Then no, it doesn't constitute a profound argument.
If, on the other hand, you read it as me describing my personal journey from teenage liberal idealist to elderly cynic, then it doesn't need to be persuasive at all. My error was in not using the singular pronoun, "I" instead of "we."
It is rhetoric for exactly this reason. It is rhetoric "for it is an alienated experience", it says your life experience can transfer onto another person's life experience in a 1:1 way.
Reality does not work that way, peoples material experiences are always different, the small details matter. Shrug