, though - 12/02/2022 07:10:48 PM 602 Views
Having grown up watching Cronkite, Huntley-Brinkley I concur with your point. - 12/02/2022 07:46:26 PM 616 Views
Yep *NM* - 12/02/2022 08:03:19 PM 338 Views
well I feel stupid - 10/02/2022 04:08:10 AM 603 Views
You're referring to an entirely different case... see my reply to Jeo for the details on this one. - 10/02/2022 09:03:40 AM 633 Views
Oops - 10/02/2022 03:32:33 PM 602 Views
Purpose achieved! I win again! *NM* - 12/02/2022 06:54:36 PM 324 Views
So what's your point about activism? - 11/02/2022 10:54:21 AM 642 Views
Hilarious that *you* would be whining about judicial activism. Shameless. *NM* - 12/02/2022 06:06:12 PM 341 Views
I have no issue with judicial activism, dolt. - 12/02/2022 07:06:49 PM 605 Views
Not your best analogy. - 12/02/2022 08:47:04 PM 591 Views
Actually, I consider it one of my best analogies. - 12/02/2022 09:19:40 PM 553 Views
you've made better - 12/02/2022 10:23:39 PM 593 Views
I dunno - 12/02/2022 10:34:57 PM 574 Views
why do you think this is an example of judicial activism? - 14/02/2022 09:01:40 PM 821 Views
I like how you don't even attempt to have a reasonable discussion - 16/02/2022 03:01:57 PM 593 Views
This amused me. *NM* - 16/02/2022 03:36:31 PM 330 Views
As it should - 16/02/2022 05:43:28 PM 610 Views
I'm sure you do - 16/02/2022 04:21:09 PM 566 Views
Your point is to troll - 16/02/2022 05:41:26 PM 619 Views
I'm truly devastated... - 17/02/2022 06:00:01 AM 580 Views
Will this continue? - 17/02/2022 04:07:11 PM 580 Views
No - 17/02/2022 07:11:12 PM 642 Views
Popcorn is always required! - 18/02/2022 03:14:01 PM 619 Views
Nobody ever offers to do a grilling, it is always popcorn. - 18/02/2022 06:51:17 PM 567 Views
One does not have a rational discussion if something is fundamentally "perverse" - 17/02/2022 12:21:32 AM 622 Views
I'm glad you can't resist me - 17/02/2022 07:09:43 PM 567 Views
Are you doing “well” in this dread of Winter? - 17/02/2022 08:05:04 PM 596 Views
Re: Judicial activism - 19/05/2022 11:16:24 PM 740 Views
He just doesn't understand what judicial activism means. - 20/05/2022 03:55:24 PM 559 Views

Reply to Message