Active Users:1205 Time:22/11/2024 06:41:00 PM
Except that it isn't a person, it is a character in a book HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 14/11/2018 02:57:12 PM

The reactions of the characters of the book are based on the character's perception. As a reader, we are privileged to know the totality of that character.

Based on that totality, "it" is appropriate based on the context.

Reply to message
Aran'gar and the trans issue. - 13/11/2018 12:25:48 AM 697 Views
This is exactly why the knee-jerk response was so amusing. - 13/11/2018 01:18:28 AM 422 Views
I think you could argue it's surprisingly apt. - 13/11/2018 01:31:37 AM 448 Views
I don't know what's so hard to understand about this. You don't refer to people by 'it'. - 13/11/2018 08:09:34 AM 410 Views
People are refered to by "it" all the time.... - 13/11/2018 05:26:33 PM 408 Views
But remember, human fetuses aren't people. /s *NM* - 13/11/2018 05:42:00 PM 303 Views
Your second example rather proves my point, don't you think? - 13/11/2018 07:50:39 PM 391 Views
and those of us defending Cannoli maintain - 13/11/2018 07:59:08 PM 369 Views
I'm not really commenting on Cannoli's post.... - 13/11/2018 09:20:13 PM 385 Views
FWIW mine was concerning ambiguity - 13/11/2018 11:01:03 PM 420 Views
Okay, sure. - 13/11/2018 11:26:58 PM 419 Views
Interesting.... - 13/11/2018 11:36:43 PM 399 Views
Because it is just contempt - 13/11/2018 11:45:08 PM 537 Views
I think I mostly covered that above, but I can recap. - 14/11/2018 08:02:51 AM 397 Views
Who's on the phone? - 14/11/2018 01:53:14 AM 401 Views
Sure, I agree. - 14/11/2018 07:45:58 AM 414 Views
Aran'gar does not, and doesn't have to represent, trangender people for your usage to be wrong - 13/11/2018 03:21:42 PM 415 Views
Except that it isn't a person, it is a character in a book - 14/11/2018 02:57:12 PM 392 Views
So? - 14/11/2018 07:18:10 PM 405 Views
Re: So? - 17/11/2018 02:13:37 PM 373 Views
Upon reflection, I have edited the original post - 13/11/2018 08:02:17 PM 397 Views
Thank you. *NM* - 13/11/2018 11:31:41 PM 190 Views

Reply to Message