probably not if they're spending the same amount of time
LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 17/03/2010 01:56:32 AM
one can typically play video games for much longer than one can participate in physical exertion. The most a child is going to be able to run around on a field before getting bored or tired is probably a 2-3 hrs, and that's probably stretching it. On the other hand, if a kid is playing video games when they should be working on their school work, they're likely doing it for much longer, if not all night. I'm assuming, of course, that the children were allowed to play as long as they wished, or as much as they wished before a certain "bed time". I'm not sure of the parameters established by research group in order to make sure their experimental group was getting a degree of game time that would be indicative of what they were looking for.
But assuming both activities (organized physical activities such as sports compared to video games) are allowed to be participated in ad lib, there is little doubt that a child is going to be playing video games for a much longer amount of time.
In any case, as far as practical application goes, I think you're right, but I dont think it has to do with the nature of physical activity. I think it's just that a 6-9 yr old kid will spend much longer playing video games than playing baseball.
But assuming both activities (organized physical activities such as sports compared to video games) are allowed to be participated in ad lib, there is little doubt that a child is going to be playing video games for a much longer amount of time.
In any case, as far as practical application goes, I think you're right, but I dont think it has to do with the nature of physical activity. I think it's just that a 6-9 yr old kid will spend much longer playing video games than playing baseball.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
/Scientific Findings: Video games may hinder learning for boys
16/03/2010 07:48:18 PM
- 1131 Views
really, 64 kids? so that's 32 who got a playstation?
16/03/2010 09:52:21 PM
- 801 Views
probably not if they're spending the same amount of time
17/03/2010 01:56:32 AM
- 697 Views
Hah. Not a very convincing sample size there.
16/03/2010 11:54:44 PM
- 770 Views
Actually an N=30 is sufficient to produce a normal curve and minimize error.
03/04/2010 05:26:27 AM
- 882 Views
And anyway, any null hypothesis can be rejected with a large enough sample size.
10/04/2010 03:49:41 AM
- 810 Views
what? you mean if I don't do my scholastic work, my academic progress will diminsh?
17/03/2010 01:47:51 AM
- 731 Views
Re: /Scientific Findings: Video games may hinder learning for boys
18/03/2010 01:37:19 PM
- 711 Views
The words "video game" can be replaced by anything with the same result.
19/03/2010 05:54:51 AM
- 773 Views
+1 for misspelling the phrase per se. Apparently Yahoo has now corrected that error. *NM*
21/03/2010 09:23:04 PM
- 339 Views