Except that it isn't a person, it is a character in a book
HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 14/11/2018 02:57:12 PM
The reactions of the characters of the book are based on the character's perception. As a reader, we are privileged to know the totality of that character.
Based on that totality, "it" is appropriate based on the context.
Aran'gar and the trans issue.
13/11/2018 12:25:48 AM
- 697 Views
I think for once you were unfairly called out on this based on your "history"
13/11/2018 01:26:41 AM
- 468 Views
Re: I think for once you were unfairly called out on this based on your "history"
13/11/2018 02:40:05 AM
- 424 Views
I don't know what's so hard to understand about this. You don't refer to people by 'it'.
13/11/2018 08:09:34 AM
- 410 Views
People are refered to by "it" all the time....
13/11/2018 05:26:33 PM
- 408 Views
Your second example rather proves my point, don't you think?
13/11/2018 07:50:39 PM
- 391 Views
I'm not really commenting on Cannoli's post....
13/11/2018 09:20:13 PM
- 385 Views
Okay, sure.
13/11/2018 11:26:58 PM
- 419 Views
Aran'gar does not, and doesn't have to represent, trangender people for your usage to be wrong
13/11/2018 03:21:42 PM
- 415 Views