Active Users:813 Time:15/11/2024 10:01:01 AM
It all comes down to depth. Aemon Send a noteboard - 01/09/2009 04:33:24 AM
Brawl has none. Melee had the perfect amount, in that it was easily approachable, yet quite difficult nonetheless to get really good. Not as difficult as in a true, pure fighter, but more than enough that only a few very rare people made it to the upper tiers. Even there, there were moves that people couldn't do consistently, every single time, so there was still room for improvement, if not much. Melee to this day has top players who dominate. The Kens, PC Chris', etc, rarely lose, even to their own ilk. There are no such people for Brawl.

Back to the beginning though, yeah; Brawl has no depth. I've hardly played the game at all, yet when I sit down to play against players that have played it constantly since release, I only lose a few more games than I win. Brawl is a crapshoot, a game of rock-paper-scissors. There are no advanced techniques or strategies to try to pull off, there aren't really even any combos. Everything they can dumb down, they have. Even things that weren't advanced at all, but just took a little skill. For example, sweet-spotting the ledge. In Melee, you had to time it just right with your up-b so you'd just baaaaarely grab the ledge. Any higher and the waiting smash would catch your fingertips and you'd die a horrible death. In Brawl? Auto-sweet-spot. Get anywhere near the ledge, and you're golden.

Everywhere you look, Brawl is like that. It's slower, you can't do moves as rapidly as before (so that you can't combo), tripping was added to remove dash dancing, wave dashing and all the other neat moves were fixed, and the list just goes on and on.

In summary, I don't like Brawl because you can't get good at it. There are no players out there who could consistently beat most other players. I want to play Smash as a fighter, instead of just a party game, and you just can't do that anymore.
Reply to message
So what's the most disappointing game in your current library? - 31/08/2009 05:50:30 AM 1010 Views
hmmm.... - 31/08/2009 06:26:01 AM 844 Views
That John Woo game, I guess.... - 31/08/2009 06:30:07 AM 822 Views
Re: So what's the most disappointing game in your current library? - 31/08/2009 06:52:31 AM 1158 Views
I would have to say - 31/08/2009 08:51:40 AM 827 Views
The worst game I own is a DS game. Does that count? - 31/08/2009 12:40:18 PM 788 Views
Wow. Those games are great on the Computer and Wii. - 31/08/2009 07:37:22 PM 800 Views
Wait. Actually... - 31/08/2009 07:39:08 PM 790 Views
Star Wars Galaxies *NM* - 31/08/2009 12:51:05 PM 444 Views
Braaaaaaaaaaaaawl. *NM* - 31/08/2009 01:37:25 PM 416 Views
I second that one. *NM* - 31/08/2009 04:27:07 PM 435 Views
Funny, I loved every minute of it, and still do. - 31/08/2009 04:59:38 PM 797 Views
My reasoning... - 31/08/2009 06:49:00 PM 855 Views
It all comes down to depth. - 01/09/2009 04:33:24 AM 817 Views
Thanks for that, Matt. - 01/09/2009 05:22:41 AM 830 Views
Re: Thanks for that, Matt. - 02/09/2009 08:29:50 PM 739 Views
Re: Infamous - 31/08/2009 04:51:40 PM 748 Views
Prototype is cool - 31/08/2009 04:53:50 PM 785 Views
Re: I actually sorted liked prototype's story line. - 01/09/2009 01:03:09 AM 799 Views
Call of Duty 4 - 31/08/2009 05:20:23 PM 828 Views
Re: Call of Duty 4 - 31/08/2009 06:51:07 PM 792 Views
You're right about the enemies. Also, The Witcher was great. - 31/08/2009 09:27:58 PM 732 Views
Well, I generally don't keep disappointing games. *NM* - 31/08/2009 05:21:56 PM 415 Views
Halo 3 - 01/09/2009 03:41:20 AM 731 Views
Hmmm... that's a toughy... - 01/09/2009 06:15:20 AM 780 Views
Armored Core Nine Breaker - 01/09/2009 01:58:10 PM 733 Views
Etrian oddesey - 01/09/2009 09:58:51 PM 878 Views
Prince of Persia - 02/09/2009 01:40:40 PM 650 Views
Re: So what's the most disappointing game in your current library? - 03/09/2009 07:44:39 PM 717 Views
Age of Conan - The 1st 20 levels were truly excellent... - 04/09/2009 06:04:34 PM 783 Views
spore... - 11/10/2009 01:19:44 PM 715 Views

Reply to Message