Not only is there is no reason or motivation to help them out by patching the games, I think the company may well be legally required to focus their attention elsewhere.
Those servers are an asset of the company, the ability to make money from a patch is an asset of the company, as such if the company releases a patch when it know it is going bankrupt the directors could be liable to prosecution. This is why not a single company, including Valves Steam, will legally bind themselves to keeping those servers up, or releaseing a patch if they come down.
Ubisoft DRM cracked. Already. Along with some interesting statements from the company.
- 05/03/2010 03:45:07 AM
713 Views
Steam is a form of DRM, but notice that Ubi doesn't have legions of fans like Valve does.
- 05/03/2010 01:06:53 PM
419 Views
They do seem to be taking notes, actually.
- 05/03/2010 02:02:54 PM
363 Views
It just makes it so there's a local save if it disconnects
- 06/03/2010 08:31:45 AM
390 Views
No, but an improvement resulting from player feedback nonetheless. *NM*
- 06/03/2010 03:56:29 PM
349 Views
The odds I'd give it are 0% or 1%, depending on the circumstances.
- 06/03/2010 10:22:44 PM
373 Views
More than that.
- 06/03/2010 11:50:37 PM
466 Views
Just to note: Steam's offline mode works <right now>, which is nice. *NM*
- 07/03/2010 02:33:39 PM
181 Views