Ancient Rome actually is estimated to have just around one million at its peak.
Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 05/09/2017 11:10:10 PM
Granted, that's a rough upper bound, and it's all educated guesswork, but the idea of Rome containing a million people in its heyday is not completely ludicrous.
It's worth noting that sustaining that population required Roman control of both Greece and Egypt.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla
Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel
*MySmiley*
~Camilla
Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel
*MySmiley*
This message last edited by Ghavrel on 05/09/2017 at 11:10:56 PM
Game of Thrones (Spoilers)
- 28/08/2017 04:50:02 PM
1022 Views
Isn't incest really only a genetic problem if you do it over several generations?
- 28/08/2017 05:04:06 PM
613 Views
The problem is that Targaryens have been doing it. It's why Viserys and Aerys were nuts.
- 28/08/2017 07:22:28 PM
513 Views
Yes, true. If the genetics are perfect and there are no mutations then there is no genetic issue.
- 28/08/2017 08:06:57 PM
590 Views
We're worrying about scientific verisimilitude, when they say a medieval city has a million people?
- 29/08/2017 06:23:10 AM
870 Views
Ancient Rome actually is estimated to have just around one million at its peak.
- 05/09/2017 11:10:10 PM
547 Views
John can still do better 
On a different note, as much as I enjoyed *spoiler*
- 29/08/2017 06:43:49 AM
697 Views
On a different note, as much as I enjoyed *spoiler*
- 29/08/2017 06:43:49 AM
697 Views
marrying cousins only became taboo in recent history and even then mostly just in the west
- 29/08/2017 04:55:29 PM
590 Views
Well, in-universe, there was already an uncle-niece marriage that produced two kings.
- 29/08/2017 10:08:27 PM
586 Views