But whatever some things I share and I think in general people should share even if you do not agree with every specific detail and word choice in an article. Do you agree with this Shrike / Greg, or are you a purist / pedantic when it comes to history? 
Are you taking a page out of the Trump administration - espousing the use of alternate facts?
While our conception of history is often in flux due to limited knowledge and conflicting variations, some things are set.
Our conception on the origins of Halloween are not, however, in flux. The opinion piece is wrong. I don't know what agenda you may have in promoting it, but I do not share it.
The true gay agenda, and it already happened, and now you like it 
- 31/10/2017 08:02:57 PM
741 Views
- 31/10/2017 08:02:57 PM
741 Views
So if I'm a heteronormative cisgender white male who goes to an adult Halloween party,
- 31/10/2017 08:20:03 PM
597 Views
I'm not sure I agree with the article's factual grounding.
- 31/10/2017 08:44:33 PM
544 Views
I agree so let's rephrase this, gays are the ultimate founders effect 
- 31/10/2017 08:59:19 PM
456 Views
- 31/10/2017 08:59:19 PM
456 Views
Anoka Minnesota had the first city wide Halloween celebration in 1920. Hardly a gay haven.
- 01/11/2017 05:14:21 AM
553 Views
What revisionist history is this? Spreading an OPINION piece as Fact? Why?
- 01/11/2017 01:11:03 PM
493 Views
Wow I feel you are misreading the author's point and my point.
- 01/11/2017 11:00:09 PM
577 Views
Your point, and the author's point, are both wrong.
- 01/11/2017 11:59:52 PM
519 Views
I don't like that line, if I were writting it myself I would not use it
- 02/11/2017 12:08:49 AM
450 Views
I am not into false histories.
- 02/11/2017 11:38:45 AM
460 Views