Active Users:813 Time:23/12/2024 03:26:28 AM
What? I've barely had the opportunity to play 4th Edition yet. Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 11/01/2012 02:38:50 AM
I actually really like the core of what 4th Edition is. The thing is very bland and clinical, which I imagine would put off many players, but the rules are very clear and efficient, for the most part. Hell, I think it could use a little more trimming down (I've cut out Armour Class from my version, shunting its responsibilities to Reflex, since they were pretty much the same anyway.) For someone who has been using modified 3/3.5 Edition rules forever (I played 2nd Edition straight, mainly because at that age I barely understood those ridiculous rules enough to play, let alone know how to rework them), I can't understate how much easier 4th Edition is to adapt. 3rd Edition was based around the Class system, which I hated and pretty much restricted any significant attempt at change, but with 4th Edition classes are very easy to change, hell, I could even adapt the system to work without classes (though it would still work on level advancement) with very little difficulty.

As a DM who has always taken an inordinate amount of pleasure from building settings, 4th Edition has been fantastic. The rules are so simple it makes everything easy.

Unfortunately, with all that modding, I've not run a lot of actual games :tinfoilhat:.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
D&D 5th Edition... Hard to believe how many years this has been going. - 09/01/2012 10:47:30 PM 1490 Views
We still play 3.5 - 09/01/2012 11:05:52 PM 951 Views
Nerd! *NM* - 09/01/2012 11:13:04 PM 524 Views
Yessssssss - 10/01/2012 08:51:04 AM 977 Views
I use 3.5 rules too... - 13/01/2012 05:50:58 PM 978 Views
Thanks to 4th Edition, sadly not. - 10/01/2012 01:55:04 AM 857 Views
Hey now! - 10/01/2012 08:50:02 AM 870 Views
I found this blog entry enlightening: - 10/01/2012 01:41:12 PM 991 Views
Dunno about the "Old-School Revival," but Pathfinder is definitely pretty popular - 10/01/2012 02:21:37 PM 895 Views
I started playing when 2E came out. - 10/01/2012 03:01:45 PM 999 Views
Same here. - 11/01/2012 02:20:41 AM 849 Views
Re: Dunno about the "Old-School Revival," but Pathfinder is definitely pretty popular - 10/01/2012 04:34:39 PM 923 Views
If you want to know more, read this thread. - 11/01/2012 02:42:06 PM 921 Views
Cool, thanks. *NM* - 11/01/2012 03:40:46 PM 476 Views
I can't wait to see the Edition Wars™ flare up again. - 10/01/2012 02:55:27 PM 1065 Views
True story: - 10/01/2012 04:39:47 PM 975 Views
I still play 3.5 - 10/01/2012 04:31:27 PM 932 Views
The last time I played an AD&D CRPG, it had THAC0. - 10/01/2012 07:47:47 PM 906 Views
Baldur's Gate, woo! - 11/01/2012 03:49:49 PM 836 Views
That was a Warrior trait, not a human one. - 11/01/2012 07:18:09 PM 992 Views
That sounds insanely unintuitive. *NM* - 11/01/2012 07:37:37 PM 499 Views
That's 2nd Edition. - 11/01/2012 10:59:34 PM 807 Views
I repeat what FT said, that was 2nd edition. *NM* - 12/01/2012 04:20:28 AM 440 Views
AD&D represent! *throws up half-orc gang signs* *NM* - 13/01/2012 01:50:06 AM 570 Views
Throwing up a half-eaten rat is not throwing up a gang sign... *NM* - 13/01/2012 05:26:47 AM 494 Views
What about a half-eaten halfling? - 13/01/2012 02:41:06 PM 923 Views
*facedesk* *NM* - 13/01/2012 03:45:05 PM 430 Views
(-:,` *NM* - 17/01/2012 09:02:26 PM 485 Views
Been re-reading The Sleeping Dragon, have you? - 25/01/2012 05:29:15 PM 918 Views
I honestly have no idea what you're talking about. - 25/01/2012 06:41:46 PM 960 Views
A joke in Joel Rosenbergs "The Sleeping Dragon." - 25/01/2012 07:13:26 PM 975 Views
*sign* *NM* - 13/01/2012 02:41:57 PM 494 Views
*hollas* - 25/01/2012 05:30:45 PM 824 Views
GURPS is still in 4E. - 25/01/2012 05:58:34 PM 870 Views
What? I've barely had the opportunity to play 4th Edition yet. - 11/01/2012 02:38:50 AM 816 Views
Dude.. I still remember the 1st edition books.. - 11/01/2012 12:54:27 PM 995 Views

Reply to Message