The hard copy would obviously be more expensive than the downloaded one (one could hope).
But that would never last. It would be too expensive to produce a games machine that supported both download of games and physical copies.
But that would never last. It would be too expensive to produce a games machine that supported both download of games and physical copies.
"I didn't have much to say to anybody but kept to myself and my books. With my eyes closed, I would touch a familiar book and draw it's fragrance deep inside me. This was enough to make me happy."
— Haruki Murakami (Norwegian Wood
— Haruki Murakami (Norwegian Wood
This message last edited by Dragonsworn on 06/11/2009 at 08:20:39 PM
Digital distribution or not?
06/11/2009 05:06:30 PM
- 746 Views
I'm a collector, so digital distribution is not really for me.
06/11/2009 05:23:20 PM
- 448 Views
Er... have they not heard of Steam? It's not a long way off, at all
06/11/2009 05:24:18 PM
- 527 Views
They said "replaces."
06/11/2009 06:13:54 PM
- 491 Views
I feel like both should exist, like CDs, Magazines, etc. Digital will never 100% trump tangibility. *NM*
06/11/2009 07:54:19 PM
- 203 Views
"Never" is a rather foolish word to use. I agree though, it'll take a while. *NM*
06/11/2009 08:02:55 PM
- 213 Views
They might be able to coexist? For a while...
06/11/2009 08:18:33 PM
- 572 Views
Definate no.
07/11/2009 10:08:09 AM
- 411 Views
Why would pirating give you a hard copy?
08/11/2009 01:02:36 AM
- 454 Views
It does not.
08/11/2009 09:02:17 AM
- 461 Views