At least in the show....the immunity to fire/heat seems exclusive to Danny. In the books at least, Jon did burn his hand on the lantern when the walkers/zombies/whatever we call them here woke up (book/season 1). Her brother Visceras (sp?) was certainly not resistant to heat. And presumably the old Maester Ammon could burn himself on something. We didn't see it, but one can't imagine he could live at the Wall for years, and no one notice that the old man is totally good with fire/hot.
I think that Danny's immunity to heat/fire is a result of the show writers trying to demonstrate that she is special/The Slayer/whatever. If anything, Jon having Stark blood from his mother's side would only make him partially immune.
~Jeordam
ex-Admin at wotmania (all things wot & art galleries)
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
Game of Thrones - Final Season Thread!
- 15/04/2019 01:30:10 AM
881 Views
I am on Team Cersei, only about half ironically
- 15/04/2019 04:50:38 AM
427 Views
I liked it.
- 15/04/2019 08:25:01 AM
442 Views
I assume Bran can use his Bran-abilities to prove Jon's backstory.
- 15/04/2019 02:13:21 PM
379 Views
Anyway, thoughts on the episode
- 17/04/2019 12:42:05 PM
413 Views
They're attempting to create political tension between Jon and Dany.
- 17/04/2019 01:16:59 PM
355 Views
To prove Targaryen ancestry
- 18/04/2019 07:26:02 PM
353 Views
But along those same lines....
- 18/04/2019 11:54:06 PM
339 Views