Active Users:806 Time:23/12/2024 01:53:46 AM
Re: Two things can both be true? Duke Send a noteboard - 17/10/2021 03:41:14 AM

View original post
I think it's a little of both. Semirhage taunted Rand about the voices in his head being indicative of Taint madness. Truth, fucking with his head, or a little of both? Ishy's lies were often based on a grain of truth.

This is where part of my theory / headcannon comes into play. (Part of a larger more comprehensive theory about this particular Third Age I've been kicking around but never got to fully flesh out.)

I think that basically all the madness (voices and such) comes from the Taint breaking down walls between lives. It explains Fedwin Morr having the mind of a child: if in one of his past lives he died as a child, then if he were to basically merge with that life (similar to what happened during Veins of Gold, but also similar to what almost happened when Rand attached Rhavin and he almost became LTT) and that child's life took over the body, he would have the mind of a child.

I think it also explains why someone wouldn't go mad: either understanding the other lives that the Taint is letting them access (and accepting this ala Rand/LTT) or, a situation where someone happened to not have a past life (I assume new souls come into existence periodically, and that not everyone is re-born).


View original postConversely, Rand tells Tuon that his claim to leading the forces of LIght trumps Artur Hawkwing's because he is Lews Therin and thus predates Hawkwing by over a thousand years.

Yes, but I would only say this is true after Veins of Gold. Prior to this, he's not really LTT is he?


View original postSo both true to an extent? The Dragon is always the same soul but the Taint madness confuses the Dragon Reborn who can't adequately assimilate the memories of previous lives until after the Taint is cleansed? I'm speculating here, not proposing a solid theory.

I think we're in agreement it's the same soul. But I guess the question is, whether they're just a single person and the voice is a figment of Rand's imagination as an explanation for the memories, or, whether the voice is truly a second person, who merges to become a single unified individual after Veins of Gold.

I tend to think the latter. And that if Rand had never channeled: ie if he'd been stilled (assuming the Patten allowed), then he'd never had this second voice.

Reply to message
The nature of Rand and LTT - 16/10/2021 06:24:22 AM 511 Views
Two things can both be true? - 16/10/2021 05:12:01 PM 294 Views
Re: Two things can both be true? - 17/10/2021 03:41:14 AM 322 Views
Lev Semyonovich Vygotsky was a Russian / Soviet Psychologist who - 17/10/2021 09:51:29 PM 340 Views
Re: The nature of Rand and LTT - 17/10/2021 10:33:05 PM 329 Views
Re: The nature of Rand and LTT - 20/10/2021 07:29:22 PM 314 Views
Ta’veren + Atman(Hinduism) was always my take. - 18/10/2021 02:19:01 PM 333 Views

Reply to Message