Active Users:2476 Time:22/01/2025 06:29:03 PM
What? I've barely had the opportunity to play 4th Edition yet. Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 11/01/2012 02:38:50 AM
I actually really like the core of what 4th Edition is. The thing is very bland and clinical, which I imagine would put off many players, but the rules are very clear and efficient, for the most part. Hell, I think it could use a little more trimming down (I've cut out Armour Class from my version, shunting its responsibilities to Reflex, since they were pretty much the same anyway.) For someone who has been using modified 3/3.5 Edition rules forever (I played 2nd Edition straight, mainly because at that age I barely understood those ridiculous rules enough to play, let alone know how to rework them), I can't understate how much easier 4th Edition is to adapt. 3rd Edition was based around the Class system, which I hated and pretty much restricted any significant attempt at change, but with 4th Edition classes are very easy to change, hell, I could even adapt the system to work without classes (though it would still work on level advancement) with very little difficulty.

As a DM who has always taken an inordinate amount of pleasure from building settings, 4th Edition has been fantastic. The rules are so simple it makes everything easy.

Unfortunately, with all that modding, I've not run a lot of actual games :tinfoilhat:.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
D&D 5th Edition... Hard to believe how many years this has been going. - 09/01/2012 10:47:30 PM 1516 Views
We still play 3.5 - 09/01/2012 11:05:52 PM 971 Views
Nerd! *NM* - 09/01/2012 11:13:04 PM 534 Views
Yessssssss - 10/01/2012 08:51:04 AM 996 Views
I use 3.5 rules too... - 13/01/2012 05:50:58 PM 1007 Views
Thanks to 4th Edition, sadly not. - 10/01/2012 01:55:04 AM 878 Views
Hey now! - 10/01/2012 08:50:02 AM 900 Views
I found this blog entry enlightening: - 10/01/2012 01:41:12 PM 1010 Views
Dunno about the "Old-School Revival," but Pathfinder is definitely pretty popular - 10/01/2012 02:21:37 PM 920 Views
I started playing when 2E came out. - 10/01/2012 03:01:45 PM 1026 Views
Same here. - 11/01/2012 02:20:41 AM 874 Views
Re: Dunno about the "Old-School Revival," but Pathfinder is definitely pretty popular - 10/01/2012 04:34:39 PM 942 Views
If you want to know more, read this thread. - 11/01/2012 02:42:06 PM 945 Views
Cool, thanks. *NM* - 11/01/2012 03:40:46 PM 484 Views
I can't wait to see the Edition Wars™ flare up again. - 10/01/2012 02:55:27 PM 1091 Views
True story: - 10/01/2012 04:39:47 PM 994 Views
I still play 3.5 - 10/01/2012 04:31:27 PM 963 Views
The last time I played an AD&D CRPG, it had THAC0. - 10/01/2012 07:47:47 PM 931 Views
Baldur's Gate, woo! - 11/01/2012 03:49:49 PM 861 Views
That was a Warrior trait, not a human one. - 11/01/2012 07:18:09 PM 1013 Views
That sounds insanely unintuitive. *NM* - 11/01/2012 07:37:37 PM 504 Views
That's 2nd Edition. - 11/01/2012 10:59:34 PM 828 Views
I repeat what FT said, that was 2nd edition. *NM* - 12/01/2012 04:20:28 AM 451 Views
AD&D represent! *throws up half-orc gang signs* *NM* - 13/01/2012 01:50:06 AM 578 Views
Throwing up a half-eaten rat is not throwing up a gang sign... *NM* - 13/01/2012 05:26:47 AM 505 Views
What about a half-eaten halfling? - 13/01/2012 02:41:06 PM 952 Views
*facedesk* *NM* - 13/01/2012 03:45:05 PM 437 Views
(-:,` *NM* - 17/01/2012 09:02:26 PM 493 Views
Been re-reading The Sleeping Dragon, have you? - 25/01/2012 05:29:15 PM 936 Views
I honestly have no idea what you're talking about. - 25/01/2012 06:41:46 PM 978 Views
A joke in Joel Rosenbergs "The Sleeping Dragon." - 25/01/2012 07:13:26 PM 1002 Views
*sign* *NM* - 13/01/2012 02:41:57 PM 502 Views
*hollas* - 25/01/2012 05:30:45 PM 849 Views
GURPS is still in 4E. - 25/01/2012 05:58:34 PM 891 Views
What? I've barely had the opportunity to play 4th Edition yet. - 11/01/2012 02:38:50 AM 834 Views
Dude.. I still remember the 1st edition books.. - 11/01/2012 12:54:27 PM 1018 Views

Reply to Message