Active Users:1149 Time:23/11/2024 12:29:51 AM
I don't think it's appropriate, but I think it's more about sexual shaming Tom Send a noteboard - 16/08/2018 10:35:53 PM

There are certain things that kids said when I was growing up, like "that's so gay", that I would intentionally avoid saying today because I don't think it's a derogatory comment and treating it that way is insulting to gay people.

At the same time, let's be clear about why all of these supposedly homosexual remarks are being made: it's more about forced sexual shaming and power relationships than about consensual homosexuality. In my mind, that makes it even worse than casual homophobia, bad as that is, because it's essentially condoning rape or rape-like situations. This is not the language of Chelsea; it's the language of prison bitches. It's about forced (as opposed to consensual) humiliation and displays of power.

In the hypersensitive "pound#me too" world, it's amazing what people can get away with in that respect. Can you imagine someone saying that about women? Just try saying Nikki Haley "blows and rims Trump on a daily basis" - though sadly, because she's conservative maybe the Left will give even that a pass.

Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Interesting article in my Twitter feed last night on an issue Greg (The Shrike) brought up... - 15/08/2018 03:05:37 PM 1098 Views
I thought this response in the comment sectionwas funny - 15/08/2018 08:12:49 PM 437 Views
I was thinking about this at lunch today.... - 15/08/2018 11:43:33 PM 405 Views
I don't - 16/08/2018 12:09:32 AM 419 Views
It seemed more like moondog was making a prostitution reference to me *NM* - 16/08/2018 02:51:23 AM 230 Views
Say what? - 16/08/2018 09:47:19 PM 415 Views
It is a more of a domination / hierarchy reference I think *NM* - 16/08/2018 09:57:23 PM 229 Views
Re: Say what? - 16/08/2018 10:33:43 PM 462 Views
Yes, but there's more to it... - 16/08/2018 10:38:05 PM 397 Views
Says who? - 19/08/2018 05:05:37 AM 437 Views
However much of a hypocrite moondog is, the article, I feel, represents something else - 16/08/2018 05:51:59 AM 436 Views
Phobia - 16/08/2018 10:55:05 PM 425 Views
You don't even understand oral sex? - 17/08/2018 12:43:50 AM 424 Views
Get to a sex education class, won't you? Or at least, use Google - 17/08/2018 05:29:25 AM 365 Views
I am a normal male person, who had conversations with other male people. - 17/08/2018 08:25:48 AM 420 Views
Yes, yes, you're so male, your penis has a penis. We get it. - 17/08/2018 04:13:09 PM 429 Views
Re: Yes, yes, you're so male, your penis has a penis. We get it. - 19/08/2018 03:23:10 AM 435 Views
You are wrong about Cannoli. - 17/08/2018 02:49:35 AM 436 Views
No - 17/08/2018 05:41:22 AM 407 Views
Re: No - 19/08/2018 03:29:15 AM 442 Views
Cannoli is right: "sucks" implies the active party in oral sex - 17/08/2018 03:04:40 AM 503 Views
That would be the "receptive partner" in scientific terminology - 17/08/2018 05:44:16 AM 390 Views
Fuck scientific terminology. It blows. - 17/08/2018 08:26:16 AM 407 Views
Regarding phobia - 17/08/2018 06:30:51 PM 427 Views
There's a pretty simple test, I think - 17/08/2018 08:02:31 PM 403 Views
Once again...who are you to make that determination. - 17/08/2018 09:54:41 PM 386 Views
*I* don't make the determination, liberal society did. - 18/08/2018 12:02:22 AM 421 Views
So for clarity - 18/08/2018 01:28:17 AM 412 Views
Yes! - 18/08/2018 01:46:05 AM 412 Views
Who said I was surprised? - 18/08/2018 02:10:46 AM 402 Views
Re: Who said I was surprised? - 18/08/2018 02:32:41 AM 407 Views
Are you asking a serious question? - 18/08/2018 02:45:03 AM 430 Views
Yes, I was - 18/08/2018 01:59:48 PM 425 Views
"liberal" society does not police speech - 19/08/2018 03:31:54 AM 424 Views
You don't need to protect speech everyone agrees with. *NM* - 19/08/2018 06:02:17 PM 267 Views
It most certainly *does* police speech. - 20/08/2018 03:01:32 PM 409 Views
But to follow up on that. - 20/08/2018 03:16:07 PM 403 Views
Well, that's why we didn't stop with the FIRST Amendment *NM* - 21/08/2018 04:25:53 PM 212 Views
That's individuals policing speech, not society. Agregate individual action =/= collective action - 21/08/2018 04:25:23 PM 431 Views
I completely agree. - 21/08/2018 04:35:38 PM 392 Views
heh, heh, heh - 21/08/2018 05:00:32 PM 401 Views
Hump it like you mean it! - 21/08/2018 07:00:01 PM 431 Views
About the casual part - 16/08/2018 10:33:45 PM 386 Views
I don't think it's appropriate, but I think it's more about sexual shaming - 16/08/2018 10:35:53 PM 465 Views
Precisely - 16/08/2018 10:59:42 PM 419 Views
You are absolutely correct - 17/08/2018 02:43:21 AM 412 Views
I, for one, am glad to see this topic go flaming. - 17/08/2018 05:16:55 PM 477 Views
Yes, it is a tool used by those who should "know better". - 20/08/2018 03:14:30 PM 387 Views
well said - 20/08/2018 03:50:50 PM 437 Views

Reply to Message