Active Users:1232 Time:25/12/2024 07:36:53 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
WSJ source Roland00 Send a noteboard - 03/02/2018 05:04:04 AM

Read the whole thing here. (Use the twitter link to bypass the WSJ Paywall)

https://twitter.com/rebeccaballhaus/status/959637869479579648

https://www.wsj.com/articles/house-releases-gop-surveillance-memo-1517592392

But let me highlight a specific paragraph from the WSJ reporting for it counterdicts the memo / certain talking points.


The memo is critical of Mr. Steele and notes that prosecutors in their application for the warrant didn’t explicitly state that he was working for a firm funded by Democrats. But the FISA application did disclose Mr. Steele was being paid by a law firm working for a major political party, according to a person familiar with the matter. Redacting the names of U.S. people or organizations who aren’t the subject of an investigation is a common practice in government legal filings, designed to protect privacy.

This flat out contradicts Page 2 of the memo Point #1, bullet point A.

So who is telling the truth here?

Reply to message
So that memo was released.... Jeordam - 02/02/2018 06:59:35 PM 1215 Views
"God's in His heaven— All's right with the world!" Roland00 - 02/02/2018 07:14:41 PM 753 Views
Just reading the memo is indeed the best approach, I just did too. Legolas - 02/02/2018 08:20:01 PM 767 Views
I find it hard to believe the Obama appointees in the DoJ did not know where the dossier came from *NM* AgentApple - 02/02/2018 09:17:06 PM 375 Views
As do I. Was that supposed to have any relevance to my post? *NM* Legolas - 02/02/2018 09:34:57 PM 414 Views
Re: As do I. Was that supposed to have any relevance to my post? AgentApple - 02/02/2018 10:37:21 PM 685 Views
Yes, you did misunderstand me then. Legolas - 03/02/2018 12:17:27 AM 695 Views
yes, that's makes sense. AgentApple - 03/02/2018 09:41:46 AM 578 Views
It does bring up more questions... Jeordam - 02/02/2018 10:53:01 PM 721 Views
Seems you already decided on some answers in advance, though. Legolas - 03/02/2018 01:53:00 AM 582 Views
With over 34,000 FISA applications just 12 (not 12,000 or 1200 or 120) were denied. Tom - 03/02/2018 04:07:24 PM 736 Views
Correction: "just under", not "over" 34,000 Tom - 03/02/2018 10:08:54 PM 667 Views
Bah! LiterateDog - 03/02/2018 11:53:05 PM 671 Views
Ok, I really did laugh out loud at that Tom - 06/02/2018 09:16:50 PM 531 Views
Those are the ones we have to watch! aerocontrols - 04/02/2018 12:48:49 AM 640 Views
He's the primary demographic for the 4Chans, isn't he? *NM* Tom - 06/02/2018 09:15:47 PM 387 Views
This part was quite revealing The Shrike - 02/02/2018 08:23:28 PM 616 Views
I do find it very telling how many members of the media are suddenly opposed to transparency random thoughts - 02/02/2018 08:51:28 PM 597 Views
Ironic, right? Anonymous2000 - 02/02/2018 09:12:43 PM 560 Views
So you are saying the House Intelligence Committee SHOULD release Schiffs rebuttal of Nunes' lies? Joel - 03/02/2018 03:58:13 AM 696 Views
I am for releasing all of it random thoughts - 04/02/2018 12:28:57 AM 673 Views
You, Sen. Kennedy (R-LA) and NO ONE ELSE on the right. Joel - 04/02/2018 07:41:17 AM 1021 Views
To summarize..... Anonymous2000 - 02/02/2018 09:12:06 PM 633 Views
I seem to recall much incredulity when Trump claimed he was being wire tapped AgentApple - 02/02/2018 09:15:14 PM 600 Views
Er. Let me see if I'm getting this right. Legolas - 02/02/2018 09:34:14 PM 654 Views
They did somehow tap Flynn AgentApple - 02/02/2018 10:44:55 PM 598 Views
Keep in mind Sessions wanted Rosenstein to resign random thoughts - 02/02/2018 11:28:52 PM 520 Views
Why would SESSIONS want Rosenstein fired? Joel - 03/02/2018 05:22:16 AM 641 Views
It was on a list of about 40 Sessions wanted fired. Probably becuase he is a lib *NM* random thoughts - 04/02/2018 12:31:13 AM 409 Views
Sessions is a lib? Do you mean Libertarian? Joel - 04/02/2018 07:57:45 AM 1061 Views
No, they tapped the Russian Ambassador to the US, per SOP; not the FBIs fault Flynn called him. Joel - 03/02/2018 03:59:54 AM 592 Views
no but were they listening when he spoke to Trump? random thoughts - 02/02/2018 11:25:30 PM 587 Views
Nope, just listening to the Russian Ambassador when Flynn repeatedly called during the campaign Joel - 03/02/2018 04:11:27 AM 615 Views
Actually, also, seems I missed a fairly crucial point until now, as did others here... Legolas - 03/02/2018 01:15:10 AM 715 Views
If working with a forgein agent is such a sin... random thoughts - 02/02/2018 11:22:41 PM 607 Views
You're saying oppo research should have its own kind of Jones Act? Legolas - 03/02/2018 12:51:27 AM 584 Views
No I am saying that it seen as crimianl when one side does and no big deal when the other does it random thoughts - 03/02/2018 01:15:22 AM 618 Views
I believe campaign aid from foreign private citizens OR govt is equally illegal, FWIW Joel - 03/02/2018 04:28:14 AM 533 Views
Actually, JEB BUSH hired the former MI6 agents firm to do oppo research on Trump during the primary Joel - 03/02/2018 04:03:08 AM 688 Views
Sometimes I forget how right-wing most everyone here is. The memo itself is just nonsense. Ghavrel - 03/02/2018 02:44:16 AM 690 Views
Ironic, since Republicans Mueller, Comey and Wray threatened to resign over Ws warrantless taps Joel - 03/02/2018 04:07:10 AM 608 Views
I can't speak for the present with too much information is unknown Roland00 - 03/02/2018 04:51:14 AM 626 Views
Everyone looks right wing to someone on the far left. The Shrike - 03/02/2018 03:04:48 PM 579 Views
The memo is clearly not nonsense to the extent it shows abuse within the FBI. Tom - 03/02/2018 10:15:49 PM 634 Views
Fruit of the poisonous tree wouldn't apply here, though. Ghavrel - 04/02/2018 05:40:44 AM 629 Views
I would certainly argue it Tom - 05/02/2018 04:55:18 PM 532 Views
I think you'd win! Insofar as you'd get the FISA warrant excluded. Ghavrel - 07/02/2018 07:01:42 AM 646 Views
Actually, everyone I have seen exposing the material falsehoods Nunes invented are Republicans Joel - 03/02/2018 03:54:03 AM 685 Views
Dear Joel, damookster - 03/02/2018 04:31:18 AM 675 Views
I have Joel - 03/02/2018 05:09:19 AM 596 Views
You’re getting to old to be this naive damookster - 03/02/2018 05:17:44 AM 593 Views
Never said either side is the good guys Joel - 03/02/2018 05:36:55 AM 585 Views
Don't feed the Joel. Tom - 03/02/2018 10:17:12 PM 569 Views
Turn him to any cause of policy, The Gordian Knot of it he will tangle, Familiar as his garter Roland00 - 03/02/2018 10:51:36 PM 629 Views
I sort of want to like this, but your answers keep getting weirder and weirder *NM* Tom - 06/02/2018 09:17:42 PM 332 Views
WSJ source Roland00 - 03/02/2018 05:04:04 AM 732 Views
You believe the commie liberals at Rupert Murdochs Wall Street Journal? Joel - 03/02/2018 05:14:08 AM 604 Views
well as long as you have an unnaamed source it must be true *NM* random thoughts - 04/02/2018 01:05:36 AM 419 Views
What is your point? *NM* Roland00 - 04/02/2018 01:53:37 AM 350 Views
What is yours? random thoughts - 04/02/2018 04:30:51 PM 515 Views
We are having completely different conversations right now, and completely different things we are Roland00 - 04/02/2018 11:38:35 PM 670 Views
Yeah, look what happens when you shit on the Fourth Amendment. Vodalus - 03/02/2018 09:09:00 PM 600 Views
Right, because the President of the United States is just a private citizen Joel - 04/02/2018 08:08:32 AM 1016 Views
The point was that the people in power want the Fourth Amendment to apply, or not, as they see fit. Vodalus - 06/02/2018 08:16:19 PM 516 Views
The key issue is being ignored random thoughts - 04/02/2018 04:35:32 PM 540 Views
Answer = Hell Yes Anonymous2000 - 04/02/2018 09:00:49 PM 544 Views
Does anybody still cares about the Nunes memo? I ask for the Schiff memo was released? Roland00 - 26/02/2018 11:14:51 PM 750 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes