You persist in the delusion that those numbers have any legal meaning whatsoever. In fact, they are distorted by one state with extreme political views and practices, which is locked down by the Democrats. Republicans were not on the ballot in the Senate race in California, where the Democratic winner received 7.5 million votes, and the loser, ALSO A DEMOCRAT, received 4.7 million votes. That, in case your math skills are no better than your research skills, comes to over 12 million votes, in an election with no Republican candidate. Now let's talk about that 11 million vote majority, if you're done playing moron.
Hey, kettle, the pot is filing an anti-defamation suit against you. At this point, "Trumpian" is a step up for you or the people from whom you get your talking points.
Which is to the point of the article, that the left is deranged and going to extremes.

And that's an obnoxiously disingenuous distinction. Not that Pelosi and co are above using extreme rhetoric concerning Trump & supporters, but they also benefit by the media's extremism and voluntarily undertaking the role of attack dogs for the Democrats. Obama was able to cruise through his campaigns taking the high road, because journalists would do his mudslinging for him. One e-mail was leaked of a journalist in 2008 to colleagues suggesting that they "make an example" of one of Obama's critics, to smear and trash such a person, in order to send a message that strong criticism would not be tolerated, and the e-mail was rife with violent imagery, like smashing their hypothetical victim through a window and hitting him with a cinder block. Republicans are demonized for connections to violence that exists only in left-wing heads, while Democrats and Leftists commit the overwhelming majority of political violence.
But Sarah Palin telling supporter to do research on issues because "I want you armed" for a political debate IS a call to violence, as was her use of a map with crosshairs on Democratic districts the GOP hoped to flip in a coming election.
And if you can find ANY evidence that Loughner shared actual political principles with the Tea Party, let people know. You'll get a chair at the Columbia School of Journalism, if not a Pulitzer.
And violence in self-defense is not a real solution to violence, I suppose? It was Sophie Scholl who brought down the Nazis, not Patton?

At this point, it's well beyond calls for civility. It's one thing not to turn the other cheek, but the Right ran out of cheeks more than 50 years ago.

WHAT REPUBLICANS HAVE BEEN DOING THIS STUFF? Aside from an atheistic drug user blowing up the Alfred E Murrah building, there are no acts of political violence by Republicans or Conservatives. Even the only Democratic president ever to be assassinated, was killed by a communist, and it is Democrats who are most supportive of the terrorist demographics. In the haste to protect Muslims, leftists love to point out that most of the terrorism in the US is committed by white people, almost all of whom are Democratic constituents, like environmentalists. To find a Republican committing political violence, you have to go back to President Garfield, who was explicitly killed by a supporter of his more radical vice president.