well as long as you have an unnaamed source it must be true *NM*
random thoughts Send a noteboard - 04/02/2018 01:05:36 AM
View original postRead the whole thing here. (Use the twitter link to bypass the WSJ Paywall)
View original posthttps://twitter.com/rebeccaballhaus/status/959637869479579648
View original posthttps://www.wsj.com/articles/house-releases-gop-surveillance-memo-1517592392
View original postBut let me highlight a specific paragraph from the WSJ reporting for it counterdicts the memo / certain talking points.
View original post
The memo is critical of Mr. Steele and notes that prosecutors in their application for the warrant didn’t explicitly state that he was working for a firm funded by Democrats. But the FISA application did disclose Mr. Steele was being paid by a law firm working for a major political party, according to a person familiar with the matter. Redacting the names of U.S. people or organizations who aren’t the subject of an investigation is a common practice in government legal filings, designed to protect privacy.
View original postThis flat out contradicts Page 2 of the memo Point #1, bullet point A.
View original postSo who is telling the truth here?
So that memo was released....
02/02/2018 06:59:35 PM
- 1197 Views
Just reading the memo is indeed the best approach, I just did too.
02/02/2018 08:20:01 PM
- 748 Views
I find it hard to believe the Obama appointees in the DoJ did not know where the dossier came from *NM*
02/02/2018 09:17:06 PM
- 369 Views
As do I. Was that supposed to have any relevance to my post? *NM*
02/02/2018 09:34:57 PM
- 409 Views
Re: As do I. Was that supposed to have any relevance to my post?
02/02/2018 10:37:21 PM
- 668 Views
With over 34,000 FISA applications just 12 (not 12,000 or 1200 or 120) were denied.
03/02/2018 04:07:24 PM
- 720 Views
Correction: "just under", not "over" 34,000
03/02/2018 10:08:54 PM
- 648 Views
I do find it very telling how many members of the media are suddenly opposed to transparency
02/02/2018 08:51:28 PM
- 582 Views
So you are saying the House Intelligence Committee SHOULD release Schiffs rebuttal of Nunes' lies?
03/02/2018 03:58:13 AM
- 675 Views
I seem to recall much incredulity when Trump claimed he was being wire tapped
02/02/2018 09:15:14 PM
- 586 Views
Er. Let me see if I'm getting this right.
02/02/2018 09:34:14 PM
- 636 Views
They did somehow tap Flynn
02/02/2018 10:44:55 PM
- 581 Views
Keep in mind Sessions wanted Rosenstein to resign
02/02/2018 11:28:52 PM
- 504 Views
Why would SESSIONS want Rosenstein fired?
03/02/2018 05:22:16 AM
- 626 Views
It was on a list of about 40 Sessions wanted fired. Probably becuase he is a lib *NM*
04/02/2018 12:31:13 AM
- 399 Views
No, they tapped the Russian Ambassador to the US, per SOP; not the FBIs fault Flynn called him.
03/02/2018 03:59:54 AM
- 577 Views
no but were they listening when he spoke to Trump?
02/02/2018 11:25:30 PM
- 573 Views
Nope, just listening to the Russian Ambassador when Flynn repeatedly called during the campaign
03/02/2018 04:11:27 AM
- 602 Views
Actually, also, seems I missed a fairly crucial point until now, as did others here...
03/02/2018 01:15:10 AM
- 697 Views
If working with a forgein agent is such a sin...
02/02/2018 11:22:41 PM
- 590 Views
You're saying oppo research should have its own kind of Jones Act?
03/02/2018 12:51:27 AM
- 571 Views
No I am saying that it seen as crimianl when one side does and no big deal when the other does it
03/02/2018 01:15:22 AM
- 600 Views
I believe campaign aid from foreign private citizens OR govt is equally illegal, FWIW
03/02/2018 04:28:14 AM
- 519 Views
Actually, JEB BUSH hired the former MI6 agents firm to do oppo research on Trump during the primary
03/02/2018 04:03:08 AM
- 670 Views
Sometimes I forget how right-wing most everyone here is. The memo itself is just nonsense.
03/02/2018 02:44:16 AM
- 675 Views
Ironic, since Republicans Mueller, Comey and Wray threatened to resign over Ws warrantless taps
03/02/2018 04:07:10 AM
- 591 Views
I can't speak for the present with too much information is unknown
03/02/2018 04:51:14 AM
- 611 Views
The memo is clearly not nonsense to the extent it shows abuse within the FBI.
03/02/2018 10:15:49 PM
- 616 Views
Fruit of the poisonous tree wouldn't apply here, though.
04/02/2018 05:40:44 AM
- 617 Views
I would certainly argue it
05/02/2018 04:55:18 PM
- 516 Views
I think you'd win! Insofar as you'd get the FISA warrant excluded.
07/02/2018 07:01:42 AM
- 630 Views
Actually, everyone I have seen exposing the material falsehoods Nunes invented are Republicans
03/02/2018 03:54:03 AM
- 666 Views
Dear Joel,
03/02/2018 04:31:18 AM
- 663 Views
I have
03/02/2018 05:09:19 AM
- 580 Views
Don't feed the Joel.
03/02/2018 10:17:12 PM
- 550 Views
Turn him to any cause of policy, The Gordian Knot of it he will tangle, Familiar as his garter
03/02/2018 10:51:36 PM
- 614 Views
I sort of want to like this, but your answers keep getting weirder and weirder *NM*
06/02/2018 09:17:42 PM
- 323 Views
WSJ source
03/02/2018 05:04:04 AM
- 717 Views
You believe the commie liberals at Rupert Murdochs Wall Street Journal?
03/02/2018 05:14:08 AM
- 588 Views
well as long as you have an unnaamed source it must be true *NM*
04/02/2018 01:05:36 AM
- 414 Views
What is yours?
04/02/2018 04:30:51 PM
- 502 Views
We are having completely different conversations right now, and completely different things we are
04/02/2018 11:38:35 PM
- 651 Views
Yeah, look what happens when you shit on the Fourth Amendment.
03/02/2018 09:09:00 PM
- 588 Views
Right, because the President of the United States is just a private citizen
04/02/2018 08:08:32 AM
- 1001 Views
The point was that the people in power want the Fourth Amendment to apply, or not, as they see fit.
06/02/2018 08:16:19 PM
- 500 Views
Does anybody still cares about the Nunes memo? I ask for the Schiff memo was released?
26/02/2018 11:14:51 PM
- 739 Views