Hilarious that *you* would be whining about judicial activism. Shameless. *NM*
TyrReborn Send a noteboard - 12/02/2022 06:06:12 PM
View original post
I remember a time when some board members here used to ramble on about judicial activism, and sticking to the text of the Constitution.
I remember a time when some board members here used to ramble on about judicial activism, and sticking to the text of the Constitution.
After the recent order from the Supreme Court, would these folks like to prate on a little more about these values? Or is the hypocrisy too much even for them to bear?
Judicial activism
09/02/2022 09:33:40 PM
- 673 Views
Can you reference
09/02/2022 09:38:55 PM
- 375 Views
Here
09/02/2022 11:27:15 PM
- 353 Views
So I can't read it
09/02/2022 11:52:04 PM
- 339 Views
I don't understand that..
12/02/2022 06:53:06 PM
- 300 Views
we actually agree on this
12/02/2022 07:04:56 PM
- 316 Views
Not just in 2022, though
12/02/2022 07:10:48 PM
- 312 Views
Having grown up watching Cronkite, Huntley-Brinkley I concur with your point.
12/02/2022 07:46:26 PM
- 318 Views
well I feel stupid
10/02/2022 04:08:10 AM
- 322 Views
You're referring to an entirely different case... see my reply to Jeo for the details on this one.
10/02/2022 09:03:40 AM
- 292 Views
Hilarious that *you* would be whining about judicial activism. Shameless. *NM*
12/02/2022 06:06:12 PM
- 175 Views
I have no issue with judicial activism, dolt.
12/02/2022 07:06:49 PM
- 325 Views
Not your best analogy.
12/02/2022 08:47:04 PM
- 309 Views
I like how you don't even attempt to have a reasonable discussion
16/02/2022 03:01:57 PM
- 336 Views
I'm sure you do
16/02/2022 04:21:09 PM
- 315 Views
Your point is to troll
16/02/2022 05:41:26 PM
- 333 Views
I'm truly devastated...
17/02/2022 06:00:01 AM
- 308 Views
Will this continue?
17/02/2022 04:07:11 PM
- 320 Views
One does not have a rational discussion if something is fundamentally "perverse"
17/02/2022 12:21:32 AM
- 338 Views