Active Users:1153 Time:23/11/2024 12:37:14 AM
Re: No Cannoli Send a noteboard - 19/08/2018 03:29:15 AM


The problem with your logic is that you think moral consistency is some kind of bar to homophobia.

No, the point I think he is making is that I do not discriminate against homosexuality except in the normal everyday acceptable ways. Such as not engaging in it and so forth. I treat homosexual activity the same way I treat heterosexual activity. And there are many sort of heterosexual relationships and activities which are not legitimized by marriage or cannot be engaged in marriage as well.

The ridiculous standards by which you expand the definitions of homophobia to maintain its relevance make everyone who is not actually homosexual a homophobe". People who refuse to have sex with a member of same sex are thus homophobic, especially if their reason for refraining is that they are not only not attracted to the same sex, or enticed or stimulated by the activity, but actually turned off, is well within the definition of an "aversion" to it.

Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Interesting article in my Twitter feed last night on an issue Greg (The Shrike) brought up... - 15/08/2018 03:05:37 PM 1098 Views
I thought this response in the comment sectionwas funny - 15/08/2018 08:12:49 PM 437 Views
I was thinking about this at lunch today.... - 15/08/2018 11:43:33 PM 406 Views
I don't - 16/08/2018 12:09:32 AM 420 Views
It seemed more like moondog was making a prostitution reference to me *NM* - 16/08/2018 02:51:23 AM 230 Views
Say what? - 16/08/2018 09:47:19 PM 415 Views
It is a more of a domination / hierarchy reference I think *NM* - 16/08/2018 09:57:23 PM 229 Views
Re: Say what? - 16/08/2018 10:33:43 PM 463 Views
Yes, but there's more to it... - 16/08/2018 10:38:05 PM 397 Views
Says who? - 19/08/2018 05:05:37 AM 437 Views
However much of a hypocrite moondog is, the article, I feel, represents something else - 16/08/2018 05:51:59 AM 436 Views
Phobia - 16/08/2018 10:55:05 PM 425 Views
You don't even understand oral sex? - 17/08/2018 12:43:50 AM 424 Views
Get to a sex education class, won't you? Or at least, use Google - 17/08/2018 05:29:25 AM 365 Views
I am a normal male person, who had conversations with other male people. - 17/08/2018 08:25:48 AM 420 Views
Yes, yes, you're so male, your penis has a penis. We get it. - 17/08/2018 04:13:09 PM 429 Views
Re: Yes, yes, you're so male, your penis has a penis. We get it. - 19/08/2018 03:23:10 AM 435 Views
You are wrong about Cannoli. - 17/08/2018 02:49:35 AM 436 Views
No - 17/08/2018 05:41:22 AM 407 Views
Re: No - 19/08/2018 03:29:15 AM 443 Views
Cannoli is right: "sucks" implies the active party in oral sex - 17/08/2018 03:04:40 AM 503 Views
That would be the "receptive partner" in scientific terminology - 17/08/2018 05:44:16 AM 391 Views
Fuck scientific terminology. It blows. - 17/08/2018 08:26:16 AM 407 Views
Regarding phobia - 17/08/2018 06:30:51 PM 427 Views
There's a pretty simple test, I think - 17/08/2018 08:02:31 PM 404 Views
Once again...who are you to make that determination. - 17/08/2018 09:54:41 PM 387 Views
*I* don't make the determination, liberal society did. - 18/08/2018 12:02:22 AM 421 Views
So for clarity - 18/08/2018 01:28:17 AM 412 Views
Yes! - 18/08/2018 01:46:05 AM 412 Views
Who said I was surprised? - 18/08/2018 02:10:46 AM 403 Views
Re: Who said I was surprised? - 18/08/2018 02:32:41 AM 407 Views
Are you asking a serious question? - 18/08/2018 02:45:03 AM 430 Views
Yes, I was - 18/08/2018 01:59:48 PM 425 Views
"liberal" society does not police speech - 19/08/2018 03:31:54 AM 424 Views
You don't need to protect speech everyone agrees with. *NM* - 19/08/2018 06:02:17 PM 267 Views
It most certainly *does* police speech. - 20/08/2018 03:01:32 PM 409 Views
But to follow up on that. - 20/08/2018 03:16:07 PM 403 Views
Well, that's why we didn't stop with the FIRST Amendment *NM* - 21/08/2018 04:25:53 PM 212 Views
That's individuals policing speech, not society. Agregate individual action =/= collective action - 21/08/2018 04:25:23 PM 431 Views
I completely agree. - 21/08/2018 04:35:38 PM 392 Views
heh, heh, heh - 21/08/2018 05:00:32 PM 401 Views
Hump it like you mean it! - 21/08/2018 07:00:01 PM 432 Views
About the casual part - 16/08/2018 10:33:45 PM 386 Views
I don't think it's appropriate, but I think it's more about sexual shaming - 16/08/2018 10:35:53 PM 465 Views
Precisely - 16/08/2018 10:59:42 PM 419 Views
You are absolutely correct - 17/08/2018 02:43:21 AM 412 Views
I, for one, am glad to see this topic go flaming. - 17/08/2018 05:16:55 PM 477 Views
Yes, it is a tool used by those who should "know better". - 20/08/2018 03:14:30 PM 387 Views
well said - 20/08/2018 03:50:50 PM 437 Views

Reply to Message